Taught by
Stephen ArmstrongAccess all of our teaching materials through our smartphone apps conveniently and quickly.
Taught by
Stephen ArmstrongOver the past several weeks, we’ve watched in bemusement as Jesus trained His disciples how to serve the Kingdom program
Those men struggled to make sense of it all, and to be fair Jesus’ lesson would have been hard for anyone to grasp
Because Jesus wasn’t running just another rabbinical school preparing men to perpetuate Pharisaic Judaism
Jesus was a rabbi unlike any other…and therefore His ministry would be unlike anything else the disciples had known before
The Lord was preparing these men to lead a new, worldwide movement of God
They would live on the frontlines of a spiritual battle for truth and the salvation of the world…and that’s no small assignment
So where do you start in preparing someone for such a high calling?
Well, Lesson #1 is knowing that Jesus is God… they were in the company of the Messiah, the Lord’s anointed One
And Lesson #2 is appreciating the significance that God became man to live and die for us
Because at the end of the day, the Church isn’t about miraculously feeding hungry people or healing diseases
Our mission as ambassadors of Christ is saving souls, calling men and women to be reconciled to God…that’s what all this is about
So understanding that Jesus came to bring forgiveness and hope and eternal life to lost sinners is paramount
And more than that, those men needed to understand that they were to do it as Christ did it, following in Jesus’ footsteps
Just as the Son of God came to seek and save the lost, so will His disciples seek to serve the lowly and needy with the good news
Grasping all that is a tall order, so perhaps it’s understandable that these men were so slow to catch on to what Jesus was saying and doing
But last week they had a breakthrough of sorts
Look back to the end of prior passage in vs.11-12
Jesus chastised them for their lack of faith in Him and for failing to pay attention to all they had seen and heard
The final straw was their ignorance of Jesus’ comment about beware the leaven of Pharisees, Sadducees and Herodians
Jesus was speaking of the dangers of each group’s false teaching while the disciples were thinking only of trivial matters
After Jesus corrected them, Matthew says then they understood what Jesus meant, and that gives us hope they turned the corner
Maybe they were starting to grasp the enormity of what was happening around them
And most importantly, maybe their hearts were finally opening to Who Jesus was and what His arrival meant?
Well there’s only one way to find out…so Jesus decides it’s time to test their understanding starting with Lesson #1
Matthew tells us that Jesus goes to the district of Caesarea Philippi
This district sits at the base of Mt. Hermon, the tallest mountain in the Middle East, nearly 9,000 ft high
Today, the northern half of the range is in Syria and the southern half is in Israel
In Jesus’ day, the region was largely Gentile, much like the eastern side of the sea of Galilee
This area was under the rule of one of Herod the Great’s descendants, Herod Philip II
And at the foot of Mt. Hermon sat a small town called Paneas, which Philip renamed Caesarea to honor Caesar
At that time, there was already another city called Caesarea in Judea built by Herod the Great on the Mediterranean coast
So to distinguish one town from the other, this Caesarea became known as Caesarea Philippi
It’s original name, Paneas, came from a temple in the town dedicated to an ancient pagan god, Pan
Pan was a figure of Greek mythology depicted as half man, half goat
He was the god of nature and outdoors, and his followers engaged in wild fertility rituals and other extreme behavior
For that reason, we get the word “panic” from the god’s name
The temple of Pan was located in a cave at the base of Mt Hermon, the ruins of which are still visible today
Scholars have assumed that this encounter between Jesus and His disciples took place somewhere near the Pan temple
But Mark says this conversation took place among the men as they traveled to Caesarea Philippi
So perhaps they were near the Pan temple, perhaps not
In any case, Jesus asks His disciples who do the people say the Son of Man is, and Mark records the question as who do they say I am?
For the first time, Jesus acknowledges the elephant in the room…the question of His identity
The answers they offer reveal the confusion and mystery that surrounded Jesus’ ministry
But remember, Jesus already knew what was being said, so He’s not asking the disciples this question because He was curious
Jesus was actually asking to find out what the disciples are thinking…which view have they accepted?
They tell Jesus that some in the crowds were saying Jesus was the resurrected John the Baptist
We know who was principally responsible for that rumor
Matthew told us earlier that Herod Antipas, the man who killed John the Baptist, thought that Jesus was the resurrected John
But since both men were alive at the same time, this was a ridiculous conclusion
Others were saying that Jesus was Elijah, the prophet well known for being taken up in a chariot of fire at the end of his life
Jewish people knew that Malachi prophesied Elijah would return to announce the Messiah’s arrival
So it was natural to assume that Jesus was Elijah come to announce the Kingdom’s arrival
But the Bible says John the Baptist was the herald sent to announce the Messiah’s first coming
And Elijah’s return awaits to announce Jesus’ Second Coming, so this was also illogical
Then others were saying Jesus was a resurrected Jeremiah, which is even stranger
The Bible never says Jeremiah will reappear, so perhaps some assumed Jesus was Jeremiah based on similarities in ministry
Jeremiah ministered to Judah during a time when a foreign kingdom had conquered Jerusalem and held the city
And like Jesus, Jeremiah spoke of a coming Kingdom for Israel
But there was simply no basis for drawing such a connection
In fact, speculation seemed to be the order of the day, because some were saying Jesus was one of the other prophets resurrected they say
It seems as if any suggestion was fair game, and obviously, the people weren’t constrained by Scripture or even logic
Meanwhile, they ignored what Jesus actually said about Himself, as well as His miracles, especially the Messianic miracles
And they ignored what John and Scripture said about Jesus fulfilling the prophecies of the Messiah
And when it comes to understanding what God is doing, once you set aside Scripture, all you have left is speculation
So obviously the crowd has many ideas for who Jesus is, but did you notice the one, obvious option that the disciples didn’t mention?
Surely, we know some in the crowd were saying Jesus was the Messiah
So why didn’t the disciples at least mention that possibility?
I think that’s why Jesus began by asking what the crowds were saying…it gave the disciples an easy way to suggest that Jesus was Messiah
And yet it seems that most of these guys either hadn’t come to that conclusion yet themselves
Or they were too nervous to be the first to make that suggestion
And in Jewish culture, fear of blasphemy was a real thing, because the penalty was death under the Law
But thank the Lord that He included Peter in this group, because where others feared to tread, Peter charged ahead
Jesus forces the men to enter into the conversation everyone was avoiding
He asks them plainly who do you say that I am? It’s time to get them on the record
And though the text doesn’t describe the scene in detail, here’s how I imagine it
Mark says they were on their way to Caesarea Philippi, so I imagine the men walking in a small group with Jesus in front
Looking straight ahead, Jesus asks the question and there’s a pregnant pause…no one wants to be the first to speak
The men start exchanging glances trying to figure out the next move…do they say the obvious and risk blaspheming?
Peter senses the awkwardness and can resist filling the silence
Moreover, Peter knows what the correct answer should be…inside himself the answer seems obvious and surely everyone knows it
In fact, he can’t understand why the others aren’t speaking up
And he’s even a bit embarrassed at his own silence, so as the seconds tick by Peter finally blurts out…
He says, “You are the Christ, the Son of the living God.”
But in Greek, Peter’s statement has a particular feeling that’s not evident in the English translation
Before each noun, Peter adds the article “the” which gives his words an emphatic tone
Literally in Greek, Peter said you are “the” Christ, “the” Son of “the” God, “the” living One
All of those articles leaves us with the impression Peter was making a point to someone
And given what he’s saying, I don’t think he was trying to convince Jesus
After all, if you believe Jesus is the Christ, you don’t assume He needs your help understanding that
I believe Peter was making a point to his comrades and probably even to himself
This was the first time Peter let those words escape his mouth and he wasn’t doing it tentatively
He’s owning it publicly, and he wants everyone to know it
And I suspect he’s also making a point to the other disciples that their hesitation to speak up was a problem
This is one of Peter’s finer moments… it’s the moment Peter assumed the mantle of leadership among the disciples
And Jesus recognized and confirmed Peter’s leadership, but first Jesus makes clear that Peter’s courage and initiative was not entirely his own
Matt. 16:17 And Jesus said to him, “Blessed are you, Simon Barjona, because flesh and blood did not reveal this to you, but My Father who is in heaven.
Peter declared that Jesus is the Messiah, but more than that, he has declared some remarkable things
He has said that Jesus is the son of God, effectively introducing the concept of the plurality of the Godhead
Then as now, orthodox Judaism didn’t acknowledge the Trinity
Yet here’s a Jewish man declaring that God had a Son spiritually speaking, and Jesus was that Son
That was quite a leap in understanding
Peter stepped forward and in one statement changed the course of Jewish belief and established a fundamental Christian theology
He affirmed that Jesus was the promised Seed, the Messiah, the One sent by God to end sin and the devil’s reign of terror
Moreover, he said Jesus is God himself, incarnate in the flesh
Fully man and fully God, the Son of God, a part of the Godhead
Peter was the first among the disciples to reach these conclusions, and even John, who later tells us Jesus is God and was with God, didn’t speak up here
No, it was Peter who came to this conclusion first, and as such he deserves our admiration
And yet Jesus goes on to say that though Peter was first, he wasn’t operating by his own intellect or reasoning
Jesus says Peter was responding to a work of God in his heart, for it was the Father in Heaven who revealed this truth to Peter
Before we consider the significance of this revelation, notice that Jesus’ words confirm both aspects of Peter’s confession
If it were true (as some critics say) that Jesus never claimed to be the Messiah, then why didn’t Jesus correct Peter here?
Instead, Jesus acknowledges Peter’s confession saying it was the result of divine revelation, which clearly indicates Jesus agreed
Secondly, notice that Jesus says the source was His Father in Heaven, affirming Peter’s second statement that Jesus was the Son of God
So Jesus confirms both that He is the Messiah and He is the Son of the living God, which confirms the Trinity
That God is One existing in Three Persons
Notice also that Jesus uses Peter’s full name which was Simon bar Yonah
Bar means “son” in Hebrew and Yonah is Jonah
So Peter’s full Hebrew name was Simon, son of Jonah
Why did Jesus start by addressing Peter so formally? Because this was an important, solemn moment…a turning point in Peter’s life
Peter stepped forward declaring publicly his faith in Jesus as the Messiah and his belief that Jesus was God incarnate
And as he did, Peter crossed over a line from which there is no return
Either Peter was correct and if so, he has defined the belief that every follower of Jesus after Peter must also confess
Or else he was wrong, in which case Peter just committed the sin of blasphemy and should be put to death according to the Law
This is his defining moment, and Jesus’ response makes clear which of those options holds true here: Jesus says that Peter was blessed, not condemned
Moreover, Jesus says Peter’s remarkable insight was not his own, but instead was a revelation of the Father to Peter
What Peter just said, he couldn’t have said unless the Father in Heaven had given Peter the understanding he now possessed
Without that revelation, Peter would have remained as clueless as the others
So as we look at this moment, we need to see it with spiritual understanding, stepping back to see it from God’s vantage point
Scripture is telling us that in that moment as the disciples stood silently hesitating to answer Jesus’ question, the Father was at work
But His Spirit, He placed the knowledge of the truth in Peter’s heart, and that truth was burning inside him
And it was pressing to get out, to make itself known, and Peter could feel it
He knew the truth and he knew he had to share it, and so when Jesus asked the question Peter offered his remarkable answer
That, my friends, is how faith works in the heart of everyone who has ever believed in Jesus
The knowledge that Jesus is our Savior and that He is God incarnate must be revealed to us by the Father
Without that revelation, we will never come to that understanding – no matter how often someone tells us
And no matter how many miracles or signs and wonders might be done in our presence
But on the other hand, once the Lord has placed that truth in our heart, as He did for Peter here, we can’t bear to hold it inside us
It’s a truth that we must declare, and once it’s taken up residence in our hearts, it’s only a matter of time before we make it public
And often the Lord will prompt us as He did with Peter here
He will move us into a moment like the one Peter experienced where the question comes our way and we know the answer
And more than that, we know we’re supposed to answer the question
That moment we call a confession of faith, and it’s the moment where faith in the heart makes itself known through a confession of the mouth
And as the two come together in that moment, the truth God planted in our hearts becomes a truth we ourselves accept
It’s the moment that a free gift of salvation placed in our heart becomes a gift received and affirmed in our minds and words
As Paul says:
So at some point before this moment (or maybe in the moment), Peter received revelation from the Father to know that Jesus was Messiah
And then Jesus prompted Peter to confess what he knew by giving him an opportunity make that confession
And this happens all the time…whether through an altar call in church or a conversation with a friend over coffee
I remember the way the Lord brought me to a confession…
So this is Peter’s confession moment, and this was also the moment Peter stepped forward and became the leader among these men
And Jesus affirms Peter’s leadership position
Much has been made of Jesus’ statement, and I suspect many of you are aware of some of the controversy that surrounds it
For example, the Catholic Church teaches that the pope is the highest representative of Christ on earth
And they point to this statement as evidence that Jesus establishes the papacy through Peter
Their claims are revisionist history, obviously self-serving and completely unsupported by the text
But Protestants can run too far in the opposite direction by unfairly diminishing Peter’s importance as a leader in the early church
The truth lies between those two extremes, as this text makes plainly clear
On the one hand, in speaking to Peter Jesus says He’s going to build the church upon “this” not on “you”
So Jesus’ choice of words rules out believing that the church was to be built upon Peter himself or that Peter founded the papacy
But on the other hand, in v.19 Jesus says plainly that Peter will have a special role in leading the early church
He will have “keys” to the Kingdom
And in some way, Peter’s leadership will connect heaven’s intentions to the events of the church on earth
Jesus’ two statements are fundamentally important, a key turning point in Matthew’s Gospel
And if we’re going to fully appreciate what’s going on in this moment, we need to examine both carefully
With the time we have this morning, we will only look at the first one, and we’ll save the second for next week
In His first statement, Jesus begins by changing Peter’s name, that is from Simon to Peter
Although Matthew has been calling the apostle by the name Peter all along, this is the moment when his name was first given by Jesus
Prior to this moment, 2 years into Jesus’ ministry, the man’s name had been Simon Bar Yonah
But Jesus says from now on it’s Peter, and Matthew uses the Greek petros which means rock in the sense of small stone
Later when Jesus says on this “rock” He will build the church, Matthew uses a different Greek word, petras, which means cliff
These two words are different genders in Greek, so clearly Matthew was trying to make a contrast between the two
Something about what Peter did in stepping forward to confess Jesus in the way that He did would serve as an example of the church overall
We could say that Peter was a chip of the block, a small stone compared to a cliff
And the relationship is easy to see, especially if we read Peter’s own writings
I wonder if Peter was thinking back to this moment at Caesarea Philippi as he wrote his first letter to the church
He says to all believers you have come to a living stone, the cornerstone that the builders rejected
A cornerstone was the most important stone in construction, because it set the direction and stability of a building
If that cornerstone was structurally weak or set improperly, the entire building would list and eventually fall
Jesus is our cornerstone: sure, strong, unbreakable and true
And yet the builders, that is the Jewish nation, rejected the stone
The Lord builds His kingdom on the promises He gave to Israel, and yet Israel rejected the One upon Whom the building begins
So that building begins with Gentiles first, with you and me
And Peter says that we are living stones God is using to construct a spiritual structure called the Church
And the process that led to Peter’s public confession is the same way the Lord will fashion us into living stones
The Father will reveal to us the truth of Jesus as Lord, and in a moment God appoints, the Spirit will prompt us to step forward
And that truth burning inside us will come out as a confession of things that only God could have taught us
In that moment, salvation arrives and we become part of something larger than ourselves
Jesus says He builds His church through this process of divine revelation and public confession
This is the first use of the word “church” in the New Testament and one of only two uses of the word in all the Gospels
Mark, Luke and John never use the word “church” at all, and it reflects how new this idea truly was
In Greek it’s the word ekklesia, which means the invited or called out ones
Jesus gives us this new term for the body He was preparing to create because none of the existing words could work
Since Israel rejected Jesus in Chapter 12, He wasn’t going to be building Israel – at least not for a time
And He isn’t creating rabbis or (God forbid) Pharisees or Sadducees
We are the church, the invited ones, and the One doing the inviting is the Father Himself by the revelation of His Spirit
And as we respond in faith, like Peter did, we become the called out ones
We are called out of the world to be a child of God
We are called out of darkness and into light, out of condemnation and into mercy and forgiveness
As we follow in Peter’s footsteps, we become another brick in the wall (with apologies to Pink Floyd), another living stone in the Church
Jesus was telling Peter and the disciples that’s what this whole thing was about…building a Church a body of people united by a shared faith
As Paul said:
Church is about Jesus as our God and Savior…and we can’t ever forget that
If you ever find yourself doing “church” in some sense and you realize that it’s been a while since you talked about Jesus, stop
Our focus as a church can never become programs, buildings, money, growth, image, etc.
And here’s something that may surprise you…neither can it become about prayer, worship, study or fellowship
Because those things are merely the means to a greater end…and the end is Jesus Christ
Every time we have conversations with an unbeliever about “church” our emphasis needs to be on Jesus and the salvation He offers
And every time someone enters this place, the sense they should get is that we are living stones following the cornerstone
If possible, we want to always and forever live in the moment Peter established by example
We are forever declaring by our words and actions that Jesus is THE Christ, THE Son of the THE God, THE Living One
That there is no other name under heaven that has been given among men by which we must be saved (Acts 4:12)
Lesson #1 is that Jesus is God and we can’t ever allow our life as a body in His name to set that focus aside for the sake of lessor priorities
Next week, we look at Lesson #2 in Jesus’ second comment to Peter