Taught by
Annette ArmstrongAccess all of our teaching materials through our smartphone apps conveniently and quickly.
Taught by
Annette ArmstrongLet's review Ecclesiastes so far.
This book is Wisdom literature. The author is Solomon, a man who was given by God wisdom and discernment greater than any man.
The book of Ecclesiastes establishes Solomon’s theory of the meaning of life.
The thesis is the meaning of life can’t be found in the creation, therefore it is vanity to try and seek for it there.
Solomon began providing proof through the repeating cycles in nature that display a meaninglessness in understanding an advantage in life.
Solomon continued to establish this by his personal experiences concluding that wisdom and wealth, and seeking an earthly legacy are meaningless in understanding an advantage in life.
There is a God-appointed time for every event under heaven. Our desire should be to do what God wants done in our lives.
v.1 How does Solomon move ahead in the conversation of righteousness verses wickedness? (Then I looked again at all the acts of oppression which were being done under the sun.)
In Chapter 3, verse 16 we read, “Furthermore, I have seen under the sun that in the place of justice there is wickedness and in the place of righteousness there is wickedness.”
Now in 4:1 Solomon looks more closely at this wickedness and specifically mentions the wickedness that is defined as ‘acts of oppression’.
How does Solomon continue? (And behold I saw the tears of the oppressed and that they had no one to comfort them)
Solomon looks at the human toll of oppression and says he sees the tears of these victims. He also says they had no one to comfort them.
What do the oppressors have? (and on the side of their oppressors was power)
The flip side to this is that the oppressed have no power.
Solomon repeats what? (but they had no one to comfort them.)
v.2 The realization of this truth causes Solomon to say what? (So I congratulated the dead who are already dead more than the living who are still living.)
What does ‘congratulated’ means here? (synonyms include applaud or salute)
Who had Solomon just been talking about? (The oppressed)
Those oppressed are better off dead than living through more oppression.
v.3 The severity of this oppression is so great; what does Solomon conclude? (But better off than both of them is the one who has never existed, who has never seen the evil activity that is done under the sun.)
There is the worse case, which is those still living in oppression; the next best state to be in is to have died and no longer be suffering the oppression; and the most desired state is to never have suffered the oppression at all. Solomon is using extremes to make his point.
v.4 What does Solomon say next? (I have seen that every labor and every skill which is done is the result of rivalry between a man and his neighbor.)
What does it mean when someone says “I have seen”? (They are a witness)
What two things does Solomon identify? (every labor and every skill which is done)
What is the motivation for every labor and every skill? (is the result of rivalry between a man and his neighbor)
What is a rivalry? (competition)
This same word is more often translated as jealousy.
A neighbor would be any person in proximity to know, or to see what they have, or what they do. This could be personally or collectively like tribes or nations.
The context of this comment is still what? (wickedness)
The wicked man’s labor and skill are motivated by rivalry or jealousy.
What is the conclusion? (This too is vanity and striving after wind.)
v.5 Who is identified first? (The fool)
What does does the fool do? (folds his hands)
What work can you do when your hands are folded? (None)
When you don’t bring in or produce anything new what is left to consume? (Whatever you already have, until all you have is used up)
Similar language is used in Proverbs 24:30-34
Eccl. 4:6 What two things are compared here? (One hand full of rest is better than two fists full of labor and striving after wind.)
The ‘handful of rest’ refers to v 5 of the ‘folding of the hands’ and can be seen repeated in Prov. 24:33.
‘Handful of rest’ is not being elevated as a good thing it is being compared to something worse which is the two fists full of labor motivated by rivalry or jealousy with ones neighbor.
Wicked man will be motivated to compete with those around him or to shut down so as to purposely not be of use to those around him even to his own detriment. Neither is truly desirable but Solomon is using extremes to make his point again just like in verse 3.
v.7 What does Solomon say he does next? (Then I looked again at vanity under the sun.)
Solomon says he ‘looked again’. He investigates more of what? (at vanity under the sun.)
v.8 How does Solomon begin this discovery? (There was a certain man)
We do not know who this man was.
What is true for this man? (without a dependent, having neither a son nor a brother, yet there was no end to all his labor.)
This man has no relative that he is working to help while he is alive or after he is gone.
What does this man do? (yet there was no end to all his labor.)
This man works without a family motivation, and never ceases to labor.
What is the result? (Indeed, his eyes were not satisfied with riches)
What else was true? (and he never asked, “And for whom am I laboring and depriving myself of pleasure?”)
He did not ask himself who was he laboring for. He was only working for his own accomplishment.
The labor resulted in what? (depriving myself of pleasure?”)
The work was not even to satisfy his own pleasure, it was only for the sake of selfish greed devoid of pleasure.
What is the result? (This too is vanity and it is a grievous task.)
For this man life is not only meaningless but a burden.
v.9 What is preferable? (Two are better than one)
Why? (because they have a good return for their labor.)
It would appear this is because they are laboring together.
We are not told what that return is, it is not measured in riches.
v.10 How is this demonstrated? (For if either of them falls, the one will lift up his companion.)
What is true for the man who labors alone? (But woe to the one who falls when there is not another to lift him up.)
v.11 What simple example is used to further illustrate this truth? (Furthermore, if two lie down together they keep warm, but how can one be warm alone?)
v.12 Solomon continues to use his good, better, best analogy how? (And if one can overpower him who is alone, two can resist him. A cord of three strands is not quickly torn apart.)
When a threat comes, the one who is alone is overpowered versus when there are two they can resist the threat. They are not overpowered but can at least resist the threat together.
What is even better than two? (A cord of three strands is not quickly torn apart.)
Men are created to need others and not to be alone.
Man had God in the garden of Eden but God created man not to be good alone, meaning without another person. God created another person for man to be with. God wants man to need another. Wickedness causes men to strive to be alone, to be against other men, and against God.
v.13 Solomon begins with his next example of vanity how? (A poor yet wise lad is better than an old and foolish king who no longer knows how to receive instruction.)
The first person is described how? (A poor yet wise lad)
This person is compared to who? (an old and foolish king)
Why is the old king described as foolish? (who no longer knows how to receive instruction)
This implies the king at one time would do what? (receive instruction)
What can we assume the ‘poor yet wise lad’ was wiling to do? (receive instruction)
Who does the instruction come from? (Not specified, could be counselors, could be priests or prophets or God)
This is why the poor yet wise lad was better at making decisions.
The question becomes, “Is this a general observation of kings and successors, or is it a specific king and successor?” When we get to verse 15 we see Solomon says, “I have seen,” this would indicate this is a specific king and successor, and Solomon is a witness to the event in verse 15.
The three kings and successors of the throne to Israel would be where we would look to see if the verses here line up to those individuals as displayed through scriptures.
Is this a description of Saul to David, David to Solomon, or Solomon to his successor?
I believe this is a description of David to Solomon. As we go through each verse, we will look to other scripture to see the truths revealed there that Solomon advances in these verses of Ecclesiastes.
v.13 Started with ‘A poor yet wise lad’. We know from our study earlier regarding Solomon he was indeed a wise lad. He was wise in that he asked God for an understanding heart to judge. He says he was but a little child before God, the definition of a lad.
Solomon declares himself to be ‘but a little child’.
Estimates of Solomon’s age range from about 13 to 20 years of age when he becomes king. Solomon did father a son the year before he became king.
Solomon was just another son of David. It is not like he was raised in some palace to be trained and treated as the next king. He was not wealthy.
Eccl. 4:13 The next person is described how? (‘an old and foolish king’)
David became an old king dying at 74 years of age.
What else is said to be true of this king? (who no longer knows how to receive instruction.)
When David was younger he did know how to receive instruction. David turned to priests, prophets and to God for counsel.
David listened to the prophets of God.
David listened to the LORD.
Did David become one who did not seek or receive instructions in his decision making?
Second example of David as an old king.
These verses will also reveal what Solomon declared in the rest of Eccl. 4 to be true.
David also acknowledges Solomon is wise.
Eccl. 4:14 How else does Solomon describe this ‘old and foolish king’? (For he has come out of prison to become king,)
David moved from one stronghold to another and from one city to another to escape from Saul. He was in prison to protect himself from Saul. He was not in a royal palace waiting to succeed king Saul.
What else is revealed about this 'old and foolish king’ ? (even though he was born poor in his kingdom.)
David was the youngest son of Jesse and tended the flocks. This was not a royal family or a wealthy family.
Eccl. 4:15 What does Solomon say he has witnessed? (I have seen all the living under the sun throng to the side of the second lad who replaces him.) Remember 1Kings 1:39-40.
1Kings says ‘all the people' and Ecclesiastes says ‘all the living under the sun' throng to the side of who? (the second lad who replaces him)
What ‘him’ is being replaced? (King David)
Who is the ‘second lad’ referring to? (Solomon)
Who had declared himself to be king in place of David first? (Adonijah)
The second lad to be announced as king is Solomon.
Eccl. 4:16 How does Solomon finish? (There is no end to all the people, to all who were before them,)
Who are the ‘them’? (The two kings)
How is it true “all who were before them”?
Eccl 4:16 What does Solomon describe next? (and even the ones who will come later will not be happy with him, for this too is vanity and striving after wind.)
1Kings 2:13-25 Solomon dealing with Adonijah the son of Haggith, tried to undermine Solomon as king. He tried to take one of David’s concubines to try and find a way to seat himself as king of Israel. Pure deception.
1Kings 2:26-27 Abiathar the priest, had supported Adonijah and declaring himself to be king.
1Kings 2:28-34 Joab had also followed Adonijah, plus others wrongs he committed against David
1Kings 2:36-46 Shimei stood against David as king.
These are the ‘ones who will come later and will not be happy with him’ (Solomon).
Solomon was also alone in this way. He did not have confidants from his father king David to help him in his early reign.
All of this intrigue as Solomon secured the throne he now see as ‘vanity and striving after the wind’. It is meaningless in determining the advantage to life here under the sun.
This teaching is provided by a contributing Bible teacher who is not employed by Verse By Verse Ministry International. The Biblical perspectives beliefs and views of contributing teachers may differ, at times, from the Biblical perspectives this ministry holds.