Taught by
Stephen ArmstrongAccess all of our teaching materials through our smartphone apps conveniently and quickly.
Taught by
Stephen ArmstrongCorinth was a mixture of New York, Los Angeles, and Las Vegas in the ancient world
It sat on the isthmus of Corinth, a narrow strip of land that connected northern Greece with the southern Peloponnesus
It was a crossroads of the ancient world
And it was a land bridge with two coastal ports
The city’s ports connected the western Mediterranean with the Aegean Sea in the East
These ports were the basis for commerce in the city
Boats were off loaded, cargo transported over land
Smaller boats moved entirely
Later a canal was dug, started by Nero and finished in 1893
As those boats arrived, they brought sailors
Sailors brought pagan traditions and vice of all kinds
Aristophanes in 400BC coined the phrase korinthiazo, which means to act like a Corinthian, as in to fornicate
Perhaps the most licentious city in the Roman Empire
The city was also incredibly wealthy due to the trade there
Another popular phrase was “not everyone can go to Corinth”
Which meant not everyone was wealthy enough to live in the city
Finally, the city was a center for worship of Apollo at the Temple of Aphrodite
The temple was manned by the prostitutes of Aphrodite
This is why the city was a favorite for men who wished to “worship”
You can’t overestimate how pervasive sexual perversion was in this city
It was the original Sin City
Paul has an extensive relationship with the city
Paul first traveled to Corinth in about AD 51 (less than 20 years after Christ’s death)
This was the first major church Paul established in the Greek world
As was his practice, Paul initially went to the synagogue, but was soon rejected
So then he went to the house next door and reached his first Gentile convert, and from there began the Corinthian church
There he met Priscilla and Aquila (Acts 18)
And lived among them for 18 months in his first visit
At that point, Paul left for Ephesus taking Priscilla and Aquila with him
Later in about AD 54, Paul hears disturbing news about the church in Corinth
In particular, the church is engaging in many of the immoralities of the surrounding culture, and polluting church practice and doctrine
Remember, none of the four gospels have been written and distributed by this time
Virtually none of the letters of the New Testament have been authored
The church has the Old Testament and the teaching of Paul and its other leaders
So in the absence of such grounding and discipleship, the church was highly susceptible to wrong teaching and unhealthy practices
What kind of bizarre practices would invade our church were it not for the word of God?
In fact, we do see exactly the same tendency in the church today
Where the word of God and the doctrines of the church are not taught, the practices of the faithful quickly begin to deviate and become corrupted
So in AD 54 Paul writes his first letter to the city warning about vice and immoral conduct
That letter no longer exists (1 Corinthians 5:9)
But it must have begun the discussion of how the church was to correct these practices
Later Paul hears of factions developing within the church
And he receives a letter from the church asking him to settle some disagreements (7:1)
The disagreements revolve around how the church should practice marriage, divorce, idols, spiritual gifts, giving to the poor in the church and other issues
The delegation carrying the letter to Paul (headed by a man named Stephanus) elaborated on the problems in the church
So about AD 56, Paul writes his second letter to Corinth to address the things he’s heard and and to answer the questions posed to him in their letter
That second letter from Paul is the one we hold in our hands, the letter we call First Corinthians
In this letter, Paul says he knows there are those in the church who have disputed Paul’s teaching and are claiming equal authority with Paul
And it was because of these false teachers that many of the disputes and bad behavior had developed in the church
Since there is no written New Testament scripture at this point, this church had only Paul’s word as an Apostle to guide them
Furthermore, this is a Gentile church, made up of former Greek Pagan worshippers with no prior experience in Jewish teaching or practice
So they had no background in the teachings of the Old Testament and no written guidance for New Testament practice
The conduct and future direction of this church depended on whose counsel and direction they held as authoritative
This is why Paul’s ability to perform miracles and prove his authority by the Holy Spirit was so important
Paul could back up his teaching with real spiritual power, which he received from Jesus directly
And in this letter we’ll see Paul demand that his detractors do the same
Finally, Paul later made a “painful visit” (as he called it) to Corinth in AD 58, probably because his letter hadn’t succeeded in correcting their sin
It was during his second stay in the city that Paul sat down to write Romans
I wonder if seeing Corinth running wild gave Paul the inspiration to write such a powerful letter of theology
As he came to understand how essential good doctrine is to the conduct of godly church life
That is a truth that has been set aside in many churches again today
That is the central theme of the letter: how to live out a godly (spiritual) life
If Romans can be considered the preeminent letter on Christian theology
Then 1 Corinthians is the New Testament’s principle letter for the pastoral application of theology in everyday church life
This is a letter that demonstrates how important theology is to the proper conduct of Christian life, particularly the life of the gathering
The letter reads with two discrete sections:
First, Chapters 1-6 addresses all Paul has heard about the goings on in the church
The factions
The false human wisdom
The carnal conditions
The lack of order and discipline and respect for the Apostles’ authority
The second section in Chapters 7-16 is where Paul answers the questions posed in the letter he received
This explains why the letter reads a little like a laundry list of issues
Less doctrine, more practice
Therefore, this letter is utterly contemporary and highly applicable to our day
The same issues Paul addressed in Corinth continue to weigh on the church today
The celebrity status of church leaders and the factions that develop around them?
The manner and source of our salvation?
Divorce and remarriage?
Confusion over the purpose and use of spiritual gifts?
The integration of the pagan practices in the church?
The role and place of women in the church?
This letter written nearly 2,000 years ago, may as well have been written yesterday!
Immediately in the opening of the letter, we see the issue of authority taking the center stage
Paul reminds the church of the source of his authority
As an apostle, Paul was the Apostle to the Gentiles, a man whose word and teaching carried real authority for the church
“Apostle” was and still is a unique title in the church
Men cannot assign this title to themselves or one another
Only the Lord Jesus Christ may appoint an apostle, as demonstrated here by Paul’s statement
Paul was called to be an apostle by the will of God
This office is so special and unique in the church that only God may appoint this position directly
And He did so through His Son, Jesus Christ
The office of apostle was awarded only through a personal appearing of Jesus Christ
And the office carried special and unique signs and powers, which validated someone’s claim to being an apostle
In 2 Corinthians 12:12, Paul mentions that he performed the signs of a true apostle when he visited the church
We see accounts of apostles performing these signs elsewhere in scripture, particularly in Acts, including raising men from the dead, healing and even bringing men to death
But today in the church, we do not have true apostles
The office ended when the last of the 12 died, for the office had met its purpose in establishing the church
Secondly, Paul says the believers in Corinth were likewise called by Christ into the faith they shared
This concept, that we are in faith by an act of God and not an act of men, is Paul’s first line of defense against the false teachers in Corinth
Paul wanted the church to understand that they did not owe their salvation to any teacher or even to an apostle
And they certainly couldn’t credit their own wisdom and intellect as the source of their salvation
Instead, they were called by Jesus Christ, and the rest of the first and second chapters will develop this point further
As is typical for Paul, he moves out of his salutation and directly into a prayer of thanks for the Corinthian church
This church was the first Greek church Paul planted after working his way through Asia Minor
Before reaching Corinth, Paul had spent some time preaching in Athens
But as you may know from Acts, Paul failed to gain much of a following in Athens
He must have left that city in a bit of despair and discouragement
But when he arrived in Corinth, he was met with an almost immediate Gentile response
In the 18 months Paul lived in Corinth, he saw many come to the Lord
This must have been a tremendous encouragement to Paul
Especially in a city of so much immorality
Paul’s experience in moving from a fruitless Athens to a fruitful Corinth reminds us that our evangelism results lie entirely in God’s hands
It’s clear that Paul made equal effort in both cities
And in God’s eternal purpose, it was necessary that Paul visit both places
Yet it’s also clear that in God’s eternal purpose, Paul was intended to see meager response in one city but great response in the other
Had Paul stubbornly remained in Athens, assuming he could overcome their objections and eventually achieve results, he would have been working against the purposes of God
No man can turn meager response into great response in his own power
If we persist in laboring outside God’s will, we increase our own frustration and discouragement
And we may miss the opportunity to reach people in the city down the road
Paul walked in the Spirit, moving from Athens to Corinth so that he could labor in the field God had prepared for him
Look at how Paul entered the city
God told Paul that he had many friends in this city after only one household had been converted
In other words, God already intended to bring Paul a great harvest, and the Lord described these future converts as if they were already believing
Because in light of God’s sovereignty, they were
All that was left was for Paul to reach them, and that was the Lord’s calling for Paul
In Paul’s statements of thanks, we can also see the beginnings of his first concern for this church
Paul says that this church already had everything they could hope to receive from their faith in Christ
First, and foremost, they had received God’s unmerited favor in Jesus Christ
This is the basis for every good thing that would follow
Without having received grace through faith in Christ, no other benefit of the Body of Christ is available
Secondly, they were made rich in Jesus Christ
Not just in the sense of our eternal inheritance
But also in speech and knowledge
The believer has access to all the wisdom of God and the ability to carry that truth to the world in a powerful way
Just as the Gospel testimony Paul delivered to them worked powerfully to convert Corinth
Thirdly, the church in Corinth was not lacking in any spiritual gift
The Spirit was alive in the church and with Him comes access to every spiritual gift
Finally, they have the assurance of their salvation and the glory to come
The church could be assured that they will be blameless in the end when they stand before Jesus Christ
Nothing else was required for the church to receive all these blessings…everything Paul listed was theirs already by virtue of grace alone
Why has Paul started his letter in this way? Because the church was showing evidence they did not understand what they had obtained through faith alone
The believers in Corinth were products of their culture, just as every believer is a product of his or her own culture
Corinth was quintessentially Greek: priding itself on its wealth, wisdom, sophistication and oratory
And so the church in Corinth reflected those prideful qualities
When the faith first arrived in the city, the new converts were equals in Christ
But soon they began to compare themselves to one another seeking ways to re-establish rank and privilege
Because this was the way of the Greek culture
But the shame was that their pride was actually causing them to stumble so that they were less than they should be
They valued wisdom and knowledge
They admired eloquence in speech
They respected wealth and prestige, as did all Greek culture
But Paul says they have already obtained everything in these areas by their faith in Christ
No one was superior to another
And they need not seek for something greater than they have already obtained in Christ
In their searching for greater prestige and honor, the church had begun to find it by association
They had begun to argue for a greater honor on the basis of who converted them
Ironically, they had lost sight of who they truly were in Greek culture
While they argued for who had greater honor and chased after greater forms of wisdom, they neglected to notice how the rest of the Greek society viewed the church
So now Paul begins to address the first serious problem in the Corinthians church life: their desire to create factions and credit themselves by association
Paul begins with the first thing he’s heard – there are dissensions and factions
And as Paul begins to correct them, he reminds them of his authority to correct them while describing the sin in the church
Paul says these things to bring them to shame
But then he will offer a correction
And he will end with an encouraging word to move them ahead in the right manner
This is the pattern Paul will follow throughout the letter
Paul says that all in the church should agree and that there be no divisions
The word in Greek (autos) means to be one-minded
Paul is insisting the church operate as one, not as divisions
And he says they are to be complete, in the same mind and judgment
The word complete (katartizo) means to mend, as in to mend nets (Mark 1:19)
The church should be knitted together, not pulling apart
The split in the Corinthian church was the result of church members aligning themselves with certain leaders
The members of each group began to hold that their status in the body – and even their salvation itself – was determined on the basis of these affiliations
Specifically, they began to claim they were “of Paul” or “of Apollos” or “of Cephas”
Looking at these three men, we know each was important in his own way
Paul was the founder of the church
Apollos was a gifted orator who also evangelized the Greek world
Peter was the founder of the Jewish church
Peter never visited Corinth as far as we know
But some Jewish believers had probably migrated into the city
In correcting the church, Paul asks can Christ be divided?
Obviously not – Christ’s literal body could not be divided into parts
Neither can the spiritual Body of Christ be divided
For we are all one by the same Spirit Who indwells us all
But the Corinthian church was now placing an emphasis on their affiliation with a certain apostle more than with their identity in Christ
Paul demands that the church avoid these divisions, but when Paul says to agree, he doesn’t mean that the church can’t have disagreements
Paul didn’t want division, but that doesn’t mean he wished the church would compromise on the truth
In fact, disagreements are inevitable when the truth of God’s word is at stake
There do come times when we must stand up for the truth
Notice in v.12 there were some saying they are “of Christ”
This was the correct viewpoint
These Christians were saying the correct thing, the same thing Paul himself is about to teach
But because others had established incorrect thinking, a division between right and wrong had developed in the church
Here we see how theological error creates division in the church
The division begins when some in the church leave the truth and begin teaching error
Then those who hold to the truth are forced to be divided
We cannot reconcile truth and error
The solution to division in the church has always been the same: sound doctrine and sound teaching
When the church emphasizes correct Bible teaching, then the Body as a whole can grow in the grace and knowledge of Christ
But when teaching and sound doctrine are lost, division arises
For his part, Paul says he did nothing to encourage these divisions
Paul asks, was he the one who died on the cross?
Were they baptized in the name of Paul?
Paul didn’t teach that he was central to faith and salvation
He taught that Christ was central
Paul adds that he was thankful he didn’t baptize many because he didn’t want to encourage this nonsense
This is an important principle for the church then and today
Pastors, teachers, evangelists should never encourage their audiences to see themselves as attached or aligned with the individual
Our only identity is in Christ
In the end, we must be careful not to repeat the mistake of the Corinthian church
And as members of the Body, we should take every opportunity, (short of compromising on the truth) to reconcile divisions in the church
We are not Baptists, Presbyterians, Methodists
We are not conservative or charismatic
We are not reformed or dispensational
We are Christians or we are not