Taught by
Stephen ArmstrongAccess all of our teaching materials through our smartphone apps conveniently and quickly.
Taught by
Stephen ArmstrongDavid’s fall into sin and his unwillingness to repent have led him to the place where God had to deal with His sin
The process began with the Lord revealing David’s sin to the prophet Nathan, who in turn confronted David about it
To his credit, David immediately confessed and repented, which was characteristic of David’s heart overall
David was not a man who gloried in sin nor practiced sin, as the New Testament would describe it
David was a sinful man, yes, but he desired for better, so even when he did fall, he was quick to return to the Lord in humility
If we catalogued all of David’s positive, godly traits, I believe David’s humility in repentance was perhaps his most admirable quality
And that’s why this section of our study on David’s failings is so valuable
It’s not merely a look at what David did wrong…it’s an examination of how David responded well to those failures
In this example, David committed serious sin, perhaps the most serious sins a person can commit in the case of adultery and murder
Initially for several years, David failed to hide his sin, and the Lord graciously gave David time to repent
And we have to wonder what would have happened had David confessed on his own? Would his son have lived?
We can’t know because David never took that path
Instead, it required the Lord to expose it for him and to bring consequences against David as discipline so the Lord could protect His name, He said
As we learned last week, the Lord needed the world to see that David’s sin brought severe consequences so no one could claim God approved
The nation of Israel was to be a light to the world, meaning they were representatives of God’s righteous ways
And so when the leader of God’s people behaved in ways more consistent with pagans than with God, the Lord had to act
As the prophet Nathan explained to David:
Nevertheless, the Lord showed grace delaying the child’s death for a week giving David time with him, which David used to plead with God
In the end the Lord did as He declared by taking the child home, and David learned a valuable lesson
So David ended his pleading and mourning and accepted the discipline of the Lord with humility and moved on
David went directly from his child’s bedside to worship before the Lord, humbly recognizing his part in these circumstances
He also recognized the Lord’s right to discipline him in the way that God chose, as David wrote in the psalms
David said he knew His God is a God of righteous judgment, and therefore He is blameless in whatever He does, and yet He is also a God of mercy and grace
And these two sides of God’s nature often work hand-in-hand, sometimes in the very same set of circumstances
So even as God was disciplining David for his sin, the Lord was also prepared to bless David for his humility
This pattern can confuse us at times, since we commonly expect only one or the other from someone in authority
Either we do good and get rewarded or go poorly and get punished, but we never expect both at the same time
But God’s ways are not man’s ways
We pick up near the end of Chapter 12
First, we’re told David comforts his wife in her sorrow over the loss of her son, and this must have been a difficult conversation for David to have
David is obviously fully repentant at this point, but we don’t know where his wife was at this point
Does she blame God for her son’s death? Was she willing to acknowledge her own culpability in the situation?
Has she forgiven David for killing Uriah?
Sometimes the hardest step in accepting God’s discipline with humility is helping others in your life accept it with you
Then David and Bathsheba conceive again, and the new son is born probably around 991 BC, and David names the boy Solomon
The name Solomon comes from the Hebrew word shalom, meaning fullness, completeness or peace
His name probably reflects both David’s peace with God having been forgiven and restored from his sin
And also Solomon’s time ruling Israel in peace, since Solomon ruled over a kingdom largely absent external threats
Curiously, the prophet Nathan chooses to give the boy another name, Jedidiah, which means beloved of Yahweh
It says Nathan assigned Solomon this additional name for the Lord’s sake, meaning to honor the Lord for His work in David’s life
Jedidiah was Nathan’s pet name for Solomon, not a name Solomon ever used, and the name is never mentioned again
Now clearly we see the grace of God at work in David’s life in giving David another son, almost as if to replace the one that died
Every child we receive is the result of a conscious, purposeful decision by God to bring a new life into existence through us
And of course, this child is no different…the Lord has chosen to bless David and Bathsheba with another son
And therefore, the birth of this son is evidence by itself that the Lord is still willing to bless David
And as we move on, we see further evidence of God’s sovereign purpose in all this, as God foretold that this new son would one day rule
Later in his life, David tells Solomon how the Lord spoke to David before Solomon was conceived
At some point before Solomon’s conception, the Lord revealed His plans to David to give him a son who would build a house for the Lord
This moment in 1 Chronicles 22 probably happened early in David’s life soon after the death of David’s son
The Lord appeared to David and comforted him with the knowledge that he would have another son
And the Lord said the son’s name would be Solomon and he would build a house to the Lord in this age
You’ll remember another moment in Chapter 7 when David was contemplating building a house for the Lord
The events of that chapter happen near the end of David’s life after Solomon is already alive
So apparently, David returned to the thought of building a house for God later in life as he felt self-conscious in his palace
At that time the Lord told David not to pursue the idea, because He had plans for a future descendant who would build a permanent house
That promise was the Davidic Covenant, which says that a descendant of David, Jesus, would reign in a day to come
Meanwhile, God told David earlier that his son, Solomon, would build a lessor house in his day
But either way, David wasn’t going to build a temple for the Lord
So the point here is David knew Solomon was going to be born before Bathsheba conceived
Which reinforces our understanding of the sovereignty of God in all that happened between him and Bathsheba
At the end of v.24, the writer says the Lord loved Solomon, and this is an important statement that holds great meaning
This is one of those times in the Bible when the Lord uses the term “love” to mean chose or selected
The most famous example is found in Malachi:
The Lord tells Israel that He has loved them, and then the Lord says, “You will ask Me how I loved you?”
At that time, the nation of Israel was still recovering from years spent in exile as God’s discipline against His people for their sin
And the Lord knows that His people were questioning His love for them in light of that great hardship
So the Lord says I will show how you know that I love you: I chose you to be My people
The Lord points back to the moment that He chose one brother over another which led to Israel coming from Jacob
In fact, the Lord changed Jacob’s name to Israel reflecting that God intended to bring a nation from this man
So the Lord reminded Israel that they can see His love for them in that He chose them for His covenant
And at the same time God did not choose Esau, and not choosing Esau is expressed as the Lord hated Esau
Esau’s descendants have no future and no blessing from God unlike Jacob
From this passage we come to understand that to be chosen by God is to be loved by God, and to be passed over by God is to be “hated” by God
Later, in Romans Paul points to this text in teaching that all who descend from Abraham are God’s chosen people
Paul draws from Malachi 9 using the same phraseology…God loved Jacob, meaning God chose Jacob, and Esau He didn’t
And this makes perfect sense…to be chosen by God is to be loved by God, and to not be chosen is not to be loved (or we say to be hated)
This isn’t a description of God’s emotions…God didn’t have better “feelings” for Jacob over Esau
In fact, Paul emphasizes that this choice was made while the sons were in the womb before they did anything good or bad
In that way we would see that it was by God’s choice that one received good things and one received bad things
God makes such choices all the time, because that’s what it means to be sovereign…to have authority over every outcome
Knowing this, we come back to 2 Samuel 12 to find God saying that He loved Solomon, and now we understand it means God chose him
We heard this already from David in 1 Chronicles 22 when David recounted how the Lord said He had chosen his son Solomon
That’s what this writer is saying also here in 2 Samuel 12…Solomon was God’s choice to succeed David
The writer needs to tell us this now because Solomon was not the expected choice
Normally, the oldest son of the king would be expected to inherit the throne at the death of the father
David’s first born son was Amnon, while Solomon was the 7th born son of David
So Solomon was far down the pecking order for succession
But God chose Solomon as David’s successor, just as the Lord told David He would, and that choice supersedes anything that men expected
And it’s notable that David’s successor would come by the woman that David took through adultery and murder
And it’s also notable that this son would be a uniquely wise and powerful king in all the history of Israel, save only Christ Himself
These details are proof that we cannot sin our way out of God’s grace, nor does our sin separate us from the love of God
Most of us were raised to believe that bad people should get bad outcomes, while good people should get good outcomes
The problem is that from God’s perspective, every human being is bad…there is none who do good, no not one Romans 3 says
So therefore the only way for God to ever give us something good is by His grace, not because we merit good things
When you understand this, then you can make sense of why God put one son to death as discipline and gave another as grace…
God is not rewarding David’s bad behavior…God is showing David grace, undeserved merit
And both acts were good for David…because God disciplines us as a blessing, and so everything that comes from God is good
God used David’s greatest sin to ultimately produce David’s greatest blessing, his son Solomon
In grace, God granted David another son through Bathsheba and assigned this new son earthly prominence and spiritual significance
Truly, this is an example of Paul’s statement in Ephesians:
God does this for all His children, blessing us even as we sin and sometimes even if we aren’t ready or willing to repent
Clearly, we should expect discipline when we sin and perhaps blessing when we don’t
But that’s not a rule nor does it predict God’s behavior
God turns all circumstances to good, so He often mixes discipline with other forms of blessing at the same time
Interestingly, the son that was taken from David and Bathsheba could never have received the blessings that Solomon received
He was conceived out of wedlock, so he was a bastard son, and as such he could not have been king of Israel
So the only way the Lord could bless an offspring of David and Bathsheba with the throne was to give a new son
And in addition to blessing David with a new son, the Lord continues to bless David and the nation in warfare, leading to a defeat of the Ammonites
The war against the Ammonites had been raging on and off for some time now
Remember, years earlier David had Uriah killed in battle against these same Ammonites
And it would seem the Lord left Israel’s victory out of reach for as long as David hid his sin
But once the sin was exposed, and David had repented, then the Lord was ready to move His plan for Israel forward
Here again, as David goes, so goes the nation, so not only is David moving back to a place of blessing, so is the nation
And that’s why the author of 2 Samuel includes this account here at the conclusion of the story of David and Bathsheba
He’s making the connection that because of David’s restoration, now the Lord was willing to bring about the Ammonites’ defeat
And the story starts with a summary statement in v.26 as we’re told Joab captures the Ammonites’ royal city, their capital city, Rabbah
The rest of the passage explains how that happened, beginning with Joab sending word to David
Joab speaks as if the deal were already done saying he has captured Rabbah because he captured their water supply
Without water, he knew the city couldn’t last more than a short time, so Joab calls for David to share in the final victory
Joab wryly adds that if David hesitates, Joab will win without him and name it for himself
So David sends his entire army of men to the battle, and with the extra manpower, Joab succeeds in taking Rabbah
Part of the spoil was the crown of the king of the Ammonites, which weighed a talent of gold, which was about 75 lbs
It’s very unlikely that David (or any king) ever wore a crown this heavy, or even let it rest on his head
It was a symbol of power, so when v.30 says Joab placed it on David’s head, we can probably imagine that several men held it
But the imagery is certainly powerful…David victorious over perhaps Israel’s most dangerous enemy, and gaining more power and riches
The spoil of the battle is brought to Jerusalem in great amounts we’re told in v.30
And the people living in all the cities of Ammon were enslaved and made to work for Israel
These same people had long done the same to Israel, tormenting the people of Israel for centuries, but now they cease to exist
The story of David’s victory over the Ammonites sits as bookends in the story of David’s sin, and as such, it shows how our walk with the Lord gets sidetracked
The Lord’s work in our life proceeds until we get sidetracked in sin or worldliness, and then He pauses our progress with Him
He leads us through that battle with our flesh and through discipline if necessary until we repent and return
Then our walk and our progress in other areas of our life picks up again where we left off
In a sense, everything is progress, because even during the pause, He is moving us away from our wayward path walking us back to the narrow
But we tend to see spiritual progress only in terms of big changes happening around us or through us
While God measures spiritual progress by what happens inside us, which makes the pauses the most important times of growth
When you’re not making progress in plans and goals and “ministry,” it’s probably because the Lord is busy attending to something inside you
When we’ve repented, put away our sin, and learned the lesson, then He will open new doors for the next spiritual adventure
The three chapters of David and Bathsheba give us a vivid example of that pattern
David’s “ministry” was leading Israel in defeat of their enemies and in growing prosperity
But his walk was sidetracked at times while the Lord contended with personal issues in David’s life
Our next section beginning in Chapter 13 is the longest single section of the book running from Chapters 13-20
The section is another telling of David’s failures and their impact on the nation of Israel
But unlike the section we just studied, the sin driving this section doesn’t stand out so obviously
The principle sin driving this section will be David’s choice to take multiple wives and the consequential rivalries that resulted
Adding to those consequences will be David’s hesitation to implement the will and law of God
The consequences of these sins lead to some of David’s sons dying and David being forced to leave Jerusalem for a time
The story begins with three new characters, Amnon, Absalom and Tamar
Absalom is David’s third-born son by Maacah, and David also had a daughter by Maacah called Tamar
David’s first-born son, Amnon, was born to a different wife named Ahinoam
Technically, these three children of David are half-brother and half-sister, sharing the same father but different mothers
Both Amnon and Absalom were in their early 20s, born to David while he was still in Hebron waiting to become king over Israel
Tamar, the full sister of Absalom, was probably in her early teens
And one of the consequences of David’s sin of taking multiple wives were these unnatural desires and jealousies between families
David’s son Amnon finds his half-sister, Tamar, attractive to the point of distraction and lusts after her
He is so infatuated with her he makes himself ill, because he sees she was unmarried and yet he can’t see a way to have her
Under the Law of Moses, a half-brother couldn’t take his half-sister as a wife, which is why he sees no way to marry her
So Amnon is frustrated at the prospect of being unable to have her for himself and it’s depressing him greatly
But then a friend offers a solution of sorts
When the Bible calls a person shrewd, it’s usually not a compliment, and certainly not in this case
This young man notices that his cousin, Amnon, was depressed day after day and presses for an explanation
Amnon confides in Jonadab that he is in love with his half sister, Tamar, Jonadab sees opportunity to ingratiate himself to Amnon
Jonadab is smart, but not in a godly way, and Amnon is easily influenced for the worse by his cousin
These two serve as poster children for Paul’s comment in 1 Corinthians 15 that bad company corrupts good morals
Only in this case it’s more a case of bad company makes bad morals worse
Jonadab tells Amnon to set a trap for Tamar by pretending to be sick and then asking David to send Tamar with food
In that day, a young, unmarried woman was not typically in the company of young, unmarried men
Had Amnon sought her company under normal circumstances, it would have raised concerns and questions
Preparing food was exclusively the work of women, so it became the perfect excuse to ask for Tamar
But by pretending to be ill, Amnon’s request will seem harmless
Why does Jonadab want to help this cousin? Because Jonadab wants to gain a friend in David’s successor
Amnon was the first-born of David, so Amnon was most likely to become king after David died, or so Jonadab thought
On the other hand, Tamar’s brother, Absalom, was the strongest leader among the sons of David
So shrewd Jonadab sees an opportunity to pit one brother against another and either way he gains favor
If Amnon becomes king, then Amnon will remember Jonadab’s helpful counsel
But by encouraging Amnon to take Tamar, he sets up Absalom to take revenge and eliminate a rival
Either way, he can play the situation to his advantage to gain the favor of the winner
So Amnon takes the advice and the plan moves ahead
Obviously, the point of this plan is for Amnon get Tamar alone so he can force himself on her when no one could help her
We call this rape, of course, and it’s no coincidence that one of David’s sons is about to sin in a way very similar to the way his father sinned
The acorn doesn’t fall from the tree and the hens have come home to roost, etc.
In other words, David’s sin with Bathsheba has consequences for the way his sons think and act toward women
And there is a basic biblical principle (and a principle of human nature) that says the parents’ sin influences their children’s sin
And David displays some naiveté here by agreeing to send Tamar to her half-brother’s bed
She works in a room adjacent to his bedroom making bread, and through the doorway he can watch her work
Once more, his eyes see something that provokes lust and lust is consummated in sin as we learned before
So when she was ready to serve him, he orders the other servants out of his bedroom and orders her to bring the food herself
As she offers him the bread, he grabs her arm and demands she lie with him
She begs him as her brother not to violate her for such a thing was not proper in Israel
She’s speaking both of the general violation of an unmarried woman and the specific sin of incest
In that time the one and only thing of value a woman had to offer a husband in marriage was her virtue
If that was taken from her, she would find it very difficult to attract an honorable man and might remain unmarried for life
She asks him where she could get rid of her approach, meaning that since they couldn’t marry, there was no way to be made whole
So she can’t be restored by marrying him, and since there was no way he could keep her, he would be seen as a fool in Israel
And then as a final try at escaping, she suggests Amnon talk to David to ask for Tamar’s hand in marriage
She certainly must have known that David would have refused the marriage, but she suggests this option as a delaying tactic
She’s looking for any way she can to keep her half-brother from taking this step
In the end, he overpowers her, rapes her and sets in motion a cascade of devastation in David’s family
As soon as the act was complete, Amnon’s lust for Tamar turned to hatred, and in fact the hatred was greater than the passion he had previously felt
This response is evidence that Amnon’s attraction for Tamar had been entirely selfish and fleshly, if not downright demonic
Once his flesh obtained what it desired, he reacted with self-loathing, which came out of him as a hatred for Tamar
He begins to blame the object of his lust for his feelings of guilt and the awareness that he will face consequences
Sexual sin is somewhat unique in this respect…it’s an action that can’t be reversed, has lasting ramifications, and the body itself is one of the victims
As Paul says, speaking about sexual sin
Immorality refers to sexual immorality, and Paul says flee this sin particularly because it demoralizes and desecrates our own body
And that has effects on our mind and heart that are far greater than we may realize until much later
Amnon shows that effect immediately as he throws Tamar out of the room
But she is now trying to salvage something of the situation for herself
Though the Law prohibited a marriage between them, she was grasping at straws hoping that a solution might be found
The one thing she didn’t want was to be rejected by the only man who could marry her with her honor intact
But Amnon would not have it, and so he compounds his sin by sending her away a violated woman with no prospects
Amnon calls for his servants to throw her out of the room, and the text says that she wore a long outer cloak
The writer is making the subtle point that this outer cloak obscured any evidence of her having been violated
So the servants take her out without knowing what transpired between them and lock the door so she can’t return
With no hope, she tears her garments in distress and mourning and weeps loudly as she goes
Naturally, her hysterics attract attention and that leads to the next part of the story…
As she returns to her family home, her brother Absalom immediately suspects the cause and asks if Amnon had raped her
The very fact that Absalom knew to ask that specific question tells us that Amnon’s desire for his sister is not a secret
Somehow he knew that his half-brother was on the hunt for Tamar
So now when she has shown up in torn clothing and crying, he is ready to ask that question
He tells his sister to be silent, meaning she should not say anything more about it and do not let it trouble your heart
He’s promising he will take care of her in his home as spinster forever since she is unlikely to ever be married off
So we’re told she remained in her brother’s house desolate
This sounds like Absalom is being kind and brotherly, and he is to a degree, but he’s also working an angle here for himself
He wants to keep the incident quiet to allow him time to take revenge and advance his path to the throne
Absalom sees an opportunity to take out a rival for the throne in a semi-legitimate manner when the timing is right
But if Absalom saw this coming, then certainly David should have known also, and that makes his decision to send Tamar to Amnon all the more foolish
And even more surprising, in v.21 David learns of this incident, probably from the servants, and he is very angry
But what’s surprising is what the text doesn’t say…there is no further commentary on David’s response to Amnon’s sin
Under the law, a man who did what Amnon did to Tamar was to be cut off from the nation, which generally meant to die
So David should have immediately acted against Amnon to keep the Law in defense of his daughter and for righteousness sake
But David does nothing at all, and that plays into Absalom’s hands, for had David done the right thing, then Absalom’s plan would have ended
Although David’s sexual sin gets the most attention, David’s hesitation to merit out timely justice was a close second
He failed to bring justice against Joab for killing Abner and that has longterm consequences for him and the nation
And here again, David fails to deal swiftly with the sin of Amnon, and as a result it leads to a coup and the loss of two more sons
On the one hand it’s easy to understand David’s hesitation to condemn his first-born son, but on the other hand what of his daughter, Tamar?
It seems David’s loyalties and desire to please and be loved clouded his judgment of right and wrong
Love without justice leads to injustices like the one visited upon Tamar
Not only did David not defend Tamar afterward, he allowed the situation in the first place by not dealing with Amnon’s lust
Again, if Absalom could know so easily what happened to his sister, then clearly the word was out about Amnon’s intentions
And it’s hard to believe no one would have warned the king that his daughter might be in danger
Maybe that’s why David didn’t act against his son for the rape…perhaps David felt that the blame rested with him
Or perhaps David hesitated because he felt like a hypocrite in judging his son for taking a step similar to David’s own sin
Yes, David didn’t rape his sister, but he did have a man murdered
So David could hardly say his son’s sin was worse, but of course that wasn’t the standard for justice
God’s Law doesn’t demand that we be sinless before an authority can hold someone else accountable to the Law
But it does demonstrate the difficulty of standing up for righteousness when we ourselves aren’t standing there
We are likely to shrink back from doing right by someone else when we aren’t doing right by God
So whether out of misplaced affections or guilt, David doesn’t act against Amnon
David is sinning against the Law of Moses by not holding his son accountable
And that decision has long and devastating consequences
These events set up Absalom’s revenge which itself leads to a coup and the ripping apart of David’s family and Israel’s government
Sin has consequences for all of us
And when you’re king of Israel, your sin has consequences for an entire nation