Taught by
Stephen ArmstrongAccess all of our teaching materials through our smartphone apps conveniently and quickly.
Taught by
Stephen ArmstrongIn a moment of pride and selfishness, the twelve apostles inadvertently became stumbling blocks for another disciple of Jesus
John told Jesus about an encounter they had with another of Jesus’ disciples who had been trying to cast out demons in Jesus’ name
Because that man wasn’t a part of the inner group of twelve, the apostles assumed he was acting out of turn and tried to stop him
But Jesus quickly rebuked his apostles, saying that whoever this guy was, he was engaged in a common mission
That is whoever is for you – those who seek to glorify Jesus and serve the Kingdom – that person is on your side
And then Jesus pivoted into a teaching on stumbling blocks
Jesus charged His disciples with inhibiting the other man’s obedience
He said they were a stumbling block and declared woe to any follower who became a stumbling block to other believers
Speaking in hyperbole, Jesus said it would be preferable to drown or sever body parts than to engage in that behavior
I’m sure the apostles were shocked and embarrassed to discover that their treatment of that disciple had been so misguided
They thought they were protecting Jesus’ honor and preserving good order among His followers
But in reality, they were just protecting their own selfish interests
Jesus ended with a parable about 99 sheep, which explained how the Father sees a wandering sheep like the one the apostles confronted
He said the Father rejoiced over a wayward disciple when he is turned back to the flock
Wandering sheep are a fact of life for a shepherd, so he’s accustomed to chasing them down
But when he encounters one, he doesn’t beat the sheep until it repents for wandering away
Nor does the shepherd excommunicate the sheep from the flock as penalty for having dared leave in the first place
No, a good shepherd goes in search of the stray, and when he finds it, he gently leads it back to the flock
That was the mission of the Messiah…to seek and save the lost, not to criticize and rebuke them
So that’s how Jesus wanted His disciples operating in His name
But that’s not what the apostles did…
When they encountered someone they believed to be a wandering sheep, they didn’t try to restore him, they tried to shut him down
And when that didn’t work, they went to Jesus hoping Jesus would take action against him
And to justify their actions, pointed to the fact that this disciple was not part of Jesus’ inner circle, which just exposed their pride
So not only were the disciples wrong in their assessment of the man, but they were also wrong in their response to him
First, they incorrectly judged the man by thinking he was working against Jesus when in reality he was on their side
Secondly, even if they believed the man was sinning, they should have taken steps to restore him not penalize him
It was their second mistake that prompts Jesus to move into a new section of teaching on how believers respond to a wandering sheep
We’ve reached a well-known passage in Matthew’s Gospel known as Jesus’ instructions on church discipline
What Jesus gives us here is a patient, loving and gentle approach to leading a wayward sheep back into fellowship
But the passage is so often quoted out of context, that I feel we’ve lost some appreciation for the larger context of Jesus’ teaching in Matthew 18
And as a result, it can be applied in ways that run contrary to the purpose Jesus had in mind
Before we look at the details, the first thing to note is these instructions are not some “Break Glass in Emergency” response to extreme situations
Jesus says we follow this process when a brother sins
How often do we encounter believers sinning around us?
Obviously, this is the everyday, normal way we help one another stay close to Jesus and we should be following it regularly
We all suffer temptations to stray, and in fact, we all will stray from time to time
And when someone departs away from the straight and narrow, Jesus tells us here how to respond in love
And to do so without sinning ourselves
And that process begins in the most obvious of ways…when a brother (or sister) sins and we become aware of it
Maybe we see the person do something out of character or perhaps we discover they are engaged in persistent sin
Maybe the problem is they have come under false teaching or a corrupting influence
Perhaps we realize they are harboring bitterness and an unforgiving heart toward someone else
Maybe we see they have become haughty or arrogant or maybe they are simply lax in their walk with Jesus
When we see this in a brother or sister, the Bible says we have an obligation to deal with it ourselves
We go to him or her in private to confront them about the issue
This rule means we don’t go to other people before we go to the individual…period.
Talking about someone’s misdeeds with others before talking to the person directly is a form of gossip
So don’t share your concern with a pastor or on the prayer chain or in social media or with your small group before talking to the person directly
So the first rule to avoiding becoming a gossip is to get comfortable with confronting people about their sin
We go talk to the person in private as soon as possible with gentleness and patience and a loving spirit
Speak to them honestly about your concerns, and hear them out as they respond in defense or explanation
You may cry with them, laugh with them, hug them, pray for them…be Jesus to them by seeking to bring a sheep home
Private in-person discourse is the only way to engage in that kind of one-on-one ministry with a wandering brother
And it’s also the most likely way to succeed in winning them back from their sin
Because it’s much harder for someone to confess and repent in a public forum than in a private moment
And when you meet that person, remember that the point of the conversation is to win them back to Christ, not to you!
The goal is to win them to obedience to Christ, not to win an argument with them
You aren’t trying to force them into a corner
It’s not your place to make demands for restitution, or to give them the roadmap for changing their lives
Neither do we try to force them to comply or make threats of any kind against them
This is not an intervention – it’s an invitation to repent
The goal is to encourage them back to the flock, not to exercise authority or control over them
By the way, when Jesus says go, He means have a personal conversation where you see their face and hear their voice and they can see and hear yours
In-person conversation is in view here and there are multiple reasons why that is what Jesus asks
First, in-person communication makes clear we are sincerely concerned for the individual
Secondly, it reduces the chance for misunderstandings since body language plays an important part in our communication
Thirdly, it allows us to see their response in the moment so we can tailor our choice of words to best effect
Today, we communicate in ways never imagined in Jesus’ day, primarily in electronic forms of communication
Email has replaced written letters, texting has replaced phone calls, and social media has replaced face-to-face gatherings
These modern methods of communicating have their place, and they are convenient
But they are not compatible with Jesus’ intent in Matthew 18:15
Texting someone they are sinning or sending long manifestos by email generally do more harm than good in these situations
We’re communicating to that person that we want to make our opinions known
But at the same time, we’re also saying we don’t care enough about that person to invest in a face-to-face encounter
You’re letting the style of communication overshadow the content
Furthermore, texting or email often makes the situation worse because we tend to lower our guard when communicating in those ways
The impersonal nature of texting and email can lead us to say things in rude or thoughtless ways…things we never would have said in person
How many of us have sent an email or text we wish we could take back?
Or have you ever reread some text or email you sent in a heated moment and been surprised at what you typed?
While we can say dumb things in personal conversations too, it’s far less frequent and easier to walk back in the moment
A simple rule of thumb for how to handle difficult conversations is never deliver bad news in writing, only deliver it in person
When I’ve forgotten this rule and delivered criticisms or complaints by an email or text, I’ve usually regretted it deeply
So Jesus tells us to meet face-to-face because it’s better for us and better for the person we’re trying to help
So don’t take the easy way out…if you have something to say to someone, go to them personally, Jesus says
If they disagree with your concern, be prepared to share Scripture to back your concerns
Sometimes in the course of your discussions, you may discover your information was inaccurate
Maybe the person wasn’t doing what you suspected or there was some other reasonable explanation, and therefore your concerns were unfounded
If that happens, you’ll be thankful you kept the matter confidential rather that spreading false rumors about someone
On the other hand, if they respond to your concerns in humility and repentance, then Jesus says you have won (or gained) your brother
He means you have brought that lost sheep back into the fold walking with Jesus again
Obviously, this is the best-case outcome, and if it happens, you have met your goal and the case is closed
And in other cases, you won’t reach an agreement on the matter, and if so, don’t press further…depart as friends and remain patient
Allow time for the Spirit to use your words to bring conviction to the person’s heart
Don’t demand instant repentance…most people need time and space to respond properly
This process places love for the person above all else, so by dealing with the matter in person and in private, you have loved that person
I wonder how many believers could have been restored if two people had just had a personal, private conversation
To approach a misbehaving believer in any other way is not only less likely to succeed, it’s also potentially a sin on our part
If you do not reach agreement and if after some time there is no change, then you are required to take additional steps, Jesus says
Jesus says we try again but this time taking one or two more believers with us to confirm the matter
When Jesus says “confirm” the matter, He means to confirm the truth of it in the heart of the person acting in sin
To explain what He means, Jesus quotes from Deuteronomy 19:15
In the Law Israel was commanded to require multiple witnesses to testify to the truth in any matter
The idea is self-explanatory: it’s easy for anyone to throw false accusations around
And if a single accusation were enough to convict a person, then we could all become victims of slander sooner or later
So by having two or more independent witnesses confirming a charge, we significantly reduce the likelihood of false convictions
Now in this case, Jesus is talking about convicting someone in a court
He’s speaking about convicting a person’s conscience by encouraging them to adopt a more honest view of themselves
By bringing other witnesses, we increase our chances that the person will see our concerns as valid and worthy of attention
When one person tells us we are in error and need to change course, we can easily dismiss their concerns as bias or misinformation or lying
We call such a response to the truth “denial”
We deny that their facts are correct or that their assessment of our behavior is fair
So in our denial, we feel free to continue in sin without paying attention to their critique
But when two or three respectable Christians come to us as a unified front bringing a common complaint, our situation changes
Under those circumstances, two or three witnesses confirm the matter to us, meaning they reinforce the truth of it
At that point, denying the facts or claiming bias becomes unreasonable and makes us appear foolish
And hopefully that team effort will cause the person to abandon denial and repent, and if they do, the matter is concluded
Once again, the small group has succeeded in restoring a wandering sheep back into the flock
And the Father in Heaven is rejoicing over their return
But what if the person refuses to budge…what if they are so stubborn they won’t listen to reason even when presented by a group of trustworthy friends?
When we refuse to accept one person’s feedback, it’s denial, but when we reject correction from a team, it’s now become defiance
And defiance to Christ and His word is simply incompatible with fellowship in the body of Christ
So Jesus says if a small group of two or three can’t convince the person to change his or her ways, it’s time to go public
When the Church is faced with the defiance of a brother or sister, we must bring the matter before the whole body
Notice we’ve gone through two steps of private confrontations before allowing the person’s situation to become public
That tells you how much the Lord wants us to protect the honor of our brothers and sisters in the body
The purpose in this step is not to re-adjudicate the facts or to try the person in a court of public opinion
The purpose is to bring awareness of the person’s defiance to everyone in the body so that this person has nowhere to hide
Everywhere they go and everyone they fellowship with in the body will bring them back to the same conversation
They won’t be able to escape their sin nor pretend it doesn’t matter because it will be the only conversation they have
The goal of this step is the same as prior steps: to bring the believer to recognize their sin so they will cease wandering and return to the flock
It’s a form of peer pressure applied in love and in a sincere desire to help a person
Hopefully the person’s defiant spirit will be broken and in its place will come a soft and repentant heart
But in the worst case scenario, some believers will be so determined to remain in their sin that they will cut off their nose to spite their face
They will accept the loss of all fellowship in the body to avoid having to repent, and when this happens, Jesus says let the person go
He says if they will not listen to the counsel of the entire church body, the person is to be set outside fellowship
He says let them be as a Gentile and tax collector, which is euphemism from Jesus’ day
A Jew would not associate in any way with Gentiles or with Jews who worked for the Romans collecting taxes
A Jew wouldn’t eat with them, allow them to enter their homes or even speak with them
Now in the case of Gentiles or tax collectors, such behavior wasn’t necessary or proper
And as we know Jesus often violated those Jewish norms
So Jesus isn’t endorsing Jewish treatment of tax collectors and the like
He was simply illustrating the degree to which we should cut off the defiant brother or sister
We have nothing to do with the person…we bar them from participating in the body at any level
Should the church reach that last resort and put a person out of fellowship, the entire body must respect this decision
We cannot give the person comfort or sympathy in that situation until they soften their position and repent
The whole idea is to use fellowship with the body as the carrot to get them to do the right thing
And in the end, it’s for their own good…because a sheep that continues to wander away from the flock is in danger
They stand to risk far more in eternity for their failure to repent than what we are taking from them in the body now
Unfortunately, our modern lifestyle undermines the effectiveness of this method
In the first century, you would typically find one church in a given city or district under the authority of one set of elders
So if a person defied authority in the church and was set out of fellowship, they had nowhere else to go
That made this technique especially effective
But today, we have at least one church body on every city block and often more than one
And these churches aren’t working under common leadership
So if a lost sheep is placed under pressure to repent, they only need to walk down the street to escape the discipline
That’s largely why we don’t see this process used as often as we should
Because people under discipline usually refuse to submit to leadership
They take their ball and go home at the first challenge rather than submit
Here’s the thing about submission…it’s not submission when we only obey on things we prefer or support…that’s agreement
True submission is obeying in matters where we don’t agree
Running away when you’re confronted over your sin is never a pathway to great spiritual maturity and sanctification
It didn’t work for King Saul, it didn’t work for Jonah, and it won’t work for us
Meanwhile, the value of sticking around and submitting to your church leaders is immeasurable
By the way, the requirement to submit to the church in matters of discipline doesn’t turn on whether the facts are on your side or not
You can be 100% right on the facts and yet you’re still expected to submit to the church body
And in the long run, we will be better off spiritually by submitting in all cases even when we’re right on the facts
Because the purpose of submission isn’t to determine right and wrong
The value in submission is the humility it produces in our heart
Yes, sometimes the Lord exposes our sin to others so they will call us to account for what we did and we will be properly humbled by it
But it’s relatively easy to submit to discipline when you know you’re wrong
But it’s another thing to remain submitted to authority when you believe you’re unjustly accused
And sometimes, the Lord will allow us to suffer the injustice of false accusations or unfair judgments to bring us even greater sanctification
If you can remain humble and submitted when falsely accused, then you are truly walking in our Lord’s footsteps
Because that’s exactly what He did for you
So that’s the value of not running away from discipline…the Lord may use it to correct us and humble us, regardless of the facts
So if someone brings sin to your attention, receive it with an open heart
Don’t run away, allow the Lord time to use this process to grow you spiritually
Remember, discipline for the moment seems not to be joyful, but sorrowful
Yet to those who have been trained by it, afterwards it yields the peaceful fruit of righteousness
Finally, Jesus is so serious about restoring lost sheep, He tells the disciples that as they apply this process, they will be representing Jesus’ judgments on earth
In v.18 Jesus says truly whatever you bind or loose on earth has been bound or loosed in Heaven
To bind or loose refers to the decision of a court, as in to bind is to convict and to loose is to acquit
We last saw these terms used when Jesus gave Peter the keys to the kingdom
As we noted then, Jesus is saying that the apostles would have unique power to execute justice within the church
So every Christian is to follow Jesus’ rules for restoring wandering sheep
In the Church today we leave final judgment to the Lord
If someone doesn’t submit to Church leaders on a matter, we know that in the end the Lord will judge between us
If we were wrong and treated the person inappropriately, the Lord will shield them and make our error clear in time
If they were wrong, then the Lord will address their failure to submit at the Judgment Seat
But under apostolic rule, the Church experienced instant judgment according to the judgment of the apostles
The apostles possessed unique power to exercise authority and Jesus demanded the Church obey the apostles’ judgments without exception
If and when there was defiance to an apostle’s judgment in any matter, Jesus is saying He would back the apostles 100%
Justice would be swift and sure to set an example for all generations in the Church
We remember what happened to Ananias and Sapphira when they defied Peter
And you may remember what Paul did to the man in Corinth who disobeyed his authority?
This is what Jesus is talking about…He was so serious about obedience in the body that He invested the early leaders with these powers
But He wanted this power exercised with a love for the flock
Instead of harboring pride in their status and prejudice toward other disciples, Jesus wanted them to think like shepherds
Shepherds aren’t men of status and honor…they are lowly and uncelebrated caretakers of flocks
A shepherd's goal is to keep a flock together, so when one strays, they make every effort to bring it back
Literal shepherds chase over hills and valleys retrieving wandering animals
Spiritual shepherds confront disobedient brothers and sisters calling them to repent and return to obedience to Jesus
In all cases, our goal is restoration, not condemnation, maintaining the unity of the flock, not seeking to disqualify individuals within it
And though the process Jesus outlines here is important, it only works when applied with loving intent and a pastoral approach
And if we pursue it vindictively or in the hope of running someone off, we’re the one leading others to stumble
And remember what Jesus said about those who would stumble one of His children