Taught by
Stephen ArmstrongAccess all of our teaching materials through our smartphone apps conveniently and quickly.
Taught by
Stephen ArmstrongArchimedes had discovered a way to measure the purity of a gold crown by means of a simple, nondestructive test
By submerging the crown in water
This story can be useful as a great picture for understanding the main thrust of James’ letter
His letter describes how the Lord uses simple tests to determine the purity of our faith
The Greek word for test back in James 1:3 is dokimion, which means to prove or show the purity of something
So the testing of our faith, according to James, ultimately produces the perfecting or proving the purity of our faith
By removing the impurities of our walk
And like Archimedes’ water test, the test the Lord sends are nondestructive in the sense that they aren’t sent to destroy us but to build us up
So we could say that the Lord is at work in our life testing the purity of our faith to show whether it is contaminated with impurities of one kind or another
In Chapter 1, James discussed how the Lord uses trials or difficulties as a means of testing our faith
And in Chapter 2, James describes two additional methods of testing
The chapter opens with an examination of how God tests our faith by our responses to people from varying social backgrounds
Later in the chapter, James moves to a third test, which we will address when we get there
Turning to the second test now, James says:
The second testing of faith comes on the issue of favoritism
There is an interesting Greek word used here for personal favoritism: proso-polemp-sia
It’s a translation of a Hebrew idiom which literally means to “lift up the face”
The point of the idiom is that lifting our face to someone is to show them our favor or attention to the exclusion of others
James says don’t hold (the Greek word actually means accompany or join) your faith in Christ with favoritism among men
Again, we’re talking about a man or woman of faith who is acting wrongly in that faith…failing a test in that sense
James now moves to using examples to make his point clearer
The setting for this example is your assembly, but the word in Greek for assembly is sunagoge, which is the Greek transliteration of synagogue
Remember, this letter was written to Jewish Christians, who still attended the synagogue as the way to worship Christ
Two different men enter the assembly, and the contrast between the men is clear
One is wearing fine clothing, or gorgeous apparel
While the other is clearly poor, as evidenced by his dirty (or filthy) clothes
The rich man is known to be rich by his gold ring, my Bible reads
But in Greek the phrase is a “gold-fingered man” which suggested he had many rings on his fingers
So he is not just rich, but obviously rich
And likewise, the poor man is obviously poor
And it’s in this visibility of wealth or social status where we find a test developing for the believers in this assembly
The test is how we choose to think and act in response to that show of wealth
And the key to passing the test, as before, is to think and act like God thinks and acts
Relying on godly wisdom, led by the Spirit
In vs. 3-4, James presents an indictment and describes the crime
As each of these men walk in to the assembly, you pay special attention to the rich man
The Greek word for special attention means regard with favor
The rich man looks wealthy and so this leads the usher to guide the man to a good seating place
Likewise, the poor man is given a lowly position in the assembly
There are two errors or sins committed here
And they are committed not only by the one who selects the seats, but by association everyone in the assembly who would see that decision as proper is also culpable
The first sin was in making a judgment of each person’s worth, and then responding to each person in a different way based on that judgment
James says in v.4 that they have made distinctions among themselves
The assembly is showing favor to one man over another
And regardless of the basis for that judgment, the very fact that we make distinctions is wrong – period
This fact alone is wrong, and it means they failed the testing of their faith
Our faith should bring with it an understanding that all men have sinned and fall short of the glory of God
Our faith also understands that by Christ’s blood we have all been made new creatures and are seated with Christ in the heavenly realm
We are brothers and sisters in Christ without distinction in worth or value to God
So when we look upon our brothers and sisters in Christ and assume one to be better or more important than another, we sin
We aren’t looking at each other with eyes of faith; we’re relying on worldly eyes
Rich people aren’t more important or more special than poor people in God’s economy
Good looking people aren’t better either
Neither are smarter people, famous people, UT grads, etc.
Any attempt to re-establish that kind of worldly ranking system in the church is simply sinful, and ungodly
When we see people in these ways in the Body of Christ, we sin because we fail to operate in godly wisdom
We are living in our flesh
There was a time months ago when one of our elders received a call from a representative of a TV celebrity
This celebrity was in town to shoot an episode of a TV program
And the representative called the church to let us know that the celebrity and a small number of guests might arrive for one of our Sunday services
We told the person that we would welcome them no differently than we would any visitor
We hoped their arrival wouldn’t be a distraction from the Sunday service, but we wondered what effect it might have
In the end they never showed up
But if you think about it, just the fact they thought they needed to call beforehand says something about the church today
It suggests that celebrity has found its way into the Christian thinking and this person knew from experience that they needed to prepare a congregation for their arrival
Perhaps it’s an understandable concern, but it’s still sad
If the celebrity had arrived at Oak Hill Bible Church, would we have passed this test of faith? The test of favoritism?
Would we have seen them as merely another visiting brother or sister in the Lord?
Would our welcoming have been different, even in small ways?
Would we have shown them to the best seat?
Would we have handed them a bulletin or a cup or water or a donut when we might not have done the same for another visitor?
I think we’re generally very welcoming to every visitor, and I know we would have done the same to this celebrity
But I still think it would have been a real test for some of us, myself included
To not just act normally, but to truly see the person with eyes for eternity
To simply see them as a sinner saved by grace and no different than anyone else
That’s the test James is teaching about, and it’s obvious from the letter that he has concerns that these churches were failing the test regularly
In v.4 James says that our favoritism for the rich Christian over the poor one stems from evil motives
What “evil motives” do we have for making distinctions between rich and poor in the church?
If we’re honest with ourselves, the answer comes easily
We favor a person who looks rich because we have a secret hope that they will return our favor by using their wealth to reward us
Perhaps they will reward us personally or just reward the church
But either way, it’s the lure of money that causes us to think and act sinfully
That’s the evil motive that James is referencing
Remember the test came because the man was obviously rich
We see the wealth and the wheels begin turning, subconsciously maybe
We need to put those thoughts aside and replace them with the wisdom of God’s word
James offers that wisdom…
James gives us God’s view of rich and poor
God chose the poor of the world to be rich in faith and heirs of the kingdom
But when we show the poor scorn or simply dismiss them, we dishonor that person
The Greek word is atimazo which means treat shamefully
We treat them as if we are ashamed of them or for them
But God has chosen them and made them rich in the things that matter, spiritual things
If we saw them with eyes for eternity, knowing they share the same future we have, then we wouldn’t shame them
Consider this…they may earn more treasure in the coming kingdom and be the “rich” person in the future kingdom
And what kind of eternal reward might we have if we spend this life treating God’s chosen in a callous or shameful way?
By the way, James’ statement that God chose the poor is echoed in Paul’s later letter to the Corinthian church
Speaking to a church made up of societal misfits, Paul says that was exactly the way God intended things to be
God chose or selected those who would become a part of the church in Corinth from among the poor and socially disadvantaged in the culture
And He did so for a specific reason, so that at the time of judgment God could shame the wise and powerful of this world
While the least of the world are lifted up by faith and receive a glorious inheritance
Those of the world thought to be rich and powerful will be shown to be “wretched and miserable and poor and blind and naked”
As Jesus described them in Revelation 3:17
This principle has its exceptions, of course
Not every poor person will become a follower of Christ
And some rich and powerful will be called to faith in Christ
But the general principle will remain true throughout history until our Lord’s return
You see that principle reflected in the story of Lazarus and the rich man in Luke 16
Or in the way Jesus said it’s virtually impossible for a rich man to enter heaven
James moves on that not only is this differentiation sinful, it’s also fruitless
The rich don’t respond to our favoritism by throwing their money around
They take it for granted, and ultimately become the oppressors of society, especially if they are fighting to keep their wealth
James gives another general truth, that the rich and powerful tend to speak out against Christians and Christ
If you have doubts about these principles, just pay attention to the entertainment and political celebrities of our day or any day
Do they tend to honor and respect Christians and Christ?
Do they tend to live godly lives and strive to be Christ-like?
Again, I’m not suggesting and nor is Scripture teaching that the rich man has no hope and that all poor people are good
But there is a general principle at work in God’s economy and we should understand it and let it inform our opinions about people
Bottom line: Don’t show favoritism
Instead of failing these tests by sinning in favoritism, James teaches us to live differently
In v.8, James commands us to live according to the Royal Law
Some call it the Golden Rule
Love your neighbor as you love yourself
Remember Jesus was asked which commandment in the Law was the most important
Jesus answered that the most important was to love God with all your heart, soul, mind and strength
And the second most important is to love your neighbor as you love yourself
James is taking for granted that his readers have understood the first commandment having come to faith in Christ
And now he is reminding us that we have a responsibility to fulfill the second one just as much
If we treat every person as we would treat ourselves if we were on the receiving end, then we are following the Royal Law and we are doing well
Showing partiality among people for any reason is incompatible with keeping this commandment of Christ
Have you ever considered that implication?
Christ gave two broad commandments for Christians under the New Covenant
Love God
Love your neighbor
And James says unequivocally that when we show partiality within the Body of Christ, we fail at this second commandment
We sin and transgress the Law of Christ
Next week, James moves forward into an examination of this law and how we may run afoul of it
But to close today, let’s just establish the basic truth that there is a law in effect for the Christian
We may already know and understand that as Christians we are not under the Law given in the Old Covenant
By Christ’s fulfillment of the Law’s requirements, He has met its terms for us
And by faith, we are credited with that work
So the Old Covenant has been fulfilled in Christ’s work and no longer requires our work…we have ceased from that work
But some Christians go too far and assume that we have no law at all
They believe that no rules exist to guide our behavior
And they are wrong, since Jesus Himself gave us the Law for Christians under the New Covenant
The Laws are the two I mentioned earlier, and Scripture calls these two laws the Law of Liberty or the Law of Christ
James is about to explore the Law for a moment in this chapter, but he makes clear here that favoritism is one way we violate that Law
And just as there are consequences for violating the Law of Moses in the days of the Old Covenant
There are consequences for violating the Law of Christ