Taught by
Stephen ArmstrongAccess all of our teaching materials through our smartphone apps conveniently and quickly.
Taught by
Stephen ArmstrongThe reality of Resurrection is so important to the church, that Paul reserved his longest and most detailed defense in the letter to this topic
Up to v.28 Paul has argued three points:
The hope of resurrection lies at the heart of the Gospel, which the church believed by Paul’s testimony
Christ Himself was raised, proving the reality of resurrection
Finally, Christ’s very purpose in leaving Heaven to be born as a man was to conquer death by making a way for men to receive new, eternal bodies through resurrection
Certainly, these arguments are powerful evidence of the reality of resurrection, but Paul isn’t done arguing his case
Next, Paul points out two examples where the actions of the Corinthian church were in contradiction with their beliefs against resurrection
The first example is found in v.29
Paul begins with the word otherwise, meaning “If resurrection isn’t true, then…”
If it isn’t true, why are you baptizing for the dead?
This phrase is potentially confusing
In fact, the Mormon religion has misunderstood this phrase to the point of creating a bizarre, false doctrine
Joseph Smith and his followers invented the practice of researching family genealogies to discover the names of family members who died without believing in the Mormon religion
Then in secret rituals, the Mormons perform a “baptism” on behalf of these dead relatives, thinking they have given them eligibility to enter the Mormon version of heaven
They came to this ridiculous practice from this one verse, thinking that Paul was advocating for baptisms for the dead
We don’t have to be Bible scholars to recognize the errors in the Mormon heresy
First, we know the Bible teaches that following death comes judgment without the possibility of second chances
Hebrews says:
God has appointed that men die and He has appointed that our physical death is followed by eternal judgment
Therefore, there are no backup plans or escape clauses
Secondly, we know every man or woman will be judged according to their own faith and decisions
We each stand or fall on the basis of our own righteousness
A righteousness we receive by faith in Christ
No one can be saved by the decisions of another person
I can’t save you and you can’t save me, whether before or after I die
A parent can’t save an infant by baptizing them
Nor can a child save a dead parent by some silly Mormon ritual
So if v.29 isn’t talking about baptizing dead people, what is Paul talking about and how does it reinforce the truth of resurrection?
Let’s take a second look at the text again
Paul asks, what will those do who are baptized for the dead?
Paul is speaking of water baptism that every believer undergoes following their profession of faith
Water baptism was given to the Church by Christ to communicate a picture concerning death and resurrection
When we enter the water and someone submerges our body, we are testifying to our belief that our sinful nature was put to death with Christ through our faith
And when that person lifts us out of the water, we are testifying to our hope that one day Christ will raise our dead bodies to eternal life
Baptism always requires a second person to conduct the ritual to illustrate that we cannot save ourselves
We depend on the Lord to lay in our grave in our place
And we rely on the Spirit to raise us into a new body
So Paul asks, why is this church practicing baptism for the dead if they don’t believe in resurrection?
Paul’s question makes more sense when we add a missing phrase that’s implied but unstated in Paul’s wording
Paul is asking why this church continues to practice water baptism if they don’t believe in the resurrection from the dead
If they don’t believe in resurrection, then why do they perform a water baptism that illustrates a belief in resurrection?
Paul’s second example of their behavior contradicting their beliefs is vs.30-32
Paul asks why are he and the other apostles – indeed all Christians – placing themselves in harm's way for the sake of the Gospel if resurrection isn’t true?
The apostles remained in danger every hour of their lives
They were hunted down, imprisoned, beaten, starved
They were never at ease and always at risk
In fact, Paul says in v.31 that because of his work in founding the church in Corinth, he received even more persecution
So then Paul asks why would he choose to live this way if his body in this life were all any man was to receive?
It must mean that he was working for human motives, for certainly there would be no spiritual reason to persevere so much
Paul says in v.32 that if working for the Gospel only produced rewards in this lifetime, then why would he have risked his neck?
The phrase “wild beasts” doesn’t mean animals
It’s a euphemistic reference to the enemies of the Gospel in Ephesus, where Paul was as he wrote this letter
So why take these risks if resurrection is a lie?
Instead, it would have been far more sensible to adopt Solomon’s perspective that we wring every last ounce of physical enjoyment out of earthly lives for as long as we can
For when we die it all comes to an end
But that’s not what Paul and the other apostles did
Instead, they fought hard against the Gospel’s enemies in Ephesus and elsewhere to ensure they pleased the Lord and served Him well
And they took their risks with their earthly lives because they understood that the abundant life Christ promises is the life that follows resurrection, not the one that precedes it
It’s the only explanation for why Paul would place himself in harm’s way time and time again for the Gospel
The eleventh chapter of Hebrews is a beautiful testimony of saint after saint who sacrificed their earthly life in faith to God’s promises of resurrection
As the writer summarizes
The writer says these Old Testament saints accepted even greater persecution for the sake of a “better” resurrection
How can a resurrection be made better?
The writer is referring to a better reward in the resurrected life
We may receive greater rewards in the Kingdom because of greater obedience, sacrifice and faithfulness now
But if the Corinthian church truly believed that resurrection was a lie, then they should have been living according to that belief
They shouldn’t sacrifice for the Gospel
They should have been using their one life to live it up, since there was no future life, no future body, no future reward to earn
But they weren’t doing that
They were preaching no resurrection, but they were attempting to live in obedience in the hope of a reward
Once again, their behavior and beliefs were in opposition
Paul asks these questions to highlight the contradictions in Corinth, but in the process Paul has exposed an even bigger problem in the church
He’s exposed the spiritual immaturity of the church
The church didn’t understand the meaning of the rituals they performed or the rewards they sought
And by their ignorance, they contradicted their own beliefs
They proved the adage that a little knowledge is a dangerous thing
While it’s easy for us to chuckle at the ignorance of the Corinthian church, we need to be careful about pointing fingers too quickly
The Lord ensured Paul’s letter found its way into the canon of scripture for good reason
Because today’s church is not that much different from the one Paul founded in Corinth
We can still find plenty of examples of belief and behavior contradicting in Christian practice today
Some churches practice baptism by sprinkling, proving they don’t understand how baptism pictures the death and resurrection of the body
Some churches feature altars in the sanctuary, even though altars imply sacrifices which Christians maintain are no longer needed
Some churches tell believers to seek for a filling of the Holy Spirit after coming to faith, yet the Bible teaches that faith itself comes as a result of the indwelling of the Spirit
The list goes on, but the root cause is always the same in every case
Any time our church practices are disconnected from the authority and instruction of scripture, we’re going in the wrong direction
Sooner or later, our behaviors will come into conflict with the beliefs we claim to hold
Before we know it, we’re wise in our own estimation
Instead following the Lord by His word, we’re in danger of becoming followers of denominations, signs and wonders, styles of worship or worse – cults, heresies and the like
Paul calls the church to seek for better influences and better theology
Paul warns don’t be led astray by this kind of false teaching
And Paul quotes a popular phrase of his day
Bad company corrupts good morals
The quote comes from a stage comedy by the Greek playwright Euripides, and it was so popular in Paul’s day that it had become a proverb
It’s still well known today because of Paul’s quotation
When we associate with the wrong people, we’ll find ourselves adopting their bad thinking and practices
If we associate with bad teachers, we’re going to fill our heads with false teaching
If we associate with immature and misled congregations, we’re going to become spiritually immature and misled ourselves
If we associate with corrupt and fleshly Christians, we’re likely to be pulled into sinful choices
No one remains immune from these influences once we place ourself under their influence
Paul admonishes the church in the severest terms yet in v.34 tells them to start thinking in spiritually mature ways and stop sinning
What was their sin in this case?
Well, among other things, clinging to unbiblical theology in the light of better teaching is a sin
When the Lord brings us the truth by His word and we stubbornly choose to hold on to contrary views we’re sinning
We’re demonstrating self-importance, pride and disobedience to the word of God
We can get away with protecting our pride for only so long
For one day, the Lord will expose us at the judgment
But we don’t have to choose spiritual ruin
Instead, we can humble ourselves, concede to the truth and become sober-minded
Paul says there were those in the church who had no knowledge of God and it was to their shame
He’s not saying they didn’t know the Lord, as in were unbelieving
He’s saying they were utterly ignorant of the Lord’s teaching…of scripture
They were professing to teach the truth, but they were fools
They were proving James’ teaching true, that not many should desire to be teachers
Educating others concerning the Lord and His word is an unforgiving, demanding task in the church, and nothing is more important
This poor church was being led by fools without a clue, and they were bringing many others down with them