Taught by
Stephen ArmstrongAccess all of our teaching materials through our smartphone apps conveniently and quickly.
Taught by
Stephen ArmstrongTonight we cover the final summary chapter in the section chronicling David’s successes and blessings upon the nation of Israel
Beginning in Chapter 5, the writer has shown us the magnitude of David’s impact on the nation of Israel
A nation that had previously been a small, weak and persecuted people surrounded by enemies were now turning into a superpower
As a result of God’s anointing upon David and his rise to power as king, he has seen blessing as have the people of Israel
And those blessings have come in the form of David’s growing family and wealth, and the nation’s military, economic and religious strength
In the chapters we’ve studied already, we’ve watched as David has established the nation’s capital in Jerusalem
He has moved into a place and fathered many sons and daughters
He has brought the ark to Jerusalem, expanded the borders of the nation and defeated many of its enemies
The nation is growing in number, prospering in the land and establishing a peaceful existence in the land
And then last week, we studied the moment the Lord blessed David and the people with blessings that will extend far beyond David’s lifetime
The Lord established a covenant with David promising to preserve David’s dynasty forever through a ruler to come
And under that ruler, the world will experience a kingdom that never ends and fulfills the promises God gave to Israel
This Kingdom is many years away, but David is overwhelmed at the grace of God and expressed his thanks at the end of Chapter 7
And now in the final chapter in this section, we return to where we started: a review of David’s military success against Israel’s enemies
We start with the description of a series of conquests that David accomplished early in his reign as king
As I mentioned at the start of this section of 2 Samuel, Chapters 5-8 are a summary of David’s impact on the nation as king
As such, they are organized topically, not chronologically, so these scenes jump around in time
Last week in Chapter 7 we studied an event that took place near the end of David’s life
He was in his palace, wealthy and at peace having defeated all Israel’s enemies in his day
And now the writer takes us back to the beginning of David’s reign to learn how David defeated those enemies
But the opening of v.1 is confusing because it starts with “now after this…” indicating these battles came after Chapter 7
But the opening verse of Chapter 7 says specifically that chapter happened after David defeated his enemies
The most logical explanation is that the writer is referring back to his prior chapter on military conquests, which is Chapter 5
Notice how Chapter 5 ends…
As Chapter 5 ends, David has defeated the Philistines throughout the land
And now jumps to the start of this chapter, and the action picks up right where it left off in Chapter 5…
So the writer has doubled back to the topic of David’s military victories, and picks up again where he left off with the Philistines defeated
David has taken control of the Philistine’s greatest city, Gath, and is now the undisputed leader of the land previously held by the Philistines
This was no small thing in that day nor in the annals of history
The land of Canaan had been largely under Egyptian rule for the better part of 500 years
As Egyptian control waned, the Philistines exerted their power hoping to fill the vacuum left by the Egyptians
But now David has defeated the Philistines and established Israel as the emerging superpower in the fertile crescent, and successors to Egypt
The Philistines had occupied the lands directly west of Israel along the Mediterranean coast and coastal plains
Now Israel’s western border was free of any enemy
From here the writer describes additional campaigns that took place in the east, north and south, removing Israel’s enemies from all sides
We already see the Philistines mentioned in v.1, and they were the power along the western coast
Then in v.2 the writer describes the battle against the Moabites
When David defeated the Moabites, he employed an unusual method of determining who to allow to live and who to execute
David had the men of Moab lie down on the ground and measured their height according to a “line”
Those men measuring one “line” were allowed to live, while those that measured more than one line (i.e., two lines) died
The point being that David allowed young men, probably under the age of adulthood, to live while killing all full grown males
Those left alive became servants of David, subjects of his kingdom, and brought tribute
Now as we hear this, we might think this was cruel or unnecessary on David’s part
But we need to see it in light of the customs of warfare in that day
Customarily, a defeated enemy was entirely wiped out by the victors leaving no one left alive, not men or women or children
The defeated nation was eradicated so that they could never again threaten the victors
So in allowing young men to live, David was showing unusual restraint and kindness toward Moab
Perhaps David did this because his grandmother, Ruth, was a Moabite
It was also a risky move on David’s part, because it opened the possibility the Moabites would rise up in a future generation
Next, in vs.3-11we’re told of David’s victories in the north against Zobah and Aram
It started with David defeating Hadadezer, the king of Zobah near the river Euphrates
His name means “Hadad is help”, and Hadad was a chief god of the Arameans
After defeating Hadadezer, David makes a point of dismantling their means of waging war against Israel
In v.4 we’re told that David captured 1,700 horseman and 20,000 foot soldiers
But in 1 Chronicles 18, the same story reports 7,000 horsemen with 1,000 chariots
Because we have 1 Chronicles, we can know that the text in 2 Samuel was miscopied
So since the actual number was 7,000 horsemen with 1,000 chariots, that means at least 7,000 horses
David “hamstrung” those horses, which means he cut tendons in their legs rendering the horses useless as an animal of war
These animals could still live in this condition though they could never support a rider again
Once more, David shows restraint and mercy while ensuring that an enemy of Israel couldn’t prosecute war again
As David was engaged in battle against Hadadezer, we’re told in v.5 that the king called for help from an ally, Aram
Aram had been a long-standing negative influence on Israel and an enemy
In the time of Judges, the people of Israel followed after the idols of Aram among other nations
And so Aram’s allegiance with Zobah gave David the opportunity to defeat Israel’s enemy on the north
David defeats Aram as well and kills 22,000 Arameans, which was essentially their entire standing army
David then stationed garrisons of Jewish soldiers in the land of Aram to subdue the people and guard the territory
And in v.6 we’re told that these too became servants of David and brought tribute to David
At this point, the writer felt the need to emphasize that these amazing military victories were evidence of the Lord helping David
David gained these incredible victories over great distances and against powerful enemies because God wanted David to win
The Lord was bringing about a result that served His purpose in blessing David and Israel
But the Lord was also producing a picture of Jesus through David, which He does time and again
Once more, we have a picture of what God will do for Israel in the times of the Kingdom
When the Kingdom arrives on earth, the enemies that surround Israel will become servants of Israel
And in the book of Ezekiel, we’re given specific prophecies concerning how the Lord will deal with Moab, Aram and others
So in David’s day, the Lord shows a picture of what the Messiah will do in His day, though in a greater and permanent way
Not only did the Lord grant David military success, but He also blessed Israel with considerable wealth as a result of these victories
Each victory yielded David and Israel something of value
The shields captured from Hadadezer were gold (likely gold plated or embossed)
The cities of Hadadezer provided a very large amount of bronze
And then other nations began to send David wealth as tribute
In v.9 we hear of Toi of Hamath, which was northeast of Aram, who had long been at war with the Arameans
So when David defeats Aram, Toi sends his son to David to bless David with silver, gold and bronze
This gift probably came as part of a covenant of peace between David and Toi
Then in vs.11-12 David takes all that he obtained through the defeat of various enemies and dedicated it to the Lord
This probably means it was set aside for use in a future temple, though when that time came God told David to wait
This comment tells us that these campaigns in the north probably took place late in David’s reign
They happened as David was contemplating building a temple, and after the events that we will cover in Chapters 10-12
The author’s tendency to move events around in time can be confusing for someone reading the book straight through
But remember the author is arranging the content to summarize David’s impact on the nation of Israel
When you consider that David ruled 40 years, you quickly realize that a 24 chapter book isn’t nearly enough to contain everything
So the author selected key moments and achievements in David’s life and arranged them by theme
While David was fighting in the north, the Edomites in the south tried to take advantage of David’s absence and invade Israel
And in this verse we find another copyist error, which we again discover because we can compare it to 1 Chronicles 18
David was fighting the Arameans in the north, where he killed 22,000 men according to v.5
Meanwhile, in the Valley of Salt, which is south of the Dead Sea, David’s commander, Abishai killed 18,000 invading Edomites
Once defeated, Israel established garrisons of Jewish soldiers in Edom, a longtime historical enemy of Israel going back to Jacob
Once again, this remarkable victory showed that the Lord was helping David even in places where David was not present
Back to the error, v.13 says David killed 18,000 Arameans in the Valley of Salt, but that’s not what we know happened according to 1 Chronicles 18
1 Chronicles 18 says that while David was away killing Arameans, 18,000 Edomites died in the Valley of Salt
A copyist inadvertently ran the two thoughts together at this point, combining “18,000” with “David away fighting Arameans”
We know that both 1 Samuel and 2 Samuel suffer from a number of these minor copyist errors, more than any other book
And this fact reinforces our trust in the accuracy of the Bible, because it highlights the degree of precision in the manuscripts we possess today
The copies of Scripture are so meticulously preserved even to this day that even small differences like this catch our attention
And the Lord has provided a way for us to know these errors exist and to find correction through other texts of Scripture
So that even when errors are introduced as we see here, they only serve to reinforce our trust in the text
When someone suggests we can’t know what the Bible said because it’s been changed throughout history, they show their ignorance
The Bible has been so carefully preserved throughout history that we know when even one word has been changed
Those changes are easy to detect by comparing one manuscript against the tens of thousands of copies that exist
And even then, the differences are so minor (as in this case) that they do nothing to change the general meaning or teaching
So David has subdued enemies in the west, east, north and now the south, with garrisons stationed in all directions
The only major enemy not mentioned here are the Amonites, because David’s battle with them is part of the story of Bathsheba
But clearly, this is a new age for Israel, a time when the nation casts off fear, oppression and weakness
It ushers in a time of plenty and carefree living in the land
As the writer concludes this multi-chapter section summarizing David’s many achievements, he lists the key leaders in David’s government
In v.15 we’re told David reigned and administered justice and righteousness for all his people
That’s a very ambitious statement, and we wonder just how true it could have been?
Clearly, there could not be total righteousness and justice in Israel in that day, and therefore it must be an allusion to the Kingdom again
David’s rule was a suggested fulfillment of things to come in the Kingdom under Jesus, where true justice and righteousness lives
Later, Isaiah makes this connection for us
Jesus’ reign in the Kingdom will bring a government of peace and justice and righteousness for all people
But in David’s day, the phrase is speaking only in relative terms
In comparison to previous times in Israel, the times under David were just and righteous
And these outcomes were the direct result of the Lord working through David and David walking closely with the Lord
Finally, we see in vs.15-18 the leaders and their areas of responsibility in David’s government
Among those listed is Joab, the one who entered Jerusalem to become the commander
David also had a secretary who recorded the events of his reign, and a private security guard made up of Gentiles
Both the Cherethites and Pelethites immigrated from the island of Crete, and as such they were related to the Philistines
It was not uncommon to choose body guards from foreigners since they were less likely to sympathize with Jewish rivals
David also installed his sons as ministers in his government
Altogether, David has refashioned the entire nation and brought it very nearly to the height of all God had promised though only as a picture
The kingdom of David now stretched far and wide and included capture or subjugation of many of Israel’s traditional enemies
And up to this point, 2 Samuel has described a remarkable turn for the nation overall
It’s turned from Saul’s rebellion and failures to David’s obedience and successes
It has defeated enemies that usually got the best of the nation, it’s seen its ark returned and land expanded
The sense we’re left with at the end of Chapter 8 is that there is nowhere left to go but down (at least until Messiah arrives)
And so we now enter a longer section running from Chapter 9 to Chapter 20 chronicling David’s troubles
In some ways, David’s story parallels the story of Saul in 1 Samuel
The start of Saul’s reign showed such promise but then it came crashing down
But Saul’s achievements were never so great as David’s, nor were David’s troubles nearly as great as Saul’s
Still the story of David’s troubles serve to define him and his reign more than the story of his achievements
And that’s in keeping with how most believers’ testimonies follow
Our victories walking with the Lord may be glorious, but our stumbles echo louder
The first of these chapters, Chapter 9, may seem like an odd chapter to include in a section on David’s stumbles, because it tells of David’s faithfulness
In fact, Chuck Swindoll called this chapter the greatest illustration of grace in the Old Testament
But as we will see later in the book, it also reflected David’s weakness in seeking approval from Saul’s allies
And that tendency later gets him into trouble and leads to rebellion in the nation
We’ll cover the impact of this chapter later in the study, so for now we will simply study the good aspects of David’s faithfulness
We can safely date the events of this chapter to very early in David’s reign, probably soon after consolidating his power
After receiving the loyalty of all tribes, David asks if there is anyone left of the house of Saul to whom David can show kindness?
David is thinking back to the covenant he established with Jonathan before Jonathan died
David and Jonathan entered into a covenant back in the day when David was under attack from Jonathan’s father Saul
Jonathan was the heir to Saul’s throne, but rather than contend with David for the seat of power, Jonathan gave his support to David
They entered into a covenant together
The covenant established here isn’t described in detail, though by the circumstances we know what it’s about
Jonathan promises to support David, and David is promising to protect Jonathan when David becomes king
We get those details in a later moment
Jonathan asks David to reaffirm their earlier covenant, and in the process we get to hear the details of their agreement
Jonathan will help David remain alive despite his father’s attempt to find and kill David
In effect, Jonathan is agreeing to become a spy for David and to rebel against his own father, the king
Jonathan is taking a serious risk here, since he could be put to death for this action
In return, Jonathan asks David to preserve Jonathan’s life once David assumes power, and this too was a significant request
Jonathan would be seen forever more as the rightful heir to the throne, and as such he serves as threat to David
So for a new king like David to leave his rival alive was a significant and unusual promise
But Jonathan goes a step further in v.15 asking that David not cut off anyone in Saul’s household even after David has taken full control
Hypothetically, had all of Saul’s sons survived, David would have been obligated to leave them all alive
Here again this is a bold and unusual request, because David would have been weakening his position tremendously
But David has entered into this covenant, so he is bound by his life to keep this agreement
We know that in the end Saul and all his sons die before David assumes the throne, the last being Ishbosheth
And by that fact, we get the sense that God didn’t want this agreement to stand
In fact, it’s reasonable to assume that David may have been wrong to enter into it in the first place
The Lord clearly didn’t want any rival competing with David for this throne that God gave David alone
And that’s probably why this chapter falls in the section on David’s troubles…David is now bound by an agreement he didn’t need
And now that David has reached full authority, he remembers Jonathan’s words asking David not to cut off Saul’s house
Until recently, Ishbosheth was Saul’s only surviving son, and though David tried to protect that man, he failed
David did execute the two men who murdered Ishbosheth in his home, but still David wants to be faithful to his covenant
So now David asks his court is there anyone from Saul’s house that David can show himself faithful to Jonathan’s covenant?
A servant of David, Ziba, reports that there was one remaining male heir to Saul, a son of Jonathan
But Ziba quickly adds that this surviving grandson of Saul is crippled in both feet
We studied briefly about this boy back in Chapter 4 where we studied possible successors to Abner and Ishbosheth in the north
This son is called Mephibosheth, and the name literally means the dispeller of shame or the one cutting shame into pieces
We learned then that this crippled son was quickly shuffled out of public view because he could never be king
He is now about 20, and by preserving him for this moment, the Lord has done David a small favor
He has kept a relative of Saul alive who couldn’t threaten David and yet allowed David to fulfill His ill-advised promise
So as David learns of this man’s existence, he is excited to know he can fulfill his word to Jonathan and calls for Mephibosheth to be brought to him
Imagine what this young man thinks when he hears that his grandfather’s rival who replaced his uncle has called for him
We can safely assume that Mephibosheth assumes the worst, because naturally the new king always kills his rivals
He goes to the palace fully expecting he is going to die for being a threat to David
In v.6 he falls on his face before David prostrate when David calls his name, Mephibosheth answers that he is David’s servant
Mephibosheth is trying to make sure that David knows he’s not a rival to David’s authority, but David already knows that
David hasn’t called Mephibosheth here to test his loyalty, but rather to show Mephibosheth that David will be loyal to him
David tells Mephibosheth not to fear, because David called him to show kindness for the sake of Jonathan and Saul
David says this man will from this point forward eat at the king’s table
To eat with another person in that culture held great significance
It was a place of fellowship and privilege and implied protection
Covenants were usually established with meals, because you don’t eat with enemies, you eat with friends
And to eat at the king’s table was the highest privilege in any kingdom, since it implied friendship with the king
Ironically, David had the same privilege at Saul’s table when Saul was king, and yet Saul was the epitome of unfaithfulness
So when Saul grew jealous of David, he began to treat David as an enemy though David was a friend and servant of Saul
And David almost lost his life eating with Saul when Saul threw a spear at David
Now David is going to great lengths to do the opposite…he calls a potential enemy to his table so he can show him friendship
We should ask why is David going through with his arrangements on behalf of Mephibosheth?
Clearly, Mephibosheth did nothing to deserve it…the decision was merely dropped in Mephibosheth’s lap
And in fact, David never even asks Mephibosheth whether he wants to sit at the table…he is simply placed there by the king
Obviously, Mephibosheth knows he is receiving something he shouldn’t
receive nor had any expectation it could be his
Mephibosheth asks a rhetorical question…why are you showing regard for a dead dog like me?
The dog was the worst creature in Jewish eyes, and so the worst insult you could give was to call someone a dog
Mephibosheth knows that as a crippled man he has no worth to David, so he calls himself a dog
But more than that, David could reasonably see him as an enemy which makes him worse than useless
So Mephibosheth calls himself a dead dog, because the only thing lower than a dog would be a dead dog
David is showing Mephibosheth grace, undeserved favor, giving the man something that he did not deserve
This situation is grace for Mephibosheth because nothing he did brought it about
But that doesn’t mean it’s happening without cause or that David isn’t obligated to do it
David is obligated to do this for Mephibosheth, but the things that obligates David is not Mephibosheth’s behavior but David’s word
David promised to show lovingkindness to Jonathan’s house
And the word lovingkindness is a special word in Scripture…it always refers to a covenant promise
It’s how the Lord describes His own character to keep promises
The Lord tells Moses and the people of Israel that He is a God who keeps lovingkindness, meaning keeps covenant
He does this for those in covenant with Him, and we know He will keep His word because of His character
Mephibosheth is the recipient of grace made possible by David’s faithfulness to a covenant he established with Jonathan
But notice the form this grace takes:
First, Mephibosheth receives an inheritance in the land, specifically, all that belonged previously to Saul’s house
So the man will instantly become rich in property in the tribe of Benjamin
Secondly, Ziba’s family has been reassigned to work the land on behalf of Mephibosheth since obviously he couldn’t work the land himself
Why did David reassign his court servant, Ziba, to a lessor post like this?
Perhaps it was because the man had fifteen sons and twenty servants, which meant a lot of labor available
Or maybe David wanted an ally close to Mephibosheth, and if so, this strategy pays off later for David
So in v.11 we’re told that Mephibosheth goes from dead dog to being treated like a son of the king eating at the table
All this because of the king’s grace based on his word in covenant
And we all have much in common with this man, of course
The parallels start easily enough with David picturing Jesus as our king
And of course, we are like Mephibosheth, probably in more ways than we prefer
First, we are born an enemy of the king, because we are part of a family that wanted to take the throne from Jesus
The Bible says we are all descended from Adam, and as such we share in Adam’s nature at our birth
When Adam sinned, he rejected God’s word and God’s rule and instead was seeking to be like God, to rule himself
That rebellion became part of Adam’s spiritual nature and he passed that nature on to all who descend from him, including you and me
In that sense, we’re like one of Saul’s relatives desiring to compete with David for the right to the throne
And if Jesus did what was easiest, He would just wipe out all His enemies, and Scripture says He has that right
God is prepared to repay His adversaries harshly as David did his at times, as is the right of the King and Judge
But there is more to the story of Jesus’ reign
Even as the Lord destroys His enemies, He also remembers those who will receive His grace and mercy based on a covenant
And those who receive His mercy are those who are dead dogs, and lame in both feet
Interestingly, the Bible describes Gentile believers as “dogs”
And we are also described as being “dead” in our sins
Finally, we are lame or crippled because of a “fall” in the sense of being spiritually fallen and useless…
So truly we are unable to help ourselves unless the King calls us into His presence by His Spirit and we receive His grace
We reach that moment though a covenant, which itself was made possible in death
Without Jonathan’s death, Mephibosheth would never have been blessed in the way that he was
And without Jesus’ death for sin, we couldn’t receive God’s mercy either
Finally, we come into our blessing because of Christ’s faithfulness to His word, specifically His word to Israel and to us
Those who have been included in a covenant with the Lord are granted an inheritance and the right to eat at the Lord’s table
David’s choice to fulfill his word to Mephibosheth is a beautiful picture of Christ’s faithfulness to us
And the Lord has turned David’s mistake into a blessing for both David and Mephibosheth