Taught by
Stephen ArmstrongAccess all of our teaching materials through our smartphone apps conveniently and quickly.
Taught by
Stephen ArmstrongToday, we near the conclusion of Paul’s teaching concerning spiritual gifts
I hope you’ll agree we’ve learned a lot so far on this important topic
Among other things, we’ve learned that all gifts are important
But they are not all created equal in their potential to edify the body
Therefore, there are going to be times when it may not be appropriate to put a certain gift to use in the body
As this example demonstrates, there are times when it’s best to remain silent rather than to use our gift
In our last lesson, Paul was teaching about one such situation involving the gift of speaking in tongues
Speaking and interpreting tongues is a very unique gift in the body
Paul ranks it as the least important gift in terms of its ability to edify other believers
Its low rank is a consequence of its inability to communicate knowledge from one believer to another
Paul said that when communication is absent, the gift lacks a purpose in the context of the gathering
In other words, we gather to extend edification from one to the other
And since tongues lacks that ability, it should remain a private experience, not a corporate experience
Though we can understand and accept this truth, it still begs additional questions
Why did God place the gift in the body of Christ if it has so little potential to benefit the body?
What was its intended purpose in the body?
And given its low potential to edify, how common was it in the early church?
And how common should we expect this gift to be today?
Finally, if it does appear today, how do we know if it’s real or proper to see it at work in the gathering?
Last week we ended as Paul was redirecting the church’s interest in gifts away from the spectacular and toward the meaningful
In vs.18-19 Paul couples two statements that effectively sum up his teaching on the proper place of tongues in the body
On the one hand, Paul is thankful for the gift
Every gift from God is something to be received gladly and with thanks
The gift of tongues is certainly not something to be rejected or despised, neither by the individual who possesses it nor by the congregation that receives it
So all gifts are to be appreciated
On the other hand, Paul keeps this gift in its proper place and perspective
Tongues is at the bottom of our priority list in the church
Meanwhile, Paul possessed far greater gifts, like prophecy, which is where he focused his time and interest
Consider the fact that there is not a single mention in all scripture of Paul using his gift of tongues
Yet at the same time, the New Testament is dominated by Paul’s gift of prophecy, since he wrote most New Testament scripture
So if tongues is of so little value relative to other gifts, why did the Lord see fit to place them in the body of Christ?
Paul answers that question now…
When Paul begins with the phrase “don’t be children in your thinking…” we see clearly he is still admonishing the church
The church has been thinking about spiritual gifts – and tongues, in particular – in a spiritually immature way
They have missed the big picture
If they only understood the Lord’s purpose in giving the gift in the first place, then they never would have gone so astray in their use of the gift
Paul says it’s ok to be like a child when it comes to knowing evil
In other words, if you’re going to be ignorant about something, be ignorant about evil
But when it comes to spiritual thinking, strive to be mature
As usual, the church’s immaturity is a result of a failure to understand the scriptures
Because the answer to why gifts exist in the church was given in the Old Testament
So often we act in wrong ways simply because we fail to open our Bible and understand what God has written for our benefit
In the case of speaking in tongues, God spoke beforehand about how and why things would come into the world
So Paul explains this lesson from Deuteronomy and Isaiah, which takes a little explanation…it requires spiritual maturity
First, Paul quotes from Deuteronomy 28:49 where Moses wrote to Israel:
In this passage, Moses warned Israel that in the future, they would not obey the covenant of Law
As a result the Lord would punish Israel by sending an enemy against them
This enemy would come by way of a powerful army that would enslave the people and destroy their nation
Israel will know this day has come because the nation that attacks will speak in a language the people of Israel do not understand
In other words, the nation will know when their judgment had begun when they encounter an enemy speaking a tongue they do not understand
The prophecy was fulfilled when Babylon invaded speaking Akkadian, a language Israel had never heard
More importantly, the Lord is establishing an important spiritual pattern: The appearance of an unknown tongue in Jerusalem was forever be a sign to Israel of God’s judgment against their sin
The sign was established in Deuteronomy and it was confirmed for the first time in the days of Babylon
But that wasn’t the end of the sign
God continues to use this sign to warn Israel
The Lord promised to use it again after Israel rejected their Messiah, as Isaiah foretold
The Lord had been warning the northern kingdom through Isaiah that a judgment was coming
But the people mocked Isaiah’s warnings
So once again, in v.11 Isaiah warns the people that they should expect to hear from the Lord
But they will hear from God through the voice of strange people speaking in a language they don’t understand
And that people will take Israel away into captivity
That invader was Assyria
The ultimate fulfillment of this prophecy of speaking in tongues comes in connection with the arrival of the Messiah in Israel
Peter gives us that connection, when he quoted from Joel at the moment of Pentecost
When the believing Jews began speaking in foreign languages at the first Pentecost, the people watching were asking what does this miracle mean?
Some recognized this was a supernatural act of God, but they couldn’t make sense of what the sign meant
Yet others in the crowd dismissed it as merely a crowd of drunk people
So Peter stepped forward to explain its meaning and defend the word of God
He begins by saying these men aren’t drunk, it’s only 9:00 AM in the morning
Instead, this was an act of God in keeping with His word
Peter points to the prophet Joel for an explanation
In Joel, we read about a time to come in Israel when God would accomplish miraculous works on behalf of the nation
God would pour out His Spirit on Israel
And as a result of that outpouring, the people of Israel would experience supernatural manifestations of the Spirit
Prophecies, dreams, and visions
Moreover, the moon and sun would undergo miraculous changes
And the earth would also experience great turmoil
But in the midst of this calamity, all in Israel who call upon the name of the Lord would be saved
And it would culminate with the Lord’s glorious reign on earth
Interestingly, Peter offered Joel 2 as an explanation of men speaking in foreign languages in the day of Pentecost, but Joel doesn’t mention tongues at all
Furthermore, the scene in Pentecost doesn’t match the scene Joel describes
The sun and moon didn’t change on the day of Pentecost
The earth didn’t experience great turmoil
All Israel wasn’t saved and Jesus didn’t set up the kingdom and reign on Earth
Joel was describing the time of Tribulation, which is yet to come on the earth
When Tribulation arrives, it will be accompanied by all the great signs and wonders that Joel described
And it will culminate with Israel receiving the outpouring of the Spirit
As a result of that outpouring, miraculous things will happen in that nation
The nation will come to faith
And their Messiah will return to save them, as Paul says in Romans 11
So the prophecy of Joel is speaking about a time in the future when Israel will experience salvation as a result of the Spirit
And it will lead to salvation for Israel and the beginning of the Messianic Kingdom on earth
So if Joel 2 isn’t speaking of Pentecost, why does Peter quote Joel 2 to explain the moment of Pentecost?
Peter’s using Joel 2 to prove that when God pours out His Spirit on men, miraculous things should be expected
These men aren’t drunk as some accused; they were simply responding to an outpouring of the Spirit
Speaking in tongues, prophesying and the like are evidence that the Spirit of God is moving among His people
So Peter is using Joel 2 to defend the work of the Spirit
But in Israel’s case, the appearance of foreign tongues in the city of Jerusalem is always a very bad sign for Israel
Notice again Joel never mentioned foreign tongues spoken in Israel at the time of his events
That’s because the sign of foreign tongues in Jerusalem is always a bad thing for Israel
It means God’s judgment is coming upon them for their disobedience
In this case, the Lord Himself declared that this judgment was coming
When the people of Israel rejected their Messiah, He declared that they would see their nation left desolate as a result
Moments earlier, the Lord had declared that this generation was guilty of lacking faith and demanding signs
So Jesus declared that the only sign they would see is their own Lord killed, buried and later resurrected
Jesus was prophesying that this generation of Israel would be guilty of putting their Messiah to death
And so this evil generation will be left desolate
And so it was, 40 years later when the Romans arrived and destroyed the temple and the city of Jerusalem
Therefore, the Lord gave the church in Jerusalem the ability to speak in foreign tongues as a sign to Israel that it was about to be destroyed for its unbelief
Just as Moses said to past generations
Whenever the people of Israel hear foreign tongues spoken in the city of Jerusalem, they should know that the Lord is predicting judgment
It is a sign to the unbelieving Jew that their Lord is about to act against them
And yet, the sign will always go unheeded
For the Lord is determined to carry through with His judgment once the sign is given
So looking back at 1 Corinthians 14:22 Paul says the gift of tongues was given to the church as a sign to Israel of coming destruction upon the city
Its purpose was to warn unbelieving Israel in the days prior to the destruction of the temple and the city
When the early church gathered prior to AD 70, it did so largely in Jerusalem and it did so publicly
In that context, the sign of tongues was at work to warn of coming judgment
But Paul says tongues serves no purpose as a sign for the believer
We have no need of the sign, for we are not going to be caught in God’s judgment
Therefore, the practice of signs is to be limited by its purpose
If the church wanted to be spiritually mature in their understanding of this gift, then they needed to understand this background
They needed to know what tongues meant and who it was for
That it meant judgment, and it was for unbelieving Israel
Obviously, the sign has lost its purpose today, at least for the time being
The destruction of AD 70 has already come and unbelieving Jews are not present in our gatherings, generally speaking
Consequently, any display of tongues today in a corporate gathering runs counter to its purpose
In fact, any manifestation of tongues in the gathering without unbelieving Jews present cannot be a true manifestation
Otherwise, we would be saying that the Spirit was working contrary to the word of God
Unfortunately, that’s what’s happening in some churches today
Large gatherings are all taught to mimic tongues through babbling, which is not tongues at all
And in doing so, they are directly disobeying Paul’s instructions in this text
And even worse, they are bringing shame to Christ and His word by causing the unbelieving world to think that Christians are bizarre and gullible
This is exactly Paul’s concern as well…
Paul says if the whole church acts together to speak in tongues, those who visit will think the church is insane
In Paul’s example, he’s not distinguishing between a mimicking or the real thing
He’s saying that either situation is equally wrong
Of course, mimicking tongues is always wrong, because it’s not a spiritual work
It’s a work of the flesh which profits no one
But even if it were possible for an entire church to speak in tongues, it would be wrong for the entire congregation to do so
It does nothing to advance the mission of the church
We are called to be ambassadors for Christ, to witness to the truth and to invite others to know the salvation we have
We can’t fulfill that mission by speaking in words no one can understand
Furthermore, misusing the gift in tongues just makes us into a spectacle that the unbelieving world mocks
Nothing good comes from acting in disobedience to the word of God
Instead, Paul says if we give priority to the proper gifts, like prophecy or teaching, we have a hope to influence the unbeliever
We can edify the ungifted (i.e., the one who needs our gift) and we convict the unbeliever
They hear what’s taught and they understand the truth of the word
And then their heart is changed and they respond to the word
And in conviction, they fall on their face and seek for salvation
The question is what do we want out of church?
Do we come here to show off our gift?
Do we seek a chance to stand up and dance and make a scene and cause everyone’s eyes to turn our way?
Do we want for that attention?
Or do we want to see people convicted and changed?
Do we want believers to learn about Jesus? To become more like Him?
Do we want unbelievers to be pierced in their hearts by the word of God, as we were?
Do we want to see Christ glorified and the church growing
If we want for the latter, then we should follow the words of John the Baptist
John understood how spiritual gifts truly worked
A man can have nothing spiritual except what has been given him from Heaven
And by that gifting we become useful to Christ
But only if we understand that we must diminish, so that Christ may increase
Next week we’ll conclude Paul’s examination of how gifts are to operate in the church
Paul will finish his correction on gifts by giving us a model for how the entire worship service should proceed
A model that fits very well with our desire to include a wider variety of individuals in the conduct of our church service