Taught by
Stephen ArmstrongAccess all of our teaching materials through our smartphone apps conveniently and quickly.
Taught by
Stephen ArmstrongLet’s start working our way out of Daniel’s chiasm
We’ve reached Point B’ in the chiasm of Chapters 2-7
The message of this chapter parallels the story in Chapter 3
Chapter 3 saw Daniel’s friends suffering persecution at the hands of the king of Babylon because of their faithfulness
Now that we’re on the flip side of the chiasm, we find a similar story of persecution and rescue
The message in both chapters is largely the same
Those in Israel who remain faithful to the Lord will continue to receive His protection, even in captivity
The God of Israel was still at work preserving a remnant among the exiles
In Chapter 6, however, the antagonists and the protagonist change
Instead of the king of Babylon, we have the king of the Medes, now that the Medes and Persians have supplanted Babylon
And instead of Daniel’s friends, it’s Daniel himself who suffers
But, the outcome will be the same
Israel was in captivity by God’s decree, but the nation was not forgotten or forsaken
He continues to protect them against the very enemies He’s permitted to conquer His people
We pick up tonight at the very end of Chapter 5, where we learn that there is a new sheriff in town
The final verse of Chapter 5 bridges us into Chapter 6, and in fact, this verse is the first verse of Chapter 6 in the Hebrew Bible
Darius the Mede is now ruling all that Babylon previous owned
This reminds us of the statue prophecy in Daniel 2
The Lord told Nebuchadnezzar that his nation’s time ruling was appointed by God to last only a time
Then a second kingdom, the breast and arms of silver, would take over for Babylon
Now just 66 years later, we’ve moved into the second stage of the statue timeline
Babylon is no more, Belshazzar is dead and Darius is ruling
And the new ruler inherits the service of Babylon’s previous court, including Daniel
The exact identity of Darius the Mede has long been a source of controversy in Daniel’s book
History records that the first ruler of the new Medo-Persian Empire was not a Mede, but a Persian
Specifically, Cyrus the Persian was the king that defeated the Babylonians
Even Scripture confirms that Cyrus was ruling at the time
Isaiah says, hundreds of years before it even happened, that Cyrus would come conquering to release Israel from captivity
Ezra and 2 Chronicles confirms Cyrus as king of Persia
In roughly a year’s time, Cyrus will issue an order that the Jewish people be released to rebuild their temple in Jerusalem
And even Daniel confirms he served Cyrus in the final verse of Chapter 6
On the other hand, Daniel says he served BOTH King Darius the Mede and Cyrus the Persian
This comment at the end of the chapter tells us that Darius and Cyrus were different men
Yet Darius must have ruled in about the same time as Cyrus
Daniel was in his 80’s when Babylon fell and he served both kings, he says
So they couldn’t have ruled very far apart
In other books of Scripture, we hear of other kings of the Medo-Persian empire named Darius I and Darius II
These men ruled long after Cyrus
So they can’t be the same Darius as mentioned here in Daniel 6
Therefore, some propose that Darius the Mede may have been a co-regent ruling with Cyrus the Persian
Perhaps they divided up the kingdom, with Darius ruling Babylon and Cyrus ruling in Persia
Then when Darius died, Cyrus took over the entire kingdom
Or perhaps Darius was the title of a lesser ruler over Babylon appointed by Cyrus, much as Belshazzar ruled under Nebonidus
Whatever the answer, Daniel’s book is the only historical record we have of Darius’ ruling
And it’s under the rule of Darius in Babylon that Daniel gains attention
This chapter chronicles how the new king is manipulated into persecuting Daniel, and yet, Daniel is protected and his enemies vanquished by the Lord
The chapter is another chiasm in itself
It begins with Daniel’s success in serving the king
It will end the same way
In the middle, we’ll find Daniel’s enemies conspiring and later dying
And at the point of the chiasm, we find Darius hoping for Daniel’s deliverance, and then witnessing that deliverance
The story opens with Daniel’s new appointment as the commissioner of a third of the kingdom
Whatever role Daniel played in the years of Babylon’s decline, he’s back on top now
Darius divides his kingdom into 120 lesser provinces to administer the kingdom’s business
Their role is probably focused on tax collection more than anything else
But the king has limited trust in these 120, so he then divides the 120 into three groups of 40
And over each of the 40, he appoints a commissioner to ensure he does not suffer loss
That would tell us that the king has great trust in the integrity of these three men
And Daniel is one of the three commissioners
Soon enough, Daniel begins again to distinguish himself before the king
The details of his good work are not provided, but we can imagine them on our own
Daniel is probably scrupulous in rooting out fraud and corruption
He is probably wise in his judgments and incorruptible in his rule
Where others might take bribes to look the other way, Daniel serves the king faithfully
And when we hear that he has distinguished himself among the other commissioners, we know there is a comparison taking place
The king is looking at Daniel’s behavior in comparison to the other commissioners
And the result is the king finds Daniel to be exceptional
But by the same token, it means his peers are diminished in the eyes of the king
Like the straight-A student who blows the curve on the test for the rest of the class
So in jealousy over Daniel’s success, and in anger over being convicted by comparison to Daniel, his peers begin to conspire against him
Both the commissioners and the satraps began searching for an accusation against Daniel
Presumably, they asked his associates or others in the court for anything they could charge against Daniel
But much like the Pharisees seeking to discredit Jesus, they could find no accusation that would stick
Daniel was blameless
He couldn’t be charged with corruption, because he was faithful
This finding must have amazed Daniel’s enemies
Taking bribes was the norm in that line of work
Daniel’s integrity must have been a complete shock
Furthermore, Daniel was never negligent in his duties
Here again, this is unprecedented
Men of great power are often found to take advantage of their position
Showing up late, going home early, taking long vacations, etc.
Daniel never did these things…he was diligent in his duties
Daniel’s extraordinary testimony was the result of the extraordinary Spirit within him, as the king found in v.3
That Spirit, that is, the Spirit of the Lord working in Daniel, sanctified him, leading him into righteousness
That’s the power of God working in the life of a faithful servant
We don’t just possess a testimony in our words
We possess a testimony in our actions
And the testimony of our obedience and faithfulness is far more powerful than anything we might say
And when we conduct ourselves in a blameless fashion, we are making a public statement about the Lord
We are testifying that His love and approval of us matters more to us than gaining the approval of men
That His laws written on our hearts are more important than the ways of men
That testimony of faithfulness is more valuable than silver and gold
As Peter reminds us
It’s God’s will that we would silence ignorant, foolish men by serving Him faithfully in submission to human authority
Just as Daniel silenced his critics because they could find nothing wrong in his service to the king
But Scripture doesn’t teach that our faithfulness will necessarily yield converts among those foolish men, nor even prevent them persecuting us
On the contrary, our faithfulness may very well provoke persecution
Those who witness our faithfulness to Christ may choose to attack us for that very reason
Like the commissioners and satraps, our enemies may grow angry at us because of their conviction in witnessing our blameless ways
Christ knew that persecution, so we may as well
Nevertheless, we persevere in our obedience, integrity and diligence because we know the Lord may reward us one day
As Paul says
So because these men couldn’t find something against Daniel, they turn to the only solution left to them
In v.5, they say they must find a way to turn the Law of Daniel’s God against him
These men are using the oldest trick in the book, literally
They are looking for a way to manipulate the Word of God against Daniel
Understand, they aren’t depending on finding Daniel violating God’s Law
On the contrary, they are depending on Daniel’s obedience
They are looking to turn his obedience to the Law against him in the eyes of the king
I call this the oldest trick in the book, because in a sense, this was Satan’s trick against Woman in the Garden
He knew she was inclined to obey the Word of God, so he manipulated God’s Word to deceive her
Woman was innocent and without the support of her husband in the face of a superior adversary
So the enemy used the Word of God against her in that sense
So these men devise a plan to bring Daniel’s obedience to the Word of God into conflict with the expectations of a pagan king
The advisors come to the king with an appeal to his pride
Specifically, they know the king will react predictably to any suggestion that there are those in his government who do not toe the line
They suggest a test to ensure that everyone is loyal to him
Everyone must worship only the king and should one disobey this law, they will be cast into a den of lions
The test will last for 30 days, long enough to ensure time to catch someone who is disobedient to the king
Obviously, the test is specially-designed to target Daniel’s piety toward Yahweh
These men knew of Daniel’s religious practice, of course
They are confident Daniel will be obedient, they are depending upon it
In proposing this rule to the king, they add that everyone in his government has agreed it should be done
There is no evidence that this was, in fact, the case
For one thing, Daniel himself is in the government and he didn’t propose this, of course
They are lying to manipulate the king
The game they are playing is obvious
They have the king issue this edict, knowing that Daniel will not cease worshipping his God
Then they lay in wait to catch Daniel and expose him to the king
Essentially, they are making a law tailored to arrive at Daniel’s disobedience
This is an example of the kind of law that a godly man or woman must disobey
While we endeavor to obey rulers, there are limits to our obedience
When the law of man compels us to disobey the Law of God, we refuse men and live to serve God
The commissioners knew Daniel’s heart would act in this way, so they intended to take advantage of it
As we consider the impact of their actions on Daniel, don’t forget this law would have impacted all the Jews in captivity
While we don’t hear what they did, we can imagine that many chose apostasy during these 30 days
In fact, we don’t hear of anyone else entering the lions’ den beyond Daniel
These men may have only sought to prosecute Daniel, while ignoring anyone else’s violation of the law
If this is so, then it would mean that any other Jew who chose to remain faithful to God was spared in the end
They didn’t go to the lions’ den because they were never the true target
And even if some were caught and killed, their faithfulness was a testimony to the rest of Israel
This is how the Lord uses trial to purify the true heart and expose the false
And as the story will reveal, the Lord continues to bless those who are faithful in Israel
This is the fundamental lesson of the chapter...that faithfulness, even in times of trial, has its own rewards
The commissioners tell the king to sign the law so that it cannot be changed, according to the law of the Medes and Persians
They are referring to an unique aspect of Medo-Persian law
In their law, the king was all powerful in the kingdom
There was no senate or parliament to counter his judgments
In that sense, their kingdom was equal to the Babylonians
But there was one key difference
The Medes and Persians required sitting kings to honor all previous royal edicts, even their own
So once a law was passed by a king, it couldn’t be changed or ignored, even by future kings
This was a constraint on the king’s power, since it gave a king reason to give careful thought before making edicts
This one difference between the Medo-Persian empire and the Babylonians accounts for the difference in the metals in the statue
Remember, we noted that the gold of Babylon gave way to the silver of the Medes and Persians
Silver is of lower value than gold, which suggested a less glorious or majestic kingdom
The lower value of the metal is symbolic of this limit on the king’s power in the Medo-Persian empire
Babylonian kings had no such restriction, and therefore, they were more majestic in power
The commissioners’ trick worked and the king signed the document, sealing Daniel’s fate
We can’t tell if the king expected to entrap Daniel with his order
He may have given his law little forethought, which is ironic, given the Medo-Persian rule
He took the bad counsel and acted too quickly
As a result, he needlessly endangers the life of his most trusted advisor
First, we hear that Daniel has learned of the decree
He must have suspected why it has been issued and that it was directed against him
He has suffered attacks and jealousies in his role ever since he interpreted Nebuchadnezzar’s dream
So this is nothing new
On the other hand, this threat represents real jeopardy for Daniel
The king has issued an injunction Daniel can’t obey
And he has specified a penalty he can’t survive, or so one would assume
So we might think Daniel would step carefully at this point
Nevertheless, in v.10, we’re told Daniel keeps to his normal routine
Three times a day, Daniel goes to a room on the roof, where it was cooler and semi-private, and he prays and gives thanks to the Lord, facing Jerusalem
His posture of facing the city was a practice Solomon taught the people of Israel as a way of looking expectantly for the Messiah
Obviously, Daniel’s routine was already somewhat private
But because Daniel has followed this routine for so long, it was also probably well known
For that reason, we would expect Daniel to change his practice, now that it could get him killed
Daniel could go about his worship and prayer, but do it at other times, or in other places or less frequently
But Daniel shows great confidence in his convictions by sticking to his normal pattern
Even as we consider his courage, are you not simply impressed by his routine?
He prays and praises the Lord every day, three times a day, without fail
It’s one thing for Daniel to hold the line in the face of persecution
That’s admirable, of course, and some of us would struggle to follow his example
We might see persecution as good reason to shrink back and save ourselves by becoming more secretive in our practices
On the other hand, following this practice routinely is a challenge all itself
Many people gain greater resolve in the face of trials
It’s not uncommon for people to grow stronger when under threat
Like a mother putting herself in harm’s way to save her children
Or a husband protecting his wife from an intruder, etc.
We grow braver and show more resolve when someone threatens us
For this reason, I’m even more impressed that Daniel followed his three-times-a-day routine before God, even when he wasn’t being persecuted
I think the hardest test of faithfulness to pass is keeping to our disciplines of the faith when times are easy and nothing forces our hand
It’s easy to find time to pray when you’re desperate for rescue
But it’s hard to pray when we don’t feel you have much need for God’s grace
It’s easy to give thanks in times of ease
But it’s hard to rise three times a day to thank the Lord when doing so puts you at risk of dying for proclaiming it
Daniel prayed three times a day in times of ease
And he gave thanks to the Lord three times a day in times of great trial and testing
He’s a great example of a mature, faithful follower of God
He didn’t let his relationship with the Lord turn on his life circumstances
And he didn’t let life’s circumstances dictate his pattern of prayer and praise
How closely do we live this pattern in our lives?
It’s been said that those who have no regular habit of prayer or study or praise rarely do much praying, studying or praising
In other words, these practices develop out of habit
And the formation of habits must be by intent, by choice
They will not form of their own
And if you do not make them habit in times of ease, then you will not turn to them with much conviction in times of distress
Then in v.11, we see the conspiracy come to conclusion
His adversaries came “by agreement” to Daniel’s house at one of his appointed prayer times
“By agreement” means in a conspiracy, because they want multiple witnesses to make their accusations stick
They planned the time of their visit to coincide with Daniel’s usual time of prayer
And they knew what they would find
After they observe Daniel in violation of the order, they quickly return to the king and make their accusations
First, they remind the king of his edict
And they remind him that an order by the king is binding, even upon the king himself
To which the king agrees again
Then, they lower the boom and reveal what Daniel has been witnessed doing
Obviously, these men realize that Darius has a sweet spot in his heart for Daniel
And in fact, notice in v.14, that the king is distressed over Daniel’s situation
And then he begins to look for some way to rescue Daniel
This is different than the corresponding story in our chiasm in Chapter 3
In that chapter, Nebuchadnezzar had become enraged at Daniel’s friends
So he quickly ordered that they would be placed in a super hot furnace
His anger burned against them, being driven by his pride
But now, we see the Gentile king working hard to save Daniel
But having been trapped by his own edict and his kingdom’s own rules, the king can do nothing to help Daniel
Not even the king of the most powerful kingdom on earth can save Daniel now
The point in this difference is to emphasize that God doesn’t just rescue the remnant of Israel from kings He sets against them
God remains Israel’s deliverer, even when kings are favorable to Israel
The Lord has constructed this situation so that Daniel’s rescue must depend on the Lord, and the Lord alone
Darius may be king, but even he can’t solve this problem
So all that remained was for the sentence to be carried out
Now we have the infamous moment which has inspired countless young coloring book artists
As Daniel is pushed into the den, the king pronounces a prophetic blessing
He says the Lord Daniel served continuously will deliver him
In other words, the king is saying you served me well, Daniel, but I couldn’t save you
So the God you serve without fail will have to save you instead
And as I said, that’s exactly what the Lord wanted
He is Israel’s Deliverer
Even though Gentile nations rule over Israel, those nations do not hold the secret to Israel’s safety and security
The Lord alone is Israel’s strength
The king’s words sound a lot like the way many Christians think under trying circumstances
We pray, “God, I couldn’t solve this problem myself.”
“And my family and friends couldn’t solve it.”
“My lawyer, banker or doctor couldn’t solve it…”
“So I guess you are going to have to solve it.”
Why do we try everything else before seeking the Lord?
In Daniel’s case, the Lord wanted everyone else out of the way so He could show Himself to Daniel
But Daniel was already praying three times a day
And I suspect he prayed for deliverance even before he was taken before the king
But if we’re not in the habit of praying and praising regularly, perhaps the Lord will use trial to teach us the importance of depending upon Him
Nevertheless, there is no guarantee the Lord is going to rescue us every time we come to Him for relief
He may solve our problem, or He may let it overcome us
Regardless of how it turns out in the end, the question is: did we respond in faith and obedience?
Because the spiritual benefits of depending on the Lord are far greater than the physical toll taken by our trials
At that moment, the king puts Daniel in the den, which was a large pit or cistern used to hold the king’s lions
A cistern was a large underground cavern used to store rain water
Larger cisterns or pits can be the size of a large hall or theater, so this pit may have been a very large cave
As Daniel is dropped into the pit, the entrance is covered over with a stone
So no one is going in and no one is going out
That sealing reminds us of Jesus’ tomb
In fact, Daniel can serve as a picture of Christ here
Like Daniel, Jesus was given over to death for obedience to the Word of God
Jesus was subjected to the penalty by a ruler, Pilate, who was sympathetic, but felt he had no choice
Only Jesus’ God could rescue Him
And after a time in the ground, He was vindicated by His God and Father
Certainly, no one expected to see anything of Daniel again
No one being left overnight in such a place would be expected to survive
In fact, there would be no trace of the person come morning
Every bit of the person would be consumed
During that night, the king is fasting and wants no entertainment before him, because he’s obviously not in the mood for merriment
The king is troubled by what has happened and he can’t sleep at all
It’s interesting to wonder about what the king is doing
He is obviously worried for Daniel and yet, he seems to hold out some kind of hope
His fasting would seem to suggest a petition before a god or gods
But it may just be nerves
When morning comes, he goes to the den with some anticipation
He seems to believe that Daniel’s God has the potential to do something miraculous for Daniel
Such a thought would be expected for a pagan, since they looked to many gods for many things
But perhaps Daniel’s history and the history of Yahweh in Babylon are also giving the king some reason for hope
The next morning, the king rushes to see if Daniel survived
The sentence of death in the lions’ den must not have had a specific length of time, since the king is already ready to release Daniel
Again, the king’s return to open the pit at dawn foreshadows the women running to Jesus’ tomb on the first day of the week
And like Jesus’ tomb, the king finds only the living in the pit
He calls out to Daniel through the mouth of the opening
His question is specific:
Has your God delivered you?
The king is already prepared to credit Israel’s God, should Daniel have survived
Again, this is the message of the chapter
And the Lord is reminding the reader of the point each time the king makes this pronouncement
Daniel is in God’s hands
And even lions submit to God’s will
Daniel responds to the king with a greeting of honor and respect
Remember, Daniel is in his 80’s by this time, probably a bit feeble and obviously no match for a lion
And so as he emerges unscathed, it’s clearly a miracle
Daniel says the Lord sent His Angel to guard the lions’ mouths
The mention of God’s Angel suggests the Angel of the Lord appeared to save Daniel
Remember, the Angel of the Lord saved Daniel’s friends in Chapter 3
So it seems sensible to conclude this is the same Person, that is Jesus Christ, pre-incarnate
Daniel says the Lord shut the mouths of the lions
His words make clear that the lions were still inclined to eat Daniel
This wasn’t a case of lazy or disinterested lions
They were supernaturally held back from pursuing their natural course
When Jesus went to the grave, it was the enemy himself who pursued Jesus, but the enemy wasn’t able to defeat Jesus in the end
The Bible calls the enemy a prowling lion looking to devour
And the Lord shut the enemy’s mouth in His day, just as He did in Daniel’s day
Daniel adds that his vindication was proof from God that Daniel was innocent in the matter
Daniel is speaking about the larger claims the king’s advisors made against him
Daniel certainly violated the king’s law
He prayed to a God other than the king
But the advisors sold the king on passing this law on the basis that it would expose those who were disloyal to the king
And in that, Daniel was innocent
He was not disloyal to the king
In fact, he was the king’s most loyal subject
The king’s edict was poorly conceived and executed rashly, leading to Daniel’s entrapment
So the Lord vindicated Daniel by saving him in the den
Interestingly, the edict said that this law remained in effect for 30 days
Yet, we must assume that Daniel went back to praying three times a day without further incident
We know the law could not be changed
So how did Daniel avoid another round of persecution under that law?
The answer is, his enemies were no longer around to accuse him
Because ironically, the king’s edict did, in fact, expose those who were disloyal to him
Those who had conspired against Daniel were now judged guilty of the very crime they accused Daniel of
They weren’t guilty of praying to another god
But they were guilty of disloyalty by conspiring against one of the king’s loyal advisors
Therefore, the king cast all of them and their families into the den
And this time, the lions’ mouths were allowed to remain open
In fact, we might wonder if the lions were all the more hungry, having just stared at Daniel all night without being able to pounce
While we might question the decision to destroy whole families, this was common practice in these days
The errors of the leader of a home brought consequences to everyone in the home
This is still somewhat true today, though not in the same way, obviously
If a father is poor with money, the family suffers
If a wife has an affair, the family suffers
If children rebel, the family suffers
These aren’t necessarily judgments from God, so much as the natural consequences of sin
The chapter finishes with another decree, one that sounds much like the one issued in Chapter 4 by Nebuchadnezzar, following his humiliation
Darius wrote an edict for all people of earth to hear, which again made sense, given he was (co)ruler of the most powerful nation on earth
As we read his recounting of the story and his praise for Daniel’s God, we see two things reinforced
First, the key lesson of the chapter emerges again
God will rule over the Gentile nations that rule over Israel
So that as Israel exists under Gentile authority during the Age of Gentiles, this is according to God’s purposes and plans
Secondly, Gentile kingdoms will rise and fall as God appoints, but His dominion goes on forever
He is still on the throne, and Israel’s plight is not cause to doubt God’s power and authority
Here, we see another chapter where God uses Gentile kings to remind Israel of that truth
Finally, Darius’ praise for Yahweh leads us to ask the same question we asked about Nebuchadnezzar: did he become a convert? Was he saved by faith in the Lord?
He uses striking language
He calls Yahweh the Living God and the God that endures forever
But he also calls Him the God of Daniel
Once again, the answer is, we don’t know for sure
It makes more sense to conclude that the Lord doesn’t persuade the king to faith
It would remind Israel that God can use even their enemies to save them
The chapter ends, reminding us that Daniel forevermore enjoyed success under these kings in Persia
The events of Daniel 7 and 8 occur prior to these events in Chapter 6
But the events of Chapter 9 happen in the same year as the lions’ den experience
And then Daniel’s final revelations are given in Chapters 10-12
Those revelations come in the third year of Cyrus’ reign, just a couple of years after this
Daniel died soon thereafter, while still in Babylon
He never returned to Jerusalem
He was faithful during his time in exile