Taught by
Stephen ArmstrongAccess all of our teaching materials through our smartphone apps conveniently and quickly.
Taught by
Stephen ArmstrongJoseph is on a mission to bring reconciliation with his brothers
Last week he met them for the first time in 20 years
When they bowed down before him, Joseph immediately recognized what he had to do
He was to rule over his family
But he determined to rule over them as a brother deserving of their love and devotion
Not as a despot commanding their obedience
Under even normal circumstances, it would be difficult for one brother among 12 to receive the love and devotion of his siblings
How much more difficult will it be for Joseph to manage this outcome
Especially given their history together
But as these brothers go, so goes the nation of Israel
If the nation is to survive as a single unit, Joseph must succeed in his task of reconciliation
There is a story of two brothers who reflect the importance of working together
So Joseph has accused his brothers of being spies and put them in prison for three days
Joseph has done this to bring them under pressure and stress while giving himself time to consider his next steps
Building this pressure against his brothers is an important part of Joseph’s plan
By this trial and tribulation, Joseph’s brothers will have added reason to consider their past mistakes and repent of their sins
We also noted last week that this story teaches a beautiful picture of another time of stress for Israel, the Tribulation of the last days
In that future time, the nation will experience great tribulation precisely for the same reason we see the brothers suffering in the story of Joseph
So that Israel might repent of past sins toward Christ
And by that repentance, they will become reconciled to Christ
So as we move forward in the story, we’ll continue to look for those parallels
Joseph devises a plan to bring all the brothers together
Benjamin is still back at home with Jacob because Jacob wanted to protect his favored son
But Joseph is intent on reconciling with all his brothers
As we discussed last week, Joseph must conceal his identity if he hopes to know their hearts truly
And so he must have all brothers present for that moment
His plan to bring Benjamin is to test their claims by demanding they produce the missing brother they claim to have at home
Previously, Joseph said he would hold all the brothers while sending one back to claim Benjamin
After leaving the brothers in jail for three days, Joseph has changed his approach
He will hold only one son while sending the rest back to Jacob to claim Benjamin
Joseph gives his reason for the change in plans in vs.20
First, by sending back multiple brothers, the story they tell Jacob can be verified by the voice of multiple brothers
If only one brother were sent back, Jacob might not believe the story
Also, Joseph knows these brothers have a history of coming back to their father with bad news in the form of a lie
Joseph wants Jacob to believe the story and allow Benjamin to leave
Secondly, Joseph says that this will ensure they do not die
Sending a single brother alone was a dangerous trip
He could easily fall prey to robbers and fail to make it back safely
And his return trip with Benjamin would be less likely to succeed as well
Upon hearing Joseph’s command, the brothers immediately begin to lament to one another over their misfortune
The boys begin to associate this situation with the one they put their brother Joseph through years earlier
They conclude in v.21 that this is “payback” for their earlier misdeeds
Reuben takes the opportunity to remind them that he hadn’t agreed with the plot
He reminds the brothers that he warned them against taking action against Joseph
Though Reuben has participated in the cover up
Joseph can understand the conversation, though the brothers don’t realize this
So Joseph learns, perhaps for the first time, that Reuben was not in favor of the plot
This knowledge will influence which brother Joseph holds ransom
Upon hearing the boys lamenting their fate, Joseph turns to weep, feeling their pain and perhaps re-living his own distress from those years ago
The boys are lamenting their situation, but this is worldly sorrow, not repentance
They are sorry that they are experiencing these circumstances, though they see them as connected to their earlier misdeeds
Among the unbelieving world, the word used to described this viewpoint is “karma”
Karma has its origins in Buddhism and other Eastern pagan religions
The concept has many variants and forms, including reincarnation, but the basic concept is simple
The choices a person makes will come back upon him in a similar way
Karma teaches that if a person does “good” things, then good things will be returned
Conversely, if a person does bad things in life, then they will see bad things returned to them
Believers in karma may or may not recognize the involvement of a deity in this cycle
Obviously, these teachings are man-made concepts lacking spiritual truth, but there is a Biblical parallel to this teaching
First, the Bible teaches that sin has consequences, which is similar to the notion of karma
If we live a life of sin, whether believers or unbelievers, then we can expect to see consequences sooner or later
As believers we are promised to see the discipline of the Lord as we walk with Him
Secondly, the covenant God made with Israel provided for cause-and-effect outcomes for the people of Israel
If the nation obeyed God’s commandments, they would see blessing
If the nation disobeyed the covenant, they would see His wrath
This was a national covenant, so these consequences played out over generations within the nation
Again, this is similar to the concept of karma
But the key difference between karma and the Bible’s teaching is the involvement of the Creator God
Karma and other new age notions attribute this cause and effect relationship to ambiguous, impersonal cosmic forces, not to a personal God
But the Bible teaches that the Lord always remains in control of all outcomes, not some cosmic role of the dice
And those outcomes will lead the world to an appointed end, while holding all guilty accountable
And yet the Lord makes a way of escape for those who accept the provision made available in Christ
Those who believe in karma never stop to ask the obvious question: how did the “cosmic forces” arrive at their rule of “right” and “wrong”?
Where do these definitions come from?
If there is no Law-giver and no judgment, then what dictates the consequences of karma?
Karma as a concept can only work if there is some higher standard of right and wrong guiding the process
Only the Bible offers an answer for the origin of right and wrong
It teaches that the holiness of God and the perfection of His law define good
And any departure from God’s law is by definition sin
Unless we equal God’s holiness, we are 100% bad
This is the essential difference between the truth of scripture and the lies of the enemy found in false religion ideas like karma
Our outcomes are not determined by our works or cosmic law of chance
There is an eternal Creator Who will judge us according to His Law
And we cannot stand that test by our own merit
And the only hope we have to escape a certain judgment is to have the covering of Christ’s blood
So, Joseph presses forward with the plan, devising a clever scheme for testing the brothers‘ hearts
Their past failure was to forsake a brother in need, turning their backs on him
So their test would be whether they would come to the aid of a brother in need this time around
Simeon would be held back while the rest are released
Joseph wisely skipped over Reuben and held Simeon instead
By allowing Reuben to return, Joseph ensured that the oldest was able to represent the brothers in meeting with Jacob
So the test is whether they will forsake Simeon to save their own skin?
Or would they voluntarily return to Egypt with Benjamin to rescue Simeon?
They may weep over their past mistake with Joseph, but will they show true repentance by their actions?
As the boys depart, Joseph decides to increase the pressure on them even more
He wanted to be doubly sure that the brothers’ return would be motivated entirely by love and not merely by the need for grain or anything else
So Joseph gives his brothers even more incentive never to return to Egypt
Without the brothers knowing, Joseph orders that the brothers’ money be returned to them in their sacks
The brothers brought the money to pay for the grain they bought
The money would have been paid to Joseph’s attendants at the point when the grain was delivered
So obviously, the brothers never expected to see the money again
By returning the money, Joseph was giving the brothers additional reasons to never return to Egypt
It wasn’t merely a matter of the money itself
It was the implication that they had stolen the grain from Pharaoh
Notice in v.28 when the brothers discover their money returned their hearts sank
The point is they realize that if they return to Egypt, there is a good chance they will be accused of stealing the grain
And then they will be put to death
Now the question has become whether they are willing to risk their own lives to save Simeon?
Joseph has increased the pressure on these boys 100 fold
This is the same pattern we will see in Israel during the waning days of Tribulation
The entire time of Tribulation is a pressure cooker designed to bring Israel to repentance and to acceptance of their Messiah
In fact, Daniel teaches that the last days of Tribulation are merely the final part of a long period of judgment reserved for Israel as penalty under the Old Covenant
In Daniel 9:24 we’re told that a period of seventy weeks, or seventy “sevens” are decreed for Israel
This period is intended to accomplish several goals in Israel
To finish the transgression of Israel under the Old Covenant
To put an end to sin in Israel
To make atonement for their sin under the Old Covenant
To bring in a period of everlasting righteousness
To bring an end to vision and prophecy
And to anoint a new temple
All of these events are accomplished through the chastisement of Israel, culminating in the events of Tribulation and the arrival of the 1,000 year kingdom of Christ on earth
These outcomes are the result of a period of great trial and stress upon the people of Israel
Zechariah describes this coming period of trial
Israel will feel the heat of the Lord refining His people
Two thirds of the Jews on earth will not survive this period of trial
But one third will survive
And in the end, that remnant of Israel will call upon the name of Jesus, leading to their salvation
We’ll study this more in coming weeks as we see it play out in the picture created in the story of Joseph and his brothers
After the sons reach Jacob in Canaan, they relate all that happened to them
They explain of how they met the Lord of the land
But this powerful man claimed they were spies
And how they defended themselves by explaining they were 12 brothers
And how one of the brothers was forced to remain as a ransom
Furthermore they explained that they had discovered their money had been returned
Then it was Jacob’s turn to speak
He says his sons have bereaved him of first Joseph, now Simeon and now they would have him lose Benjamin as well
This is an interesting thing to say
It’s even more interesting when you learn that Jacob’s statement is phrased in the form of a question
It’s as if Jacob suspects that his sons are responsible for Joseph’s and now Simeon’s loss
And they want to take Benjamin too
Why would Jacob suspect this?
Well, consider that twice now the brothers have returned from long trips with one fewer brother but with more money than they had when they left
When they came back from Dothan, they lacked Joseph
But they had twenty pieces of silver from selling him
Now they return from Egypt
They have one less brother
But they have all the grain and they have all their money
It seems Jacob is beginning to doubt the brothers’ stories, which is going to make it even more difficult to get the entire family to Egypt
Jacob denies the brothers’ request, leaving the family devastated
Reuben tries to convince his father to let him take Benjamin
He offers to let Jacob kill Reuben’s own two children if Reuben fails to come back with Benjamin
This is a foolish and rash vow
And it was unhelpful to Jacob, for certainly Jacob wouldn’t want to kill his own grandchildren
Reuben’s point was to emphasize how seriously he took the responsibility to bring Benjamin back alive
Predictably, Jacob refused Reuben’s offer and leaves Simeon for dead
Jacob’s favoritism for Rachel’s sons is so strong he is willing to forsake another son to preserve Benjamin
But the famine is not over, and the pressure is only going to increase on Israel
Just as the Lord will increase the pressure in Tribulation until the Jews of that time are left with no alternative but to seek for Christ
Which we will see in the next several weeks of our study in Genesis