Taught by
Stephen Armstrong
Taught by
Stephen ArmstrongWe have begun our study of Law in Exodus
Specifically, we are studying the first ten laws or commandment
Though the Bible teaches that the entire Law of Moses is indivisible, nevertheless the first ten laws are distinctive
They deserve to be considered separately from the rest in the sense that they are very different in scope and style
They are at the beginning for a reason, and we do well to acknowledge and understand that reason
However, their distinctiveness is not an argument for divorcing these commandments from the rest of the law and expecting believers to keep them today
As we learned last week, the believer in the New Covenant receives a new and better law written on their hearts by the Holy Spirit
This new law replaces the old by incorporating all of the requirements found in the old yet in better ways
And it adds an infinite number of additional commands in keeping with holiness
The sanctification of a NT saint is accomplished by two principle forces
First, the Spirit of God indwells every believer as an agent of change, teaching, convicting and empowering believers into righteousness
Secondly, the word of God is fuel for the Spirit to use in accomplishing His work
Without a steady diet of the word of God, the NT saint will find his spiritual growth stunted
Yet even with Bible study, it still falls to the believer to respond to the work of the Spirit and follow Him into sanctification
This is why the writer of Hebrews calls the word of God the “sword of the spirit”
So far we have examined the first two commandments
They were commands to have no other gods beside the Lord and to not make graven images or idols that substitute for worship of the Lord
As we said, both are closely related
Together they demand that we follow God with our whole heart
This expectation is also present in the NT law of Christ, which demands that we love and obey God without challenge or reservation
Today we move forward into the third commandments and beyond
Let’s re-read the third commandment in Exodus 20
This command is directed at restricting Israel’s speech or communication concerning the name of God
The name of God was spoken to Moses and repeated within Israel
As we learned earlier, the name was I AM and has a certain sound in the Hebrew language
However, the nation became so concerned with the possibility of violating the third commandment, they adopted a practice of never speaking His name at all
And in written form, they removed the vowels of God’s name in the Hebrew language to prevent the pronunciation of His name
After the vowels were removed, God’s name became YHWH, which has become known as the "tetragrammaton"
This shortened form of God’s word is commonly pronounced Yahweh, but in reality we do not know how God’s name was pronounced
As a result of this tradition, it became impossible to take God’s name in vain within Israel, at least in the literal sense of a misuse of the actual name of God
But that didn’t prevent men from violating the spirit of this Law
Jesus condemned the Pharasees for thinking they were holy by avoiding swearing by things they felt had spiritual significance while avoiding other things that they thought ran afoul of this commandment
Notice they were willing to swear by the temple but if they swore by the gold in the gold in the temple, they were sinning according to their own rules
Likewise, they would allow themselves to swear by the altar but not the offering
Jesus pointed out that their rules were stupid and contradictory
If they desired to take an oath by binding themselves to some representation of God, then they were effectively binding themselves to God Himself, in violation of the third commandment
They were swearing by God, which was a diminishment of God’s name
And it as presumptuous to expect that God would honor such pledges anyway
As Jesus said
So merely forgetting the literal name of God isn’t a barrier to violating this commandment
Like all the commandments of the Law, this commandment is present in the Law of Christ in a greater way
Besides Jesus instructions not to swear oaths on God’s name, the NT writers expand the intent of this commandment to include any speech that is degrading
The Law of Christ teaches us that when we speak ill of another person, who was created in the image of God, we are violating the spirit of the third commandment
The OT Law stipulated that we ought not to diminish the name of God in any way
But the NT Law extends this commandment to its full purposes
The name of God is more than a word
Names in scripture are the embodiment of a person, their character, reputation and their work
The Lord’s name represents His goodness and the perfection of His work
So when we speak degrading things about another person, someone created in the likeness of God, we are degrading the Lord’s work and therefore the Lord Himself
The fourth commandment is found in vs. 8-11
The Lord commands the nation to observe a sabbath day on the last day of each week, which is Saturday in the Jewish calendar
The occasion for this commandment is the Creation itself
The Lord asks Israel to repeat the actions the Lord took following the complete of Creation
After the Lord spent six days creating all things, He ceased from His work on the seventh day
That final day was therefore set apart from the other days in that it was different from the rest of the days
The first seven days were days in which work was done
But the seventh day was a day in which only rest from work took place
Therefore that day is holy, the Lord declares
The word holy simply means set apart from sin
So the final day of each week is set apart from the rest, just as the Lord Himself is set apart from sin
The nature of this command is simply to abstain from any form of work
The word “work” in this case means common labors
The ordinary ways men work to sustain their lives
The Law itself expounds on various ways in which work must be curtailed
We’ve already seen the Lord tell Israel not to gather manna on the sabbath
Later Israel will be told not to gather wood, kindle fires, or bear heavy burdens among others
But overall the expectation is that men simply rest in the work that had already been done during the prior days, as did God
The Pharisees and lawyers took this commandment and greatly increased its burdens on Israel over the centuries
These added restrictions grew and grew to the point of ridiculous
Today, orthodox Jews who observe a sabbath will refrain from even turning on a light switch in the home
So on Friday afternoon, they will turn on all lights in the home to preclude the need to turn them on during the sabbath day
Like the rest of the Law, this commandment no longer applies for the NT saint today
Though the Lord’s sabbath existed from the days of Creation, the Law of Moses was the first time the Lord mandated men follow His example
Some teachers argue that since the sabbath existed from Creation, then it is a law that didn’t go away when the Law of Moses was fulfilled by Christ
So, believers today should observe a strict sabbath on Saturdays as did the Jews under the Law
But there is no example in scripture of God ordering any man to observe a sabbath prior to the giving of the Law, nor do we see any man practicing a sabbath prior to the giving of the Law
Even the order concerning gathering manna is considered to be an early preview of the delivering of the law to Israel
Furthermore, God has never required Gentiles to observe a sabbath
And the NT teaching specifically states that no sabbath day exists for the Christian
The believer is free to observe a sabbath day or not
But we do not sin if we work seven days a week
Nor do we sin if we observe a sabbath day on Sunday or any other day of the week
Paul teaches that each should do as they feel convicted, because the Law of Christ does not demand such an observance
Nevertheless, this law is stil found in the Law of Christ in a new and better way, as are all the Laws of the Old Covenant
Paul teaches how in Colossians
Paul says that the commandments of the OT Law like the dietary restrictions and festivals and seasonal observances and even the Sabbath Day itself were all shadows
A shadow is anything in scripture given in a lessor form to represent a something of greater spiritual significance coming in the future
In this case, Paul says the greater spiritual significance is Christ Himself
So dietary rules and festivals and the Sabbath Day were carefully constructed by God to teach about Christ
During the Creation account, the Lord takes a day to rest, which is a strange statement when you think about it
Why would the Lord need rest? Surely, He never tires, since He is all spirit
Now we understand that His rest wasn’t a matter of physical rest for God...it was to teach us about Christ
So what do we learn about Christ from the Sabbath?
The Sabbath in the Law teaches that a man’s work can end
And that rest from work is a good thing, something that men look forward to each week
But under the Law, that rest had a limit
Before long, the sabbath ended and the work resumed
It was a temporary rest and therefore it was one that could never truly satisfy
The kind of rest men long for is that which never ends
On the other hand, the Lord has never gone back to work
His sabbath continues to this day
He is still resting from His work of Creation
So it leads men to a question...how can we share in THAT rest?
How can we share in the Lord’s rest, the one that never ceases?
Hebrews gives us that answer
The writer was concerned for some within the church who hadn’t come to faith but were merely hanging around the crowd
And the writer uses the term “rest” as a description of coming to faith in Christ
In v.3 he teaches that by believing in Christ we can enter (or share in) the Lord’s rest
The Lord speaks about disobedient not entering “His” rest
The Lord’s rest is the rest He established when He ceased from all works
This is the permanent rest that everyman longs for
A rest that never ends and allows men to cease from all their works
But in Hebrews we learn that the ultimate intent of the Sabbath was to picture a spiritual rest, not merely an earthly rest from labor
As the writer says in v.10, we cease from our works when we believer
By entering into the New Covenant, we enter into the Lord’s sabbath, never again bearing a burden of works for salvation
We rest in the work of Christ on the cross
So the Law of Christ also has a sabbath law requiring rest
We keep that law through our faith and reliance in Christ’s work
And therefore, NT believers do not observe the shadow of the sabbath, that is a physical rest on Saturday
Instead, we observe the greater Sabbath, which is to rest in Christ everyday
Now to the fifth commandment
The fifth commandment requires that Israel show respect for their parents
The word for honor literally means something weighty or burdensome, but it can also be used euphemistically to mean something of honor and significance
I think both sense are applicable here
As children we are to honor our parents authority
This honor means obeying, respecting and trusting them for no reason beside the fact they are our parents
Then as we become adults and they come to depend on us at some point, we bear that burden gladly
We honor them by continuing to respect and defend them
We may not always agree with what they think or say, but as much as possible we show deference and respect for their views and their needs
This commandment is the first to include a promise of blessing for obedience
Since the commandment was given to Israel by the Covenant, the promise is limited to Israel as well
If Israel continues to observe this command, their obedience will prolong their time in their land
This promise is interesting for two reasons
First, the fact that the Lord is promising to “prolong” Israel in their land implies that He knew Israel would one day be required to leave the land
The nation was eventually dispossessed from the land
They were scattered into the nations as a result of idolatry and disobedience under the Law
Secondly, the Lord says the key to Israel avoiding that punishment was strong, godly families
Therefore, we conclude that a breakdown in the family was the starting point for the sin and idolatry of Israel
And this eventually leads to the nations judgment under the Old Covenant
The family structure is the lowest common denominator within society from which God rules over the hearts of people
When the family unit becomes weak by tolerating disrespect, disobedience, rebellion, and dishonor, the stage is set for a corruption of society as a whole
This was Israel’s fate and it’s certainly happening in our world today, as Paul predicted
As with the earlier commandments, the Pharisees preached obedience to this commandment while disobeying it in practice
And Jesus called them out for it
The Pharisees recognized that honoring parents meant providing for their financial need when circumstances warranted
But to avoid parting with their money, the Pharisees made an exception if the money had been given to the temple instead
Jesus said this was a hypocritical rule contrived to avoiding doing one’s duty because the law required that both parents and God be honored, not one or the other
How has this commandment been improved upon in the the Law of Christ for the NT believer?
First, it’s simply repeated in several places
And a promise has been extended to the NT saint as well, though in a new form
Believers are promised to enjoy a long life rather than time in the land
How would disobedience to this commandment lead to a shorter life?
First, there is always the possibility that the Lord might execute supernatural judgment against us for disobeying our parents
Like my mom used to say to me when I misbehaved, “I hope you have twins just like you!”
But even natural experience tells us how rebellion to parental authority can lead to a shorter life
Not respecting a parent’s wisdom can lead to accident, injury, danger, disease, and assorted calamities
Like Adam in the garden, when we set aside the instructions of a wise parent, we set ourselves on a road to destruction
As Mark Twain once said:
When I was a teenager, I was amazed at how little my father knew and when I turned twenty, I was amazed at how much he had learned
The Law of Christ also broadens this commandments
Jesus taught that believers become part of a new family, the Body of Christ, and we gain new relationships we must honor and obey
And these relationships take precedence over even our natural family relationships
Notice that Jesus speaks of the disciples being forced to leave natural family behind for the sake of the GospelJesus is speaking about priorities, not absolutes
No believer is automatically required to turn their back on their natural family in order to be a disciple of Jesus
But if the natural family makes an ultimatum and the believer is required to choose, then the believer should choose Jesus
And when this happens, the believer will inherit a new family, the family of believers in the body of Christ
This new family must be honored just as we do our best to honor our natural family
We obey our elders and authorities over us in the church
We respect and share the burdens older members of the fellowship just as we might our own parents
And if pushed to choose, we must honor the family of God over our earthly family
The sixth commandment comes next
This command prohibits the unlawful taking of a human life
This commandment says nothing about the killing of animals
Murder is, by definition, the unlawful taking of a human life by another human
Animals can’t “murder” one another and we can’t “murder “an animal
So this commandment deals specifically with a man taking another man’s life
Some think the sixth commandment outlaws all forms of killing, including capital punishment and acts of war
But there is a difference between lawful and unlawful killing both in scripture and in our laws, which descend from the Law of God
Murder is the unlawful taking of human life
The word murder is ratsach in Hebrew
But Hebrew uses another word for lawful killing: harag
Lawful killing is a taking of human life in keeping with the rules of law
For example, God’s law provides for the taking of human life when certain serious crimes have been committed
And in war, God prescribes for the killing of combatants - and even entire cities - to further His purposes in establishing Israel or eradicating sin
So when we act under the rule of law to carry out justice or to participate in war, we are not automatically committing murder
However, if government has become corrupt or cruel
Or if war is conducted in unjust ways, then killing can become murder again
The question is whether our act of killing is justified and proper according to law
If the Jew was commanded not to murder, then why did individual men kill in war and why did the Law itself allow a person to take another person’s life at other times?
The confusion comes in conflating the rights and responsibilities of governments with those of individuals
An individual has the right to take another human life only in defense of self or others, according to law
The NT echoes this right for men to be prepared to defend oneself with deadly force if need be, even Christians
This is how Jesus encouraged the disciples to be prepared for rough times after His crucifixion
The Greek word for sword in this passage refers to a small dagger, which was common carried by an individual for self-defense purposes
Apart from that case, however, an individual has no right to take life
If we take life other than in self-defense, we do it unlawfully
Therefore we commit murder and violate this commandment
When people act as governing authorities, however, they have the power to take human life as punishment for crimes or in times of war
The key to understanding the difference is to remember that God is the giver of life
Therefore He also has the authority to determine when it may be taken
And God has authorized human governments to take human life at times according to His specific instructions.
For example, beginning in Genesis 9 after the flood, the Lord delegated authority to human government to take life for capital crimes
As Paul explains as well in the New Testament:
When Paul reminds us that governments “bear the sword,” he is speaking about the right to execute men for crimes
This right was given by God to government so it may act as a minister of good
Not that all governments act properly toward their citizens, of course, but the institution of government is something GOd established for good
Imagine what kind of world it would be if evil men were not restrained by governments with their courts and judges and jails and even executioners
Secondly, we know that God commanded Israel at times to prosecute war against ungodly peoples who stood in the way of God’s purposes in Israel
Remember, all men die and the day and manner of death is appointed by God
If you die in your sleep, God took your life
If you die on a battlefield at the hands of a soldier whom God sent to kill you, God took your life
God is no more guilty of a crime when he takes your life in your bed than when He employs the services of a soldier
So when Israel waged war in Canaan according to God’s direction, they were acting lawfully (not murdering) because the Giver and Taker of life had directed their actions
Nevertheless, Jesus’ words and the Law of Christ do broaden the prohibition against murder in challenging ways
Perhaps Jesus’ most famous speech broadens this commandment, though is a subtle way
In the Beatitudes, Jesus said
The NT Law of Christ prohibits unlawful killing just as the OT Law did, but Jesus takes that law considerably further
He says that the intent of the sixth commandment was to require respect and love for all persons
So that even if we refrain from killing someone, yet if we still hate them in our hearts, our physical restraint buys us nothing
We are still convicted just by our thoughts and desires
The Law of Christ demands that we take control of even our attitudes toward other people
Even a careless word spoken against someone is a harm that violates this commandment
Then a few verses later, we read
While the OT Law prohibited murder, in other places it permitted certain types of nonlethal retribution for crimes committed against persons
The purpose of this forms of justice under the Law was NOT to encourage retribution but to limit the degree of retribution
For example, a man was blinded by the negligence of another, he had the right (but not the requirement) to demand that the offender lose his eye as well
The intent of this rule was to ensure that any punishment fit the crime
Our 8th amendment to the Constitution is built upon a similar principle
But the Law didn’t require that the injured person take every opportunity for retribution
The victim could forgo taking retribution, which the Law of Christ says is the way to imitate the Father
Jesus says forgiveness and mercy are the more perfect way that mirrors our Father in Heaven
The NT Law demands that we be perfect like the Father by showing mercy and forgiveness for personal attacks rather to seeking retribution
This doesn’t mean we may not participate in the criminal justice system or defend our lives in self-defense
Notice in v.44 Jesus is speaking about those who persecute us
The point is that when we are singled out for our faith, we should expect mistreatment but shouldn’t hold it against the person
Just as Jesus said nothing against those who persecuted Him
So the Christian is commanded in to guard ourselves in personal relationships from showing malice or disrespect
Instead, we show forgiveness and mercy, even in situations where we might have right to retribution
Nevertheless we may act within the framework of government to take human life lawfully
And we retain a right to self-defense or to defend others from harm
But as with the OT Law, we always have the option to forge the opportunity for retribution
When persecuted for our faith, we may even decline to defend our own lives
Martyrdom can be an appropriate response to persecution, as many disciples have chosen over the years
Yet self-preservation is also reasonable, just as Paul chose to flee from Jewish persecution on more than one occasion
Next week we finish the first ten laws and move on to the other laws
Scripture quotations taken from the (NASB®) New American Standard Bible®, Copyright © 1995, 2020 by The Lockman Foundation. Used by permission. All rights reserved. www.lockman.org