Taught by
Annette ArmstrongAccess all of our teaching materials through our smartphone apps conveniently and quickly.
Taught by
Annette ArmstrongLet's start again with a review of Ecclesiastes:
This book is Wisdom literature. The author is Solomon: a man who was given, by God, wisdom and discernment greater than any man.
The book of Ecclesiastes establishes Solomon’s theory of the meaning of life.
The thesis is the meaning of life can’t be found in the creation, therefore it is vanity to try and seek it there.
Solomon begins by calling attention to how the repeating cycles in nature display a meaninglessness in understanding an advantage in life.
Solomon continued to establish this by his personal experiences concluding that wisdom and wealth are also meaningless in understanding an advantage in life.
v.12 Solomon returns to an idea he mentions earlier, how? (So I turned to consider wisdom, madness and folly;)
What question does Solomon pose? (for what will the man do who will come after the king except what has already been done?)
Who is the man who will come after the king? (An heir to the throne, the next king.)
What question does Solomon ponder about this next king? (What will he do except what has already been done?)
He can only follow in the footsteps of Solomon. What had Solomon accomplished? (An amazing list of building projects beyond imagination, reigned over a kingdom in Israel, accumulated wealth beyond any need, was a righteous judge of the people, enjoyed exceedingly the pleasures of life.)
As a king of Israel, there is nothing new to do that Solomon as king had not accomplished.
v.13 What observation does Solomon share? (And I saw that wisdom excels folly as light excels darkness.)
What does “excels” mean? (advantage, profit)
This is the same word translated "advantage" in 1:3 and "profit" in 2:11.
So wisdom does have an advantage or profit over folly, like light has an advantage over darkness.
v.14 How does Solomon describe the advantage? (The wise man’s eyes are in his head, but the fool walks in darkness.)
The wise man’s eyes can see things the fool will not be able to see, like one who walks in light can see, and one who walks in darkness and can’t see.
Solomon enjoyed the pleasures or fruits of his labors, but in a more restrained way than the all-out over-indulgence of the fool. There was some advantage in wisdom.
v.14 What is also true? (And yet I know that one fate befalls them both.)
v.15 What reasoning does Solomon apply now? (Then I said to myself, “As is the fate of the fool, it will also befall me.)
Since both will have the same fate what does he ponder? (Why then have I been extremely wise?” )
If both have the same fate and Solomon’s wisdom did not give him a different fate what does he conclude? (So I said to myself, “This too is vanity.”)
Solomon sees that having wisdom, in itself, is vanity, or meaningless.
v.16 Solomon explains this how? (For there is no lasting remembrance of the wise man as with the fool, inasmuch as in the coming days all will be forgotten. And how the wise man and the fool alike die!)
The focus is on the "lasting remembrance" of each.
"Lasting remembrance" is defined how? (in the coming days)
We might say in the future days.
What is true in the future days of both? (all will be forgotten)
Using Solomon as an example we know he had more wisdom than any man before him or since he was on earth. Where is that wisdom now? (Lost to us)
There was no record made of all the wisdom to pass on to future generations that has survived. Why was the wisdom achieved not kept and not added to by those who came after so that mankind would have the benefit now?
What the wise man knew and did is lost in the same way as what the foolish man knew and did.
v.16 What else is true for each man? (And how the wise man and the fool alike die!)
v.17 What did this realization cause Solomon to say? (So I hated life)
What specifically did he hate? (for the work which had been done under the sun was grievous to me)
The work Solomon accomplished on earth, in his temporal life, were grievous to him now.
Why did he consider the work "grievous"? (Because everything is futility and striving after wind.)
All Solomon had accomplished was only done here on earth, or ‘under the sun’. All those things were considered futility. Nothing with lasting value outside of the earth, or to those in the future in a lasting valuable way.
Solomon found he actually had done what? (striving after wind)
He had been chasing after something his whole life to only now realize he could not achieve it by his wisdom.
v.18 Not only did Solomon realize the wisdom he had was grievous but what else does he say he hated? (Thus I hated all the fruit of my labor for which I had labored under the sun.)
Why did he hate his labor? (for I must leave it to the man who will come after me.)
v.19 Why does leaving all the fruit of his labor to someone concern Solomon? (And who knows whether he will be a wise man or a fool?)
With all Solomon’s wisdom he does not have the ability to control the category his heir will be in, being wise or a fool.
What does Solomon conclude? (Yet he will have control over all the fruit of my labor for which I have labored by acting wisely under the sun. This too is vanity.)
How had Solomon gained the fruit of his labor? (by acting wisely under the sun)
The fact that someone can receive all the benefits earned by someone else Solomon declares is what? (This too is vanity.)
This is another reason the way the world works in determining where an advantage can be is meaningless. It makes no sense.
v.20 Because this is a reality what does Solomon say? (Therefore I completely despaired of all the fruit of my labor for which I had labored under the sun.)
It had lost meaning to Solomon.
v.21 Solomon explains exactly what this means, how? (When there is a man who has labored with wisdom, knowledge and skill, then he gives his legacy to one who has not labored with them. This too is vanity and a great evil.)
Solomon broadens his explanation to anyone who finds themselves in this position not just himself, how? (When there is a man)
This is not just something Solomon has experienced.
A man who has done what? (who has labored with wisdom, knowledge and skill, then he gives his legacy to one who has not labored with them)
What is his focus? (he gives his legacy to one who has not labored with them)
What is a legacy? (anything handed down from the past, as from an ancestor or predecessor)
How is the one receiving the legacy described? (one who has not labored with them)
This is describing a person that inherits something they had nothing at all to do with the acquiring or the building of the legacy with the one leaving it all.
When this happens what does Solomon have to say about it? (This too is vanity and a great evil.)
A legacy can change in one generation or maybe more but eventually this will be the truth for all men who establish their legacy based on what they do here on earth or as described as "under the sun".
Solomon says this is not just meaningless it actually moves to being a great evil. Solomon expresses a stronger impact to this declaration.
Remember this is exactly what happens to Solomon.
v.11 God said, “I will tear the kingdom from you” (Solomon)
The kingdom will be given to a servant of Solomon. (“I will not do it in your days.”)
This event will happen to the legacy of Solomon. (“One tribe will be left to your son.”)
Eccl. 2:22 What question does Solomon ask? (For what does a man get in all his labor and in his striving with which he labors under the sun?)
What does a man actually have to show for all his work on earth?
v.23 What did this man who passes on his legacy do? (Because all his days his task is painful and grievous; even at night his mind does not rest.)
This was not just the activity of labor but even the constant thinking about this activity that consumes a man’s thoughts at night.
All the doing and thinking about this labor is what? (This too is vanity.)
v.24 In contrast to laboring, a mans tasks being painful and grievous, what does Solomon describe? (There is nothing better for a man than to eat and drink and tell himself that his labor is good.)
At this time in Solomon’s life he says there is nothing better than this endeavors.
v.24 Who can grant this? (This also I have seen that it is from the hand of God.)
Solomon say he has seen this for himself.
v.25 What rhetorical question does Solomon ask? (For who can eat and who can have enjoyment without Him?)
v.26 What does Solomon describe as coming from the hand of God? (For to a person who is good in His sight He has given wisdom and knowledge and joy, while to the sinner He has given the task of gathering and collecting so that he may give to one who is good in God’s sight. This too is vanity and striving after wind.)
The last use of the word "he" used here should also be capitalized since the pronoun used prior was referring to God and there is not a shift in subject.
Let’s reread with the pronouns replaced.
A contrast is given here. How is the first person described? (For to a person who is good in His sight)
Who’s sight? (God’s sight)
What did God give that person who is good in His sight? (He has given wisdom and knowledge and joy)
Who do we know were given the these exact gifts by God? (Solomon)
Solomon was given wisdom and knowledge and riches and honor. Solomon in Ecclesiastes adds the word “joy.”
Eccl. 2:26 How is the second state of a person described? (to the sinner)
What did God give this sinner? (He has given the task of gathering and collecting)
Why does God have the sinner gather and collect? (so that he may give to one who is good in God’s sight.)
God is always the one giving to the one who is good in His sight.
This is true even when we can’t see this at work. There are plenty of ‘sinners’ and evil people who have inherited loads of wealth and other benefits in worldly measures.
There are also many testimonies throughout history of evil men who end of benefiting godly men in the end. Is this the point Solomon is making?
Solomon has been sharing his observations lived out in his life: how wisdom and great wealth was meaningless. He has just established that thinking he could decide how to leave a legacy was also meaningless.
The two ways God can seem to respond to men are on display in Solomon’s life.
We saw the first one in 1 Kings 3:12-13 but that was not the end of the story for Solomon. We see a brief highlight first in 1 Kings 3:3.
Refer back to the verses we just read in 1 Kings 11:4-8
What did God do?
This was the worst punishment Solomon could endure for his sin.
Solomon acknowledges God is just in Ecclesiastes 2:25 (For who can eat and who can have enjoyment without Him?)
Eccl. 2:26 After revealing how God deals with man what does Solomon say? (This too is vanity and striving after wind.)
God will ultimately do as He determines and it is meaningless to resist Him.
God told Solomon what the consequence of his sin was going to be.
Solomon lived out the remainder of his life knowing this truth.
This may be one of the reasons he writes Ecclesiastes.
This was a grievance sin Solomon committed against God.
Let’s look at exactly what this sin was.
Solomon went after Ashtoreth and Milcom. He built high places for Chemosh and Molech. There are plenty of horrible things involved in the worship of these gods but there is one gruesome practice that stood out in its grievousness – child sacrifice.
God warns His people before they enter the promised land to avoid this.
“Those who give their offspring to Molech," is talking about child sacrifice. God will not accept this.
King Ahaz participated in this abomination of child sacrifice.
Manassah participated in child sacrifice with his own son in the valley of Ben-hinnom. He led Judah to do more evil than the nations in the land before the Israelites.
Joshiah, grandson of Manassah, defiled these places, meaning he removed them. Notice Topheth is in the valley of the son of Hinnom
God never asks for the sacrifice of the life of a child to be given to Him, like the worship of other God’s demanded.
Child sacrifice took place in worship of Molech. It is emphasized that death took place in the valley of Ben-hinnom when it says it filled this place with the blood of the innocent.
Many other corrupt practices in worship to many other false gods filled Israel.
Solomon is recognized as the king that built the places for these events that took place.
This is the legacy of Solomon!
Citation:
This teaching is provided by a contributing Bible teacher who is not employed by Verse By Verse Ministry International. The Biblical perspectives beliefs and views of contributing teachers may differ, at times, from the Biblical perspectives this ministry holds.