Taught by
Stephen Armstrong
Taught by
Stephen ArmstrongThe book of Exodus moves into a new section today
The next eleven chapters recounts the law spoken to Moses and recorded for the people of Israel
The Lord has been slowly preparing the people to receive the Law as they made they way from Egypt to Sinai
The Lord told the nation on several occasions that as God’s people will be required to keep the Lord’s statutes
And now we have those statutes spelled out and incorporated into a covenant binding the nation to keep them
As we mentioned last week, the Law of God was incorporated into the covenant at Sinai
The covenant didn’t establish the law
God’s Law is eternal and reflects God’s holiness
It is the standard for fellowship with God
If men cannot live up to His holiness, we must face the penalty for sin, which is the second death
Nor was it necessary for God to enter into a covenant before He could judge Israel by His law
As we studied last time, Paul taught in Romans that all men are judged according to God’s law
Those who have the Law and those who are without the Law will be judged according to the same Law
Since we all have sin, we all fail that test
Only if we accept Christ’s payment under the Law on our behalf will we escape this second death
So the Law of God is one thing, and the covenant God gave to Israel is another and the two work together for God’s purposes in Israel
Most of the details of the covenant itself are given in the remaining books of Leviticus, Numbers and particularly Deuteronomy
Obviously, we aren’t going to study those books in this class
So our study from this point forward will be focused on to studying the Law itself, the tabernacle, and some interesting moments within the camp of Israel
Including one incident in particular that involves a golden bovine
Before we study the Law, we need to spend one lesson on an introduction
First, we’re going to cover three guiding principles for understanding and interpreting the Law
Secondly, we’re going to learn the ten reasons for God giving Israel the Law
Finally, we’re going to examine how a Christian is to view the Law today in the age of the Church
Let’s begin by reviewing some general principles for understanding and interpreting the Law
The First Principle: the Law consists of 613 commandments, given to Israel by a covenant, which only function as an indivisible unit
A total of 248 positive and 365 negative statutes, as the Jewish rabbis counted them
The first ten of these 613 are the best known, but they are not different from the rest nor can they be separated from the rest
There is no basis in Scripture for separating any of the commandments in the Law from the rest
When the Bible speaks of the “law” of God, it always views all 613 laws as a single entity
As James says:
God defines keeping the Law successfully as keeping all His commandments and statutes without breaking a single one
No law is more important than another; no law is dispensable; all must be kept or else we are lawbreakers
In short, it’s all or none, according to scripture
We’ll return to this principle later in the study
The Second Principle: The Law is not a means to obtaining righteousness (salvation) for anyone.
The Law of Moses was given to a redeemed people, not to redeem a people, as Dwight Pentecost once wrote
If there were any doubts concerning this point, we need only read Paul’s letters to gain a proper understanding, as Paul said
The Law was given to Israel for specific purposes, which we’ll study in a moment, but personal salvation was never one of those purposes
But scripture is utterly clear that the Law made nothing perfect, as Hebrews 7:19 states
Paul calls the Law a ministry of death in 2Cor 3
And in Romans 3:20 Paul says that by the works of the Law no flesh will be justified, that is declared righteous
The Third Principle: Keeping the Law did not, by itself, yield greater holiness in the OT saint (sanctification)
The OT saint was called to live a life of holiness, one that reflects the holiness of the Lord Himself
And when that command met a faithful and obedient heart, it produced sanctification for the the saint seeking to please the Lord
But that sanctification was made possible because a faithful heart was seeking to obey God’s word by doing what was commanded
That same faithful heart understood that God would provide a Messiah to remove sin
That same faithful saint never lost sight of his own unworthiness, since the Law served as a constant reminder of sin
So sanctification was a product of faith seeking to obey God’s word
The keeping of the Law was merely the test of faith provided to the OT saint in Israel
It didn’t by itself produce sanctification
We’ll also return to this topic later in tonight’s lesson
Moving to our next topic for the night, let’s examine the ten purposes for the giving of the Law to Israel
These purposes can be divided into three groups: theological, national and individual purposes
First, the theological purposes...teaching concerning holiness and sin
(1) The Law reveals the holiness of God, which is the standard of righteousness
(3) Therefore, the Law sets the standard for fellowship with God (i.e., the holiness men must obtain for entrance into Heaven)
(4) By setting such an impossible standard, the Law meets its ultimate theological purpose in leading men to recognize the need for a Messiah
The second group of purposes in the law are national purposes for Israel
(5) The Law (and the covenant that delivered it) was God’s instrument for establishing Israel as God’s chosen nation of people on earth
(6) The Law, by its strict rules and unique provisions, caused Israel to be set apart from other nations and to remain forever distinct in identity and culture
(7) The Law instituted national worship observances, including certain festivals and the temple services
Finally, the Law purposes for the individual within Israel, as a standard of conduct for the OT saint (it didn’t create a saint; it regulated the life of a saint)
(8) First, the Law regulated individual conduct to yield blessing and promote well-being
This was a tool the Lord used to promote holiness in the lives of OT saints
As we mentioned earlier, the Law BY ITSELF does not produce sanctification
But during the dispensation of Law, the OT saint was guided into holiness through the commandments and instruction of the Law
Notice the Psalmist says that he delights in meditating on God’s law
This is another way of saying “studying God’s word”
The Law was God’s word for the OT saint, and therefore it provided the same fuel for sanctification that the word of God does for the NT saint now
In fact, the giving of the Law to Israel occurs exactly 50 days after the crossing of the Red Sea, when the Jews were freed from Pharaoh’s army
The Feast of Weeks was given to Israel to commemorate this time of escape from the Red Sea and the arrival at the mountain
The Feast of Weeks goes by another name in the New Testament: the Feast of Pentecost, where the word pentecost means 50 days in Greek
In the book of Acts, we read that on Pentecost the Holy Spirit arrives to indwell all believers in the Church
This moment is the fulfillment of the earlier moment of Israel in the desert
In Acts we read (NKJV):
So the Law came to Israel 50 days after they were freed from Egypt
It was written on stone
And it was given to Israel so they might have a guide for righteous living
That day was intended as a picture of a greater fulfillment for the Church, when it received a law written on hearts by the Holy Spirit
The Spirit came 50 days after believers were freed from slavery to sin
And He was given to all men so that we might truly become righteous by grace
(9) Secondly, the Law served as a test for whether a person was part of the kingdom of God (i.e., the theocracy of Israel)
This is the OT equivalent of fruit of the Spirit, showing by a person’s actions whether they were a follower of God’s word
Those who failed to abide by the Law were to be removed from the nation of Israel, cut off from the people
In that way, it also serves as a picture of what will happen in the eternal kingdom
Only those who are righteous (in Christ) will enjoy life in the kingdom
(10) Finally, the Law’s sacrificial system provided for personal atonement and restoration of fellowship in the aftermath of unintentional sin
By observing the sacrificial system of the Law, the OT saint was commanded to confess their guilt and paying a personal price in the form of an animal
This process required the priesthood to officiate
And through this ritual atonement, the person experience a tangible example of God’s
We should also remember that the Law made no provision for willful sin
Only unintentional sin could be covered by atoning sacrifices
Intentional sin was punishable by death
Furthermore, ritual sacrifice under the Law didn’t obtain God’s forgiveness or produce righteousness in the individual
The Lord’s forgiveness for sin was a matter of faith made possible by the atonement of Christ on the cross
But during the dispensation of Law, prior to the sacrifice of Christ, the rituals of the Law served an important purpose in foreshadowing Christ’s work
Through these rituals, the OT saint was demonstrating personal repentance and showing evidence of faith
Meanwhile, their obedience to the Law produced a picture of God’s work through Christ
On a personal level, the individual also experienced the assurance of God’s forgiveness
Participating in the ritual atonement under the Law was a grace given to the OT saints, since it provided for a cleansing of the conscience
The saint would experience a relief at knowing he was acceptable to God despite his sin, an acceptance made possible by faith only
So the sacrifices of the Law regulated an OT saint’s relationship with God while the world awaited the Messiah
Today, we have no need for such rituals to regulate our relationship with the Lord since the greater sacrifice of Christ has been made for us
We have the Holy Spirit indwelling every saint, providing conviction of sin and assurance of forgiveness
Christ’s sacrifice gives makes possible a new spirit and a clear conscience without need for repeated sacrifices
The final topic of our introduction is the question of how we as Christians are to relate to the Law now that we are under the New Covenant
First, as we studied already, the Law was given by way of a covenant made with Israel
Only Jews were a party to this covenant, so only Jews were obligated to keep the Law
Gentiles were never under the Law unless they attached themselves to Israel
Once Christ inaugurated the New Covenant in His blood, this wall of separation between Jew and Gentile was broken down
Specifically, the elimination of the Law itself removed this barrier
Notice Paul says in v.15 that the dividing wall between Jew and Gentiles was the Law of commandments
The Law was given as part of a covenant, and the covenant was only given to Israel
This caused Israel to be set apart from all other nations
No Gentile had opportunity to enjoy a relationship with God unless they became part of Israel
Some Gentiles did attach themselves to Israel, like Ruth
But otherwise, the existence of the Law created a barrier for Jews and Gentiles to join together
So if God was going to open up the family of God to all men, then He had to first do away with this barrier
Therefore the Law was abolished for those who believe
So the NT believer is not commanded to keep the Law
This is why Paul teaches in Romans and Galatians and elsewhere that the believer is not under the Law, but is under grace instead
The Law of God was not abolished; it was fulfilled
As Jesus Himself testified
Christ met all the holiness requirements of the Law
As a Jew Himself, Jesus was subject to the terms of the covenant
Therefore, He had to keep all the statutes of God’s Law,
And He did so by living a sinless life
Christ also bore the punishment for our sin under the Law
Christ took upon Himself the curse of the Law
As the Law itself says
So Jesus fulfilled the Law’s requirements for righteousness
And He fulfilled the penalties prescribed in the Law for sin, though He had not sinned
So even though believers are no longer judged by the Law because the Law’s terms have been fulfilled totally in Christ, the covenant and the Law still exists
The covenant is still in effect for unbelieving Israel
The terms of the covenant continue into the Millennial Kingdom (see Revelation study to learn how)
Meanwhile, for every believer whether Jew or Gentile the Law has been fulfilled (or we could say completed) on our behalf by Christ
There is nothing more we could accomplish by our attempts to keep the Law that would improve upon what Christ has already done on our behalf
In fact, since breaking even one law means breaking the entire law, our fruitless efforts to keep the law amount to nothing but greater condemnation
Instead, we are told not to keep law but to rest in Christ’s work and accept His righteousness credited to us by faith
But when we hear that believers are not to observe the Law, we reach a point of difficulty for many Christians
Some might assume I am teaching that a Christian is free to do whatever they please
Without law, won’t people run amok in sin?
Aren’t at least the Ten Commandments still requirements for Christians?
In an attempt to prove their point, someone will inevitably throw out the question “Does this mean a Christian can murder?”
The question is clearly ridiculous, since we know the answer is no...murder is sin
And no Christian would feel free to murder simply because someone tells them they are not under the Law
The question is useful for our discussion because it exposes two common false assumptions
First, the question assumes that the Ten Commandments can be treated differently than the rest of the 613 Laws of Moses
But we have already established that the Law is a single, indivisible entity, and we established that the NT believer is not under Law
All the law - all 613 laws - have been fulfilled by Christ on our behalf, so we are not judged according to those laws today
Therefore, if someone thinks they should keep the first ten commandments of the Law, they are also arguing for observing the remaining 603 laws as well
Obviously, no Christian I know advocates for keeping all 613 commandments of the Law
As Paul says to the Galatians:
Those who feel the need to preserve some or all of the Law as part of Christian experience show their ignorance of that very law
Many of the laws require performing animal sacrifice at a temple that no longer exists!
So it’s literally impossible to keep the Law today...and if you break even one of the laws, you’ve broken them all!
Nevertheless, some Christians try to preserve the ten commandments (and sometimes other laws) apart from the rest of the LawBut we can no more choose to selectively observe some laws of God than we can selectively obey some of the laws of our nation
It’s all or none, just as James says
So the first wrong assumption we make in trying to preserve the ten commandments is thinking can preserve some of the Law without the rest
If you think there is no way God wanted us to put aside the Ten Commandments, then you are also insisting that you keep the other 603 laws
But we know the NT explicitly says we are not under Law, but under grace
Secondly, the question assumes that the purpose of the Ten Commandments was to compel righteous behavior
Let’s take murder, for example
When someone asks “Is it not OK for a Christian murder?” they are implying that Christians refrain from murdering today because of the Ten Commandments
If we agree that the Ten Commandments are no longer in force, we are giving Christians license to murder
Well, perhaps we should start by asking how many Christians routinely commit murder today? Answer: all of us
Have you ever called hated someone, even for only a second? Have you ever insulted someone, even just by calling them a “fool?”
If so, then you have committed an offense no different than murder according to Jesus
A lot of good those commandment did then
If we think the Ten Commandments are needed to keep Christians from sinning, then we need to reset our perspective on sin and law
The Law never stopped anyone from sinning
On the contrary, the Law amplifies sin, in that it highlights our transgressions and enflames our flesh to violate it all the more
So giving me ten commandments didn’t serve the purpose of reducing sin
On the contrary, it caused transgressions to increase, Paul says
It showed us where sin existed
And the Law triggers a natural response in fallen flesh, which is to intentionally do whatever the Law prohibits
You can observe this principle in action in any four year old child or teenager
Tell them what they can’t do, and watch what they desire most
The point is it’s a myth to think Christians have been protected from sin by the existence of the Ten Commandments
There is not a single commandment that every Christian has not broken in spirit if not in fact
We have all used the Lord’s name in vain, whether in speech or thought
We have all broken the Sabbath
We have all lied or been dishonest in some way
We have all dishonored our parents at some point
We have all lusted in our hearts or been sexually impure at some point
We have all taken something that is not ours at some point, even it’s just leaving early from work
We have all coveted another person’s property or harbored desires for another person’s spouse, even if only for a second
We have all served idols in various ways and at various times
The Ten Commandments never kept anyone out of sin much less out of hell, so preserving them serves absolutely no purpose
The Law does not makes us holy
It can only reveals how sinful we truly are
The words may look nice on a plaque on the courthouse steps
But when we reverse the Ten Commandments, we’re idolizing the very thing that condemns us, not a thing that makes us holy
As Hebrews sums up, contrasting the Law and the Old Covenant with the New Covenant in Christ
Scripture quotations taken from the (NASB®) New American Standard Bible®, Copyright © 1995, 2020 by The Lockman Foundation. Used by permission. All rights reserved. www.lockman.org