Taught by
Stephen ArmstrongAccess all of our teaching materials through our smartphone apps conveniently and quickly.
Taught by
Stephen ArmstrongWhich is easier? To look righteous or to be righteous?
We can look righteous externally by what we say and do, but the person we are inside is our true self
And the conflict over external behavior vs. inward righteousness was at the heart of the conflict between Jesus and the Pharisees
And that issue was most evident during the encounters between Jesus and the religious authorities on the Tuesday before He died
Jesus is in the temple teaching and preparing to give His life as the Passover Lamb, and the religious leaders are trying to discredit Him
We’re studying this conflict which lasts through Chapter 23
And we return to a tense moment between Jesus and the Pharisees and Sadducees in the morning of that day
Jesus has just told a parable where He compared these men to a son who said he would obey the father but in reality had no desire to obey
And now Jesus tells a second parable to explain why the religious leaders were so set against Jesus as their Messiah
It was external righteousness vs. internal righteousness
Jesus’ asks His accusers to consider another parable of a vineyard owner
A moment earlier, Jesus had presented these same men with the parable of the two sons
In that parable, Jesus compared the religious leaders to a son who had only external righteousness
The son said he wanted to do his father’s will but in reality, he was all hat and no cattle
He gave His father lip service when in reality he never intended to do what the Father wanted
The hero of the story was the other son, who disobeyed initially and openly but in the end he repented and obeyed
That son represented the prostitutes and tax collectors who flocked to Jesus
They were different than Jesus because they never pretended they were righteous…they knew they were sinners
So because they repented, they were forgiven
Now Jesus moves the conversation along with a second parable and it’s one of the most important in the Gospels
This one parable explains Jesus’ contentious relationship with the religious leaders of Israel
It’s built on several Old Testament pictures and almost every detail in the parable has allegorical significance
Let’s start by reviewing the context of the events, and they are somewhat unique to ancient Israel
The parable is about a man who owned a vineyard, and in ancient times, much like today, land value was determined by what it produced
People put their land to work so that they could receive the value of it
But if a landowner possessed a large tract of land and couldn’t farm it all himself, he would hire others to work the land
Then the land would still produce income for the landowner, and he shared that income with those who worked the land
So as the story goes, this landowner invests his time and money into preparing his land to produce grapes
He digs irrigation channels around it, plants the best vines, removes stones, installs the needed equipment and builds a watch tower
The landowner did everything he could to create the optimal circumstances for his land to produce fruit
And then the owner leaves on a journey and places the land in the care of custodians hired to work the land
These custodians have invested nothing and they own nothing…they simply received a stewardship to manage
Their responsibility is to produce fruit and ensure a great crop, which has value to the vineyard owner
If these workers do their job properly, then not only would the owner profit but so would they
The owner will share proceeds of the harvest with those who worked the land, so they have incentive to do well
But soon these custodians become self-deceived by their positions of responsibility and they come to see the land as their own
They decide they would rather have the entire harvest for themselves rather than settling only for their share
They come to believe they owned everything and owed no one anything
So when the time came for the harvest, the landowner sends first one slave and then another to collect his rightful produce
But time after time the custodians of the field beat and abuse and even kill these slaves
And in response to this outrageous behavior, the landowner shows extreme patience and mercy
The landowner sends slave after slave hoping to change the hearts of those working his land, but the rebellion continued
So the landowner gives his custodians one last opportunity to do the right thing by sending his son to represent him
Surely the custodians will respect the landowner’s son, since the son is the heir of the land and represents the father’s interests
The owner hopes his son’s appearance will communicate to these men the seriousness of the situation
But when these men see the son coming, they react to him in an opposite way
Because he is an heir of the land, they say if they kill the son, then the land will have no heir and will be theirs forever
So they throw the son out of the vineyard and kill him
This is a ridiculous plan and it shows how self-deceived these men are
Obviously, a landowner isn’t going to turn a blind eye to such treatment
And Jesus asks the Pharisees, what should the owner do?
Before we look at the religious leaders’ answer, let’s decode the parable
The landowner in the story represents the Father, Who created Israel and planted her in the land which God gave to His people
The Lord prepared the land for Israel and gave her everything the people needed to flourish in that place
He pushed out the land’s inhabitants before them, and gave Israel victory over her enemies
He brought rain in the appointed day, caused the ground to give forth its produce and blessed the people with abundance
In the Old Testament, the Lord makes this same comparison
In Isaiah, the Lord tells us plainly that Israel is God’s vineyard so the landowner is the Father
And Isaiah goes on to say the Lord “planted” His nation in the land for the purpose of seeing them producing spiritual fruit
That fruit was supposed to be godliness and obedience to the Law so the Lord could provide the world a testimony
Israel was supposed to be a light to the nations, a beacon beckoning the world to know the Living God
But Isaiah says instead Israel only produced worthless grapes
They were ungodly, disobedient and rebellious
Why did Israel fail to produce fruit? From Jesus’ parable, we learn where the Lord places the blame for a lack of fruit: on the custodians of the land
When the time came for the Lord to receive a harvest of fruit from Israel, the Father received nothing back
And why not? Because those left in charge of the vineyard, the custodians, didn’t do their job
And the custodians in this parable are the leaders of Israel, their kings, their priests and most of all their teachers
Throughout Israel’s history, the leaders of Israel forgot their place and their purpose and most of all they forgot the source of righteousness
Along the way, they started to see the land and the people as their own possession, not God’s possession
Earlier in Israel’s history, the Lord called out these evil custodians through the prophet Ezekiel
As Ezekiel describes, the shepherds of Israel became arrogant and greedy and abusive of God’s flock
The leaders drive the people into idolatry and depravity and all manner of sin to suit their own purposes
These custodians used the vineyard for their own purposes rather than for the purposes the Lord had ordained
But the Lord in His mercy and love for His people gave opportunity after opportunity for the leaders of Israel to repent and return to Him
He sent His slaves, the prophets of Israel, and these men told Israel they must give the Lord His harvest of good fruit
Isaiah was one of those slaves, and this is what he told Israel
The Lord told Israel through His slave, Isaiah, that it was time to pay up, to produce fruit
But instead of good fruit the Lord only received worthless fruit
And so the Lord told His people that judgment was coming to them as a result
He would break down the walls and trample the ground and hold back the rain
The Lord was speaking about the coming invasion of Assyria and later Babylon which resulted in the exile of Israel from the land
That was the warning the Lord brought His people through His messengers like Isaiah
But the custodians of the land didn’t listen to the slaves, and instead they took the prophets and treated them harshly, killing most of them
Tradition holds that Isaiah was persecuted to the point that one day he fled from a mob by hiding himself in a hollow tree
But the mob discovered his hiding place, and they killed the prophet by sawing the tree – and the prophet – in half
So now the Landowner has given His custodians one more opportunity to repent and submit to His authority
The Landowner sends His Son, Jesus, to the religious leaders calling on them to produce fruit, but how did they respond?
They knew the Messiah would rule the Kingdom, but if Jesus were that Messiah, He would have put them out of power
Jesus had already declared that their elaborate religious system of external righteousness based in the Mishnah was invalid
So the custodians, the religious leaders, conspire to put an end to Jesus’ claim on the vineyard
They want to deny His rule so they can protect their own interests
So these men ultimately throw Jesus out of the city and kill Him on a cross at the hands of the Romans
After Jesus tells the parable, as with His earlier parable, He lets His accusers name their own punishment
He asks them how would you have the landowner respond?
And without realizing that the parable is about them, they give the logical answer
The religious leaders say the landowner should bring those men to a terrible end and give his land to someone who would care for it obediently
A better English translation of v.41 might be “He will bring those evil men to a severe end”
I wonder if Jesus stood amazed at how they still could not see themselves in the parable
Especially given how closely Jesus’ parable mirrored Isaiah’s
So Jesus asks these men had they overlooked the Scriptures that foretold how Israel would reject their Messiah?
Quoting from Psalm 118, Jesus says the stone that the builders reject would be the chief cornerstone
“Builders” is a reference to the custodians of the land, the religious leaders of Israel
They rejected Jesus as their Messiah, and Jesus tells these leaders they are fulfilling Scripture even as they deny Him
But the Lord will use that rejected stone as the cornerstone of the Kingdom
And as Isaiah promised centuries earlier, the land would be taken away from Israel and her leaders at least for a time
And the land and the people that these men had once ruled over would belong to someone else
A new group would be “hired” to care for God’s people so that they might produce fruit
Beginning with the apostles and continuing to the shepherds of today, the Lord has turned to Gentiles to produce fruit
Until a day comes for the Lord to return to His people, Israel
Only at this point do the religious leaders realize that Jesus has been talking about them again
And they have just pronounced their own judgment…they said the Lord should deal with them harshly
And Jesus assures them that’s exactly what will happen to them
If there was any doubt about the evil in their hearts, it’s only confirmed by their response
Because of what Jesus says about them, they harden their hearts all the more against Him
They double-down on their plans to seize and kill Jesus but they don’t act in the moment because they fear the crowd
So which is easier? Is it easier to look righteous or to be righteous?
The Pharisees of Jesus’ day certainly looked very righteous, and they maintained that appearance through hard work
As we’ve learned from earlier lessons, those men engaged in elaborate rituals of washing many times a day
They prayed publicly multiple times a day and fasted multiple times each week
They were the epitome of righteousness in Israel, and they worked incredibly hard to keep it up
But their righteousness was entirely external, meaning it consisted of behaviors only, and those behaviors masked their true nature
Think of external righteousness like an actor playing a role on stage
An actor works hard to change his mannerisms and voice inflections to adopt a different persona
He carries on in a contrived way for the sake of the audience, and if he’s good, he can convince his audience that he’s someone else
For 2 hours or so, an actor on stage literally becomes someone he isn’t, but his transformation is entirely external
But when the audience is gone and the actor is alone again in his dressing room, he returns to his true self
Who he is underneath never changed…he just changed his external, outward appearance
My point is that if we work hard enough, we can makes ourselves appear to be someone or something we aren’t, and that’s what Pharisees did
They worked incredibly hard adopting mannerisms, habits and styles of living to project a certain image to their audience, the Jewish society
But underneath that facade, their true nature was still there, because it was just an act
In fact, Pharisees were so dedicated to this act, that they took it to the extreme
They learned to stay in character at all times, even in their homes by themselves, to the point that they knew no other way
They maintained this act of righteousness to the point that they convinced themselves of it also
Like an actor who stays in character for too long, these men came to believe they were the person they pretended to be
Pharisees truly believed that observing those elaborate religious rituals they invented were their source of righteousness
Then they went on to teach others that the way to obtain righteousness was to imitate their act
But God wasn’t fooled by their rituals and recited prayers and extreme piety, because God knows the intentions of our heart
The things we do externally don’t change who we are on the inside, not by themselves
God knew who these men truly were on the inside, and it’s our inward reality that God judges
So appearing righteous requires a lot of work but ironically it achieves nothing in the end
And even worse, it deceives us in to thinking we have something we don’t
On the other hand, actually being righteous is quite easy, humanly speaking
It only requires faith in Jesus Christ, and when we place our faith in Jesus, we receive His righteousness assigned to us
As Paul said:
True righteousness happens inside us, as our spirit is made righteous by our faith in Jesus, and that’s about as easy as it gets
That’s what Jesus was offering the nation of Israel and those religious leaders
But in order to receive true righteousness by faith, we must first repent of self-righteousness, of any effort to obtain external righteousness
To repent means dropping our act, to stop seeking external righteousness and to confess it doesn’t work
We stop pretending we are righteous at all, and we accept the reality that we need inward righteousness
That’s why the religious leaders of Israel opposed Jesus so strongly in His day
He demanded they drop their act, to stop seeking external righteousness and to acknowledge their need for forgiveness
Jesus was calling for no less than the dismantling of Pharisaic Judaism and the elimination of the religious leader roles
Moreover, they were blind to their predicament and they were convinced they had no sin requiring forgiveness
At a point in John’s Gospel, Jesus says this to these men:
The temptation to substitute external righteousness for true inward change didn’t die with the Pharisees and Sadducees
Billions of people today are still following this same lie
They seek ways to make themselves righteous or they think themselves good already
And why? Because of what they do…how they live, how they pray, what rules they keep and what rituals they practice
It’s all an act, one that someone taught them would please God and none of it changes who they really are on the inside
But Heknows our hearts, and He’s not fooled by these external efforts no matter how hard we work at them
Those who think external righteousness impresses God are like the Pharisees who declare we are not blind
But Jesus says if you truly want to see, meaning if you truly want to know God and be counted righteous, then you must first realize you are blind
And that blindness is only cured by placing faith in Jesus, Who gives us credit for His righteousness
Psalm 118 says the One the leaders of Israel rejected will be the cornerstone upon which God builds His Kingdom
And in v.44 Jesus says we can either fall on that stone or it will fall on us
This is the Gospel that Christians believe, and I pray everyone who hears my voice knows this truth
When responding to Jesus’ claims, we have two choices
We can fall on the cornerstone, falling to our knees before Jesus in repentance and falling on Him to rely on His righteousness
And as we do, we receive His righteousness which changes us inside, producing spiritual fruit as God intends
Or we can stand defiantly like those custodians in the parable and the Pharisees in Jesus’ day, and if so we will share their fate
The Pharisees said such people should be treated harshly and rightly so
So as Jesus says, we will be crushed and become like dust
Either we repent of seeking external righteousness and receive His righteousness or else He will crush us at our judgment
We know the choice the Pharisees made…what choice will you make?
If you are moved today by the word of God to fall on the cornerstone, then pray with me
And if you have already fallen on that stone, then pray with me as well for the sake of those who are turning to Him today