Taught by
Stephen ArmstrongAccess all of our teaching materials through our smartphone apps conveniently and quickly.
Taught by
Stephen ArmstrongThere is a short ditty that helps us remember the purpose of each part of the Bible
This memory aid helps us recognize the purpose in each major section of the Bible
The Old Testament is Christ promised
The Gospels are Christ revealed
The book of Acts is Christ preached
The letters are Christ explained
The book of Revelation is Christ anticipated
The epistles were given so that we might fully appreciate the meaning and significance of Christ’s work of redemption
Naturally, that means when we turn to the letters of the New Testament, we’re going to find doctrine
In fact, virtually all the doctrines of our faith comes out of the letters of the New Testament
Knowing that, we must give priority to understanding and appreciating doctrine
Doctrine is an examination of spiritual truth
And understanding doctrine requires thinking soberly and deeply
We come to a study of doctrine to learn why the Lord has done what He has done
We’re learning the truth about sin, about holiness, about man and about God
And to appreciate what is yet to happen
Ultimately, we learn doctrine for much the same reason that we were taught chemistry or biology in school
We learned those subjects so that we could make sense of the way things are
I didn’t need to understand biology or chemistry to appreciate and enjoy nature
But as I learned more about those subjects, I could better appreciate what I saw by understanding it at a deeper level
Furthermore, through my knowledge I could live and work in greater harmony than was possible without that knowledge
By learning about elements and the reactions of certain chemicals, I could avoid tragic accidents
By learning how the body works I could make better choices for my health and wellbeing
Similarly, I don’t have to study doctrine to know God and enjoy Him
I am saved by my faith before I know even the first thing of doctrine
But if I take time to study doctrine in Scripture, I gain the benefits of that learning
I can enjoy God even more fully through a better understanding
I can learn how to please Him better, how to avoid potentially dangerous choices and decisions and I can resist false teaching better
So studying doctrine is absolutely essential to proper spiritual development as a Christian
Chapter 3 of Galatians is 100%, full strength Christian doctrine
Paul is teaching (he might say re-teaching) the churches in Galatia on the core doctrines of the faith
The doctrines Paul touches upon in the next three chapters are:
Soteriology, the doctrine of salvation
Israelology, the doctrine of Israel
Ecclesiology, the doctrine of the Church
He addresses these doctrines in a chiastic structure
A chiasm is a literary structure in which a series of points are developed in a certain order
The order of the thoughts proceed to a point, then the order is reversed and the thought completed in opposite order
So if an argument has three points, a chiastic procession of those points would be 1, 2, 3, 3, 2 ,1
In Chapters 3-5, Paul address the doctrines of soteriology, Israelology and ecclesiology in a chiastic order, loosely speaking
He begins with a discussion of soteriology
Then he proceeds to a proper view of Israel and the Law
Lastly he shows the meaning for the church
Finally, he’ll look at all three again in reverse order
Paul opens with five rhetorical questions that set up his teaching
Each question has an obvious answer
And those answers drive the reader to natural conclusions that counter the false teaching of the Judaizers
There is no way to answer these questions honestly without contradicting the tenets of the false teachers
First Paul asks who bewitched you, oh foolish Galatians?
The world foolish can also be translated stupid
This is a hard word in scripture, equivalent to an insult
How is it that Paul can say this without sinning?
In short, Paul is speaking honestly with regard to their thinking on this matter
They are acting foolish, like a person who has never learned basic things
Paul asks are you acting this way because someone bewitched you?
The Greek word for bewitched only appears here in the New Testament
It means to be placed under a spell
So in effect, Paul is saying “Are you acting so stupidly because someone cast a spell upon you?”
His point is that this is the only way he can imagine they would have come to their present state of confusion concerning Christ and the Gospel
Because they were taught properly before Paul left town
He says at the end of v.1 that Jesus Christ was portrayed as crucified before their eyes
I don’t particularly like this English translation of the original text
The Greek words literally say “before your eyes Jesus Christ was described from before all time as crucified”
Paul is reminding the church that their own eyes saw the truth of Jesus written in scripture declaring He was the Messiah Who died for sins
These new believers had received proper instruction from scripture
They saw for themselves the basis of their salvation, which is Jesus crucified as scripture testifies
Then Paul asks the second question: how did they receive the Spirit?
Was the arrival of the Spirit in their hearts a matter of Law or faith?
Clearly, the answer is obvious again
As they heard the Gospel message Paul preached, that message was united with faith in their hearts
And at the moment of faith, they received the Holy Spirit
The Spirit didn’t come as a result of keeping the Law of Moses
Clearly, the church in Galatia hadn’t been living under the Law of Moses
More than likely, they had no knowledge of the Law whatsoever
So obviously, the Spirit’s arrival in their hearts had nothing to do with following the Law of Moses
Why is Paul focused on the arrival of the Spirit?
Because the baptism of the Holy Spirit is the moment of salvation
In Romans, Paul says that the definition of a Christian is one who has the Holy Spirit
So Paul is asking the Galatians, how did you receive eternal life? By faith or by works of Law?
And the answer is by faith
Then Paul asks his third question, which is itself predicated on the answer to the second question
Paul asks if this church is so foolish (stupid) that they now believe they can be perfected by Law having been saved by faith
Obviously, Paul is assuming they knew the right answer to the earlier question
The church received the Spirit by faith, that is they were saved by their faith and not by works of Law
So then Paul asks why they are switching horses in midstream?
If faith was sufficient by itself to bring them to Christ, then why would they foolishly believe that returning to life under the Law was necessary to perfect them?
The word for perfect is epiteleo, which means to bring something to completion
God began the work of salvation in them by faith
So Paul asks if the origin of their salvation is by faith, why do they feel the need to bring it to completion through works?
Our sanctification – our being made holy – was begun by the Spirit and will be finished by the Spirit
God brings it to completion on the basis of our faith in His promises
Paul’s fourth question directs their attention to what they experienced as believers
The churches in Galatia saw immediate and intense persecution as a result of their conversion to Christianity
In Acts 14 we have the record of Barnabas and Paul preaching in Galatia
As they prepare to leave and go home to Antioch, we read:
Paul was encouraging the disciples to withstand the tribulations they were experiencing
He reassured them that suffering was a natural consequence of faith – it was a privilege to suffer for Christ
So now Paul asks what did your suffering mean if you were not actually saved at the time?
Remember, the Judaizers were teaching that the churches in Galatia were not actually believers because they hadn’t yet been circumcised or followed the Law
So if this teaching was to be believed, Paul asks why were being persecuted? Was it in vain, for no benefit?
If persecution is the mark of the believer, then how do they explain the enemy attacking them?
A house divided against itself cannot stand
Finally, Paul’s last question is a summation of all the issues Paul has raised so far
When we see God’s work in this church, the giving of the Spirit and the working of miracles, how do we explain it?
Did God accomplish these works because the church was working under the Law?
Or did He respond to the faith of the church at the proclamation of His word?
The answer to this question is as obvious as the earlier questions, so let’s review them all
Who cast a spell on the Galatians to lead them away from the testimony of Jesus crucified in agreement with the scriptures?
The Judaizers
How did the church receive the Spirit, receive salvation and become children of God?
By faith having heard the Gospel preached by Paul
If their sanctification began in faith by the Spirit, then how should they expect the rest of their walk with the Lord to proceed?
In faith by the Spirit
Did they experience persecution for Christ in vain, as if they hadn’t yet been saved without circumcision?
No, they rightly suffered having believed
Has God chosen to demonstrate His desire to work in your life through faith or through works?
He has manifested Himself through faith
These questions and their unavoidable answers deal a devastating blow to the Judaizers’ arguments
Those false teachers called for works of Law to assure salvation, but Paul proves their arguments can’t hold water
And now he moves forward to make his argument against the Judaizers
First, Paul sets straight the doctrine of salvation by grace through faith
Next, he’ll look at the doctrine of Israel, which includes the purpose of the Law
Then finally, he will address the proper understanding of the Church in God’s economy
Paul opens his teaching on salvation with “even so” which means just as, or according to
This is a transition intended to alert the reader that Paul is launching into teaching mode
He reminds the church that from the beginning God worked through faith to bring righteousness
Even before the Law was given, before even circumcision was commanded, the Lord declared Abraham righteous
Abraham believed a word of promise God spoke
And as a result of that faith, God declared Abraham righteous
When God declares anything, it becomes true in the moment it’s spoken
It may require many years before the truth of it comes to pass for men, but it is no less real and true even as we wait
God is not constrained by time
Which is why Jesus says the heavens and earth may pass away, but God’s word will never pass away
The word of God is as eternal as God Himself
So if Abraham was declared righteous in this moment in Genesis 15, then righteousness simply cannot be a matter of law or circumcision
For we know that God is perfectly just
Therefore, if one man can be declared righteous without those things, then they are unnecessary for any man
So Paul concludes in v.6 that those who are of faith are sons of Abraham
In these verses Paul raises the next major area of doctrine he wants to address, that is an issue of Israeology
Abraham is the father of the nation of Israel
He received a promise from God and a covenant
That promise and covenant eventually brought the nation of Israel into existence
And from that nation came the word of God and the Messiah
But the Judaizers had taken Abraham’s importance and distorted it
They claimed that only those who were Abraham’s children would be included in the promises of God
Galatians couldn’t be blessed, or receive an inheritance or enter the kingdom unless they were part of the family that received those promises – that is to become Jewish
So now Paul moves to discuss Abraham’s importance and the connection between Abraham and the Gentile believer
Those who are of faith, that is those who have received the promises of God in Christ Jesus, are counted as Abraham’s sons
But in what sense are we Abraham’s sons (and daughters)?
There are two mistakes we could make doctrinally in interpreting Paul’s statement here
On the one hand we could assume that Paul means we must in some sense literally become Jewish
This was the conclusion the Judaizers had reached
On the other hand, we might go in the other direction and claim that belief erases all distinction between Israel and Gentiles
This is the mistake of the modern replacement theology movement
Paul will eventually come back to settling this question in the letter
But first, he uses the next section to give a proper perspective on the Jewish nation, the law and the promises spoken to Abraham
Paul says that God always intended to bring salvation to Gentiles in due time
And since God intended to save Gentiles, who do not have the Law, he devised a means that did not depend on Law
He preached to Abraham that through him all nations will be blessed
The word for nations in Hebrew is goy, which simply means Gentiles
So before the Jewish nation had even been birthed, the Lord declares that salvation would be made available to Gentiles through Abraham’s family
So how was a Gentile to be blessed with salvation through Abraham’s descendants if Gentiles didn’t descend from the man Abraham?
Paul says Gentiles join that blessing by faith
By faith we are called Abraham’s sons
In Jewish thinking, the word “sons” can carry the sense of follower
Just as the sons of God are followers of God
So the sons of Abraham are the followers of Abraham
As Jesus demonstrated to the Pharisees
The Pharisees called themselves the sons of Abraham
But Jesus pointed out that if they are to be called sons of Abraham, then they should be following Abraham’s example
So the Gentile becomes the son or daughter of the Lord in faith, because by that faith we become His follower
Paul will return to discussing this issue of Jewish and Gentile children
Meanwhile, Paul continues to develop the doctrine of Israel by turning to the purpose of the Law
The Judaizers had made following the Law of Moses the centerpiece of their argument
They taught that believers, whether Jew or Gentile, must live according to the Law to be saved
But here Paul says that all who rely on the Law for their justification are under a curse
The Law itself declares in Deuteronomy 21:23 that all who do not abide by all things written in the Law are cursed to hang on a tree (that is to die)
James echoes this truth when he teaches
God’s law functions as an indivisible unit
Keeping some of the law while failing to keep others gains us nothing, since God’s Law is an all-or-nothing standard
Scripture defines righteousness as a point, not a scale
We see this clearly in an exchange between Jesus and a rich young ruler
Only God is good, Jesus says
Men prefer to think that good is a scale of degrees, but we have the wrong measuring stick
Being good means being 100% sinless
Even one sin makes us 100% bad by God’s standard
This is why scriptures say that the one wishing to live according to Law must keep all of it or else be cursed by the penalties of the Law
The penalty for failing to keep the Law, according to the Law itself, was death
Only those who keep everything written in the Law from birth could escape that penalty
On the other hand, scripture has always declared that righteousness was obtainable only by faith
Abraham was our example of a man declared righteous by faith, and the prophets made similar declarations
Habakkuk 2:4 declares that the righteous man shall live by faith
The prophet teaches
Faith in God’s promises is and always has been the one and only way to righteousness, which is the requirement to enter God’s presence
So in v.12, Paul concludes that faith and law are always two mutually exclusive means of seeking righteousness
In other words, there are only two options for reaching Heaven, and one is no option at all
We can either earn entrance on our own merits living up to the standards of the Law, which is to be equal to God’s goodness
Which Jesus Himself said is impossible
Or we can rely entirely on faith in Jesus Christ
Paul says it’s impossible to seek righteousness by Law and by faith at the same time
They are mutually exclusive paths
Either I trust in my own ability to meet some standard of performance and demonstrate my righteousness by my actions
Or I recognize I can’t meet God’s standard, and so I trust in God’s promises instead of on my own abilities
I rely exclusively on His mercy trusting in His provision of Christ
To summarize, Paul repeats that he who practices the Law shall live by them
Another way to state this principle is to say those who place their trust for salvation in works of Law must be prepared to accept the result
They must be prepared to live with what follows
And since every man has sin, and breaking even one law leaves us short of righteousness required for Heaven, then following the Law leaves us empty handed
Even our choice to follow law for justification is proof in itself that we are not resting in faith in God’s promises
The Bible teaches that we cannot receive God’s promises in faith until we have first repented of dead works
So those who seek to be justified by works of Law are giving evidence they have not received Christ in faith
Because the Law is no solution to the problem of sin, Paul turns back to Christ as our solution
Here we have the entire Gospel message and the central point of the Bible
Christ redeemed sinful men from the curse
The word redeemed means to pay a ransom, to free someone by means of a payment
Jesus purchased or ransomed us from the curse of the Law
By hanging on the cross, a tree of sorts, Jesus died in our place
So with the penalty of the Law satisfied, we have the opportunity to be saved by faith rather than works
Everyone who stands in God’s presence must possess a righteousness equal to God’s own goodness
The Law of God is the standard we must meet
But working to keep that Law is a fruitless path
So if we can’t fulfill it, our only hope is that someone else fulfill it on our behalf
Paul says Jesus died to give us that way
He makes possible the blessing given to Abraham and also to the Gentiles
Those who rest in God’s promises by faith are blessed
In contrast to those who rest in works and are cursed by their sin
It seems so clear that faith trumps works of Law, especially given the futility of working to earn perfection
So why did the churches in Galatia agree with the Judaizers? What argument did they make to convince the church to keep the Law?
In short, it was historical sequence
The Judaizers had argued that since the giving of the Law to Moses came later in God’s plan, it took precedence
It took priority over the early revelation to Abraham
So while faith was good enough for Abraham, once the Law came to Israel at Sinai, it superseded the earlier revelation
This analysis was wrong and completely misunderstood the purpose in the giving of the Law
And if Paul is going to defend salvation by grace through faith alone, then he needs to teach the proper perspective of the Law
He is going to teach more doctrine, ecclesiology, the doctrine of the Church, and use examples from human experience to show the proper relationship between God’s promises and the law
Paul’s argument begins with a human example of covenants
A covenant is a special form of relationship, one we don’t see today outside of marriage
It is a legally binding agreement similar to contracts
Covenants had terms and obligations like a contract
But covenants always differed in important aspects as well, and Paul points those out here
First, Paul says that once a covenant is ratified, no one sets it aside
Paul’s referring to a covenant’s most enduring quality…it endures
A covenant is legally binding for life
There is no “cancel” button on a covenant
To break a covenant meant paying with your life
So it was said that only by death does a covenant come to an end
This is why Jesus says to divorce and remarry is always adultery
A marriage is a type of covenant before God, and therefore is an agreement that only comes to an end when a death occurs
Secondly, Paul says no new conditions can be added to it
It’s not a living agreement, like the US Constitution
It is formed in a moment, according to certain terms, and thereafter it remains unchanged
So every covenant must continue until its terms come to pass
Now these limitations are true even for a regular, everyday human covenant, Paul says
So why should we expect a covenant set by the Lord to be any less certain and unchangeable?
Will not God honor His covenants at least as well as men honor their covenants?
Certainly, that’s the conclusion we should make, and that’s the application Paul begins to make starting in the next verse
The promises Paul mentions are those made in the Abrahamic covenant
The terms of that promise were given to Abraham personally and his seed
Paul is referring specifically to the moment in Genesis 22 when God spoke to Abraham
When the Lord spoke these words to Abraham, He used the singular form of the word seed in Hebrew (zera)
If God had simply meant that Abraham and his offspring were to receive these things, then God would have used the plural form of the word seed
But Paul says God purposely used the the singular form of seed because He had a certain person in mind, that is Christ
These promises had Christ’s arrival in mind, because Christ was the One to fulfill these promises
Now earlier, the Lord had spoken to Abraham about this same covenant and said Abraham’s descendants would receive the blessings
In those earlier presentations, God used a plural word for descendants
So the promises do extend to Abraham’s family in the sense of believing Jews
But in Chapter 22, God changed His language to use a singular version of seed to show His promises revolve around Jesus’ arrival
This was Paul’s point
The covenant given to Abraham was given by a promise, and that promise was spoken to Abraham and to Christ
Until both Abraham and Christ receive what God has promised in the covenant, then the covenant cannot be set aside or changed
Until Christ is given all that the Lord promised for Abraham and his Seed, the covenant will remain in force
So then Paul makes the application
The Law of Moses arrived 430 years after the Lord spoke the promises of the covenant to Abraham
This later arrival of the Law was the reason Judaizers claimed that the Law was a requirement for the believer
Their logic was the Law must be a requirement if the Lord added it after the promises spoken to Abraham
But Paul argues such a conclusion is impossible given the nature of covenants
Nothing that comes after an existing covenant can invalidate a covenant already in effect
Therefore, nothing can nullify the promises God made to Abraham
Abraham and Christ were going to receive the things God promised
And those promises were no less sure because of the Law’s arrival
In v.18 Paul brings the argument to a close
We remember that our salvation, which includes our inheritance, comes either by works of Law or by the means of God’s promise
But as we established earlier, these two things cannot both be true at the same time
Righteousness and the inheritance we receive in the Kingdom cannot be by both a promise and by works
Either I give you something and it is a gift, or you obtain it by earning it for yourself
Something cannot both be earned and be a gift
So in v.19 Paul says if we gain our salvation and with it our inheritance by keeping the Law, then we cannot also say we gain it as a gift from God
We must say that the Law replaces the promises of God
But as Paul demonstrated, our inheritance in the Kingdom was made available to Abraham and all who follow him by faith alone
So which will it be? Working the Law or receiving a promise?
While the issue may be settled in our hearts, and I hope it is, still Paul knew this church needed to hear more
Maybe you have the same question the church did in Paul’s day
That question is why the Law then?
If salvation didn’t depend on the Law, why was it given to Israel?
As Paul continued to teach Israelology and moves into Ecclesiology, we’ll get our answer next time