Taught by
Stephen ArmstrongAccess all of our teaching materials through our smartphone apps conveniently and quickly.
Taught by
Stephen ArmstrongThis is our second week of our 2-week run through the shortest books of the New Testament
Last week we studied 2 John
I hope you agree we found a lot more than we might have expected for such a short letter
Scripture is still the word of God, whether 25 chapters or 25 verses
3 John is even shorter, but still offers some important lessons
But unlike 2 John, 3 John is a very personal letter, similar to 1 & 2 Timothy
John probably wrote this letter at about the same time as his other letters, and the book of Revelation
Sometime in the last decade of the first century
This letter shares some similarities with 1 John and 2 John, though it stands apart in many ways as well
The letter is only 15 verses, so it’s short and to the point
In fact, it’s the only NT book that never mentions Jesus Christ by name
John’s letter focuses on three commendations for Gaius
His obedience as ministry
His hospitality as ministry
His financial sacrifice as ministry
And then John highlights the behavior of another individual to contrast with Gaius
Diotrephes
Finally, he ends with a recommendation for the courier, Demetrius
• Let’s start in v.1
As with 2 John, there is a bit of mystery around John’s audience: Gaius
The name is a common Greek name in the day
So although there are a handful of other Gaius characters in scripture, we have no reason to think they’re the same person
Unlike the “lady” in 2 John, there is no reason to suspect that Gaius was anything other than a real person
But we also notice that John continues to refer to himself as an elder as he did in the previous letter
More than likely, this was a means of protecting himself and the church from persecution
We’ll see that he ends the letter in a similar fashion as 2 John for the same reason
And once again, John expresses love in truth
The expression reminds us what we studied in our previous week
That is love in truth is a unique form of love, one unique to the body of Christ
It describes a supernatural source of love that unites all believers by the power of the Spirit living in us
The command to love one another does not come without the power to obey
On the contrary, the presence of the Spirit is why the Bible confidently proclaims we will love one another
Our love in truth for one another is how we are identified as different from the world
The world loves in human terms
We love in godly terms
The world loves conditionally
We love unconditionally
The world loves selfishly
We love with agape love
Then John begins the first of his three commendations for Gaius
John says he prays for Gaius, and this prayer is focused on prosperity
It’s such a shame that this word - prosperity - has been hijacked by Satan in recent decades
But let’s put the distorted and false understanding of prosperity out of our minds for now and focus on what he says
John says he prays that Gais would prosper
The word in Greek means a good journey
It’s a euphemism that means simply all would go well for him
It includes the sense of financial well being, but this is not the major emphasis
John is speaking in terms of Gaius’ entire life and circumstances
John specifically mentions physical health and spiritual well being
John has been praying for this man in all regards, both physical and spiritual
Our prayer life would be more powerful if we sought the same balance in our intercession
We should actively seek to find that balance in our concerns for other people
Many requests come in the form of financial, health and other earthly concerns
And it’s never wrong to intercede for someone on the basis of those needs
On the other hand, let’s recognize that just as we often consider our physical comfort above our spiritual needs, so do we often put the cart before the horse in prayer for others
If given a choice between praying for someone to prosper financially, physically or spiritually it should be no contest
Remember, a soul prospers into eternity, while the flesh can only prosper to a point
Again, we aren’t saying that we never pray for prosperity in the flesh
But we need to keep that in balance with spiritual maturity
Why has Gaius been on John’s mind and in his prayers? John explains
John begins v.3 saying “for” meaning because he had heard some things about Gaius
Fellow Christians had visited John and testified to Gaius’ truth
And by his truth, John explains that they testified that Gaius was walking in the truth
Walking in the truth means to walk according to the commandments of Jesus and the apostles
We studied the metaphor of walking in 2 John, and John is drawing on that concept again here to commend Gaius
Notice the chain of events in this case
Gaius chose to live according to what he had been taught
His lifestyle made an impression on the other believers
And then they, in turn, testified of what they knew
And then that testimony led Gaius to receive this public commendation
A public commendation by the last living apostle, a man who was the apostle Jesus’ loved, was no small matter in the church
This letter was to be read and circulated in the church, like all letters from apostles
When a letter like this came to a church, it was treated like scripture from the very beginning
So imagine the feeling Gaius had to hear this letter read aloud in the church gathering, praising his name in such glowing terms
The point of John’s letter is to commend certain things, and Gaius gave John that opportunity by his godly behavior
Gaius was walking in the truth, and John wanted the church to understand that Gaius was a man to be emulated
Others knew of his success and now they know that the apostle approves as well
And the end result was a commendation in a public way
This is exactly the pattern we are called to exhibit in our walk on earth
We are to walk with the Lord, in obedience, so that we might established a good testimony before men and God
Paul states this plainly again in Philippians
Our goal in walking in truth is to be blameless and innocent
Whenever you see the words blameless or innocent, it usually references our testimony before men
Notice here Paul says we are live in contrast to the crooked and perverse world around us
We are to be blameless, in the sense that Noah was called blameless
He could not be accused by his generation as a sinful man, especially in comparison to the sin of the world
That is our goal as well
Paul says the point of that lifestyle is that we might appear as lights in the world
The Greek word for appear is also the word for shine or to be visible
The point of a blameless walk in truth is to make a statement into the world on behalf of God
Not a pious or sanctimonious statement
Rather, a statement of truth about God
But then Paul goes on to say that in holding fast to the word, we then have reason to glory in the day of Christ
The day of Christ is a reference to the day we are judged and receive a reward
That day will be a day we can glory in, provided we have walked well in truth
So Gaius’ situation demonstrates this relationship on a smaller scale
His blameless life had become a light shining in the dark world
He was commended for that lifestyle by John
And that commendation was to his glory
And though I’m sure he appreciated John’s commendation, the real commendation Gaius sought was the Lord’s
Next John says that his report caused John to have great joy
John says his greatest joy as an apostle was learning that his children were walking in the truth
John had spent most of his adult life following Christ and endeavoring to call other men to know and follow Christ as well
As an Apostle, John knew how important obedience was and how much was on the line for those who failed
He wrote letters, suffered persecution and lifted up prayers on behalf of his spiritual children
So when he saw his children living out their faith, he says he felt joy
What John doesn’t say, but I suspect we can assume, is that he must have felt great sadness to watch believers failing to live according to the Lord’s commands
John knew the jeopardy these believers were in
He understood the eternal loss they would experience
Though I cannot compare to John or any other apostle, I can identify with them on this point in the sense of how teachers hope for their students to perform well
As I teach the word of God, my desire and greatest joy is to see lives transformed to please their Lord
To receive the truth gladly and then to live according to it
This is John’s perspective for the church
And it’s the Lord’s perspective of us all
John’s next section, the second commendation, begins with the word “beloved” again
John credits Gaius with hospitality for believers, even when he didn’t know them
Hospitality in John’s day was an especially important and honored tradition, so we might ask why Gaius would be credited with it?
If everyone was expected to show hospitality, why would Gaius have been praised for it?
The answer comes back to persecution
There was real risk for Christians opening their home to strangers, even those claiming to be Christians
A stranger could be a spy looking to expose Christians to the Roman empire, or Jews
Nevertheless, Gaius accepted the risks of hosting others, showing kindness and love to anyone calling themselves a Christian
There is always risk in opening your home to someone, especially a stranger
But it is a unique privilege for any Christian to be able to open their home to a fellow believer and show the love of Christ
In fact, it’s a command of scripture
Because he obeyed scripture again, he obtained a good testimony...again
Notice John says that these strangers gave John the good report
Gaius likely had no way to know that these strangers knew John or were likely to meet him
But because Gaius did the right thing, he is now receiving a commendation from John for his love
And I’m sure he would also receive one from the Lord
Gaius went a step further in his willingness to host strangers in the faith
He sent them away in the manner worthy of God
When the time came for these men to leave, Gaius took the extra step of ensuring they didn’t leave empty handed
He may have given them provisions, money, clothes, or all of the above
Notice John says he sent them away in a manner worthy of God
Worthy means in keeping with God’s honor
That if the Lord Himself had made the gift, it would have reflected well upon the Lord
So we can imagine it was a generous supply given by Gaius
Gaius showed hospitality at personal risk and self-sacrifice, and he received a commendation, and eternal reward we can assume
This is the standard the scripture is holding us up to, but are we ready to do what’s required?
My wife and I have always insisted that our home have at least one bedroom set aside to host guests
But I will admit that my wife has been more willing to extend it at times than I have been
My personal concern for some privacy and a retreat from the world means I don’t lean toward opening the door as easily as she does
Whenever she would suggest inviting someone down-on-their-luck to stay with us for a while, I would usually respond by asking what was our “exit strategy”?
I wanted to know before they entered my home, how long the stay would be
But the Lord was good to give me a wife who would balance this part of my personality and lead me toward hospitality
When we have guests who are in need, we also like to send them away with something, but then the question becomes how much?
Here again, it becomes a matter of personal sacrifice
The point is to sacrifice the flesh to make room for the growth of the spirit
So that we may be blameless before men and receive praise from the Lord
Gaius’ commendation reminds us that hospitality to the saints requires sacrifice if we are to obtain a testimony and a reward
Gaius took risks, which meant he put the needs of the body ahead of his own
And when we are given an opportunity to show hospitality, we need to understand that sacrifice is expected
In my case, I know my flesh will justify my desire to withhold hospitality because it’s too much of an imposition
But scripture tells me that this is the perfect opportunity to earn praise and rewards
If hospitality requires no sacrifice, then we are doing no more than others might do
It’s only when we confront our flesh that we step beyond the natural and do the unexpected...which is love
Then John explains why Gaius’ hospitality was so important
The men that Gaius hosted in his home were traveling preachers of the Gospel
They went out for the sake of the Name, meaning for the sake of the name of Christ
What an honor it was for a man to travel and greet people in the Name!
There was no more important task, and these men deserved honor for it and Gaius gave it to them
John says that Gaius’ support was all the more important because these preachers had made a point of not accepting support from Gentiles
The term Gentiles isn’t exactly what we might think
To a Jew, a Gentile meant a pagan unbeliever
Obviously, this is a Jewish stereotype, but since John is Jewish and he’s writing to Jewish churches, he used the conventional term
Today, we would use a different term; we would simply say unbeliever
Why did these preachers not accept support from unbelievers as they traveled and preached?
These men were committed to living according to the standard Paul gave in 2 Corinthians
These men were determined to separate themselves from dependence upon the unbeliever
The point of the rule wasn’t to diminish unbelievers; it was to elevate the Lord
By allowing the Lord to pay for the work of ministry, these men gave opportunity for the Lord to show Himself strong
This is a powerful witness that the Western world has largely jettisoned in the spirit of independence and self-reliance
When we make opportunity to support our own needs using whatever means the world offers, we potentially rob the Lord from receiving glory for His provision
If we rush to pay for things on credit rather than waiting for the Lord to provide the money
When we deny others the chance to fund our mission work, we rob the Lord of His glory through the provision of giving
There was a seminar student who tells a testimony of attending seminary on a conviction that God would pay for the tuition
He never tells anyone of his needs so that no man would ever offer to pay his bills
Nevertheless, he testifies that checks appeared in his mailbox from people he didn’t know
In various ways, the Lord paid his tuition bills, and the student finished seminar without ever asking anyone for money
His conviction mirrors the one of these men
They knew that all money comes from God, whether through Gentiles or otherwise
Just as that seminary student knew that if he asked and a man gave him money, it was still from the Lord
But in both cases, by leaving room for the Lord to act on His own, He then received all the more glory for His faithfulness and power
That’s the attitude these men had in Gaius’ day
And then John tells Gaius that his hospitality was all the more important because he stepped in to support that need
Gaius was that person God used to support these men in their convictions
That’s an important lesson too
When we leave room for the Lord to take care of our needs, we also give room for the Lord to use someone else to bless us
In our self-sufficient culture, we need to understand the power of becoming vulnerable so that the Lord can show Himself strong
Then in v.8 John reinforces Gaius’ good deed with a reminder that the church is supposed to support those who make sacrifices to teach and preach the word
Obviously, as I deliver this teaching point I’m conspicuously aware that it may appear self-serving
But if that’s how it appears to anyone, then the only thing I can say in love is “Get over it!”
I speak these things not for my own sake or the sake of anyone in particular but because they are in the text of scripture
We are all commanded by scripture to support financially those who God has sent to support us spiritually
This is not optional; the Bible makes clear this is a requirement
John gives a positive benefit for doing so
He says we become fellow workers in the truth
We may look upon someone who is teaching us and imagine they are doing great work for the Lord
Well, if this is so, then we can be considered a part of that work, a fellow worker, merely by supporting that work financially
Or through other material means like hospitality
Have you ever considered that you can gain a measure of the reward that a hard working teacher will receive merely by assisting financially
The teacher has worked hours and hours to teach, and traveled around the world to deliver it
The teacher has endured persecution, hardship, deprivation and sacrificed other good things so they could bring you the word
And John says you can become a fellow worker and receive reward through your support
That’s a pretty good deal
Paul points out a second self-interest in supporting those who teach us the Bible or minister to us through the word:
Paul refers to the Law of Moses to remind the church that supporting those who minister in the word yields a benefit for the church
A farmer that muzzles his own ox is starving the very animal he depends upon for his livelihood
If the animal is weak from hunger, it can’t thresh the grain
So giving the ox a little of the farmer’s grain allows the ox to produce more
Then Paul makes the application that we stand to gain so much more spiritually, by sacrificing a little of our earthly material
But if we starve the teacher, we lose in the long run
So John has given three commendations - on obedience, hospitality and generosity - and now turns to calling out two men for good and evil
Within the church there was a man, Diotrephes, who was a leading man in the church
His name means nourished by Zeus
His situation is probably included to illustrate a bad example
John had just commended a good example
So now John illustrates the opposite example
John apparently wrote to this church in the past, but Diotrephes rejected the letter and did not accept it as binding
He was motivated by pride and did not want to compete with the Apostles
He is a petty man living in sin and rebellion
John says he is guilty of committing six offenses
First, he wanted to be above everyone, even the apostles themselves
Clearly, pride motivated the man to be in charge
He wanted to Lord over the church in a position of authority
Every man in ministry must guard himself against this possibility
Power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely
Secondly, he doesn’t accept the apostles’ teaching
Naturally, the teaching of the apostles would have convicted his heart
Their teaching would have set the record straight
So he rejects it, preferring to stay with his own desires
Third, he unjustly accused the apostles using wicked words
Rather than be subjected to the apostles’ teaching, he attacks theirs
He wants to undermine their authority so he can do as he pleases
Fourth, he does not receive Christians
John directly contrasts Gaius with this man
In fact, we can begin to see that John picked this man to highlight the difference between obedience lived out in Gaius, compared to disobedience
Since we know these visiting men were teachers of the word, that would explain Diotrephes’ unwillingness to receive them
Fifth, he forbids other Christians from receiving the teachers
Once again, this is an indication that he felt threatened by their teaching
Any other authority was an affront to his position and pride
Finally, he put out a Christian who contended with him
He used intimidation to stop dissent
And if they would not listen he removed them
This is the recipe for a cult, and this man is clearly someone John intends to correct
John says he will call attention to this man’s deeds
Call attention is a single Greek word meaning to remind or bring to mind
John would remind everyone of his deeds when he came to visit
It’s interesting that John does not threaten to remove him, but just to expose him
Perhaps John knew that exposing him would be enough for him to lose his chance to lead anyone
This is a helpful reminder that our fight against false leaders and teachers doesn’t revolve around their positions, but around the truth
We want to expose the truth, which will then naturally diminish the man
We don’t need to attack them personally or forcibly remove them
Simply showing them to be the men they are will destroy their base of power in the eyes of most Christians
Finally, John gives his positive example to reinforce what he says about Gaius
So John has given the church two examples to consider: Gaius and Diotrephes
John now says don’t imitate the evil man; imitate the good man
The one who does good is of God, meaning he is representing God’s heart
This is the man who is working to please God
And therefore, if we imitate him, we are learning how to please God ourselves
On the other hand, John says that the one who does evil has not seen God
This doesn’t necessarily mean that this man is not a believer
In the context, John is comparing the one who is of God (i.e., revealing God by his life) vs. the man who is not of God (i.e., not reflecting God’s heart)
Certainly, it’s possible that this leader was not a believer, but he could simply be a very rebellious believer
Demetrius is the courier bringing this letter, so John tells Gaius that this man has a good reputation and deserves to be well-treated
Perhaps this man was one of the traveling preachers
In any case, John says that Demetrius has a good testimony from three sources
First, all the brethren who know him give a good testimony of his life
Secondly, the truth itself testifies, meaning this man was a good handler of the word of God
He divided rightly the truth
Thirdly, John added his approval of the man, which Gaius knows is trustworthy
So Gaius had no reason to reject this man when he came to deliver the letter
I’m sure once he read the letter, he was glad to have received him
Finally John ends the letter in a way similar to 2 John:
Persecution prevented John from speaking more forthrightly in his letter
He was not willing to write them and risk persecution for himself or his church family
But he says he intended to see them in person shortly
And he looked forward to seeing them face to face
He ends simply: peace to them
The friends of his church greet them and vice versa