Taught by
Stephen ArmstrongAccess all of our teaching materials through our smartphone apps conveniently and quickly.
Taught by
Stephen ArmstrongMy teaching on the first half of Romans 4 ended in a place of confusion, I feel, so I need to clarify my teaching from the previous lesson
First, let’s take another look at our Structure of Romans chart
We’re in Chapter 4: Paul’s proofs from the Old Testament
Paul’s seeking to prove three basic points related to obtaining righteousness
First, Paul proved that salvation has always been a matter of faith, not works
He used the example of Abraham as his proof
Abraham was credited with righteousness because he believed in God to keep a promise concerning a future son
He wasn’t credited on the basis of his works, therefore Abraham proves works are not the way to righteousness
Abraham is Paul’s example to prove that salvation by faith is not a new idea
Secondly, Paul proved that the means to salvation didn’t change after the Law came to Israel
He used the example of David declaring in the Psalms that a blessed man is the one who has his lawless deeds forgiven and his sin debt covered
Once again, scripture testifies that blessedness (i.e., righteousness) is according to God's mercy only
David lived after the Law, so his example proves that the Law’s arrival didn’t alter God’s plan
So David proves that salvation by faith alone has never changed
Thirdly, Paul proved that God made faith the means to salvation so that both Jew and Gentile could receive His mercy
To prove this point, Paul returned to the example of Abraham in v.9 asking when was Abraham circumcised
This is where my teaching wasn’t clear enough, so I want to spend a moment revisiting Paul’s third proof
Circumcision was commanded under two of the five covenants God gave to Israel: the Abrahamic and Mosaic Covenants
The Abrahamic Covenant came first, and it established Jewish identity
In that covenant, circumcision was the sign of the covenant
As such, it was like a Jewish birth certificate demonstrating who had been included in the covenant
It was performed at 8 days because it didn’t depend on personal agreement
Every child born to Abraham, Isaac and Jacob was a party to the covenant and circumcision was the sign of that covenant
If a child was not circumcised, then the covenant was broken for that individual and they were cut off from the Jewish nation
The Mosaic Covenant also expected males to be circumcised
Obviously, Jewish males were already commanded to be circumcised under the Abrahamic Covenant
But under the Mosaic Law, Gentiles who wanted to join in the commonwealth of Israel were also circumcised
So circumcision became a way for Gentiles to submit to the Law
That’s why Paul warned the Galatians that if they took circumcision, they were obligating themselves to keeping the whole law
So that leads to the question, must a Gentile become a Jew before they may be included in the promises of the covenant?
To address this point Paul asks when did Abraham receive his declaration of righteousness: before or after circumcision?
The answer is before, and Paul says this proves that salvation didn’t depend on being Jewish
Abraham didn’t have the sign of the covenant yet was still declared righteous by faith alone
Therefore, Paul concludes that Abraham serves as an example (i.e., a father) to both Jews and Gentiles
His faith preceded his entry into the Abrahamic Covenant
Therefore, he is an example for all mankind, both those who descended from him and those who didn’t
Any man or woman who repeats Abraham’s example of faith will receive the same outcome: a heavenly credit of righteousness
Today, we are entering into the New Covenant by faith, because the content of God’s promise has been expanded to its fullness in Christ
Abraham received a promise with a lessor content but his faith was in the same object: the faithfulness of God
We too place our faith in the faithfulness of God
And like Abraham, we are justified by our faith in God’s promise
But the promise God gave to us in the New Covenant holds greater content concerning God’s plan of redemption
Still, the process works the same
We receive the promise
We believe in the One Who promises
And we receive the credit of righteousness that Abraham received
Following our faith we follow Abraham’s example in taking the sign of a covenant
By faith, we receive the sign of our faith which is the baptism of the Spirit, called the circumcision of the heart
Our spirit baptism happens without any action on our part, since it is accomplished by the Spirit at our moment of faith
In the same way that the sign of the Abrahamic covenant was given to an infant
We don’t chose to enter in…our Father brings us in
Later, we give testimony to our spirit baptism by taking water baptism as a public witness
In the last part of the chapter, Paul refutes once again that the Law’s arrival and its requirement for circumcision changed the rules
Remember, the Mosaic Law also mandated circumcision
That fact suggested to some Jews that the blessings of the Abrahamic Covenant were to be obtained through the Law
That was the argument being made by the Judaizers in the first century…
They said one must be under the Law to receive the blessings of the New Covenant
So that leads Paul to give further argument on this point
As we read this section, we need to pay attention to Paul’s vocabulary in this section
Paul mentions the promise to Abraham and the Law
The promise to Abraham refers to the Abrahamic Covenant
The Law refers to the Mosaic Covenant
The Abrahamic covenant was a one-way grant, where the blessings were given as a promise based on faith
The Mosaic Covenant was a two-way agreement, where the blessings were earned by performance of works
Both required circumcision, which was the mark of Jewish identity and submission to the Law
Secondly, Paul talks of heirs
In the covenant God spoke to Abraham, He made promises to both Abraham and his descendants (see Gen 15:18)
Likewise, in the Mosaic Covenant, the Lord made an agreement with all future generations of Israel (see Deut 29:14-15)
So the question is who are the heirs of the covenant God spoke to Abraham?
Since both covenants commanded circumcision, which covenant is responsible for delivering the promises God gave Abraham’s descendants?
Or we could ask it this way: which covenant did God intend to use to fulfill His promises to Abraham and his descendants?
Did God intend for Abraham’s descendants to keep the Law in order to receive the promises He gave Abraham?
Did God add circumcision to the Law so that the two covenants would work together to bring about the promised blessings?
Or did these two covenants stand apart?
To this Paul says plainly in v.13 that God’s promises to Abraham were to be obtained in the way Abraham obtained them, by faith alone, not by the Law
In Genesis, God promised Abraham that his descendants would be heirs of the world
God made a grant to Abraham, a grant of land and prosperity
The Lord said that this blessing would be Abraham’s inheritance
And like any inheritance, Abraham would pass that inheritance down to his descendants
Earlier, Paul taught that Abraham’s descendants were those who share in his faith
So the connection between Abraham and his heirs will be spiritual not physical
Abraham received that promise when he put his faith in it
After Abraham believed God, God established His promise as a covenant
But Paul says if those blessings were later incorporated into a covenant of works (i.e., the Law), then they would no longer be on the basis of a promise
He says in v.14 that if those who are Abraham’s heirs were those who were party to the Law, then it would mean that the promise was void or nullified
The original promises that God gave Abraham were received on the basis of faith only
But if the Law was the means of receiving the blessing, then it would be by doing works of Law
That would have made that earlier promise of no effect
Let me use an example to explain Paul’s point more easily
Imagine I promise my son $100 for his birthday and he believes my word and looks forward to his gift
I’ve told him that this blessing will be his without any condition
By my word alone, he expects to receive a blessing
But what if later I return to him and say that he can have that $100 only if he keeps his room clean
At that point, my earlier promise is no longer in effect
He is no longer assured the money simply because of my word
Now he must obey my rule if he is to receive the money
So my law has nullified my earlier promise
Paul says that if this were how God’s covenants worked, then it would have had a profound effect
In v.15 Paul says law always brings about wrath
He means that laws are cause for accusation
They do not makes us do the right thing; rather they expose us when we fail to live right
When I added my rule for my son, I introduced the possibility of failure and condemnation
I didn’t increase the chance of receiving the money; I greatly decreased that possibility
But when no law exists, there can be no violation, Paul says
Before I added the rule for my son to follow, there was no chance he would fail to receive the money
There was nothing he could do to ruin it, since I never connected his receiving of the blessing with his behavior at all
Without law there can be no violation and without violation there is nothing standing in the way of blessing
That’s the difference between works and grace
In the first situation, my son was looking forward to a reward and had no reason to fear or even labor to obtain it
In the second situation, he had little hope for a reward and lived under the burden of constant effort yet with little or no hope to escape judgment
One is a blessing, one is a curse
So it was with the Abrahamic Covenant
God only asked Abraham to believe in the promise
And on that basis the promise was assured
From that point forward, nothing could stop it from coming to Abraham, since its fulfillment wasn’t connected to his behavior
Paul says “for this reason” the blessing of righteousness was to come by faith (in the way of the Abrahamic Covenant) and not by works (Mosaic Covenant)
Paul means for all the reasons he’s covered in the chapter up to this point
The first reason: the blessing must be by grace, not by works, because righteousness is credited not earned
Secondly, it must be apart from circumcision (i.e., Jewish identity) so that it could available to both Jew and Gentile
If Jewish identity were part of the process of salvation, then it would only be available to those who were Jewish
But Abraham was promised to be a father of many nations, Paul says in v.17
Meaning, that many would be spiritual heirs of that man for following his example of faith
Finally, God’s blessing must be by faith in a promise and not by law because otherwise no one could have expected to receive the blessing
God is the One Who gives life to the dead and calls into being that which did not exist
In Abraham’s case, Paul is describing the arrival of Isaac from a dead womb
But that statement has a double meaning
It also refers to the bringing of new life to a spiritually dead person
Calling into existence a faith and trust in God that previously didn’t exist
This is how Abraham stands as ultimate proof for the manner of salvation
He is our example of how a person can be lead to faith in a promise from God
Paul ends the chapter with an extended examination of the faith Abraham had in God’s promise
The point in this examination is to understand how closely we follow in his footsteps as we believe
We aren’t just repeating his example of faith
We are actually believing in essentially the same thing
In v.18 Paul says that Abraham believed in hope against hope
That phrase means that Abraham had hope in something that he ought not have had reason to hope in
Abraham had been promised by God that he shall have innumerable descendants
But Abraham contemplated his own body, Paul says
Contemplated could be translated “understood”
Abraham understood his situation
He was not naive or ignoring the obvious
He knew that he – and particularly his wife – were past the age when children could be expected
They had no reason to hope for a baby
But there was God promising to bring new life from something dead
And Paul says that Abraham understood his situation but nevertheless, he didn’t let that fact weaken his faith in God’s promise
Instead, Abraham did not waiver
He put no hope in his flesh to solve the problem, but he placed his faith entirely in the Lord to solve it
He gave glory, being fully convinced that what God had promised He was able to perform
This is exactly how we follow in Abraham’s footsteps in obtaining God’s righteousness as he did
We receive a promise that God will bring new life from our dead spirit
That by faith in Christ we may be born again, made new spiritually in the likeness of Christ
As Jesus told Nicodemus
If we contemplated our deadness, our sinfulness, and our rebellious hearts, then we would have no reason to hope for heaven
But we don’t place our hope in our flesh, just as Abraham didn’t place his trust in his own flesh to solve his problem
We hope against hope, putting our trust in God to justify the ungodly
More than that, God also promises that out of this dying body He will bring a new eternal body that will never die again
Paul explained that promise to us
1Cor. 15:42 So also is the resurrection of the dead. It is sown a perishable body, it is raised an imperishable body;
1Cor. 15:43 it is sown in dishonor, it is raised in glory; it is sown in weakness, it is raised in power;
1Cor. 15:44 it is sown a natural body, it is raised a spiritual body. If there is a natural body, there is also a spiritual body.
If you look at your own dying body, you have no hope to live eternally
You see your body getting older, getting weaker, getting sicker
You put no trust in it to solve the problem of death
Instead, you place your hope in God’s promise to raise you as Christ was raised
So hoping against hope, you expect to live again one day
In that future day, God will give you a new living eternal body
What explains such a confidence?
Intellectually, we struggle to explain our confidence to others, don’t we?
Imagine Abraham explaining to others that he was confident that he would receive a son despite being 100 yrs old
I’m sure anyone who asked for defense of his confidence would have heard Abraham speak of the glory of God (v.20)
But in the end, there was no proof possible
His confidence was a faith that defied explanation
That faith was a product of God’s supernatural work in Abraham’s heart
Hebrews says that Jesus is the Author and Perfecter of our faith
He brings us the supernatural confidence not to waiver in that confidence
But what about that episode of Abraham and Hagar?
While Abraham was waiting for the Lord to fulfill His promise to Abraham, he took matters into his own hands
Abraham took Hagar as his concubine for the purpose of producing the child he expected from God’s promise
He did this at the suggestion of his wife, but nevertheless Abraham went through with it
It seems as Abraham did exactly the opposite of what Paul was saying here in Romans
It seems that Abraham contemplated the weakness of his wife’s body and then he wavered in his faith because of it
And so he doubted God, and it lead him to his sin with Hagar
But that’s not how to understand Abraham’s actions
He didn’t seek for a son through Hagar because he doubted God’s promise
He did it because he had faith God was at work to produce an heir
Notice that Paul says Abraham was about 100 when he had this confidence
But Abraham received the promise when he was 75, and it was at that time he was declared righteous by his faith
So Abraham received a promise at 75, and believed and was credited with righteousness
Then time begins to pass
Even as time passes, Abraham’s confidence in that promise doesn’t waiver, but his patience did
The long time caused Abraham to second guess God’s timetable and presuppose how the promise would be fulfilled
So that at a point Abraham becomes convinced, perhaps by his wife, that the child would simply come in a conventional way
Eventually, Abraham assumed that God intended to keep his promise through the son he produced with Hagar
To Abraham, God’s promise was still trustworthy and the blessings were no less true
But he wasn’t patient
Then after 25 years, the Lord announced that the time had come for the child to be born and that the son would come by Sarah, not Hagar
By this point, neither Abraham nor Sarah are looking for the fulfillment of God’s promise because they assume it has already happened
They suppose it has already been fulfilled in Ishmael, the son from Hagar
This isn’t a lack of a faith in God’s promise; it’s a lack of perspective and appreciation for God’s ways
They both believed in the promise but they thought they understood God’s plan
So when they heard the Lord promising to bring a son through Sarah, after Ismael was already 13, they couldn’t understand it
Sarah laughed at the suggestion, Abraham puzzled at it
Much like a 100 year old woman might laugh at the suggestion today or an old man might assume he didn’t understand something
Then God explained the plan to Abraham and when Abraham finally understood what God was going to do, he realigned his expectations
That happened when he was about 100, as Paul says
And at that point, Abraham demonstrated his confidence in God’s promise by acting without wavering
First, Abraham obeyed God by sending his beloved son Ishmael out of the house
Secondly, he willingly sacrificed Isaac when God required it
Abraham’s story is so interesting precisely because it features such a contrast of highs and lows
Abraham hopes against hope for a child and later nearly sacrifices him at God’s request – what great examples of faith!
But in between those two high points, Abraham lies about his wife rather than trusting in God to protect them while waiting for the promised son
And he beds another woman in an attempt to have the promised son rather than wait patiently
From the first moment Abraham was trusting in God to fulfill His word
And as a result he was declared righteous from the beginning
But he didn’t walk in perfect obedience or understanding
Abraham’s life is evidence that a journey of faith doesn’t always reflect our great confidence in God for our eternal future
We may have saving faith in His promises but we will waiver at times in our obedience
We may assume too much about how God plans to work out His plan
Or we may decide to take matters into our own hands
But our faith is intact as is our justification
And so Paul says in v.22 that’s why God chose to declare Abraham righteous in Chapter 15 of Genesis, at the start of this journey…it was for our sake
In Genesis 15 Abraham was at the beginning of that journey, and his faith was childlike
He knew nothing of the future
He had no idea that God intended to make him wait a quarter of century before his promised son was given
He simply heard a promise and he believed it
And so God credited Him with righteousness
Even as God made that credit the Lord knew all that would come later for Abraham
He knew the sin Abraham would accumulate in those coming years
Yet He was already prepared to cover that sin under this grant of justification
Abraham was credited as righteous and his credit was a forever decree
Paul says we needed to see this order of events too
We needed to see that faith produces righteousness regardless of the walk our life may take after that point
Like Abraham, our faith saves us from the penalty of sin and it also saves us despite our sin
So that even as we stumble like Abraham, we remain credited with righteousness as he was
These things we share with Abraham even as we believe in a different promise than Abraham did
The content of our promise has fully matured
At the end of v.24 Paul says we are those who have believed in the promise of Jesus raised from the dead, which is something more than Abraham received
Nevertheless, we have what he had
But eventually, Abraham’s understanding of God’s plan was fully informed, and at that point his behavior aligned with his faith
I think that’s one of the reasons we have the story of Abraham sacrificing Isaac in Genesis 22
Had that story never happened, we might still be debating Abraham’s faith
Because after his declaration of righteousness in Genesis 15, his record of obedience wasn’t very good
So we might assume his faith wasn’t genuine or we might doubt the Lord’s willingness to remain faithful to His promise
But then we reach the point that Abraham sends Ishmael away and is then ready to sacrifice his other son Isaac, the promised son
That moment confirms for us that Abraham was truly trusting in God and not flesh
He was willing to put flesh to an end in the form of his son, yet remain confident in God to bring back the dead
The writer of Hebrews explains Abraham’s thinking in that moment
How encouraging for those of us who depend on God’s grace yet repeat the same mistakes Abraham made!
We can know that our salvation is secure despite our sin
And all the more because of our sin
As Paul says in v.25 Christ was put to death because we have so much sin
Someone needed to cover it, because we simply can’t escape it on our own
But then Jesus was raised for our justification, that is He was raised from the dead to gives us confidence that our account in Heaven is truly clear
When Jesus returned to life, God brought life from that which was dead
And He gave us our proof that He can keep His promise to us
He has proven death is not a barrier to fear when God is on your side
So as we walk by faith, we have our confidence that our faith has cleared our account, and we maintain our faith in that future outcome
But like Abraham, we don’t know how long the Lord will tarry
We don’t know the length of our life or the trials we will face
Somedays our path in life may depart from the faith in our heart
We may try to work the plan ourselves
We may try to find our blessing in the wrong way
We may cling to the physical life rather than seeking for spiritual life
But none of those things can change that heavenly credit of righteousness
They only prove we needed God’s grace all the more
Meanwhile we grow, and as we do, our faith and our behavior are to grow closer together
As the Lord reveals more of Himself and His plan to us in His word and by His Spirit, His expectation is that we begin to live in the light of that knowledge
Our goal should be to begin our walk of faith like Abraham did
And that we should end our life as he did, acting according to that faith
As James said:
Our faith is saving us from the first moment, but is it useful to God?
Does it bring Him glory?
Does it testify?
Abraham’s faith was justified or proven when he offered up Isaac on the altar
And his faith was finally working to perfect or complete his faith
And finally, the scripture that declared Abraham as righteous could be seen to be fulfilled
That’s our goal, that our life would become a testimony to all that we claim to hold true in our hearts