Taught by
Stephen ArmstrongAccess all of our teaching materials through our smartphone apps conveniently and quickly.
Taught by
Stephen ArmstrongPeople tend to judge the value of a message – at least in part – by the reputation or importance of the messenger
We prefer that important news comes from important and reputable sources
If you hear that something big has happened in the world, you turn on a respectable TV news channel to get the details
You probably don’t flip over to the WWF channel
And so it was for the Jewish Christians in the early Church
The Jewish Church remembered the importance the Lord placed on angels throughout the course of Jewish history
Time and time again, the Lord delivered His messages to Israel by way of angels
Many times, that “angel” was actually a pre-incarnate Christ, called the angel of the Lord
But nevertheless, the people of Israel saw good reason to hold angels in high regard
And Jews respected angels all the more, because the angelic realm exists above the earth-bound existence of mere mortal men
Angels came in brilliant light or mysterious dreams
Angels had powers and knowledge beyond men
And angels didn’t die, or get sick, or suffer in all the many ways that sinful man must endure
So when the early Church received teaching on the New Covenant doctrines of Christ, some Jews struggled with where to rank Jesus as a messenger of Christ
That struggle centered on Jesus’ form
Jesus of Nazareth was a man – fully human, yet fully God
And His humanity presented a dilemma for many Jews in the early Church
Where do we rank Jesus as a messenger, if He came in a form lower than the form of angels?
Can a message delivered by a man be greater than the message God entrusted to angelic beings?
For some in the early Church, the answer was “no”
Jesus was an important prophet, and perhaps even the Messiah
But his form as a human being meant that His message must be considered secondary to the messages delivered by angels
In Chapter 1, the writer has worked carefully to explain from Old Testament Scripture that the Father has always declared his Son to be superior to angels
In fact, the OT Scriptures demonstrated that Jesus occupies a unique place in God’s plan
He is Son, Creator, Lord and Judge
He is eternal, while angels were created
All angels work for Him, not the other way around
And in fact, angels aren’t just working for the Lord as His ministers of fire
They are also working for you and me
Look at v.14, where we pick up today
Angels are ministering spirits sent out to serve us
They are not ruling agents
They are not judging agents
Only Christ rules and judges
They are ministers, which is the Greek word for “servants”
Angels are agents God, created as heavenly servants, and their principle mission is to serve those who are appointed to inherit salvation
In other words, among all the duties God gave to angels, the most important duty the Lord assigned was the responsibility of serving you and me
When we understand angels in this way, we keep their importance in a proper perspective
God didn’t choose angels to deliver important messages in past days because angels themselves were important
God used them because that was their job
They were created for that very purpose
But then the time came for the Lord to reveal the Person at the center of those messages, and no ordinary servant would suffice – Christ Himself did it
Which is why the writer opened the letter explaining the many ways in which Jesus was superior to angels
And with that analysis, the writer has left his audience at a juncture – a decision point
We can choose to disagree with the writer’s argument that Jesus was greater than angels
But if so, then we must go back to the OT texts and show the errors in the writer’s conclusions
Or we can agree with the writer’s teaching, and if so, then the conclusion must follow naturally
Jesus is superior to angels, and therefore, anything Jesus delivered was superior to anything delivered by angels
The writer focuses on what the angels delivered in the form of an Old Covenant through Moses, vs. what Christ delivered in the New Covenant
Old vs. New, Law vs. Grace, Moses vs. Jesus
This places the Old and New in their proper context, so we can see how they work together
The writer’s point is simple…who do you say Jesus is?
It’s the very same question Jesus Himself asked during His earthly ministry
Our opportunity to be reconciled to God, and to obtain the salvation He offers, hinges on our answer to Jesus’ question
Who do you say that I am?
Who is Jesus?
Prophet? Teacher? Criminal? Maniac?
Or the Son of the Living God? The Messiah?
It serves no purpose to debate the merits of His teaching, or even to seek to imitate His exemplary life, if we don’t believe His claims
He claimed to be the Son of God, the Messiah sent to proclaim the Kingdom was at hand
He claimed to be equal, one with the Father
He claimed to be the Creator
If He was not these things, then Jesus is clearly a liar – or at least seriously disturbed
And how could we commend the teaching of anyone under those circumstances?
The writer is making this same argument to the Jewish members of the early Church, asking them to consider this central question: Who do you say Jesus is?
The very fact that some in the Church thought angels to be superior to Christ was of serious concern to this writer, because it calls into question their claims to faith
Saving faith requires an acceptance of Jesus as Lord
Paul says:
Confessing – that is, agreeing – that Jesus is the Lord, is at the core of saving faith
Any church confused on the importance of Jesus in comparison to the rest of the Heavenly host, is a church without saving faith
And this concern leads the writer into the first of five important warnings issued to his readers
These warnings form the rhetorical high points in the letter
In fact, we can divide the letter into five sections, each leading up to a warning to the reader
Chapters 1 & 2 comprise the first of those five sections and include the first warning of the letter
The writer issues the warnings to stir his audience to action, because he’s concerned over things they are thinking and doing
And all five warnings work to correct an aspect of Christian doctrine or duty
This first warning addresses the first and most important issue of Christian doctrine: the doctrine of Christology
That is, who is Christ?
And so the warning is naturally that of the need to receive Him for salvation
At the opening of Chapter 2, the writer begins to transition to the warning
And this warning is built on the premise he’s presented in Chapter 1, that is, the superiority of Christ to anything in creation
The writer calls his audience to pay much closer attention to what they have heard from Christ
Given Christ’s supreme importance as a Messenger, then we must give the utmost attention to what He says
Let’s take a moment to understand the writer’s statement
The phrase, “pay much closer attention” is contrasted with “drift away”
These phrases in Greek create an image of moving water
In fact, the Greek word for “drift” is literally the word to describe the flowing of water
The writer is drawing a picture of someone floating in a boat down a slow-moving river
And at the edge of the shore, is a firmly-planted rock
As we float by the rock, it catches our attention
We consider it carefully, but we never reach out to grasp it and stop our movement
Instead, we just watch it at a distance as we continue to drift
Until we drift so far away, it’s no longer in sight
That rock is the message of the Gospel, the Gospel that declares Jesus as Lord
This is the rock we must embrace to be saved
Yet some in the early Church had heard the Gospel, and even considered it for a time
But they hadn’t embraced it
And so they were in danger of flowing by and drifting away entirely
And the evidence of their unbelief is found in their unwillingness to consider Jesus as above the angels
Their continued preference for angels, and the messages delivered by angels, betrayed their lack of faith in Jesus and His claims to be the Messiah
At the very least, they weren’t clear on the purpose of the Messiah
And so, they were letting the truth of the Gospel pass them by
They may have been assembling in the church, but they were not yet part of the Church, spiritually speaking
There is nothing shocking, or even usual, about suggesting that some in the Church are not truly believers
This has always been a reality in the Church
And it will only get worse as we approach the apostasy in the last days
Every day, men and women walk into congregations and join themselves to the gathering, without actually knowing Christ as Lord
Hopefully, they soon come to know the Lord, but some never do
They hang around the faithful and mimic the Church culture, but they have never come to understand and agree that Jesus is God
The essence of the Gospel escapes them
The writer begins his letter, calling out those in the Church who continue to live in unbelief, citing as his proof their continued reliance on angels over a reliance on Christ
And to that group, the writer issues a warning
The writer again draws a comparison to angels and the messages they delivered
The Word, spoken through angels, is a reference to the Law of Moses, delivered by angels as part of the Old Covenant
That Word was unalterable, the writer says
The Law of God never had a clause for amendment
Our nation’s constitution has a provision allowing the people to change the law of the land through amendments
So our law is not unalterable
But God’s Law for Israel was unalterable
No amendments, no adjustments
As Jesus said:
All the Law must be accomplished, according to Jesus
So if someone in the nation of Israel failed to heed the instructions found in the Law, they were subject to the death penalty
There is no provision, or sacrifice, in the Law of Moses for intentional sin
If someone in Israel intentionally disregarded the instructions found in the Law, then there was only one remedy under the Law
They were subject to the death penalty
Their earthly lives were in jeopardy if they failed to heed what an angel delivered to them through Moses
So likewise, the writer asks in v.3, what kind of penalty should we expect if we neglect so great a salvation as the one delivered by the Lord Himself?
The word for “neglect” in Greek is ameleo, which means “to pay no attention”
In other words, if we ignore the salvation offered in Christ, what penalty awaits us?
If the penalty for ignoring an angel’s instructions was physical death, then what might we expect to receive for ignoring the instructions of the Messiah?
Though the writer doesn’t answer the question, the answer is obvious: spiritual death
Rather than dwell on that possibility, the writer moves quickly back to reaffirming the truth of the Gospel revealed in Christ
In the second half of v.3, the writer testifies that this salvation, the Gospel, was the Word spoken by the Lord Himself
And it was confirmed to the Church by those who heard the Lord
Those who heard were the apostles, and they confirm the Words of Christ in their writings
This writer speaks as one who knew and accompanied the apostles, but perhaps was not an apostle himself
So the Church has the Lord’s appearing and Words, and we have the confirming testimony of the apostles
But then we also have the Lord testifying to the truth of the Gospel, through signs and wonders in the early Church
Miracles were proof that the claims of Christ and the apostles were trustworthy
And from then until now, the gifts of the Holy Spirit given to the Church according to the Lord’s Will, continue to testify of the truth of the Gospel
In other words, the claims of the Gospel are trustworthy
They came from a superior source and were thoroughly validated by God and men
We simply can’t neglect such a great salvation
And yet, some in the Church were doing exactly that
As we have already learned, their stumbling block was a preoccupation with angels, but it goes deeper than that
The real concern was His incarnation and what it meant that Jesus died in the end
For a Jewish believer, the superiority of Christ and His message was a tough pill to swallow when they reflect on their Messiah in a frail, human body crucified by their Roman enemies
This image of Jesus contradicts their expectation of a conquering, all-powerful Christ coming to rule on earth
And so by comparison, angels appear far more majestic and important
And therefore, their message found in the Law of Moses appears to trump the message delivered by Christ
So to these wavering members of the early Church, the writer moves his discussion of angels to an explanation for why the Messiah needed to take the form of man and die