Taught by
Stephen ArmstrongAccess all of our teaching materials through our smartphone apps conveniently and quickly.
Taught by
Stephen ArmstrongWhat about Israel?
That’s the question Paul set out to answer in Chapters 9-11
At the end of Chapter 8, Paul had just concluded his compelling argument for our eternal security in Christ
Paul demonstrated that God sets in motion a chain of events to bring us into glory
And that chain is unbreakable, for God determined we would receive His mercy before the foundations of the earth
So what God has determined for our sake from before Creation began cannot be thwarted by anything in Creation
Yet at the same time, Paul recognized that Israel’s rejection of their Messiah seemed to argue an opposite conclusion
To the casual observer, it seemed God promised Israel a Messiah only to set Israel aside when the promised Messiah finally arrived
For if God predestines His elect to salvation and nothing can challenge His will, then why didn’t He save Israel?
Why did God reject His own people Israel while permitting the Gentiles to enter in His grace?
Even more concerning, what does God’s rejection of His own people in this way suggest about His trustworthiness?
Might God reject us too one day?
Can we trust in the promises we’ve received in Christ or will we end up like Israel?
Because Paul knew these questions would be on the mind of his Jewish readers (and perhaps some Gentiles), Paul felt compelled to address the question of what about Israel?
So Paul suspends his discourse on righteousness to answer several critical questions in defense of God’s faithfulness
Paul will explain why God didn’t call the nation of Israel into faith when He delivered on His promise to bring the Messiah
He’ll explain where God’s plan is going next for Israel
And he’ll show how God will remain faithful to His promises to Israel in a day to come
Paul organizes his response chronologically, explaining Israel’s past, present and future circumstances from God’s perspective
Chapter 9 reviews Israel’s past, specifically who received the promises of God
Chapter 10 explains Israel’s present circumstances of having rejected the Messiah and His Gospel
And Chapter 11 reveals God’s eventual plans to fulfill His promises to His people Israel
Perhaps most importantly, Chapter 11 also explains why it was necessary that God enact such a complex plan
Last week we ended at Romans 9:13, just as Paul finished explaining God’s prerogative to decide who may receive His promises
The Lord made promises to Abraham concerning a nation of people called Israel
But as Paul explained, God had a very specific “Israel” in view when He issued His promises
God’s promises were intended only for a certain group of descendants from Abraham
Not everyone who descended from Abraham would be included in God’s grace
To prove his point, Paul cited examples from Abraham and Isaac’s own family
In both men’s cases, God preselected one of their children to receive His promises and excluded another
God communicated His selections in advance of their births and without regard to the children’s behavior or desires
In short, God simply chose one child and passed over the other
Paul’s point is that throughout Israel’s history, God alone determined who will be included in His promises
Not all born of these men were automatically included in God’s plan
God’s grace is dispensed not on the basis of birthright or our effort to win His favor or even according to our will or desire, as John 1 taught
Rather, God extends His grace to those whom He chooses in advance
In Israel’s case, God chose some of Abraham’s descendants to receive His promises, but not all of them
As I said last week, to be considered part of God’s Israel, it was necessary to descend from Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, but it was not sufficient
Therefore, the first lesson we learned concerning Israel’s past is that God never intended to bless all Jews with His promises
Only a subgroup of Jews, called the elect, were selected to receive the promises of God
Furthermore, God’s selectivity among His people is not the exception but rather the rule
Therefore, we shouldn’t be surprised to see that pattern repeating when Jesus appeared to Israel
Some Jews were appointed to receive the promised Messiah upon His arrival, but most were not
This fact raises some difficult questions…questions Paul anticipated we would ask
Beginning with the question that opens tonight’s teaching:
Upon hearing Paul explain that God selects only some to receive His promises, we immediately wonder if this is just?
We know God is good and righteous in all that He does, and yet Paul’s explanation seems to paint God in an unfavorable way
Isn’t Paul’s explanation depicting God as cruel or even unjust?
Isn’t a God who only extends His mercy to some unfair, unkind, & unloving to those He passes over?
And as a result, we may be tempted to reject Paul’s teaching out of hand or seek an alternate interpretation to explain it away
Paul knew we would feel this way, because it’s the natural reaction of an untrained spiritual mind
When it comes to deciding justice and mercy, the accused always feels as if he knows better than the judge what the proper judgment should be
But of course, the opposite is true
So Paul asks the question on our behalf in v.14 so he may put this objection to rest
Paul says emphatically, God is never unjust
Notice, Paul doesn’t retreat from his earlier teaching at all
He simply denies that the reality of God’s selectivity suggests that He is unjust
In other words, God is both selective with His mercy and just in doing so
Our natural thinking assumes that God owes every human being an opportunity to receive grace
As if we were born with an entitlement to His mercy
So we define “justice” and “love” as extending opportunity for mercy
But this is not a biblical concept nor is it even logical
The Bible never claims that love is defined as giving everyone an opportunity for mercy
On the contrary, love is defined this way:
Notice that Jesus says the greatest love is laying your life down for “friends”, not for everyone
Furthermore, Jesus adds that these disciples were His friends because He chose them, they didn’t choose Him
So to say that all mankind has a right to God’s mercy is contrary to the very meaning of the word grace
Grace means receiving something you were not entitled to have
No one has a right to grace, and God is not obligated by fairness or justice to extend salvation to everyone
The Bible says plainly God extends His mercy to those He chooses
And once again, Paul turns to a prominent example from Israel’s past to illustrate this truth at work
He cites the example of Moses in Exodus
And brilliantly, Paul chooses as his proof God’s own words concerning this very topic
In explaining His ways of dealing with His people, the Lord told Moses in Exodus 33 that He decides who will receive His mercy
To paraphrase, God says He will have mercy and show compassion on those whom He chooses
Some people receive God’s compassion and His mercy, and some do not
And this outcome is solely God’s prerogative
God isn’t moved to showing us mercy by something within us or even in response to something we say or do
God says He extends His compassion and mercy solely on the basis of His sovereign will and purpose
When doctors make life or death decisions concerning the future of a terminally ill patient, we commonly say the doctors are playing God
In that comment, we’re acknowledging that life and death decisions are reserved for God alone
God alone has the power to determine the course of a life
The Bible says you can’t add a day to your life…God alone determines how long you live
So we acknowledge God’s sovereignty over our physical life, but then we try to deny Him that same privilege concerning our spiritual life
We claim true love means man retaining the ultimate control over our eternal future
But if we’re willing to extend God that privilege in one circumstance, then we cannot deny Him the same in the other
If He is God over physical life and death, than surely He is also God over spiritual life and death
And that’s what God declares concerning Himself
Paul summarizes God’s statement in v.16 with a profoundly important principle
Paul says it does not depend on a man’s willing, or working, but on God’s choice
The “it” in that statement obviously refers back to v.15
It means God’s mercy and compassion
So first, Paul says God’s mercy doesn’t depend on the man who wills
Our will refers to our desires, our own thoughts and assumptions about God
No man or woman wills their way into receiving God’s mercy
Paul already demonstrated earlier in Chapter 3 that man’s fallen never seeks for God in any case
So our will is not a factor in God’s decision to extend mercy
Secondly, Paul says God’s mercy won’t depend on the man who runs
Running is a euphemism for doing good works
To run represents someone expending effort to please God hoping to be rewarded with mercy
Like someone running a race to receive a prize
But of course, God’s mercy can’t be earned, as Paul showed earlier in Chapter 4
So, God’s mercy can’t be chosen and it can’t be earned
It only comes when God determines to extend it
If Paul’s teaching wasn’t challenging enough already, Paul presses us harder with an example from Exodus in v.17 – one that provides a corollary to the first example
During the confrontation with Pharaoh in Egypt, the Lord reassured Moses that the Pharaoh would play a role that God assigned to him
God determined that Pharaoh would be His antagonist
God was ready to redeem His people from Egypt, just as He promised Abraham 400 years earlier
And God determined that He would do so only through a great display of His power and might
Therefore, God required an adversary leading Egypt who would resist God until a time when God was ready to end the battle
That man would be Pharaoh, who God raised up specifically to oppose Moses and God Himself
God told Moses that He raised up Pharaoh so God could display His power in defeating Pharaoh
You can see further evidence of God’s intentions when you look at the record of the plagues in Exodus
Altogether there were ten plagues against Egypt
And we know God intended to deliver all ten plagues against Egypt even before the first one began
We know this because God declared it to Moses before Moses even entered Egypt
Notice the Lord says the plagues will culminate in the killing of the first born
That’s the tenth plague
It’s the one that gives us the Passover observance
It’s the plague that pictures the work of Jesus Christ as our sacrificial lamb
Obviously, we couldn’t imagine the Exodus story taking place without a tenth plague, and neither could God
Which is why God told Moses that He must harden Pharaoh’s heart to ensure that all ten plagues take place as planned
God knew that no man, no matter how stubborn, can withstand His wrath for very long
Not even Pharaoh could maintain his opposition to God through ten plagues
Yet God had predetermined there would be ten plagues before Israel was released
So at a certain point in their confrontation, when Pharaoh’s resistance was weakening, God stepped in to harden Pharaoh’s heart so he would continue to battle
Notice the Lord says He will harden Pharaoh’s heart “to multiply” His signs and wonders in Egypt
In other words, hardening Pharaoh’s heart would ensure the conflict continued and the plagues piled up higher
And He did all this to demonstrate His power among the nations
During the first six confrontations with Moses, scripture reports that Pharaoh’s heart hardens itself
Pharaoh resists the will of God through his own stubbornness and disobedient will
But at a certain point, Pharaoh couldn’t resist any longer
After the sixth plague of boils, the text changes in a notable fashion
Sure enough, the Lord stepped in to harden Pharaoh’s heart against Moses just as the Lord promised
Without the Lord’s intervention, Pharaoh would have given up
Not even a man as stubborn and defiant as Pharaoh could withstand God’s wrath any longer
But there were four more plagues remaining, so quitting wasn’t an option for God
So God hardened Pharaoh’s heart, ensuring the continuation of the plagues until the point God determined they should end
Just as He told Moses He would do
Once again, Paul’s point in his corollary example is as disconcerting as it is undeniable
Just as God dispenses His mercy upon those whom He chooses, God also displays His wrath against those He chooses
Now, no one could deny that Pharaoh deserved God’s judgment
He was unquestionably a sinner
He was so opposed to God that he willingly endured six plagues rather than submit to God’s authority
So we know his judgment was well-deserved
But God didn’t wait to see Pharaoh’s sinfulness before selecting Him to receive His wrath
Nor did the Lord ever give Pharaoh an opportunity to repent or receive mercy
The text of scripture says clearly that Pharaoh was raised up for the very purpose of opposing God
And even when Pharaoh was ready to relent and submit to God’s authority, God hardened His heart to continue to battle
Just as the Lord said He would do before the battle started
God didn’t make Pharaoh a sinner…he was born that way
But God chose to put Pharaoh’s sin to work rather than to rescue him from it
And this is God’s sovereign right, Paul says in v.18
God extends mercy to those He chooses, softening their hearts, and bringing them into glory
And likewise, God hardens those He chooses, confirming their opposition, ensuring their just condemnation
Therefore, among Abraham’s descendants there were those who received God’s mercy (Isaac) and those who didn’t (Ishmael)
As difficult as this concept may be for us to accept, God is no less holy, no less just, and no less good because He acts in this way
Paul said as much back in v.14
So we must accept that the truth of v.14 and the truth of v.18 work together in scripture
Everyone is born a sinner and justly due God’s judgment
So God’s goodness is evidenced in the fact that He extends mercy to anyone
Nevertheless, many Christians over the centuries have stopped at this point in Paul’s argument and refused to go any further
They simply cannot accept the God Paul is describing
They believe Paul’s depiction of God is at odds with the God who so loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son, that whoever believes in Him shall not perish, but have eternal life
The God of John 3:16 doesn’t sound like a God who only extends His mercy to some while hardening others
He sounds like a cruel, capricious God, some would say
Furthermore, if it’s true God’s mercy doesn’t depend on our will or works but only on His choice, than it means God could grant salvation to everyone
And if God has the power to grant salvation to everyone, then wouldn’t the God of John 3:16 wish to save everyone?
Wouldn’t that be what a loving God would do?
Paul knew we would ask that question about now, and so he answers it next
Paul expected you to respond to his teaching by saying, “Why doesn’t God just save everyone then? Why condemn anyone?”
Paul phrased the question a little differently in v.19, but that’s what he’s saying
Interestingly, when you hear someone pose this question in the course of this discussion, they’re usually not interested in the answer
Because the question is actually intended as critique of the doctrine of election
In itself, the question is ridiculing election by saying…
Since we know God is loving…
And since a loving God would certainly want to save everyone if He could…
Yet we know that not everyone is being saved…
Therefore, God must not be in control of who receives His mercy, and therefore the doctrine of election can’t be true
In other words, unless and until Paul gives us an explanation for why God doesn’t save everyone, we won’t accept what Paul is teaching
Notice Paul’s initial response to this subtle critique
He calls us out for our arrogance and unbelief in the face of God’s revealed word
Who are we to doubt God’s word?
Don’t you know that the words Paul wrote are the inspired revelation of the Creator God?
God didn’t have to reveal this truth to us, yet in His mercy and kindness He has graciously given us this truth
Yet we dare to stand in judgment of Him and refuse to accept what He has given us unless God first satisfied our doubts and critiques?
We should expect to hear God respond as He did to Job:
God puts Job in his place, reminding the man that mankind has no place to question God in anything He does, for we know nothing by comparison
How dare any of us answer back to our Creator, our God and Savior, the Maker of all things, as if we know better how He should extend His mercy
And don’t be self-deceived…that’s what we’re doing when we question why God doesn’t save everyone
It’s hardly shocking that we should demand God give everyone opportunity to receive His mercy, because that suits our own interests
It just reveals our biased thinking and pride
We are demanding God prove Himself to be loving according to our definition of the word before we will accept His word
Using the analogy of pottery, Paul rebukes us for our hubris saying, “Who are you, oh man, (i.e., mere man) to question God?”
We have as much worth and importance in comparison to God as a lump of clay has to a potter
We’re dirt, and we exist to be molded by our Creator
Clay’s only purpose is to be shaped by a greater power into something useful to the potter
A potter has a purpose in mind as he begins the process of creating a pot from clay
He may have an honorable use in mind
An honorable pot refers to pottery intended for dining on special occasions, similar to your fine china
The potter forms the pot intending it will serve guests in this way
And based on the potter’s decision, the course of that pot’s future is predetermined
Conversely, the potter also needs jars to hold refuse
That’s what a dishonorable pot did…it was a toilet that held refuse
Once again, the potter set forth to mold the clay for that purpose
And once he was finished, the future of that pot was predetermined and could not change
For obvious reasons, you never took a pot created for use as a toilet and converted it to use as a dining pot
Likewise, we have no right to question God’s choices for who will receive His mercy any more than clay could question a potter
It’s preposterous to consider a pot questioning its purpose
And it’s preposterous that we should question God’s choices in how He determines the outcomes for our lives
Should God choose to use Pharaoh’s life in one way and Moses’ life in another, it’s His prerogative
And we have no place to judge His decisions
Both men were lumps of clay in their Maker’s hands, and God did as He knew was best with each to reflect glory upon Himself
Moreover, the Lord will not explain Himself to our doubting hearts
Because that’s not how doubts are erased
As Abraham told the rich man in Hades
If we will not accept [the word of God] as it is written, then we will not be persuaded by the truth even if someone rises from the dead
Your doubts will only be satisfied if you first accept the word of God for what it says
Then in time trust the Lord to reconcile your heart to this truth so that you may accept it
In time He will show you how the truth of a sovereign God is consistent with the truth of a loving God
And that’s where Paul moves next, to offering us the biblical explanation for why a loving God has chosen to bestow His mercy on some but not all
Paul phrases his explanation as a question, which makes it a little harder for us to understand what he’s saying
Yet his choice to word v.22 as a question is an important detail
Paul is subtly mocking our foolishness in judging God’s actions and motives
It’s as if Paul’s saying, so you think you know how to decide if God is just…
Well, what would we say about God if I remind you that God is willing to immediately destroy all ungodly mankind in the moment of their birth
Which is what the ungodly justly deserves
Yet God patiently endures their ungodliness
He allows even the most ungodly men and women to live long and even enjoyable lives
Men like Pharaoh or Herod or the rich man in Jesus’ story of Lazarus
These people are an offense to a holy God and every day they live on earth they test God’s patience
They mock God, persecute His children and pollute His earth with their evil ways
Still, God allows them to be born, to live long lives, to prosper and even to grow rich and powerful
That’s more mercy and grace than such people ever had reason to receive
As Jesus says, this is the standard by which we should measure God’s goodness
The very fact that God allows the wicked such mercy during their lives on earth is evidence of his long-suffering patience and mercy
But Paul says this will be the extent of God’s mercy for the wicked
Paul calls these wicked people vessels of wrath prepared for destruction
Like dishonorable pottery, the Lord has brought these people into the world on a course leading to destruction
Why did God even allow such people to be born in the first place?
Paul gives us that answer in v. 23
The verse opens with “and God did so…”
Meaning, here’s the reason God allowed people destined to destruction to be born and to live side by side with the elect
And that reason was to teach His elect, those vessels prepared beforehand to receive His glory, about the riches of His mercy
Paul is describing the power, the necessity of contrast
Even though He was willing to destroy the wicked, or perhaps to prevent them from even being born at all
Yet God patiently permitted the wicked to exist on earth so that God’s elect could appreciate the magnitude of His grace extended to us
So that we who have been elected to receive God’s mercy might see the lives of the ungodly and appreciate what we have received
That’s the power and necessity of contrast
If you have never known darkness, you can’t possibly appreciate the glory of light
If all you’ve ever known is light, then light is meaningless
Or if you’ve never known sadness, then the concept of joy has no meaning
The same is true for concepts like grace, mercy, forgiveness and love
If no one received God’s judgment, then how could we appreciate God’s forgiveness
If there were no one deserving of God’s wrath, then how could be be thankful for His forgiveness?
If no one was rejected by God, then who would praise Him for His love?
Remember what the Lord told Moses in Exodus
He said He raised up Pharaoh to oppose Him so that He could display His power in defeating Pharaoh
In a nutshell, that’s the purpose for all Creation including mankind
God made this Creation and everything in it to reflect glory upon Him
So that we might know God and glorify Him for Who He is
And to praise and worship God for Who He is, we must know all of Him
We must know His love and His anger
His mercy and His judgment
His grace and His wrath
So there must be those among men who receive one and others who receive the other
You can test this truth with a thought experiment
Go back to the moment in the Garden when the Lord came upon Adam and Woman having just fallen into sin
Consider God’s range of options for how He might have responded to the fall of mankind in that moment
There are only three options possible
First, God could have chosen to save no one
He could have rejected Adam and Woman and every son and daughter that came from them through all generations
He could have justly condemned all humanity to an eternity in Hell
Secondly, God could have chosen to save every member of humanity
He could have justified Adam and Woman by faith
And thereafter, every child that came in Adam’s line would have likewise received God’s mercy
Everyone born for all generations would enter into glory and Hell remained an empty place
Or thirdly, God could choose to save some of Adam’s descendants
God would elect some from among fallen humanity to receive His mercy
From generation to generation, two kinds of people would exist: those destined for rescue and those destined to receive the judgment they deserve
God could save none, all or some
What criteria would God use to decide which choice He should make?
What criteria does the Lord give for why He creates anything? Why does everything exist at all?
The Lord’s criteria for every choice He makes is what maximize His glory
And the choice that gave God the most glory in His Creation was to save some
If He saved none, then clearly there would be no one to praise His name and His glory into eternity
And if He saved all people, then we would never appreciate the magnitude of the gift we’ve received
You can’t fully appreciate eyesight unless you’ve known blindness
Imagine a world where everyone ever born was automatically and inevitably ushered into grace
No one would pray for themselves to receive mercy, much less for the lost
No one would live in gratitude for salvation
No one would think about repentance much less about maintaining a holy and righteous witness
What’s the point in those things when everyone ultimately receives God’s grace?
In fact, God Himself would be an afterthought at best
God would receive far less glory in a world where His grace was taken for granted
And so for our sakes the Lord has patiently endured ungodly men and women to teach us something about grace
In v.24 Paul says God established this plan for the benefit of us, those who are called by God into His grace
Both Jew and Gentile
People predestined from before the foundations of the earth to know Him and to receive His mercy
God has established this plan for our sake, Paul says
Today, you and I look out upon a lost and dying world and we see ourselves before grace
We can appreciate what it means that the Creator of the Universe has chosen to rescue us from that hopelessness
What’s more, our gratitude increases all the more as we come to understand that our present circumstances were assigned to us before the foundation of the earth
Not for any reason of ourselves, but purely because the Lord chose us to receive it
How humbling is this truth? How inexplicable, how marvelous, how freeing and how glorious!
To understand the doctrine of election is to truly understand God’s love
We still know sin, we still experience suffering like the world of ungodly
But we know these things will not be the end of us, and we can rejoice knowing we have been prepared for glory
So the key to understanding Israel’s past is recognizing that God is in the business of selecting who received His mercy, both among those in Israel and among the Gentiles
And Paul proves that this has been God’s way since the beginning, with quotes from Old Testament prophets
First, Paul quotes from Hosea the prophet, who told Israel that in a day to come their God would shift His mercy away from Israel and toward Gentiles
God would begin to call a people who were not His people
These who previously were not receiving His mercy would now begin to receive His mercy
Obviously, God is telling Israel that in a day to come, the Gentile nations would receive His mercy in place of the nation of Israel
Nothing demonstrates the truth of God’s election more clearly than His shift away from Israel and toward Gentiles
History demonstrates that at the Messiah’s coming, Israel ceased to receive God’s mercy in large part
During the following centuries, very few Jews have embraced Jesus as Messiah
Yet in that same time, Gentiles have come to Jesus in the billions
This pattern is unexplainable except as God shifting His choice from one people group to the other
For if such things were merely the result of social patterns or human thinking, then we would have expected exactly the opposite
A Jewish Messiah coming in fulfillment of Jewish scripture should have held great interest to Jews
Jews were primed by teaching and tradition to receive their Messiah when He came
On the other hand, a Messiah should have held virtually no interest for Gentiles
Gentiles were generally repulsed by Jewish culture and religious practices (and many still are today)
And few Gentiles understood the concept of a Messiah, much less held any interest in embracing one
Yet history records that a dramatic role reversal took place at Jesus’ coming
Within a few decades, the church was largely Gentile
While faith in Jesus among Jewish people was dying out
Nothing explains this trend except a movement of God to shift His mercy away from Israel and toward Gentiles
But notice in v.26 Paul includes a second statement by Hosea where the prophet says this shift away from Israel isn’t the end of the story
From out of their place of rejection, Israel will eventually receive mercy again
In the same place where they were previously declared to no longer be God’s people, God will speak again in a future day
In that future day, God will once more declare Israel to be His people
Once again, this statement reflects God’s election of who receive His mercy
You can’t explain this in-out-back-in pattern in human terms
It’s only explainable as the result of God’s sovereign choice for who receives His mercy
Next, Paul quotes from Isaiah 10 that God has always extended His mercy to a minority of Jacob’s descendants
Just as God loved Jacob but hated Esau, so it has gone with everyone in the nation
Some have received His grace and others have not
And Isaiah says the ratio between these two groups has never been equal
Throughout history, God has been electing a few to receive mercy while passing over the larger majority
The Lord refers to the minority in Israel who receive His mercy as “the remnant”
There has always been a remnant of Israel, a minority within the nation who are receiving mercy
Paul talks more about the remnant later in these chapters
But for now it’s enough to understand that Israel’s past has always been a story of a few saved Jews living within a nation of unsaved
Finally, Paul quotes from Isaiah 1 to remind us that God’s choice to extend His grace to some in Israel was never made on the basis of their merits
Isaiah speaks as a member of the remnant saying that had it not been for the Lord’s mercy, they would have been no different than those in Sodom
This is one of the strongest statements of God’s sovereign election in the chapter
Those praising God faithfully in the temple could just as easily have been engaged in depravity in Sodom
The only reason they weren’t was because the Lord stepped in to change their lives by His mercy
Leaving them a posterity, which means a share in His promises to Abraham, Issac and Jacob
So summarizing what we’ve learned in Chapter 9 concerning God’s faithfulness to His promises:
Israel had so far rejected the Messiah because the Lord hadn’t elected them to receive His mercy
But this isn’t evidence of God being unfaithful to His promises, nor is it even new
God has always been selective for who within Israel receives His promises
Only a minority within Israel and among Gentiles are called to receive God’s mercy
This is God’s plan to demonstrate the riches of His mercy to His elect
That by leaving some in their sins while rescuing others by His mercy, the Lord can rightly receive all glory
Next time we meet, we finish Chapter 9 as a transition into Chapter 10; Israel’s present
What is God’s plan for His people during this present time?
If God has redirected His mercy to the Gentiles, is this unfair to the generations of Jews who will be born and live during this time?
Is God being unfair to these Jews, excluding them from the opportunity to be counted among the remnant of God?
And even if Israel is restored in a future day, doesn’t this interim rejection still cast doubt on His faithfulness to His promises?