Taught by
Stephen ArmstrongAccess all of our teaching materials through our smartphone apps conveniently and quickly.
Taught by
Stephen ArmstrongGod created the world in 6 literal days
He “rested” on the seventh day to establish a picture for men
The picture that only through God’s work can we enjoy true lasting rest
The Sabbath picture is eventually fulfilled in Jesus’ work on the cross
God carefully created two people who were clearly distinguished from the rest of creation
They enjoyed the benefit of an entire world created specifically for their use and enjoyment
They were granted the unique ability to relate to the creator and respond to Him
Their nature was free and innocent
They lacked the capacity to understand either good or evil, in relation to the other
God desired to express Himself to fully to a creation capable of understanding and responding fully to that expression
So God gave a single prohibition to them, which became the test of their willingness to follow Him fully
It wasn’t a trap, yet without such a test, there could be no true relationship based on love
This is the world God designed and desired
Man would live forever in this situation, multiplying and filling the world, he and his descendants giving God glory and enjoying God’s caring provision
Yet God’s word and His design of the world reflects an expectation that things would not remain as He established them in the beginning
Ephesians 1:4: reminds us that He chose us even before the foundation of the world
Reflects reality that God expected there to be a fall, which necessitates a Messiah, who would come to die, and that in that relationship some would receive the grace that God offers
Design of creation itself also reflects this:
Tree in the garden, water suspended above world, the sea, night – all show us that God was preparing for a change in the world He created
That brings us to Chapter 3
In this chapter, we will see the fall of man from this place of privilege
But this chapter is also the place where redemption begins
In fact, the rest of the Bible is the story of God at work to return the creation to a place that’s even better than the one Adam knew
We will also see the way sin works and the techniques of the enemy
But first, we must examine a transition verse at the end of Chapter 2
Moses offers us a bridging verse to end Chapter 2 and introduce Chapter 3
The Hebrew word for naked is arom
If we glance ahead to 3:1 we see the word crafty which is arum
They are very similar to the Hebrew ear
Moses uses the similarity of the two words to draw a connection and bridge the two chapters
Moses contrasts the innocence of man and the sinister nature of the enemy
Why mention this detail?
Moses connects evil with our tendency to be ashamed of nakedness, to teach that this relationship is more than learned behavior
It’s a spiritual issue that we will understand better later in Chapter 3
Meanwhile, the fact that man and woman could be naked in each other’s presence without shame is important to Chapter 3
It also pictures spiritual transparency and vulnerability
Transparency in a relationship means true and complete honesty
Whether before God or one another, we live in a transparent way when we act and speak with no intent to keep part of ourselves hidden
Literally, we have nothing to hide
True transparency is a by-product of holiness
Only someone who is truly right before God can live in a truly transparent manner
This was the state of Adam and Woman at the start of Chapter 3
Conversely, after the Fall we lost the ability to live with transparency with one another and God, because we lack complete holiness
The more we have to be ashamed of, the less we can be transparent
Our sin removes our ability to live fully transparent lives
We’ll address the clothing connection later in the chapter, but at this point it’s enough to note that man and woman are living without shame as they were made, because they are innocent
At some point, man and woman are confronted by a serpent
This event happens after the first week, but we don’t know how long afterward
Who is the serpent?
First, we know it is Satan
Scripture also calls him the Father of Lies
Is this intended to be a literal snake?
The word in Hebrew is nachash: a serpent or snake
Moses says it is a beast of the field
So the natural reading of the text is that Woman saw a snake that was also Satan
What does Moses mean when he says the snake was more crafty than other beasts?
Is Moses saying that the snake as God created it is naturally sneakier and nastier than other animals?
We know this cannot be true because today we have poodles
Moses is telling us something about this particular snake
This particular serpent was the craftiest of all creatures
In other words, this is Moses‘ way of subtly explaining that a snake was indwelled by Satan and therefore it was made crafty
In the same way that the antichrist can be described as the most evil of all men because Satan will indwell him as well
Crafty in Hebrew means sensible, prudent
It indicates a combination of a special, abnormal intelligence
Why did Satan take the form of a snake?
First, there is no indication that the snake was chosen for any particular reason
Had Satan chosen to indwell a poodle, today we would be saying that the poodle was more crafty than any beast of the field…and how appropriate that would be
Secondly, Satan must take some form when he appears to Adam and Woman
So he chooses to come as an animal, talking and offering advice
Remember, in 2 Corinthians 11:14 Paul says the enemy comes as an angel of light
Why doesn’t woman run screaming when she sees a talking snake?
This suggests that the encounter with Satan happens very early in their existence
Before they have explored the world and come to understand that animals lack the ability to speak and interact with people
Based on Adam’s experience naming the animals, he would have known that a talking animal was an anomaly, but he’s not engaged at this moment
Before we go further in the storyline, let’s ask a more fundamental question: where did Satan come from?
He isn’t mentioned in the creation story
But we know he existed in the Garden before Satan fell in sin
Satan was in the Garden, but the Garden wasn’t created until Day 6
So at a point in time, Satan was in the garden without sin
Another theory is that the Garden existed in an earlier form and was destroyed at the time of Satan’s fall
Then remade in the six days of Creation
This is part of the Gap Theory
Notice that evil existed before man’s sin
Satan’s fall produced the arrival of evil and the Father of lies
He then becomes the instrument for initiating man’s fall
Why did God allow Satan to remain in the Garden and tempt man?
Would there have been a fall without Satan tempting man?
We will examine that question a little later, but for now remember that God has anticipated and even prepared for the Fall from the beginning
Satan begins with a question
As we look at his question and the dialogue that follows, we also want to take time to examine the art of deception and the seductiveness of sin
Satan asks has indeed God said…
Notice right away that had God never given Adam a prohibition, Satan would have had nothing to challenge
The mere existence of the tree makes this conversation possible
Without a tree, there is no starting point for disobedience
Paul makes the same point in Romans when he says:
Satan’s question is more than a question
It’s actually a statement
He implies that God has treated Woman unfairly
It makes woman feel disadvantaged, taken for a ride
Made a fool, made to seem naive
Satan impugns God’s motives
Satan’s method is often to bring us to a place where we doubt God’s character or purposes, by first questioning His word
But cleverly, Satan allows us fill in the blank with our own accusations against God
This is the way the Father of Lies works
He uses suggestion to weaken our resolve and obedience
Woman answers Satan
It’s interesting that she seems ready to have a natural conversation with a snake
Again, this would be expected if she had little experience to go on in dealing with the animals
Her answer is a defense on behalf of God
She tries to repeat God’s instructions to correct the snake
Does she get it right? No
How is it wrong?
Firstly, she makes God’s word more restrictive (adds to His word) while neglecting to emphasize the freedom God gave, and de-emphasizing the penalty (not surely die)
She says they cannot touch (God never said that)
And she forget to mention that they could eat freely from the other trees (2:16)
Obviously Woman is not familiar with or completely aware of God’s word
Here we see one of the dangers in failing to know God’s word well enough
When we don’t know the Word, we change it
And when we change it, we don’t tend to make it less restrictive
We actually tend to make it more restrictive (legalism)
When religiously-minded men depart from God’s word, they tend to insert their own rules and ideas and call them God’s ideas
Legalism is man-made restrictions masquerading as God’s law
Legalism leads to resentment and frustration and ultimately it drives people away from obedience to God
And it makes God to be an unkind taskmaster intent on robbing us of joy
Every word of Scripture matters, and when we change even small parts, we begin to depart from God’s path
And as our memory fades, the enemy is quick to insert other meanings and confuse our understanding
And as this process takes hold, the result is a meaning that doesn’t edify and strengthen our walk
But rather we will be confused and weakened in our resolve and we may begin to question God’s motives
The antidote is a life-long pursuit of God’s word as a way of knowing and following Him better