Taught by
Stephen Armstrong
Taught by
Stephen ArmstrongAt the end of chapter 17, Paul has filled his time waiting for Timothy and Silas to join him by street preaching to the pagan Greek city
On one day he caught the attention of two leading schools of philosophy, the Epicureans and the Stoics
Consequently, they invite Paul to join an elite group of privileged thinkers and debaters who met on Mars Hill and passed their time challenging each others’ ideas
Into this setting where the blind lead the blind, Paul steps in with the truth..
Paul is at his best in this moment as he rises to the occasion and preaches the Gospel
Luke probably recorded this scene in part because it shows such fine example of how this short, Jewish Pharisee could adapt his approach to reach any audience
We could spend some time analyzing Paul’s approach to presenting the Gospel, but for today we’ll just hit the highlights
Before looking at Paul’s statements in detail, we see a difference already from what we’ve seen Paul do in the past
Remember to the Jews in Thessalonica, Paul reasoned with the Jews and offered proof that Jesus was the Messiah
We said proof was Scripture from the Old Testament
In this scene, Paul never references Scripture at all
Considering his audience, this makes perfect sense, right?
They didn’t know the Jewish Scriptures and wouldn’t have cared if Paul quoted them
So Paul takes an entirely different, culturally appropriate approach
Paul opens his statement with a wonderful comment that has two meanings simultaneously
Paul walks a fine line between flattery, which is a dishonest compliment, and criticism
He says they are “very religious” in all respects
The Greek word is deisidaimon, which has two meanings in Greek
It can mean religious as in pious or as in superstitious
By using this word, Paul gave his audience the chance to hear it as a compliment (i.e., pious)
While Paul himself meant it more as a statement of fact, though with a negative connotation (they were superstitious)
Undoubtedly, his opening gained their attention since Paul was clearly not from around these parts
As a visitor invited to join this elite group, Paul understood the need to be polite and respectful of his audience
Paul also appreciated that this group appreciated oratory skill
So he elevated his game, so to speak, to meet their expectations
Next, Paul does something that every good preacher worth his keep will do when visiting a new audience
He looks for a “hook”
A hook is any device or prop taken from the culture or setting useful for giving the speaker an opportunity to place his message in a familiar context
In Paul’s case, the hook was the statue to an unnamed god
Greek documents often referred to altars to unknown gods, erected to appease the god whose name was unknown to men
Paul knew he needed a way to introduce the true God to a people who believed they had already accounted for all gods in their pantheon
Furthermore, Paul risked being charged with preaching a new religion, which would have been proselytizing, a violation of Roman law
So Paul says I saw your altar to an unnamed god
And I know the name of that god
What a wonderful hook
Instantly, they are interested and feel no reason to be threatened by his message
It would be like someone saying they have discovered the name of the soldier in the Tomb of the Unknown Soldier
This hook gives Paul the chance to make a sharp turn to the Gospel without leaving his audience behind
Before we look at what follows, let’s consider what Paul’s approach means for us
Paul knows that men are fickle and what they say they want to hear can change in an instant
He could have launched directly into the Gospel, but perhaps he would have been shouted down or ignored
Instead, he eases his audience into the truth hoping to hold on to as many as he can
I think of Paul pulling a wagon with his audience sitting inside
If he yanks the wagon ahead too quickly, everyone falls out the back
Instead, he moves steadily but slowly hoping not to lose anyone
We might ask what about God’s sovereignty in salvation?
Can’t Paul preach anyway he wants without concern since God brings faith to the heart?
The answer is no
Yes, God brings faith, but in His wisdom He works through our efforts,
When our efforts lack care or effort, He commonly withholds His grace in that moment
No fewer people will be saved in the end, but our efforts go unrewarded in the moment
Paul worked hard to preach the Gospel and his methods were carefully tailored to his audience
Paul famously said he became all things to all people so that he might win a few
And Paul also said that he planted while others watered, but it was God who caused the growth
He understood both God’s sovereignty over outcomes and man’s responsibility to give God our best efforts
We’re going to review Paul’s remarkable presentation of the Gospel to these men, but first notice that Jesus name is never even mentioned
This preaching should challenge all our preconceived notions concerning evangelism
Paul does not use any of the classic “Christian-ese” for presenting the Gospel
Can someone be saved with the words Paul uses?
If you think not, then you’re placing too much emphasis on your words to save someone
Just as someone who assumes that God’s sovereignty doesn’t require they make any effort at all is placing too little emphasis on their own actions
Let’s look at what says and why it meets the requirements of the Gospel presentation
Paul begins by describing the one true God, Who might be known by His work in Creation
God made all things and is Lord of Heaven and Earth
In the language Paul chooses, he directly contradicts certain Greek concepts
In v.24, Paul is addressing the Stoics, who believed that all matter was eternal and had no beginning
But Paul says there is a God Who made everything
Greeks believed different gods ruled over different aspects of creation
The Paul adds that this God continues to rule over all that He has created
And therefore He doesn’t dwell in temples built by human hands
He is not one of the nearly 3,000 different temple gods found in the Greek pantheon
In v.25, Paul moves to the Epicureans
God is self-supplying
There is nothing men can offer God that will impress or please Him
This was directed at the Epicureans who assumed that God viewed pleasure in the same way they did
God wanted them to please Him through sacrifice and other rituals
Paul says this God is the source of all life and everything depends on Him
This directly contradicted both camps who felt the gods were far removed from the everyday lives of men
In v.26 Paul moves to God’s role in making humanity
All men came from one man, Adam
We have a common ancestor who was himself the creation of God
The Greeks had fanciful ideas for the origin of men just as today we have many who believe men evolved from animals
In a very real sense, we face a similarly situation when we preach that God created us from Adam
Today’s audience would react little differently from this ancient Greek audience
Next Paul begins to hit at the center of Greek national pride
Paul says that this God was the One Who set the boundaries for every nation and appointed men to their respective nations
Greece wasn’t great by virtue of better people, Paul says
It was determined by God
The boundaries for the nations were created in language
When God scattered the people at the tower of Babel, he scrambled language
The language differences became the barriers that led to the separation of nations
In v.27 Paul says that God set men in nations with the language barriers so that they would seek Him
Remember, the people were scattered from Babel because they were no longer seeking God
They had made themselves so powerful as a united people that they sought their own god at the tower
So God scattered them
Now Paul clarifies that the scattering was intended to create a need that couldn’t be filled in human power
A need to know the Creator and seek Him
Of course, the depraved human heart will never find a holy God in its own power
Paul acknowledges this reality when he says “if perhaps they might grope for Him”
Grope implies looking in the dark, the kind of blind reaching that men with darkened hearts do before the Lord reveals the truth
But then Paul adds that God is not far from any of us
Imagine you’re standing with someone in a room, and they’re blindfolded
They’re trying to find you by exploring around in the room, but they grope without a way to find you
Meanwhile, you stand a short distance away, watching them
Until you want them to find you, their desperate groping will never succeed
But when you’re ready, you can walk into their path and they stumble into you
This is the way Paul is describing finding the true God
They world is groping to find a God Who is nearby but can’t be found unless He first reveals Himself to us
Finally, Paul says in Him we live, move and have our very existence, just as your own poets have said
Paul cleverly uses Greek literature to his own advantage
The Greek poet Cleanthes wrote a poem to Zeus saying “we are your offspring”
And Epimenides wrote concerning Zeus, “You live and abide forever, for in you we live, and move, and have our being.”
Paul moves those accolades away from the false god Zeus to the true God
But by using these quotes to serve his own argument, Paul kept the audience engaged and somewhat agreeing with his comments
But so far, no mention of Jesus or the cross or belief in this “gospel”
Paul simply argues for God’s existence and sovereignty
But through this argument, he implies men have an obligation
If there is one God responsible for everything and to Whom we are obliged for life and existence, then we ultimately must answer to this God
Paul is working to create the awareness of need
Remember, the preaching of the Gospel is two parts: repent and believe
Too often we run to a presentation of the solution before explaining why someone needs it
We could continue to study Paul’s technique all night
The way in which he picked away at the cultural weaknesses while playing to the cultural expectations
But we needs to move on to the conclusion
So, now Paul moves to the solution to the dilemma
If we are calling ourselves children of God, then what does it say about us when we call a hunk of wood or stone our god?
It’s an obvious contradiction
Greeks valued men above inanimate objects, certainly
But then they agree that they are the children of idols, inanimate objections fashioned by men?
Instead, Paul calls upon them to acknowledge they are product of a divine nature
A life that lives such a contradiction is a life of ignorance
And Paul says that God has overlooked the times of ignorance
This was the time before Christ was revealed
Specifically, all history from the time of Adam until Christ’s Judgment of men
The world’s sin is “overlooked” during this time in the sense that the world is permitted to continue on
Obviously, individuals face their judgment upon their death
But the world as a whole is experiencing a period while God withholds judgment
But now during this time, God is giving opportunity for men to leave their godless ways
And more specifically, He has for the first time opened a window of opportunity for the Gentiles
Because a day of judgment is coming soon
And on that future day, God has appointed a Man to conduct the judgment
And God offered proof of this truth by raising this Man from the dead
Though you may not have realized it, Paul just preached the Gospel
Everything needed for God to bring saving faith was delivered to this audience
Remember Paul’s words in Romans
The essential elements of the Gospel are a belief and confession that Jesus is the Lord, the only true God
And a belief that He was resurrected from the dead
In this presentation, Paul made a clear argument that there is only One true God above all
Paul never named the Lord by His earthly name
But a man convinced by Paul’s testimony would only have to ask what was this God’s name, and Paul would have gladly provided it
In other words, the lack of a name wouldn’t by itself preclude saving faith, assuming they accepted everything else Paul spoke
Secondly, Paul testified that this Man was resurrected
This becomes the sticking point, as it always does
At the moment Paul mentions the defining proof of the Gospel, the resurrection of our Lord, some began to sneer at the idea of resurrection
All the wisdom in the world couldn’t come to grips with the prospect of a man returning from the dead
Truly this is the one demonstration of God’s power that men stumble over
Remember the story Jesus taught of the rich man in Hades with Abraham, begging that a sign be sent to his brothers?
Resurrection is proof for those brought to faith, but it is the stumbling block for the unbeliever
And Paul has made the essential presentation of the Gospel and it has had its intended effect
A handful of the Greeks believed, which was a true miracle in itself
Consider nothing that Paul said was particularly forceful or convincing
It was simply a matter-of-fact (though carefully worded) presentation
But when the truth of the Gospel is joined with the work of the Spirit, it becomes the power of God to change a heart
The ones who sneered at Paul say they will hear more of this later
It was a polite way of saying they had heard enough and the conversation was over
Isn’t interesting that they could find ways to spend days on end discussing whatever ideas they could propose
But when Paul mentions a God Who proved Himself by resurrection, the conversation must immediately end
And they are done altogether with the matter
Why are they so suddenly put off in discussing such an intriguing subject like life after death?
The word of the cross is instinctively offensive to the depraved man
Paul knows what’s happened, and he leaves at this point content with whom God has given him
Remember, he initiated this contact with the wise men of Athens out of pity having seen their depraved culture
And the opportunity came in a moment while he was waiting for his companions
He wasn’t in Athens primarily for ministry, and Paul seemed to know that from the beginning
This is merely a preaching of opportunity
In the end, Paul doesn’t found a church in Athens and he never again returns to this city
It was a hardened Greek bastion of pagan belief that worshipped wisdom even more than the gods they pretended to follow
The entire experience brings together several elements we should remember
First, we are workers in God’s field, and we owe our Master the best work we can give
Paul was waiting in Athens and yet still thought he could make an impact there
And his technique for delivering the message showed great deft and appreciation for the culture
Secondly, no matter how much Paul played with the presentation or approach, he didn’t change the heart of the Gospel message
The call to repent and accept the true God who raised His Son from the dead is the universal call of the Gospel
Men must understand that our message demands they walk away from their current belief system, whatever it may be
And in its place is a belief in the One true God Who raised His Son from the dead
Finally, Paul never forgot that it requires the Spirit to make his message effective
When his speech produced but a handful of believers, he left satisfied
And he accepted that God never intended to establish something in that city beyond the handful mentioned
Paul never visited that city again or even wrote to it
In fact, according to Paul’s first letter to the Thessalonians, he spent the rest of his time in Athens worrying about the church in Thessalonica
We need to be ready to witness to Christ, even when waiting
We get our best effort, trying to find the most effective way to deliver the message
But we don’t change the heart of the message: we preach Christ, and Him crucified and resurrected
Finally, we accept the fruit we may receive, and we move on
Scripture quotations taken from the (NASB®) New American Standard Bible®, Copyright © 1995, 2020 by The Lockman Foundation. Used by permission. All rights reserved. www.lockman.org