Taught by
Stephen Armstrong
Taught by
Stephen ArmstrongAs we enter into chapter 5, let’s remember that John has specific purposes in mind as he wrote his Gospel
Tonight, a couple of those purposes are squarely in view:
First, John explores the union of the deity of God with the humanity of human form
Jesus lowered Himself to become man, and in the form of man, He became a servant of the Father
But how does God serve Himself in that sense? How can One part of God be a servant to another part?
This relationship between Jesus incarnate and the Father in Heaven is a central focus in John’s Gospel
it fascinates us to consider the ramifications of God becoming man
And we ponder how that change manifested itself in Jesus
But as we’ll see tonight, the unique relationship that resulted from Jesus’ incarnation yielded a model for our own relationship serving the Father
Secondly, John highlights the way Jesus was constantly contending with religious authorities
Why would men who supposed represented the Father have such concerns with the Son of the Father?
Wouldn’t we expect that men appointed to teach Israel about God would be the first to embrace the very God they studied in the scriptures?
In this chapter, Jesus and the Pharisees will conflict over certain rules of life that the religious leaders imposed but Jesus ignored
So the question arises why are these conflicts happening, and what do they say about Jesus and these men
The first part of chapter 5 describes a miraculous healing which sets up the conflict with the religious leaders
The second part revolves around the leaders’ challenge to Jesus’ teaching and Jesus’ response
As we saw back in chapter 2, John again describes a feast in Jerusalem that requires Jesus to travel back down to the city
Generally, when Jews talk of a feast without mentioning it by name, they are referring to the feast of Passover, which was the most important feast on their calendar
Like today, we might say the holidays, and it’s understood we mean Christmas and New Years
So this is the second time Jesus travels to Jerusalem during His earthly ministry
That would set the time of these events to be about a year after the events in chapter 4, almost halfway through his earthly ministry
Going back to Jerusalem meant Jesus would also run into the Jewish religious leaders
John sets up one such conflict with a story of a healing by a pool in the city called Bethesda
It was located by the Sheep Gate, which was located in the northern part of the city wall according to Nehemiah
The name of the pool probably means house of mercy
A pool has been excavated in that place, and today it’s called St. Anne’s pool
Interestingly, John says the pool has five porticoes, which isn’t significant to the account
Except perhaps because the number five in scripture is the number of grace
John says that around the pool lay a multitude of sick who came to the pool for healing
Why did they come to pool for healing?
In vs.3-4, we’re told people gathered around the water because they believed the angel of the Lord stirred the waters from time to time
And when the waters were stirred, the first to enter the pool would be healed
This possibility had attracted a large number of sick, who sat around the pool watching the water for hours or days at a time
As we consider this explanation for a moment, it’s sounds very curious and a bit suspect
Only one person received the benefit of the Lord’s mercy no matter how many were present around the pool
It was like God was dispensing His mercy on a lottery system
As if He only had a limited supply of healing power to go around
Why would the Lord ever dispense His mercy and grace in such a capricious and inevitably frustrating way to those who seek after it?
Secondly, this process required a measure of human effort or works to benefit from God’s mercy
To be healed, someone has to have the strength to beat every other cripple to the water
So only those who had the physical capacity to enter the water quickly were able to receive the Lord’s mercy
The worst conditions, the people who most needed the Lord’s help, were excluded from receiving it, it would seem
Such a scenario suggests that God only supplies His mercy to those who have strength to contribute something in return
But that’s never the way the Lord extends grace and mercy
On the contrary, the Lord gives help to the helpless
Finally, the account says the healing happens because the “Angel of the Lord” stirs the water
But the Angel of the Lord is the Second Person of the Godhead, that is a pre-incarnate Jesus
Yet for the past 30 years, Jesus has lived in human form
So He couldn’t have been stirring the waters at Bethesda unless His physical hand dipped into the water and moved it
Yet desperate people have continued watching the water expecting healing, which suggests they have been reacting to something else in the past 30 years
The unavoidable conclusion is that the story of this pool wasn’t a true story
The Lord never stirred the water and this pool did not produce healing
Nevertheless, a myth had taken hold that many people have chosen to believe
Desperate people assembled at this pool hoping that the superstition they had been told was true
And perhaps when the wind moved the water or because someone claimed they saw the water stirred, then a great rush of cripples began
And perhaps once in a while, someone claimed to have been healed, but then who could be sure
So the story of God healing through a pool was not true, though the idea held a power over the people
This still happens today as con artists work within the church promising miraculous healing to those who meet God’s arbitrary test
Such nonsense serves the same purpose as other religious superstition, like weeping statues of Mary or grilled cheese sandwiches that look like Jesus
They substitute for true relationship with the living God
So why did John include this explanation in his account if it wasn’t a true story
The answer is John didn’t include this in his account
Rather, an enterprising copyist added this detail
In my Bible translation (NASB), the phrase that begins at the end of v.3 and continues until the end of v.4 is in brackets
Those brackets were inserted by the translators to alert the reader to the likelihood that these words are not reliable
They are not present in the earliest manuscripts, having appeared centuries later
The copyist was attempting to explain why so many gathered at the pool
So he inserted commentary to explain the myth, though he presents the explanation as if it were true
Take comfort in the fact that even when someone tries to add something to the scriptures, the Spirit has insured we can discernment the truth from what is not true
Back to the story, Jesus asks a crippled man if he wanted to be healed
The man responds he hasn’t been able to be healed yet because he can’t make it happen
Someone has always beat him to it
He’s been waiting for a miracle and has spent 38 years of his life trusting in this superstition to heal him
It’s the utter epitome of hopelessness made worse by the deception of powerless religion
I’m sure his friends or the religious leaders simply told him he wasn’t worthy of God’s mercy
But now here stands Jesus, Who was prepared to extend God’s mercy to this man
Take note the man never specifically asks Jesus for healing
Jesus asked if he wanted healing, and the man responded by explaining why he couldn’t be healed
Clearly, his answer implies he wants healing
But the fact he doesn’t seek healing directly from Jesus tells us he didn’t realize Jesus could accomplish such a healing
It tells us the cripple was not as yet aware of Who Jesus was
Nevertheless, at that Jesus orders the man to get up
Since this man is crippled and unable to walk, Jesus’ words indicate He has healed the man
Not only has he been given back the ability to walk, but Jesus also restored strength to the man’s limbs
After lying around for 38 years, he would have experienced significant atrophy in his limbs
Nevertheless, the man picks up the pallet or mat on which he was laying and he walks away healed
This account produces a strong contrast with the myth
The man has been taught a superstitious myth of human religion that emphasized he must be worthy to receive God’s mercy
And year after he falls short
It’s a discouraging, hopeless outlook
And yet this is always the recipe when men invent ways to find God
These lies always begin with some mystery of supernatural power
But at the core, false religion always relies on some human achievement to please God
So that when the system fails us, we fall back to blaming ourselves for not doing enough to satisfy God
But the living God doesn’t dispense grace according to human rules or expectations
The Lord bring grace without a catch, and when the Lord decides to bring healing, the outcome doesn’t rest on human abilities
Ironically, the Angel of Lord did visit the pool on that day
Jesus had the power to part the waters in the pool much less stir them, but Jesus didn’t need parlor tricks to accomplish a healing
Jews seeks for such signs, but God’s word is the real power of the Universe
So by the word of God, a healing took place
And it came to the least powerful member of the crowd, the one with no ability to save himself
And it asked nothing of the man
In fact, Jesus didn’t even wait for the man to make a request of Him
That’s the difference between dead, powerless religion and the grace of God
Men look to their works to please God, and yet God is pleased when we hear and believe in His word
Now this scene of the man’s healing is just the warm up act for the conflict that follows in chapter 5
Notice at the end of v.9 John mentions that this healing happened on the Sabbath day
That’s the key detail setting up the rest of the chapter
It leads to the first of several disputes between the Lord and Pharisees over the rules surrounding the Sabbath Day observance
Under the scribes and Pharisees, the Sabbath day observance in Israel had become a religion all its own
The rabbis even come to calling the Sabbath day the Bride of Israel or Jehovah’s Queen
Under rabbinical tyranny, the Sabbath had become a religion of its own in Israel
It was the most important day of the week for religious observance and consequently for religious persecution as well
Almost anything action a person might take on that day could be deemed an offense against the Sabbath Law
So that by the time of Jesus’ first coming, the rabbinical system in Israel had established something like 1,500 additional rules for how Jews must observe the Sabbath
And the penalties for breaking these rules were severe, including death
These rules had no relationship to the Law God delivered to Israel
As the Lord delivered the Sabbath, He included all the rules necessary for someone to observer the Sabbath successfully
But men with false motives took God’s law and turned it into an opportunity to gain political power over the people
These rules granted power to those who made and enforced them while enslaving those who fell under them
And so naturally, it was a source of great concern to the Pharisee’s when they witnessed Jesus instructing a man to act contrary to their 1,500 rules
The Pharisees (who John simply calls “the Jews”) took immediate exception to finding a man walking out of the building carrying a mat
They tell him it is not permissible to carry the mat
Of course, God hadn’t declared it was impermissible
It was not permitted according to their manmade rules concerning the Sabbath
Yet they portrayed their rules as equal to God’s Law
In fact, they taught their obeying God’s Law was achieved by following their rules
So they led people to believe that when they violated any one of these 1,500 rules, they were offending God
The people believed what they were told
And the Pharisees retained control over people as a result
The man responded by explaining he was told to carry his mat by the man who healed him
The man was saying a lot more than merely explaining his rationale for walking
He was implying that the man who told him to walk had greater authority than these men who tell him not to walk
The One who can heal a body merely by His word is demonstrating His authority as the Creator
And if the Creator tells you to get up and walk with your pallet, you do it no matter how many men you might offend
It’s interesting that Jesus told the man specifically to walk and carry his pallet
Conceivably, Jesus could have just told the man to walk and leave his pallet behind
Instead, Jesus made a point to tell the man to carry it with him
It seems as though Jesus was inviting a confrontation with the Pharisees
In fact, Jesus slips away before they find Him because He has more important things to attend to
It’s also revealing that when the Pharisees hear the man’s explanation, they show no interest in his story of healing
They’re only interested in the violation of their laws
They are more focused on their own interests and power than on any true working of God around them
Once again, notice the man still doesn’t know who Jesus is
He can’t identify Jesus to the Pharisees
And he certainly doesn’t seem to appreciate that Jesus is the Messiah
Which tells us that Jesus didn’t require this man to possess faith as a prerequisite for the healing
At this point in Jesus’ ministry, He was performing miracles to establish His authority and prove His claims
So it didn’t depend on a person accepting His testimony necessarily
Nevertheless, Jesus still wants to bring His identity to the man’s attention after the healing
So, Jesus avoids the Pharisees for now so He can seek the man out and clarify His identity
When Jesus finds the man in the temple (perhaps thanking God for the healing), He tells the man now that he has become well, do not sin anymore, so that nothing worse happens
Though the language is a bit odd to our ears, we should recognize this is the moment of this man’s salvation
Jesus says to him that he has become well
Clearly, this would suggest his physical healing
But in this case, Jesus’ words go deeper
In particular, notice that Jesus follows his first statement by saying do not sin anymore
That phrase appears in other places in the Gospels as well
A few chapters from now, Jesus encounters a woman caught in adultery, and after saving her, He says
From the Gospels, we learn that the phrase “go and sin no more” is an instruction Jesus offers those who have experienced spiritual healing
Therefore, Jesus is saying to this man that since he has been made well spiritually (as well as physically), he must live according to his salvation
As a result of receiving God’s mercy, the man is expected to live a new life without sinning
For if he continues in sin after becoming a child of God, he is at risk of the Lord bringing discipline upon him
Which could result in an even worse calamity than being a cripple
Then as a result of Jesus words to the man, we’re told in v.15 the man goes out proclaiming Jesus
Just as the Samaritan woman did
He has become a disciple of Jesus
Now, John has set the scene for what follows between Jesus and the Pharisees
Disputes over the Sabbath are a central theme in all four Gospels
Across all Gospels, we find a total of seven disputes between Jesus and the Pharisees over the Sabbath
John’s Gospel records three of the seven moments
In this case, when the Pharisees learned that Jesus was the One who told the man to pick up his mat, they come after Him
This then leads us into the first of Jesus’ extended discourses in John’s Gospel
Jesus opens this discourse explaining how the Pharisees completely misunderstood the Sabbath and its purpose
First, Jesus says that His Father is working all the time, even until now
The Father rested from His work of Creation, but that doesn’t mean the Father ceased all work
The Father has remained at work in the lives of His people from the beginning
Simply maintaining the operation of the Universe is a constant work of God
The natural laws of the Universe that we observe are the result of God at work
The Bible says God is holding all things together and working according to His design
Jesus' point is that God can’t be accused of failing to rest on the Sabbath because God is free to work continually
The Sabbath rest requirement was given by God to man so that man might benefit from it
And the Pharisees also understood that God was not subject to the Sabbath day commandment
And so that’s where Jesus began in His defense
But by calling God His Father and by saying He is likewise working as well, Jesus went a step further than the Pharisees could accept
In v.18 John says the Pharisees sought to kill Jesus all the more
John lists two reasons why Jesus upset them
First, they said Jesus was breaking the Sabbath
Since Jesus existed in the form of man, He was subject to the Sabbath Law, just as Jesus kept all the Law
But Jesus wasn’t breaking the Sabbath, not as God commanded it
Instead Jesus was breaking one of the Pharisees’ stupid extra rules
In this case, the Pharisaical rule Jesus violated was a prohibition of carrying anything from a public space to a private space or from a private space to a public space
This was one of the many arbitrary rules that the Pharisees added to the commandment
When the cripple picked up his mat and moved it out of the portico, he was defying this rule
But these manmade rules were not in keeping with the spirit or purpose of the Law
The Sabbath was given to Israel to ensure a day each week without a need to work for their existence
Remember, in the desert the people of Israel were provided extra manna on the sixth day
And in the sixth year, the harvest was great enough to last two years
So the point was idleness; it was relaxing from the labors of subsisting
More importantly, the Sabbath was given to created a picture of Christ, Who fulfills the Sabbath in the New Covenant
Christ work on the cross brings us salvation, so we have no need to work for our own salvation
When we believe in Christ, we rest in His work and enter into His rest
So Jesus is our Sabbath fulfillment
Which is why the Christian is not required to keep a Sabbath day, since we have fulfilled the Sabbath requirement in coming to faith in Christ
Secondly, they wanted to kill Jesus because He made Himself equal with God
Of course, all Jesus could say to this accusation was guilty as charged
Jesus was saying He was equal to God because He is
The Trinity is a basic doctrine of Christianity
This verse by itself is further proof that Jesus called Himself God and it refutes those who say otherwise
False teachers like the Jehovah’s Witnesses will claim that Jesus never declared He was God
And they will deny the Trinity
But here is one of many places you can go in the New Testament to know the truth
In response to the Pharisees anger, Jesus shares some details on the intimate relationship that Father and the Son share
First, Jesus says the Son never acts apart from the Father, for they always act in unison
Jesus would never seek to do anything except what is the Father’s will
This is the definition of holiness and sinlessness
Doing everything and only what is the Father’s will
Everything single thing that Jesus did was perfectly in unison with the Father
So when Jesus told the man to pick up the mat, His instructions were perfectly consistent with the Father’s desires
In other words, what Jesus told the man to do was what the Father wanted done
And if the Father wanted it done, then by definition it couldn’t have been a violation of the Sabbath
And equally true, the Pharisees were sinning by demanding the man do otherwise
In effect Jesus explained that His instructions were in keeping with the Sabbath while the Pharisees’ were not
The idea that Jesus submitted to the will of the Father leads some to question whether Jesus was truly God in the flesh
How could God submit to God, and so they conclude Jesus was just a man, a prophet, sent from God
In coming to this conclusion, they overlook the detail that Jesus followed perfectly
As Jesus said to the rich young ruler, no one is good but God alone
The only way any man could follow in the Father’s will perfectly is if He were sinless, as only God is
So Jesus must be God to live a perfectly submitted life
Nevertheless, because of His incarnate form, Jesus had to watch and learn from the Father in order to know what to do
This is probably the greatest mystery and most awe-inspiring aspect of the incarnation
Though He was God, Jesus experienced the process of learning, growing and maturing as a human being
As Jesus grew, He was always aware of His relationship to the Father
And He was constantly seeking to follow the Father and do only what pleased Him.
What a mystery that God could be confined to flesh and therefore required to learn and grow and yet still remained forever obedient and submitted.
Next, Jesus says the Son is always in the loop, because the Father reveals all things to the Son out of love
The Son is on earth for a purpose and the Father never fails to instruct the Son on how to fulfill His mission to the Father’s satisfaction
So the Son never acts out of disobedience
Nor does He ever act out of ignorance
He is perfectly in tune with the will of God in all things
And the things that the Father is willing to do out of love for the Son doesn’t stop with human works
Jesus says the Father is prepared to show the Son even greater works than healing the physical body of a cripple
Beginning with future works of bringing men back to life and other great miracles
And culminating with His own resurrection and glorification
And continuing until today as Jesus brings new birth to all His children by faith
Jesus’ greatest miracle is His mission to save the lost, which He calls out in v.21
This claim wasn’t novel, since the Jewish understanding acknowledged that God could and sometimes did raise dead bodies back to life
Resurrections had happened at many points in the Old Testament
The widow’s son was raised by the prophet Elijah, for example
But now Jesus says He shared that same power, and He was prepared to grant it to whoever He wishes
When Jesus says that the Son gives life to whomever “He” wishes, the He is a reference back to the Father
We can see that from the context
The Father is the One raising people from the dead
And Jesus said He can do nothing on His own, but He only does what the Father is doing
So when Jesus raises someone from the dead, He is raising those the Father wishes to raise
Still, the point is that Jesus claims the same power as the Father in raising dead bodies back to life
And this statement means Jesus is claiming to be God one area in which the Father had delegated all authority to the Son
But there is one area in which the Father had delegated all authority to the Son
The Father has given the Son to right to judge all Creation
Peter declares the same thing in Acts
Jesus was appointed to judge all things
The Pharisees who were seeking to kill Jesus were going to stand before Him in a future day and receive His righteous judgment
What a warning! Jesus is telling them one day I will judge you
Yet in the meantime He willingly suffers under their condemnation
I can’t imagine the judgment these men faced
Then Jesus says in v.23 that the Father will ensure that all will honor the Son in the same way they have said to honor the Father
And if a person rejects the Son, that person is simultaneously rejecting the Father too
This is the natural conclusion from all that Jesus has stated
These men say they honor the Father, but their hearts are far from Him
And the proof of that is the way they reject the Son
But in the end, all men will honor the Son, as Paul says
Here we find the exclusivity of Jesus position and Christianity’s claims
The phrase “there are many roads to Heaven” is a popular way of saying that we don’t all have to believe the same things about God in order to be accepted by Him
Some can find “god” in following Muhammed
Some find Him in following Buddha
Some find Him in following Jesus
And some find God in completely unique ways
But Jesus’ words completely refute that notion
Jesus says that God is only found through the Son He sent
Jesus is the One and only Name with the power to save men from their sin
Any other belief is folly and will lead to disappointment
We can’t say that Jesus is both a good person or consider Him to be one way to Heaven, because His own words preclude those conclusions
Either Jesus was lying or crazy
Because He said He was equal to God
He said to reject Him was to reject the Father
If Jesus was wrong, then there is no reason to consider anything else He said
Or He is right, in which case we can’t add any other name to our list of ways to Heaven
Those are the only two rational positions we can take on the question of how to consider Jesus
At this point, you can imagine that Jesus’ words had His audience with mouths wide open gaping in either disbelief, astonishment or disgust
So Jesus begins to speak more forcefully about His authority
The voice of the Son of God is a life-giving power to the dead
Jesus is speaking of two things at once in this statement
First, He’s speaking to the miracles that He was preparing to work in raising people from the grave
People like Lazarus
But in spiritual terms, Jesus’ voice would call many men and women to belief in Him as Messiah
And that belief raises these dead people to new life
Just as Jesus explained to the Pharisees Nicodemus
The Son’s ability to give life is equal to the Father’s ability to give life
The Godhead is equal and the power of Creator is shared and equal
Just as we see in Genesis, when we read
Once again, Jesus is calling Himself God, in that He can grant life to dead bodies and spirits
But He has also been granted the power to execute judgment
So, we will either hear His voice for the outcome of obtaining eternal life
Or else we will hear His voice on a judgment day to come
And on that judgment day, we will not ignore Him, for we will receive the penalty for our sins
One way or another, we will hear His voice and obey
From here, the conversation move to a comparison of life and judgment
In vs.28-29 Jesus explains that both these outcomes include a resurrection
In the first case, those who have heard His voice and did good are resurrected to life
In v.29 your Bible may contain the word “deeds” twice in this statement, but that word never appears in the original Greek language
That’s important, because Jesus isn’t saying that good deeds or evil deeds are the determiner for eternal life or judgment
Read the sentence without the word “deeds” and Jesus was saying that doing the good thing or the evil thing makes the difference
The good thing in this context is to hear the voice of the Son of Man and respond in a positive way
As did the cripple man, when He was told to get up and he obeyed
And later when He heard Jesus tell Him to go and sin no more, and the man believed in Jesus and was joyful
These are the ones who will be resurrected to eternal life
We who have believed in the name of the Son of Man will receive new bodies in a future day
And with those new bodies, we will never die again
We will live forever in His Kingdom of righteousness and glory
On the other hand, the evil thing in this context would be to ignore the Lord’s voice, to reject Him
But those who rejected Jesus as Lord will still be resurrected
They too will receive a new bodies
But in that new body, they will experience a judgment, which the Bible calls the second death
This is the eternal death that the Lord promised as wages for all those who sin
We see these two moment juxtaposed in Revelation.
All believers are a part of the first resurrection, which occurs over a series of moments
And all unbelievers are a part of the second resurrection
The first leads into the Kingdom
While the second leads to the Lake of Fire
Jesus then repeats in v.30 that He does nothing except what the Father wills, including the judgment that Jesus renders in this future moment
The Son’s judgment will be the result of the Father’s will
According to all that the Father has ordained, the Son must judge
Once again, the Son and Father are acting in unison in all matters
To end the chapter, Jesus explains that the truth of His claims are corroborated in three ways
Jesus says that if He were making these statements with no other support, then we can be sure He was lying
People come with outlandish claims all the time
But they always lack the testimony of God to support their claims
But Jesus had supporting testimony from God
First, Jesus mentions that His testimony was backed by John the Baptist
John told the people of Jesus’ coming, and so when Jesus arrived, John’s testimony confirmed Jesus to be the One foretold
Jesus reminds the Pharisees that they sent to John as we saw in chapter 1
And when they inspected John, they could find nothing in His ministry to discredit him
But Jesus adds that he doesn’t need the testimony of an earthly man to validate His ministry
Rather, Jesus says He mentioned John’s testimony so that those who heard these words might be saved
Jesus wants the disciples, the readers and perhaps the Pharisees themselves to remember the words John spoke about Jesus, that He was the Lamb of God
And by that testimony to believe in Jesus
John was a light that was burning for a while, but as you we can tell from Jesus’ words in v.35, John has died by this point
Secondly, Jesus claims are supporter by His miraculous works, which are a greater testimony than John’s words in that they demonstrate the truth of His claims
There is no way to escape the truth of a miraculous healing
Or a person raised from the dead
As we said, it’s telling that the Pharisees never cared to inspect the healing and rule on it
They skipped past that testimony because it was an inconvenient fact
If you accept that Jesus did the miracles the Gospel writers claim He did, then there is simply no getting around the fact that Jesus is God
For only the Creator can accomplish such things
This will be a recurring theme in John’s Gospel, that the religious leaders in Israel were lost in their sin and far from the Father
Finally, Jesus offers the third and most powerful testimony that supports Jesus’ claims, and it’s the one these men rejected first and foremost
It’s the testimony of the word of God, the scriptures
Jesus says that the Father Himself has testified to Jesus.
But the Father’s voice has never been heard.
And the Father’s form has never been seen at any time.
The Father is all Spirit and cannot be seen nor heard according Jesus.
The Creation has only seen the Godhead in the form of the Second Person of the Godhead
So if no man has heard or seen the Father, how has the Father testified to the Son?
In v.38 Jesus says they don’t have the word of God abiding in them
The word of God is the testimony of the Father concerning the Son, Who is the Word
All the scriptures testify to Christ in one way or another
But these men do not have the word of God abiding in them
This statement must have been a true shock and completely offensive
These men prided themselves on being experts in the word of God
And yet they understood none of it
Which was proven in the fact that they were rejecting the very One that the scriptures testified about
These men searched the scriptures in a pious and scrupulous fashion, but as if their eyes were closed the whole time
For spiritually, they did possess closed eyes
They read the words seeking an answer to how they can obtain eternal life, but didn’t comprehend what they found
Eternal life isn’t found in what we learn or what we do
It’s found in the word of Christ
And so if you miss Christ in the word, you miss eternal life
These men couldn’t see the true message of salvation in Christ which is contained throughout the Bible
So they were unwilling to come to Jesus for the eternal life He offers
Without hesitation, Jesus labels them out as unbelieving men
He says He knows them, and therefore He knows that the love of God is not in them
That phrase is one that must have made an impression on John, because John uses this phrase in various ways in his letters
These men were seeking only for the glory that comes from other men
They were interested in receiving the praise of other men for their piety and zealousness
So they did all that they did for the praise of others
They would receive a man as an authority in the faith based on the name of a man
Meaning they would give honor to pedigree and association
The right teacher would grant a man an audience
But when Jesus comes in the authority and name of the Father, they reject Him
Which proves their hearts to be about pride and not love
And Jesus says that the one who accuses them before the Father is not Jesus personally, but rather it’s the word of God
Moses accuses them in the sense that the Law convicts them for their sin
And more generally, the word of God, which is a testimony of the Father, testifies against these hypocrites
Remember how the chapter began with a man healed merely by the word of Christ
The cripple started as like the Pharisees, believing in myths and manmade rules
Looking for supernatural displays and signs
Trying to save himself by his own power
But unable to do so
But then Jesus entered and by His word granted the man a healing that only God can work
The healing came by the power of Christ’s word
And that healing testified to Christ’s identity as Messiah
The crippled man got it
The Pharisees did not
And the difference was the Word
Scripture quotations taken from the (NASB®) New American Standard Bible®, Copyright © 1995, 2020 by The Lockman Foundation. Used by permission. All rights reserved. www.lockman.org