Taught by
Stephen ArmstrongAccess all of our teaching materials through our smartphone apps conveniently and quickly.
Taught by
Stephen ArmstrongWe’re studying Israel’s excuses to Ezekiel and God for why they need not worry about coming judgment
So far we’ve studied five of the eight excuses in this section of Ezekiel’s book
Each excuse has shown us how self-deceived the people of Israel had become
And it also gives us an opportunity to consider whether we use similar excuses at times for our own disobedience to God’s word
It’s our human (sin) nature to think that we can get away with sin, but Scripture reminds us that the Lord is aware
And He encourages us to serve Him obediently
So we want to understand the historical circumstances of Israel’s excuses and the Lord’s response so we can be better prepared to serve the Lord too
Tonight we move to excuse #6
This excuse, like many of the others, is only reflected in the text indirectly
We come to understand the excuse by noting what the Lord said in response
In the previous two chapters, Israel’s excuse was that the Lord’s covenant with Israel prevented Him from executing judgment so they need not fear
So the Lord’s response was to review in detail all the sins of the previous generations which justified His judgment
But that recap generated a new excuse, which the Lord then addresses in Chapter 17
That new excuse was that the Lord can’t punish this generation for the sins of those past generations
So this chapter is the Lord’s response to that claim
And He opens with a parable
The Lord tells Ezekiel to present Israel with a riddle and parable
The prophecy is a riddle because its meaning has to be decoded…it’s not obvious
And it’s a parable as well because the story presents an allegory, which is a message told through symbols
The riddle part challenges the intelligence of the listener, and in that way is designed to excite interest in learning the message
And the message holds the meaning of the prophecy
Combining a riddle with a parable obscures the meaning beyond the ability of the listener to make sense of the prophecy
Which in turn makes Ezekiel’s audience dependent on the Lord to explain the meaning
So in short, this form gets and holds their attention so that they might hear the message
In vs.1-10, the Lord presents the riddle/parable and in the verses that follow He explains it
So we will simply observe this first section and let the Lord explain it to us
The story centers around eagles, trees and vines
First, a singularly impressive eagle flies to the cedars of Lebanon
Today we think of Lebanon as a place distinct from Israel, but in Ezekiel’s day Lebanon was another name for the northern region of Canaan
Lebanon was part of the land God gave to Israel and therefore Lebanon was another name for Israel
But when the Bible uses the name Lebanon, it’s referring to the northernmost region of Israel, which was famous for the very tall cedar trees planted there
Today in Israel you can again find cedars in many places
But these trees were only planted during the last century following the deforestation of Israel by the Ottoman Empire
So they aren’t nearly as stately as the cedar forests of ancient Israel, which had grown up over several centuries
So Lebanon is a reference to the cedar forest of northern Israel
And in particular, calling Israel by the name Lebanon was a way of referring to the fruitfulness and grandeur of Israel
And then an impressive eagle plucks off tops of these trees and carries them to a land of merchants and traders
And the eagle also took some vine seeds from Lebanon and planted it in a fertile well-watered area
As a result, that vine sprouted with roots secure in the ground
And as the vine spread out, it’s branches reached up toward the eagle that planted it
Then in v.7 another somewhat less majestic eagle appears and the vine suddenly shifts its attention from the first eagle to the second
The vine’s branches grow upward toward the new eagle seeking for that second eagle to water it instead of the first
In v.8 we are reminded that the vine’s desire for the second eagle to water it is unnecessary because it was already planted in a well-watered area
It’s been fruitful in that place, and so there should be no need to seek for a new source of water
So in vs.9-10 the Lord asks rhetorically, wouldn’t the owner of that vine respond by pulling it out of the ground so that it withers?
Because the vine did not respond faithfully to the one who planted it and nourished it, but instead went after another provider, it will be despised by its owner
So it will suffer the fate of being uprooted
And despite having great roots, it cannot survive at that point since it has been detached from the land
Now we see the Lord interpreting the riddle/parable, and first Ezekiel interprets it historically and then makes a theological application
The Lord now begins to assign meaning to the various characters and events
Beginning with the first eagle, which represents the king of Babylon
When Scripture uses eagles symbolically, they typically represent leaders or powerful entities with authority from God
For example, in Exodus 19, God uses an eagle to represent how He escorted Israel out of Egypt
In this case, the Lord gives us the answer to the symbol, but He also gave the answer to Israel earlier in a prophecy in the Law
Nebuchadnezzar, the king of Babylon, is the eagle and the tops of the trees of Lebanon represent the leaders of Judah and Jerusalem
So as Babylon came upon Israel like a hot wind from the east (see v.10), it carried off the king and court of Israel
In 597 BC the army invaded Jerusalem and took the Judean king, Jehoiachin, and all his senior advisors
This group was represented by the tops of the trees
They were taken to Babylon, a place of traders and merchants
There are several references in the Old Testament to Babylon as a city of traders and merchants
And this same description continues into the New Testament, as the book of Revelation refers to Babylon in the same way
Then in v.13, the Lord says Babylon took another king of the family of Judah, Zedekiah, and placed him in power over Jerusalem as their vassal
This is pictured by the seed planted in fertile soil from v.5
Nebuchadnezzar expected this new king to be compliant to Babylon’s wishes, since he owed his power to them
They supported his rule and allowed him and the rest of the city’s people to remain and survive on the condition that he obey
In that sense, they were well-watered and could flourish in their place
As Nebuchadnezzar installed Zedekiah he entered into a covenant with the new king
A covenant is a life-long binding agreement where the penalty for breaking the agreement is always death
Men didn’t enter into covenants without considerable forethought, because so much was on the line
In Zedekiah’s case, the covenant stipulated that he obey Nebuchadnezzar in all things
And in response, Nebuchadnezzar pledged to provide and protect Judah from all enemies
Under the terms of that covenant, Zedekiah and Jerusalem flourished for a time
They remained in the land and were left to live life without restraint
In v.14 the Lord says the key to the nation’s prosperity under these circumstances was to remain subjected to Babylon
The nation should not try to exalt itself, that is seek to rebel against the Lord’s appointed judgment
In that sense, Judah’s roots were to remain planted in the land and its branches were to reach upward to the eagle acknowledging its authority
Its branches only turned up to the eagle
The vine itself did not grow upward but instead spread outward
This was a less-than-sincere acknowledgement of Babylon’s authority
And historically, this is the record of the time of Zedekiah’s ruling
But in 588 BC, Zedekiah decided to break his covenant and rebel against Nebuchadnezzar and Babylon
Obviously Zedekiah knew his army couldn’t possibly withstand another attack from Nebuchadnezzar, so he sought an ally
Zedekiah reached out to Pharaoh Hophra of Egypt, the enemy of Babylon, seeking assistance
Zedekiah asked for horses and troops to defeat Nebuchadnezzar’s army for when he inevitably invaded again
That Pharaoh is the second strong eagle that the vine turned to for water despite already being well-watered already
Interestingly, we know that Ezekiel issued this prophecy around 592 BC, so he’s telling Israel of Zedekiah’s rebellion 3 years before it happened
But he also tells the people that this rebellion can’t hope to succeed
In v.15 the Lord asks, can someone break a covenant and survive?
The Lord says in v.16 that the king will die in the country that put him on the throne and whose covenant the king broke
Remember, that when a man entered into a covenant, he swore by the name of his God
So Zedekiah would have sworn by the name of the Lord
And so the Lord is now swearing through Ezekiel to hold that man accountable for breaking that covenant
Remember, he hadn’t broken it yet, but the Lord knew that he was going to break it
So he says that though His people broke the covenant, Babylon would keep their part of the bargain
J. Vernon McGee said concerning this irony:
In vs.17-18 the Lord says that the Pharaoh wasn’t going to be able to save Zedekiah in the end
The Lord will ensure that Babylon succeeds in conquering Zedekiah
You can find an account of how this happens in Jeremiah 37
The city’s third conquest by Babylon is pictured by the vine being pulled up by the roots
Zedekiah and the nation were going to be uprooted from the land and allowed to wither in captivity
Now remember, the nation was saying that they weren’t going to see the destruction Ezekiel was predicting because they weren’t responsible
Their forefathers may have done terrible things but this generation wasn’t to blame
So here’s the Lord showing the people that their current leadership is just as rebellious as prior generations
Breaking the covenant is reason enough for the Lord to put an end to Zedekiah and his rule
But even before that point, the king was guilty of repeating most of the sins of past generations
In 2 Kings 24, you find the record of Babylon’s three attacks against Jerusalem and the three kings he installed
At the end of that chapter, we hear about Zedekiah’s installment
Notice we’re told that during Zedekiah’s short reign he repeated all the sins of the king, Jehoiakim
And earlier in that chapter we’re told that Jehoiachin also did everything Jehoaikim, his father, had done
And even earlier in that chapter we’re told that Jehoiakim had shed the blood of the innocent, indicating child sacrifice
So all three kings carried on the same abhorrent practices of earlier generations
So the nation had no basis for claiming it was innocent of their forefathers’ sins
On the contrary, they were just as guilty and just as deserving of judgment
So now the Lord makes a theological application
The world would see Babylon’s third defeat of Judah as simply another struggle between nations
And the result would make perfect sense to a student of the ancient East
When conquered nations resist the power of their conquerers, they will be crushed
Such was Judah’s fate following their second rebellion against Nebuchadnezzar
But now the Lord adds a theological interpretation to these same events, for Israel’s sake
The Lord would ensure that this final defeat would wipe Israel off the map for a while
The king will be captured and brought to Babylon where he will be judged personally
We covered the way in which this king was killed back in Chapter 12, where Ezekiel uses similar language of a snare to trap him
And when Nebuchadnezzar came face to face with Zedekiah, he decided to make an example of the man
Nebuchadnezzar killed Zedekiah’s son in his presence and then plucked out the king’s eyes so that his last memory was seeing his son’s dying
Nebuchadnezzar then left Zedekiah to live as a blind man in Babylon
The Lord says that when these things happen and the nation’s army is vanquished and the survivors scattered abroad, Israel would know the Lord had indeed spoken to them
How could the Lord be sure that Israel would get this message?
Because He’s told them about the outcome before it happens
Jeremiah told the inhabitants of Jerusalem, while Ezekiel prophesied to the exiles in Babylon
Both groups heard of these events in advance, and when they came to pass exactly as the Lord promised, it made an impression
So at that point, the people remaining in exile gave heed to what the prophets said and to the meaning of these things
They recognized that the Lord had executed judgment against the people for their offenses against Him
And we know from history that the people then committed to never again pursuing idolatry
The memory of Babylon was so seared into the collective consciousness of the nation that they feared the Lord’s response should they ever stray again
Of course, that doesn’t mean the entire nation turned to Him in faith
There is a big difference between following the Law in obedience and following the Lord in faith
The Lord used the Babylonian captivity to return Israel to obedience to the Law
And He uses obedience to the Law as a tutor to bring some to Messiah
Still, the first priority was preserving the nation from idolatry so that it would serve the Lord’s purpose in bringing the Messiah to the world
But as we already know, the Lord has two messages for the people, one of judgment and one of glory
First comes judgment to address the rebellious hearts of the people in keeping with the Old Covenant’s requirements
But later comes the promise of glory which is fulfilled solely on the basis of God’s faithfulness to His covenant to Abraham
So once more, the Lord ends His promise of coming judgment with a promise of ultimate glory
The Lord draws upon the same parable from earlier to extend a new message of glory to the people of Israel
He says He Himself will cut off a young, tender shoot of the very top of the loftiest cedar in Lebanon and set it up
This shoot would be planted on a high and lofty mountain
It will bear great fruit and provide shelter to many branches below it
Furthermore, birds of every kind will nest in it
Moreover, at that time all the rest of the trees in Israel will know that the Lord is the Lord of Israel
And high trees will be humbled while the lowly trees will be exalted
The green trees will dry up while the dry trees will flourish
The Lord has spoken it and so He will do it
The symbology is clear…as we learned earlier, the tops of these stately cedars represent the rulers of Israel
So planting a cutting from the top of the highest tree is an allusion to the return of the Davidic line and specifically the ruling Messiah
So the Lord is promising to install the Messiah as leader over Israel in a day to come
He will be the highest ruler over all Israel
And not just Israel, but birds of all kinds, meaning Gentile nations, would also nest under this tree
And under this coming ruler, all Israel will flourish and be protected
All Israel will be obedient and believing
And He will rule from the seat of David on Mt. Zion
Finally, the effect of Messiah ruling will be to humble the proud and to exalt the humble
Which is a very different arrangement from the way Israel worked in Ezekiel’s day and in most days
The powerful and elite in the nation held the power and abused it for their own sake and at the expense of the people
Obviously, this is exactly the opposite of what the Lord desired from those who ruled over His people
Consider that the Lord’s favorite metaphor for a leader over His people is the shepherd
The Lord always wanted men who cared more for their flock than for themselves
And would be willing to sacrifice their own interests for those they care over
Israel hasn’t had that in a long time, and now the Lord is promising to bring that to Israel in the ultimate sense of Jesus
Jesus is the perfect representation of such a shepherd
Willing to lay His life down for the sake of the sheep
And when He returns to rule over Israel and the world, He will judge the nations with perfect righteousness
He will humble the proud
He will exalt the humble
When Isaiah speaks of the day that the Lord enters into His Kingdom, he describes it this way
The Lord alone will be exalted but He will be against the proud
Including the cedars of Lebanon referring to those proud and evil leaders over Israel
Most importantly the idols in Israel will vanish
So to review the chapter, the people were dismissing Ezekiel’s warnings saying that they wouldn’t be held liable for the sins of their fathers
And the Lord responds saying Israel will be held accountable for the sins of their own generation
He used the parable to explain that their present king was just as evil as previous kings
So the Lord says they will be held accountable, predicting what will happen in three year’s time:
The king’s plan to rebel will not succeed, the city will be taken, and the people will go into exile
But because of this prophecy, the people will know that the Lord was the One bringing these judgments
And because of the serenity of what happens, the people are willing to set aside idolatry forever
The combined effect is to draw Israel back to a faithful walk under the Law
Or at least they lost their desire to pursue pagan idols
And that zealousness continues for the most part today among the Jewish people
And in the Kingdom it will finally be put away forever
Now in response to that prophecy, the people decide to double-down on their excuse
After complaining that they were being punished for their father’s sins, the Lord said their generation of leaders had sins too
But they basically ignore the Lord’s response and continue insisting they were being punished for the sins of their fathers
So the Lord takes the next chapter to specifically address that charge
We won’t do all of 18 tonight, but since these two chapters are so closely related, we are going to move into it a little
This chapter of Ezekiel is one of the more often studied for what it reveals about God’s justice
The Lord tells Ezekiel to rebuke the people with these words, beginning with a proverb Israel was telling itself
They were saying “the fathers eat sour grapes, but the children’s teeth are set on edge”
Eating sour grapes sets your teeth on edge, so to speak
So the proverb claimed that in Israel the children receive the consequences of the fathers’ poor choices
This proverb was a not-so-subtle indictment of God’s character
The proverb reflected the nation’s self-deception
They thought God treated them unfairly for the sin of others
While conveniently overlooking their own sins which justified the Lord’s wrath
But the Lord denies the truth of this proverb beginning in v.3
He says, as long as I live the nation will no longer use this proverb
How long does God live? Eternally
So in other words, this proverb disappeared from Israel forever
To set the record straight, the Lord says in v.4 that all souls are the Lord’s: the soul of every father and the soul of every son are known
This is a powerful statement of God’s sovereignty over the destiny of humanity
God is saying that every living person, every human being who has ever possessed a soul, including unborn children, belong to Him
He knows them, He determines the course of their path in life and the outcome of their soul in the end
No one exists outside the Lord’s view, which tells us that all will be accountable to Him too
None will escape His judgment in a day to come
And the Lord says that the one who sins will die
On the other hand, the one who is righteous and practices justice and righteousness according to the terms of the Law lives
The Lord gives examples of what the righteous would do or not do during these evil days
The righteous would not eat meat sacrificed to idols, pray to idols, commit adultery or violate other Laws regarding lying with women
Furthermore, the righteous don’t oppress others, fail to repay debts
He doesn’t rob others but gives to the needs of the poor, etc.
In summary, the righteous man under the Law walks in those ordinances
In v.9 the Lord says walking in the statues of the Law, which means obeying as much as possible, was dealing faithfully with the Lord
Such a heart displays righteousness and that person will live
In this context living or dying refers to physical death, the penalty for sin under the Old Covenant
That’s the question at issue here…whether the Lord was justified in holding Israel accountable for their sins under that Covenant
The people said they were being unfairly treated because they were being put to death for the sins of their fathers
The Lord defends Himself saying that every soul in Israel will be held responsible under that covenant for their own behavior
If they had a heart of obedience, they would not fall under the Law’s penalty of death
If they sinned doing the very sorts of things he just listed, then they will die
Moreover, there is no link between father and son…
The Lord lists examples of two different sons
In vs.10-13 the Lord lists the example of a righteous father who happens to have an unrighteous son
Unlike his father, that son does all the abominable things described earlier
As a result, he will be put to death as the Law required
No one would be able to say that this child was dying for his father’s sins, for his father was righteous
His own blood was on his head
Godly parents should remember this example if they have concern for a wayward child
The Lord never hints at any link between the father and the child
In fact, the father’s life is impeccable
And yet the child emerges with issues, and so the father is not accountable
We still wish for our prodigal children to do better, but we need not worry that we are responsible
Conversely, in vs.14-18 the Lord lists the example of a son who has done what’s righteous despite being raised by an unrighteous father
He walks in the Lord’s ordinances and statutes and will live because of his obedience under the Law
Moreover, the Lord says in v.17 that he will not die for his father’s sins
These are not new determinations by the Lord…this is always the way it had been
The Lord is simply reminding Israel of that fact to deny their silly proverb
Notice His summary in vs. 19-20
He asks Israel, why are you saying that I’m causing the son to bear the father’s iniquity?
The evidence argued to the contrary…children who did the right thing were not punished under the Law
Only the person who sinned was accountable
This is a basic principle of Scripture, and the Lord has never practiced it any other way on an individual basis
But there is a companion principle for the nation of Israel uniquely from the Law
In multiple places in the Law, the Lord declared to Israel that the nation must have no gods other than the Lord
And that if the nation violated this Law by entering into idolatry, then the Lord would react in jealousy
He doesn’t specify at this point how He would respond, except to say that His wrath would extend for generations
But later the Lord says in Isaiah, Jeremiah and Ezekiel that the penalty for idolatry would be exile from the land
Of course that exile lasted 3-4 generations, which is what the Lord was talking about in the Law
So the Lord wasn’t suggesting He would hold sons accountable for a father’s sin
Rather He was speaking about national penalties for national sins
Under the Old Covenant of Moses, there were laws for the individual Jew with penalties for disobedience
And there were expectations for the nation as a whole with penalties for the nation
The covenant itself stipulated that the nation would experience these judgments for failure to keep its terms
In Leviticus the Lord spelled out the blessings for obedience and the consequences for failure to keep the covenant
And included in those consequences was the exile that Judah was now facing
These were part of the national consequences for failure to keep the covenant and they were separate from the consequences for individual sin
These two lines of consequence worked in conjunction with one another
The entire nation would experience the national consequences independent of how any given individual in the nation lived
So individually, each person (i.e., soul) would live or die depending on whether they obeyed this covenant’s terms
And the nation would prosper or not depending on how it kept the covenant
And if the nation stumbled as a whole, then the consequences would extend for generations
Knowing these things, then we also understand that these verses do not directly speak to how the Lord deals with His Church
We are not under Law and therefore we are not treated according to these Laws
We are not held to the penalties of the Law in Deuteronomy or Leviticus
So we will not be sent into exile in Babylon, and our third and fourth generations will not be captives as a result, etc.
There is simply no direct comparison to be made except the obvious comparison that we too are called to live obediently
And we too will be judged individually by the Lord
He doesn’t judge us according to our sin, since Christ has taken our sin on Himself
But he does judge us individually according to our works
Reason enough to deal faithfully with the Lord