Taught by
Stephen ArmstrongAccess all of our teaching materials through our smartphone apps conveniently and quickly.
Taught by
Stephen ArmstrongThroughout the Bible, we’re continually presented with the contention of two spiritual ideas
Faith and Law
In both the Old and New Testaments, we find countless references to both faith and works of law
Men and women called to faith in God’s promises
Yet at the same time, those same men and women are challenged to accomplish works in keeping with their faith
And from the beginning, men have confused one with the other
The troubles in Galatia that gave rise to Paul’s letter were just another example in that history of confusion
False teachers persuaded Greek Christians that the way to eternal life was by becoming a Jew first
Then following circumcision, the church must follow the Law
They had convinced believers in the church to take circumcision and to adopt a Jewish lifestyle as a prerequisite for pleasing God
For the believer, this behavior was destructive
It robbed the believer of their liberty in Christ
And it sent a confusing message about the relationship between faith and works
More troubling, this teaching gave opportunity for the unbelievers to join the congregation merely through works
Works cannot save
Yet by offering a recipe of works, the Judaizers were encouraging unbelievers to become an illegitimate participant in the church
So as we’ve studied, Paul wrote to set straight the relationship between faith and Law
First, he defended his authority to teach
Paul was an apostle with authority and a message given by Christ
Paul answered to no man for his teaching
And in fact, Paul was even required to correct other apostles to preserve the truth
Then after re-establishing his base of authority, Paul moved last week to refute the false teaching
He is teaching on three central areas of Christian doctrine
Soteriology, or the doctrine of salvation
Israelology, or the doctrine of Israel
And ecclesiology, or the doctrine of the church
The Judaizers were assaulting all three areas of doctrine with their lies
They taught salvation included works of Law
They taught that only Jews could be saved, so Gentiles
must become Jewish
They taught that the church wasn’t distinct but rather was to become part of Israel
So in response, Paul began in Chapter 3 with an appeal to their past experiences and to Israel’s history
He reminded the Galatians of all they had experienced by faith alone and without works of the Law
And he argued the truth of Abraham saved by faith alone
And he finished with an examination of the covenant that resulted in the promise of salvation for Gentiles
So we can summarize all that Paul taught in the first part of Chapter 3 this way
It was the Galatians’ faith that brought the church its first experience with the Lord
And faith has always been the basis of every saint’s relationship with the Lord
And by that same faith, we receive the blessing reserved for the children of God
So the Law of Moses plays no role in justifying nor sanctifying the saint
Now Paul moves deeper into a discussion of Israelology, particularly as it pertains to the Law
And tonight we begin with a simple but profound question, which was set up by his earlier defense of salvation by faith alone
Why the Law then?
If the Law is not the basis for our faith and blessing, then why did God give it in the first place?
The answer to this question is important for the Galatian church, since the Judaizers were distorting the Law
But this issue is also important for our church today, because numerous church traditions have over-emphasized the Law
Even to the point of teaching Christians to live according to it as a matter of sanctification
So the question for us today is how should a Christian relate to the Law, knowing it was not given to save us or sanctify us?
Paul explains the Law’s unique purpose in the next section, beginning with it was “added”
The word in Greek translated added means to place something beside
So the Law came in a covenant to Israel 430 years after the covenant given to Abraham
And it comes alongside the original covenant
It doesn’t join it
It doesn’t replace it
It sits next to it
Why couldn’t the covenant of Law replace the covenant given to Abraham? Because laws cannot make a person righteous
Laws exist only to tell us when we are unrighteous
For example, we have a law saying I cannot murder
So far, I haven’t murdered anyone
But can we say that this law has made me righteous?
No, because righteousness is much more than merely whether I murder
And the law itself does not possess power to stop me from murdering should I chose to do so
That law only exists to convict me of sin when and if I should choose to murder
Therefore, a law’s purpose doesn’t even go into effect until after someone has already sinned
As such, the Law only serves to create greater awareness of sin
So this is why Paul says the Law was added “because” of transgressions or sins
Man’s sin necessitated the giving of God’s Law
Paul teaches the same thing to the Romans in Chapter 3:
The chief purpose of God’s Law was to make clear how unrighteous men truly are
So, the Law didn’t come to ensure the blessing God promised to Abraham
It came to point out sin, to moderate it and nothing more
Thirdly, Paul emphasizes that the Law’s delivery reflects its different purpose
The Law was given to Israel by angels through a mediator
The Law came as part of the Old Covenant through a complex delivery mechanism that included God working through angels and a man, Moses, to form His covenant
Paul is emphasizing the fundamental difference between the Old Covenant and the New Covenant
When a covenant has a mediator, it tells us that both parties participate in keeping the agreement
Both parties have terms to fulfill and penalties if they fail to keep the agreement
In the case of a covenant, the penalty is death
This means the covenant of Law is a covenant that can only bring blessing if men keep the terms perfectly
If we break a covenant, then the terms are forfeited
And the only expectation is death
But the covenant given to Abraham came very differently
It didn’t have a mediator
God alone made promises
Abraham was put to sleep so that he could do nothing but receive what God granted him
So that covenant is not based on performance
It depends entirely on God being faithful and keeping His promises, which He always does
That leads us to the final difference Paul lists between the Law and the Promise
The Law sits alongside the covenant of Moses only for a time
Paul says it was added “until”
Don’t pass by that word too quickly
The Law was, until it wasn’t
The word until makes clear that at a certain point, the covenant of Law ceases
The Law no longer sits alongside the covenant of Promise once the promised Seed had come
Remember, Paul has said that the seed referred to Christ, as indicated by Paul’s use of the singular “seed”
So when Christ came, He brought an end to the Law
So Paul says in v.19 that the Law came in a different way than the covenant of Abraham, and exists for different purposes and exists only until the Promised Messiah arrived
So why did the Law need to exist for a time alongside the covenant of promise?
Paul now explains that answer
So the Law and the promises of God are two distinct and different covenants
But Paul asks another obvious question the reader may be thinking
Does this mean the covenant of Law is against or opposed to the covenant of the promise in the sense that there are two competing ways to get to Heaven?
Paul says not at all…for if any Law were capable of bringing us to righteousness, then God would have said so
He would have told us explicitly that the way to the Father was by works of Law
Instead, Paul says in v.22 that the Law shut everyone up in sin
As we read earlier in Romans 3:19
Then Paul explains how to understand the relationship between the Law and the covenant of Grace
Paul says that the Law’s capacity to bring conviction for sin is actually part of God’s plan to save those who believe
God displays the whole world as guilty for their works according to His Law
And that when He granted mercy, it came through an entirely different mechanism
By a promise given to those who believe in Jesus Christ
So how did the Law accomplish its good purpose in bringing men to faith?
Paul concludes this examination of Israelology to answer
For the Jew, this literally meant it kept Israel separated from the world and under custody of its care
But for the Gentile, it carries the opposite meaning
The Law shut out the Gentile from the promises of God
The Law was a barrier to Gentiles entering into the assembly of God’s people
So whether you were Jew or Gentile, the Law dictated your relationship to God, either holding you close or holding you off
In either case, it served to convict you of sin
And demonstrate man’s unholiness in comparison to God’s holiness
Meanwhile, Jews and Gentiles could enter into the blessings of God’s promises to Abraham and be declared righteous by their faith
Even still, they would still be required to live under the Law until the Messiah arrived
During this waiting period of human history, Paul says the Law became a tutor to Christ
In the original Greek, it says the Law became the children’s teacher about Christ
In other words, the Law was a teacher for God’s people, teaching of Christ so that we would find him
And by faith in Christ, we would be declared righteous
Now that Christ has come, we no longer find use for the Law
We no longer need to rely on the Law to learn about Christ since He has been revealed
We don’t need a tutor, since Christ Himself has spoken
Now we can still learn about Him in a study of the Law
But studying the Law is very different from following the Law
We are encouraged to study about Christ in the Law, because all scripture is useful for instruction
But we are not expected to live according to it now that Christ has appeared, because His appearing becomes greater testimony than our attempts to keep the Law
To illustrate what Paul’s saying, let’s imagine these two covenants as trains moving on tracks
The covenant of promise spoken to Abraham is the Grace train headed in a straight direction to the promised kingdom
There are a countless number of cars on this train
And in these cars, we find empty seats prepared for the saints of God
Suddenly, another train appears on another set of tracks
This second train is called the Law train, and it’s also moving
But it’s going in the opposite direction
And its destination is the Lake of Fire
And unlike the Grace train, the Law train is already full to overflowing
As the people in the Law train consider their surroundings and their destination, they become aware of their jeopardy
They come to realize they are on the wrong train, headed to a terrible destination
But there’s no way to steer the train, because it’s glued to the tracks
If they stay on this train, there is no avoiding the outcome
Then in their search for an answer, some notice the train on the nearby tracks headed in the opposite direction
On the side of the train is written the conductor’s name, Jesus Christ
Immediately, they see their chance
They decide to jump from one train to the other
They leave the Law train to join the Grace train
Instantly they begin to move in the opposite direction
Now they are moving toward the Kingdom
But then at a point, the tracks diverge and the Law trains heads away and fades into the distance
Meanwhile, the Grace train continues onward
Only now, we notice the train conductor has his head outside the window yelling “All aboard!”
And still more people are running up to the train and jumping on
When we look out more closely, we notice that train conductor is Christ Himself
In a sense, that’s how Paul describes the relationship between Law and grace
The law shut up everyone, made them aware of the jeopardy and gave them reason to look for a better way
The Law train was never a solution for sin
But it made them aware of the need to find a solution
Then at the right time, they encounter the Grace train
They come to realize by faith that the promised Christ is the Messiah
In that recognition, they must leave a reliance on works of the Law in order to accept the grace of God
When they receive grace, they move in a new direction and obtain a new hope in God’s promises
And then when the conductor of the Grace train made Himself known, the call of the Gospel goes out to the world
As that happens, the Law is no longer the vehicle to bring men to Christ
Now the name of Christ Himself draws men to salvation
So the Law leaves the scene and all that remains is the conductor yelling “all aboard”
So the Judaizers were teaching that these two trains worked together
That somehow God took the Law train and hooked it to the caboose of the Grace train
And now these two trains were headed in the same direction
Furthermore, they wanted the church to spend all its time in the Law end of the train
I think I’ve run this analogy into the ground, so let’s move forward with Paul
He transitions out of the discussion of the relationship between the Law and grace with a comforting statement
All believers are made sons of God through faith in Christ Jesus
Our faith alone brings us into the family of God
And if we are sons, then we are also heirs
Moreover, this new identity takes presence over any identity we possessed prior to faith
We are all baptized into the Body of Christ by faith
Believers are clothed in the righteousness of Christ
Paul is drawing upon Greek culture, since in Greek society a young person was recognized as an adult when they were allowed to wear a toga
Furthermore, that clothing covers over our past distinctions
Whether we were Jew or Gentile
Whether were were enslaved or a free man
If we were man or woman, nevertheless we are all of the same identity having come to faith in Jesus Christ
And if we all belong to Christ in this way, then we are all brothers and sisters in the same family
Therefore, we are all descendants of Abraham in Christ
Remember, Jesus Himself descended from Abraham (in the sense of His earthly affiliation)
So if we join Christ’s family by faith, then we likewise join Abraham’s family
So by faith, we all become the descendants of Abraham and of the Seed, Christ
So we receive the promised blessings
Before we move further, let’s understand what Paul is saying and not saying
Paul is saying that believers no longer need to be concerned with issues of Jewishness vs. Gentile ,or other issues of culture in the question of salvation
Those distinctions only made sense in the first place because God established them through the Law
Choosing to work in Israel to the exclusion of Gentiles for the most part
But once Christ came, the Law had met its purpose, and it went away
So if the Law has gone away, then distinctions between Jew and Gentile went with it for the purpose of salvation
Gone as well are any other earthly distinctions for the purpose of determining righteousness before God
Faith in Christ is the great equalizer
On the other hand, Paul is not saying that we no longer observe practical differences between members of the Body of Christ
Both Jews and Gentiles still exist in the church
Men and women still exist
And in some cultures and times, slavery still exists
The moment a man or woman comes to faith they do not cease being male or female
Likewise, other natural distinctions will remain
But Paul is teaching that these differences are irrelevant for the purpose of salvation
Therefore, as Christians we need not place ourselves back under a Law given to Jews to lead them to Christ
In other words, we don’t need to become Jews to be saved, since salvation doesn’t depend on any identity except our identity in Christ
Now as we enter into Chapter 4, Paul is still talking about being sons of God by faith, but now he begins to raise the question of why the church is submitting to the Law unnecessarily?
Paul compares believers under Law and awaiting grace as a child
In this early stage of life, a child has a status barely better than a slave or servant in the family
He can’t make his own decisions, he can’t direct his own affairs
Nevertheless, he is an heir
In a date in the future, he will come into the things he is promised as an heir
While he awaits that day, the Master places His child under the care and instruction of guardians and managers
He is instructed by these authorities
He is disciplined by these authorities
And he is restrained by these authorities
But at a date set by the father, the child is set free from these restrainers
Likewise, we were under the restraints, conviction and instruction of God’s Law or the general conviction of our conscious
These things acted to preserve us to a degree until the time the Father appointed
And then at the appointed time, we came to faith in Christ
By that faith we were set free from the bondage to the Law
We were like that child that has matured to the point he is no longer under the custodian
Notice that Paul says in v.4 that this time of living under the custodian of the Law existed only until Christ was born
At the point that Christ was born of a woman, and He was revealed as the Messiah, the Law was no longer our tutor
Now Christ spoke for Himself directly
So Paul isn’t saying that individually the Law is still in effect until we individually come to faith
Paul is speaking in terms of dispensations
As the Messiah was revealed in the flesh, then the bondage of the custodian was released for all
The dispensation of Law gave way to the dispensation of grace
So now Paul makes the application for the church
To conclude, Paul says if we are no longer a slave to works of law, then that can only be true if we have moved to a position of sons by faith
And if have become sons of God by faith, then we should expect to receive what sons receive
We have been promised an inheritance in Heaven
Which means our salvation is assured
As every son is a son for life
So if the Judaizers were putting pressure on the believers to become Jewish or else lose what had been promised, Paul says this isn’t possible
These blessings came as a result of a covenant God delivered to Abraham by means of a promise
If they are the result of a promise, then we need do nothing to earn them or secure them
And if we have received them, then we are sons with an inheritance
So nothing more is required
Next week, we’ll look at Paul’s questioning of the church for their seeming willingness to return to such things
And he raise questions of what it means about their claimed faith