Taught by
Stephen ArmstrongAccess all of our teaching materials through our smartphone apps conveniently and quickly.
Taught by
Stephen ArmstrongWhen we teach children math or science, the best teachers will emphasize key principles over memorization of questions and answers
If I teach someone to memorize specific answers to questions, then they really haven’t learned much
As long as the questions don’t change, they can parrot back the correct answer
But if the variables change even slightly, then the student is lost
It’s as if they have to start over again in solving the puzzle
But if I teach a student the underlying principles, the basics timeless truths, then they are equipped to solve any problem that comes along
This method of teaching is especially important when learning spiritual truths
And Paul has followed this method in Chapter 7 as he answered the church’s questions on marriage
On that first topic, Paul taught three basic principles that hold true in any circumstance
First, marriage is a one-flesh relationship that cannot be broken by the efforts of men, so we honor marriage for life
Secondly, each man or woman should remain in the condition in which they were called
A Christian conversion does not compel us to seek a new social status on Earth
Rather, it demands we seek after a kingdom that is not of this world
Finally, Paul counsels that singleness be given serious consideration in light of its advantages for serving Christ
These are principles that guide us in making decisions about marriage under any circumstances
Under this umbrella, we have much liberty and few restrictions
And this will be the pattern Paul will use throughout the rest of this letter
Answer specific questions with a few specific imperatives but many more general guidelines and principles
The second of the questions Paul was posed by the church is answered in Chapters 8-10
This question concerns eating meat sacrificed to idols
Obviously, with three chapters to cover this topic, we’ll take some time to examine all that Paul says
But in case you are thinking that this topic can’t hold much value for the modern Christian, let me assure you it does
Because Paul responds by teaching on a principle that transcends a specific situation, like meat sacrificed to idols
And Paul uses Chapter 8 to set forth the principle he wants to teach
As we get into this topic and Paul’s answer, we need some background on Greek culture
All ancient Greek culture was replete with idol worship, which largely took place in temples, much like churches of today
Pagan cultic practice regularly included an elaborate meal as part of their worship service
These pagan celebrations were common as part of state festivals (like government holidays of today) as well as private celebrations
The pagan worship ritual surrounding the meal typically had three parts
The first part of the ritual was preparation for the sacrifice
Following the preparation ritual, an animal was sacrificed
Finally, the meat of that animal was the centerpiece of a feast
Obviously, this process took a few hours, so the entire event was a major social experience
The meat of these sacrifices were commonly divided into three parts
First, a small part of the meat would be burned to the pagan god or gods as an offering
A second small part of the roasted meat was set before an empty table to honor the supposed god who was believed to be in attendance at the ceremony
Finally, the majority of the meat was served to the attendants and worshippers in the temple
The entire event honored the god who was presumed to be present
These meals were an intense and important social occasion for the participants
It was a highlight event in Greek society, like a Super Bowl party or Christmas party today, only held regularly
Most if not all of the Christians in Corinth has likely attended these gatherings regularly before coming to faith
It was likely their primary social experience
One commentator called these temple meal services the ubiquitous restaurant of antiquity
At these celebrations, worshippers supplied the animals used in the sacrifices, as their personal gift to the gods (think of it as BYO meat)
Consequently, the amount of available meat usually exceeded the appetite of the worshippers at the temple service
So after the service was concluded, the temple attendants would
take the extra meat and sell it in the marketplace, called the Greek agora
The sale of the meat provided income for the temple and the temple attendants
The general Greek population shopped for daily necessities in the agora, including browsing meat shops stocked with temple sacrificed meat alongside regular meat
Under these circumstances, it could be difficult for a shopper to tell the difference between meat that had been sacrificed in a temple service from the regular meat
Nevertheless, the best meat was often the temple meat, because worshippers generally offered only their best animals in sacrifice to the gods
So a picky shopper would naturally gravitate to the better cuts of meat, increasing their change of selecting temple meat
Because of these Greek practices, a Christian living in Corinth faced a couple of challenges associated with meat sacrificed to idols
First, a Christian would undoubtedly be tempted to continue participating in the temple services
These services were a primary source of joy and social connection in Greek society
These were the country clubs of today, so to cut off attendance altogether meant isolating oneself from friends and family
But these events clearly posed a threat to the Christian’s witness and maturity, hence the dilemma
Secondly, just shopping in the local agora posed a challenge for a Christian
How does a Christian avoid the temple meat?
Or should a Christian even be concerned with the source of the meat they eat?
These issues were at the heart of the church’s question to Paul, and in this chapter Paul is answering both issues
As we consider Paul’s response, it quickly becomes apparent that one situation concerned Paul far more than the other
As I mentioned at the beginning, Paul wants to teach principles of Christian living rather than merely answer questions about specific circumstances
So he begins his answer by quoting a well known Greek saying:
We all have knowledge
The meaning of the slogan was, there are some things everyone should understand so we need not suffer the ignorance of fools
The slogan meant we don’t need to accommodate someone’s ignorance if that ignorance is self-imposed
But Paul challenges that slogan by saying knowledge makes someone arrogant, where love for another is edifying
If we’re not careful, we can become arrogant and unloving to others in the body of Christ because of something we think we know and they don’t
It can puff up our pride, it can give us license in our own minds to treat them with contempt
And it makes others feel left out, judged and mocked
Furthermore, in v.2 Paul says the one who believes they have mastered some topic of spirituality, they are showing themselves to be a fool
When it comes to understanding God and our call to please Him, there will always be far more we don’t understand than what we have learned
Imagine an undergraduate student claiming to have mastered mathematics, physics or medicine?
So what should be harder to understand? Science or the Author of all Creation?
Obviously, understanding God and His wisdom is infinitely more challenging than any other subject
So if other subjects take a lifetime to master, we shouldn’t ever think we have all the knowledge when it comes to things of God
In fact, the pursuit of knowledge cannot lead us to God unless it makes us more like God
In v.3 Paul says a true pursuit of God and of godliness is found only through a sincere love for God
And if we love God truly, then we will also demonstrate love for His people
Therefore, the Christian is called to make love for our brothers and sisters a higher goal than seeking empowerment through greater knowledge
For example, Paul acknowledges in vs.4-6 that an informed Christian knows full well that there is no such thing as an idol
Obviously, idols exist in the sense that pagans invented and worship idols
Paul says in v.5 that these so-called gods exist in many forms throughout the unbelieving world
But the informed Christian now understands that there is only one true God Who made all things and Who called us to Himself
The rest are figments of the unbeliever’s deceived mind
Therefore, the meat sacrificed to these false gods is no different from any other meat
Our knowledge of the truth removes a sense of guilt concerning eating this meat, since we know the meat is not changing our relationship with Christ
The fact that an unbeliever previously chanted some mumbo jumbo when preparing the meat is irrelevant
We know the whole thing is a farce, a sham
So we can freely enjoy the meat without worry
But then Paul steps back from the specific issue and returns to the principle at the heart of this question
In v.7 Paul reminds the Corinthian church that not all of their Christian brethren have broken free from their pagan roots
Not all men have this knowledge that pagan gods are powerless and without power
Paul explains that they were accustomed to idols until now
He means they were devoted pagan followers all their lives
And it takes time for someone to move beyond the influence of such things
They are babes in Christ, and in this fragile state they are still trying to understand the truth while reconciling it with their past
Consider the shock it must be to suddenly understand that everything you thought was true is a lie
Everything you’ve been taught was patently false
All the ritual and verse and songs you were taught were meaningless and pointless
All the power you thought these so-called gods possessed was never there at all
All your hopes and expectations for what your gods could accomplish has been exposed as false hope and unmet expectations
Perhaps there is no greater shock possible than for someone to lose their religion
Of course, it’s all for the best since they have now come to know the truth
Nevertheless, Paul acknowledges it takes time to come through this process
I think something happens when someone comes to understand that Evolution is false and the world has been taught a lie
It takes time to wrap your brain around the fact
Paul says those Christians who live in this vulnerable infantile state are of special concern for the rest of the body
We must consider how to behave in light of their weak conscience
It’s not enough to say they have the same knowledge we have
It’s not a kind of loving to expect them to push all that history aside in an instant and dismiss their feelings and instincts
We took time to grow in our faith, so must every Christian be allowed the same time
Secondly, we must not make the highest priority in the body the exercise of our liberty or the exhibition of our confidence in knowledge
We may know that idols are nothing and that eating meat sacrificed to idols is nothing, but that doesn’t mean we have no other concerns to consider
Paul says in v.8 that we don’t commend ourselves to God when we exercise our freedom to eat anything
In other words, we don’t prove our maturity by what we allow for ourselves
We prove our maturity by what we are willing to deny ourselves
Who is the more mature in the faith?
The one who enjoys alcoholic drinks because he knows it’s permissible?
Or the Christian who denies himself the privilege out of concern for the weaker brother?
It’s not the exercise of our freedoms that please God, but rather our self-restraint exercised in love for one another
So the measure of our spiritual maturity isn’t how much we know, but how we put what we know to practice by showing love for others
In the case of eating meat sacrificed to idols, the Corinthians’ new-found understanding of idols had freed them to enjoy meat without guilt
But the decisions they made impacted others in the church
Paul reminds them in v.9 they must take care not to exercise their liberty in such a way that they become a stumbling block for the weak
Paul calls the conscience of immature Christians weak, in the sense that they couldn’t experience liberty in this area without defiling their conscience
Our conscience is our internal compass, the conviction the Spirit gives us to help steer us into righteousness
As we grow in our maturity, that compass becomes stronger and more accurate
But in the early days of our walk, the compass is less discerning
We can make a comparison to learning how to swim in a pool
When we first put a child in the pool, they need a lot of help to keep them from danger
As they grow more confident, they graduate to water wings, and when they’re ready they swim in the shallow without assistance
Finally, one day they swim even in the deep end without concern
Likewise, when a new Christian is exploring the limits of liberty, they need a lot of help to protect them from danger
If they are thrown into difficult situations too early, it’s like throwing a toddler into the deep end of a pool
Bad things are going to happen
That’s Paul’s concern here
Those in the church who understood liberty were still frequenting the temples to dine, and buying the sacrificial meat in the agora, but this practice offended and concerned other Christians
So the question posed to Paul was whether it was acceptable to eat this meat and to attend these temple services
And as we can see, Paul elevated the conversation to a bigger, more important issue
We may not inflict harm on a fellow Christian through our pursuit of liberty
Paul explains in v.10 that if one of our weaker brothers observe us dining in the temple, won’t they become confused about what is right?
They may be strengthened to eat meat sacrificed to idols
Paul means they will be encouraged by our behavior to act against their own conscience
Their conscience is still telling them that this is wrong
In their hearts, they made a decision to forsake pagan idols
They turned from such things to follow the true and living God
And so any thought of returning to that world sets off alarm bells in their heart, warning them to stay away
But then they see you, a respected member of the church, eating in the temple, appearing to enjoy the spectacle, oblivious to any concerns
Immediately, the weaker Christian experiences an inner conflict
On the one hand they feel their God-given conscience telling them to stay away from these things
On the other hand, they watch you modeling a different behavior and wonder if their conscience is wrong
Paul says the outcome will be that they will be strengthened to follow your examples
What he means is this weaker brother or sister has been taught by the stronger Christians that it’s OK to ignore their conscience
The problem isn’t whether this specific action is permissible or not…the problem is how it impacts the weaker Christian’s future sanctification
When we give a brother or sister license to go against their conscience, even in matters where they have liberty, we are setting them up for future ruin
In v.11 Paul says we have “ruined” our brother or sister
We have assisted them in ignoring their own convictions and to go against their own conscience
And in doing so, Paul says we have sinned against them and we sin against Christ
The sin we commit is in failing to uphold the commandment to love one another
The highest goals of the Christian life is to demonstrate love toward God and toward His people
But if the pursuit of our liberties leaves another Christian ruined, then we certainly have not loved them more than ourselves
And because we have turned our back on the Lord’s commandment, we have failed to love the Lord as well
Finally, we have become a stumbling block to our brother or sister, leading them into sin
Ironically, though the specific behavior may be permissible in liberty (like eating meat sacrificed to idols), if we go against our conscience, we still sin
James says:
The right thing is according to the leading of the Spirit, and if we teach a brother to go against their own convictions, we are teaching them to ignore the Spirit
And as they obey such an example, they will be sinning against the Spirit
We have become their stumbling block
So our chapter ends with Paul’s application of this principle
He says that if enjoying a food is the cause for a brother to stumble, then he will gladly never enjoy that food again
The enjoyment of meat or of any passing thing in this life is secondary to the building up of the body of Christ
This is another example of living with eyes for eternity
Whatever passing pleasures we may enjoy in this world – and there are many we have liberty to enjoy – all of them combined are less important than even one Christian soul
Leading others into sin is a serious offense, according to Paul
So serious that it should lead us to change our behaviors whenever necessary to avoid such an outcome
This is a voluntary change, not one required by scripture but one made necessary by our love for one another
Naturally, Paul’s statement raises questions for us on what are the limits of such self-sacrifice?
For the mature Christian it may seem unfair to give up liberties for the sake of those too weak to share in them
The answers to these concerns come in the next chapters
But for now, let’s dwell on the fundamental principle Paul taught us today
Enjoying liberty is not the highest goal in Christian life
Loving God and loving our brothers and sisters in the body is a much higher goal
And so we must exercise our liberty in love, sensitive to the convictions of others