Taught by
Stephen Armstrong
Taught by
Stephen ArmstrongLet’s dive right back into the conversation Jesus is having with the crowd He fed miraculously with the fishes and loaves
It’s the day after that miracle took place, and the crowd has followed Jesus around the Sea of Galilee hoping to find Him in Capernaum
And when they did, He confronts them over their reasons for following Him so fervently
Jesus told them they weren’t following Him because they had come to know Him as Messiah and Lord
They weren’t devoted worshippers as their actions might suggest
No, Jesus declared, they followed Him merely because they were hungry and they hoped Jesus would satisfied their desires for bread
So then He told them they should redirect their goal from satisfying earthly concerns to seeking for eternal satisfaction
Specifically, Jesus said they should seek the Bread that comes down from heaven, referring to Himself
By calling Himself “bread,” Jesus revealed that the manna given to Israel in the desert was a picture of Christ
Therefore, Jesus had fulfilled this picture when He descended from Heaven to bring eternal life to Israel
So Jesus told the crowd to stop working to preserve their physical lives; instead, work to save their souls
They asked what kind of work they must do, and Jesus replied they must believe in Him Whom the Father has sent
Instead, they demanded a sign and suggested Jesus repeat the one Moses performed in the desert
In other words, they want Jesus to produce manna
And in response, Jesus repeated they should be seeking the Bread from Heaven, meaning Himself
It’s at this point that we rejoin the conversation, and it’s in this final part of chapter 6 that Jesus begins to teach the crowd and HIs disciples on the topic for tonight
The origins of saving faith
We briefly covered v.35 last time, but I repeated it tonight as part of the context we’re studying
Jesus continues to affirm to this unbelieving crowd that He is the bread that gives life
This crowd may be hungering for earthly bread to nourish their bodies
But Jesus explains to the crowd that they suffer from another hunger
One that is far more dangerous and urgent than their need for food
They need the bread of life to feed a spiritual hunger
And like He told the Samaritan woman, they need to quench a spiritual thirst
The solution in both cases is for the crowd to come to Jesus
Remember in chapters 1 and 2 we heard the disciples repeatedly telling each new disciples that they must “come and see” for themselves
Here again, Jesus says eternal life begins with coming to Him
And one comes to Him, Jesus reveals Himself as Savior
By that recognition, the person is born again and follows Him
Nevertheless, these people have approached Jesus, and yet they have not believed
Jesus continues to tell them that they must “come” to Him
Haven’t they already come to Him at least in the sense that they followed Him across the Sea of Galilee?
Notice in v.36 Jesus says they have come and they have seen Him, and yet they do not believe
Why haven’t they acknowledged Him as Messiah? What’s holding them back?
Jesus has certainly been as clear with them as with anyone else to this point
And He’s done miracles in their presence that are equal to anything else recorded in the Gospels
So why have they refused to see Him for Who He is?
At the end of last week’s lesson, I asked how it could be that the Lord Himself could present the Gospel message and yet His call to believe not be effective in converting?
If the Lord ‘s own presentation of the Gospel fails to persuade a man to believe, how can anyone convert another person?
If our own Lord strikes out, then what hope is there for us?
Is the outcome merely random?
Does the outcome rest on the capriciousness of a person’s perception or mood or feeling at a given moment?
Does eternal salvation rest on chance?
What explains the inability of these people to make sense of all they have seen and all Jesus has said?
Jesus gives us the answer to why this crowd was unable to accept Jesus as Lord
Over the next series of verses, Jesus teaches the origins of salvation and why it is that some people accept Him as Lord
The explanation Jesus provides is absolutely foundational to our understanding of the Gospel and of grace itself
In fact, there are few individual verses in the New Testament more important on the topic of our salvation than v.37 by itself
So let’s note carefully what Jesus says in this verse
First, Jesus says the Father “gives” people to Christ
The meaning of this statement is very specific and not at all ambiguous
Jesus says some people are given to Christ by the Father
The Father selects (or the Bible would say elects) certain individuals to come to Christ, to accept Him as Messiah
The verb “gives” clearly indicates that this process is entirely within the Father‘s control
The Father is the One Who gives
He isn’t reacting to something or responding to something in Creation
He is the One initiating the process, determining that certain ones will come to His Son
Then notice the second verb in this opening phrase
Jesus said all the Father gives will come to Jesus
Jesus doesn’t say those the Father gives may come, as if they are presented a choice as to whether to come or not
Rather, Jesus says all will come, meaning the outcome is determined by the Father
Furthermore, Jesus uses the word “all”
Not some, but all of those the Father gives will come to Jesus
There will be no exceptions
No one can be given to Christ but then fail to come to Christ
All those the Father gives to Christ will come to know and believe in Christ
Based just on the first half of this verse, we learn two fundamental aspects of the doctrine of salvation, soteriology
First, our salvation rests on a decision of the Father to bring us to Christ
It does not depend on our will
This is often called the doctrine of election
Secondly, the Father’s election always leads to a person to accept Christ
We cannot resist salvation once the Father has determined to give us to Christ
This is called the doctrine of irresistible grace
So when the Father has determines that a person will receive His mercy in Christ, then that person will inevitably respond affirmatively to that grace
They do so because God’s grace changes them from within, as we learned in chapter 3
They are born again so that they can then respond to the call of the Gospel
Salvation is a work of God in the heart
And there is no power in the Universe strong enough to stop the work of God
Not even our own will can resist what God purposes to do
For as Paul says in Romans 9, who can resist God’s will?
Answer: no one
And the Bible also teaches that the Father’s choice to bring us grace was made long before we were born
Paul teaches that the Father’s decision was made before time began
Notice again that Paul credits the Father with choosing us to be holy and blameless in Christ
And Paul says the Father made that choice before the foundations of the world
The word in Greek for foundation can also be translated “conceived”
So before the world itself was conceived, you and I were chosen by the Father to enter into His grace
We were predestined to be adopted as children by God
This is the definition of grace according to the Bible
Grace is not defined as the offer of the Gospel, as some have erroneously defined it
The Bible describes grace as God’s willingness to save us even while we were His enemies
That is, even before we knew well enough to say yes to the Gospel
That’s why Paul says this in later in Ephesians
Notice Paul’s particular choice of words
We are saved by grace, through faith
We aren’t saved by faith, because faith is the second step in the process
We are saved by grace
And all that follows is the result of God’s grace
So by grace, God delivered salvation to us
So what part does faith play in this process?
Paul says God granted us salvation through (or by way of) our faith
Said another way, God’s grace was delivered (or manifested to us) through a faith we received
Paul says very specifically that the faith we have we received
It is a gift from God, Paul says
God gave us the gift of faith so that we would respond to the Gospel
This is how Jesus can say with confidence that all who are given to Him will come to know Him
Because even our coming to Christ is something God Himself produces in us by His grace
Obviously, the idea that our salvation originates in the Father’s choosing of us can be a challenging and disorienting revelation
Almost without exception, every Christian who has come understand the doctrine of election from scripture has been surprised to see how they were saved
But let your surprise cause you to reject this teaching out of hand
Because our pride naturally recoils at the suggestion that our decision to follow Christ was not truly ours to make
The teaching of John 6:37 clearly shows that salvation does not originate in our own choices or decisions
And of course, this truth is backed up by the entire text of scripture from Genesis to Revelation
Few doctrines of scripture are more clearly evident throughout the pages of scripture than the principle of God’s sovereignty
But no where is it more clearly seen nor more succinctly expressed than in the first ten words of v.37
So in the first half of this verse, Jesus taught the doctrines of election and irresistible grace
Then in the second half of this verse, He teaches another core doctrine of salvation
Jesus says that the one who comes to Jesus, He will certainly not cast out
Casting out in this context means to opposite of coming to Jesus
As in to be cast into the judgment fires of Hell
Once a person has come to Jesus, once they have believed in Him, then that person will never again be without faith in Christ
As some have come to say, “once saved, always saved”
Notice Jesus doesn’t say those who remain in Him will not be cast out
There is no requirement placed on the individual to maintain their salvation by anything they might do
And this makes sense, because our entry into salvation in the first place wasn’t a result of anything we did
So it makes sense that our continuing in salvation isn’t dependent on our own strength
Once the Father wills us to come to faith, Jesus says this person will never be cast out
Eternal judgment has been eliminated forever...
The phrase theologians use to summarize this point of soteriology is eternal security
Every believer is eternally secure in the salvation they have received from the Father
There is no potential for a believer to ever “lose” what the Father has given them freely in Christ
If you’re challenged by the three pillars of soteriology in v.37, consider what Jesus says next
Notice in vs.38-39 Jesus’ repeating emphasis on the Father’s will in each verse
In v.38, The Father’s will dictated Christ’s role in the plan of salvation
Jesus says the Father determined that His Son would come down because the Father “sent” Jesus
So that even Christ Himself was subject to the Father’s will
If Christ Himself was obedient to the Father’s will, even to death on a cross, then we know that no man can resist the Father’s will!
Secondly, Christ says in v.39 that the Father’s will ensures all those He gives to Christ forever remaining in Christ
Christ loses nothing
Christ promises that all the Father has given Him will be raised on the last day, meaning resurrected into a new body to live eternally
Jesus summarizes all His statements with a powerful conclusion in v.40
He says everyone who beholds the Son and believes in Him will have eternal life and be resurrected
And He prefaces this conclusion once again with the phrase “this is the will of my Father”
We could read v.40 in this way: “It is by the will of my Father that someone beholds the Son and believes, and these I will raise up”
As challenging as this teaching may sound, it is just Jesus’ opening salvo in this discourse
And if this teaching is a challenge for us, how do you think this unbelieving crowd responded to Jesus’ words?
Predictably, not well...
In response to Jesus’ statements about Himself, the crowd began grumbling or murmuring amongst themselves
To grumble or murmur means to utter disapproving comments indirectly
Specifically, they didn’t approve of the idea that someone so ordinary as Jesus of Nazareth should compare Himself to God
Their concern betrays their hearts, for it proves to us that they didn’t know Jesus as Lord
They are grumbling over His identity
Jesus’ claim to have authority whether they enter Heaven is too much for them to accept
The Gospel always comes back to Jesus’ identity
If you cannot accept that Jesus is Who He claims to be, God in the form of Man with the power to determine our eternal destiny, then nothing else He says will matter
It’s our view of the identity of Christ that determines whether we are truly saved or not
Those who recognize Jesus as Lord are saved; those who don’t, are not
At this point, Jesus has explained how someone comes to believe in Him
But if this is so, then do we conclude about this crowd that that has seen and heard so much and yet hasn’t believed in Him?
We get that answer in the next part of Jesus’ teaching
Jesus rebukes the crowd for disapproving of His words
And in response to their rejection of Him, Jesus teaches a corollary truth to His earlier statements
Just as everyone the Father gives will come to Jesus, so also those who are not given by the Father will never come to Jesus
As Jesus says, no one can come to belief in Jesus unless the Father draws him
The way Jesus spoke these words in the Greek language is more dramatic and consequently, more revealing
The word for draw in Greek is helko, which literally means to drag
Consider some other uses of that same Greek word in the New Testament:
Personally, I’m not sure why the NASB translators choose to soften Jesus’ language in John 6,
Jesus literally said no one can come to Jesus unless the Father “drags” us to Christ
The word “drag” accurately reflects the fact that we are opposed to God by our own nature
They we must be dragged into the Light of Christ
As John said in chapter 1 one comes to Jesus of his own will
Only by the Father’s will do we come to belief in Jesus
And now we learn why this process must depend on the Father’s will
Because we must be “dragged” to Jesus
Our sinful nature is set against God and the Gospel
So unless the Father elects us and drags us to faith, we will never go there on our own accord
Paul and John also teach this truth in various places of the New Testament
Jesus is revealing to this crowd that their murmuring over His identity was proof that the Father had rejected them already
Notice in v.45 Jesus says even the OT prophets said that God’s people would know Him because they would be taught by Him
Jesus quotes Isaiah 54:13 to emphasize that this is not a new concept
God has always worked this way in bringing men to Himself in faith
Everyone who has heard and learned from the Father will come to Jesus
Once again, it’s a 100% success rate for God as evangelist
So as I asked last time, how could Jesus present the Gospel and not have success in converting this crowd?
The answer is that the Father had not taught these people about Christ
He was not in the process of dragging them into the Light
And so naturally they preferred the darkness
If the Father had taught them Who Christ was (as Isaiah says He does), then 100% of them would have received Christ
But because the Father had not taught them, exactly 0% received Jesus
It’s a black and white process: those who receive God’s grace are saved
Those who do not, are not
As a side note, when when the word of God says that God’s children are taught by God, it doesn’t mean we are taught directly by the Father
For no one has seen the Father at any time Jesus says
Jesus clarified that the only One Who has seen the Father is the One Who is from God
That One, of course, is Jesus
Jesus has seen the Father
So Jesus is our teacher by means of His word and His Spirit living in us
Therefore, men are taught by God through His Spirit and once we have been taught, we will believe
As Jesus emphasizes again, he who believes has eternal life
And with that, Jesus now return to emphasizing His identity as the key to salvation
Once again, Jesus uses bread as His analogy, saying He is the bread of life
The bread that the Lord gave Israel in the wilderness was only good enough to sustain their earthly bodies
Even though they ate the manna, they still died
But Jesus is a new, improved manna, the bread of life
As we said last time, manna pictures Jesus’s ministry
Manna came at night, as Jesus came into darkness
Manna came from Heaven, as Jesus descended from Heaven and became flesh
The manna was sweet, and Psalm 34:8 says
Just as Israel in the desert took the manna into their bodies, so we have to take Him into our spirit through faith
Just as the manna was completely consumed up by the people each day, so will Jesus be completely consumed as He saves us spiritually
Jesus gave up everything on the cross to save us
But there is an important difference between manna and Jesus
The Jews in the desert had to eat manna every day in order for it to sustain their physical bodies
Yet a man need only take in Jesus once to be saved for eternity
Specifically, Jesus says that it will be His flesh that is consumed like bread for the life of the world
We understand that Jesus was referring to His sacrificial death on the cross for the sins of the world
In that sense, His flesh was like bread, given to the world to consume so that we might live
But can you imagine what the unbelieving crowd was thinking at this point?
Well, we don’t have to imagine because we see the response in the next section
The people have the predictable response to Jesus’ words: they are disgusted at the prospect of cannibalism, which is what they assumed Jesus was suggesting
So naturally, they ask one another how can this man give us His flesh to eat?
Notice John says they were arguing with one another and not with Jesus
The word in Greek means an intense argument erupted
Some people were trying to make sense of Jesus’ words, while others had heard enough and were ready to leave it seems
But Jesus doesn’t intend to make this any easier for these people
He repeats Himself saying one must eat His flesh and drink His blood to have life
Jesus adds the reference to blood in response to the crowd’s claim that Jesus was advocating cannibalism
Obviously, that’s not what Jesus is talking about, and it’s their inability to see Jesus with spiritual eyes that has led them to this conclusion
Therefore, Jesus decides to pick up on the idea of cannibalism and pushing it even further to mock their ignorance
When He refers to eating His body and drinking His blood, He’s saying two things at once
First, He’s using a figure of speech called a synecdoche, which means using a part of something to stand for the whole of it
Jesus’ flesh and blood are parts of His body, but by the context we can see Jesus meant the whole of Himself
He’s telling the crowd they must take in not only Jesus flesh but also His blood, meaning all of Him
You must accept everything about Me, everything I claim to be and do, or else you do not have eternal life
Secondly, Jesus is also alluding to the Last Supper and the command for believers to participate in the Communion meal
Obviously, that sacrament had not yet been established at this point
Nevertheless, Jesus’ words are an allusion to that coming ritual
Our salvation depends on consuming Christ, which means to believe in Him
And our belief is pictured by our participation in the Communion meal, where we consume symbols of His body and blood
Then in vs.56-57, Jesus returns to the principles of eternal security and the Father’s sovereignty in the salvation process
Jesus says those who consume Christ will abide in Him and He will abide in them
The word abide in Greek is meno, and it has a range of meanings
It can mean to continue or to endure or to remain
So, the person who takes in Christ (i.e., believes in Christ) will remain in Him
Our salvation is eternally secure
And our belief will ultimately lead to resurrection from the dead
We will live again as Jesus lives again
Jesus says as He lives because of the Father, so will we who take Him in live because of the Father
Jesus’ resurrection was accomplished by the power of God to raise Him from the dead
And that same power will act to raise us because of our faith in Jesus
Jesus sums up His point on bread by repeating that He is a kind of bread that is far superior to the bread their father’s knew
He is a type of bread that won’t lead them to death
But instead to eternal life
His point is stop worrying about how to keep your body alive
Start concerning yourself with how to keep your soul alive
As Jesus says elsewhere
So Jesus has addressed the question of the crowd’s unbelief by explaining that they haven’t been led by the Father into belief
But what of the disciples in all this?
They were also having a hard time accepting Jesus for Who He was, at least in the sense that they didn’t recognize His power
So where did Jesus’ words to the crowd leave them?
We now learn that the crowd caught up to Jesus while He was teaching in a synagogue service, presumably on a Sabbath day
Naturally, His disciples were in the room also, so they heard all the same things the crowd heard, including Jesus calling for people to consume His flesh and blood
So in v.60 many of His disciples began to join in with the crowd’s grumbling
They say this is a difficult statement, but the word in Greek is a euphemism for offensive
They were offended by Jesus’ words
Their reaction tells us that the word disciple in this context isn’t synonymous with the word “believer”
A disciple was simply someone who chose to follow Jesus at least for a time
But not all who followed Jesus were believing in Him
And it merely took some hard statement like this one to weed them out
The same pattern exists today in the church as it always has
False disciples are everywhere
And we come to know them when we see them rejecting clear teachings of Jesus from the Bible
When they reject Jesus as God
When they reject Jesus’ teaching on sin, Hell, judgment, etc.
When they reject the notion of salvation by faith alone and not by works...
They are showing themselves to be false disciples because they are rejecting the very truths that define our need for Christ
In v.61, Jesus asks these grumbling disciples if His words are leading them to stumble?
His question is rhetorical and serves to set up His next statements
Jesus adds in v.62 that if they are unable to accept this teaching, how will they accept Jesus resurrected from the grave and ascending into Heaven?
The answer of course is they can’t
If they cannot accept Jesus’ word in one thing, then they cannot accept Him at all
Once again, it’s an all or none proposition
You are either in or not, according to the Father’s grace
Then Jesus graciously offers a clarification of what He meant in His earlier statements
He says in v.63 that the One Who gives men eternal life is the Spirit
He’s referring to the regeneration process that the Spirit does in the heart
Being born again is literally a process done to us by the Spirit inside us
Because of that Spirit’s work of regeneration, we come to believe in the Gospel and are saved
In that way we receive eternal life
And then Jesus calls out those in the room for there unbelief
In v.64 He says that some of these people have not believed
But notice, John adds that Jesus knew from the beginning who these unbelievers were
What does John mean when he says “from the beginning?”
From the beginning of what? The meeting? The day? The events of the prior day?
The answer is from the beginning of the foundations of the Earth as Paul taught
Jesus knew which people were given to Him by the Father and therefore they would come to Him
And He knew which ones were not given to Him and would not come to believe
And in fact, Jesus knew He had a disciple following Him who would one day betray Him
In other words, Jesus wasn’t waiting for each person to make up their minds concerning His identity so that He could know who would be His followers
Jesus knew who the Father had selected for Him before He ever left Heaven and came to earth
So that as Jesus walked around the Galilee and ministered to the crowds, He could see His sheep even before they knew Him
Just as He did with Nathaniel
Just as He did with the woman at the well
Likewise, Jesus knew who wasn’t given to Him by the Father and therefore would never come to believe in Him
This crowd and even some of His disciples were people such as these
Men and women who could not accept the things Jesus said because they were not among those elected by the Father
Notice in v.65 Jesus repeats His central tenet on the origins of our faith
No person can come to believe in Jesus unless it has been granted by the Father
So that if someone rejects Christ, it is evidence in itself that the person is not given to Christ
Or at the very least, the day of their salvation has not yet arrived
We see the truth of Jesus’ words in the effect it had on the crowd
As a result of His teaching, many of these so-called disciples withdrew and stopped following Jesus
These people were exposed for who they truly were: unbelievers
As Peter teaches in 2Peter, a dog returns to its vomit
They acted differently than their true nature for a time, but eventually the act grew old
It became too hard to follow Jesus given all that He was saying
So then it came down to the twelve disciples, those Jesus handpicked
How will these men react to Jesus’ teaching?
Jesus offers them the chance to leave as well, asking you don’t want to leave too, do you?
The point of His question is to expose their hearts as believing just as He had exposed the rest of the disciples’ hearts as unbelieving
In response to Jesus’ challenge, every-ready Peter steps up and declares, “Where else would we go, since you have the words of eternal life?
This is a great opening, and if Peter had left it there, he might have done pretty well in Jesus’ eyes
Instead, Peter pushes the conversation once step further saying we have believed and come to know you are the Messiah
Now that statement might not seem too bad either, except that it’s completely wrong
Peter asserts that these twelve were sticking around because they had come to know Jesus as Messiah
The construction of Peter’s statement in Greek suggests that the disciples themselves worked out Jesus’ identity on their own
As if to suggest they evaluated His claims
Considered His teaching and miracles
And then concluded that Jesus must have been the Messiah
But nothing could have been further from the truth
These disciples didn’t come to faith in Jesus any differently than any other person
As Jesus says in v.70, “Wasn’t I the One Who chose you?
Jesus is pointing out that each of the was brought to Jesus and subsequently selected as apostles entirely because of Jesus’ own choice
And as He taught earlier, their faith in Him was ultimately the result of the Father’s will
These men didn’t “come to know” Jesus as Lord
They were made to know Jesus as Lord
They aren’t staying because they have resolved to stick around
They are staying because Jesus will not lose any the Father has given to Him
And just to prove the point, Jesus says that one among them is a devil?
John explains in v.71 that Jesus was referring to Judas who was later to betray Him
Of course, the rest of the disciples didn’t have a clue what Jesus meant at the time
Though obviously it made an impression, since John remembered the statement
God’s sovereignty is so certain and His plan so intricately worked out in advance that even Jesus’ betrayer was selected by God in advance
The Father knew that no true disciple of the Lord would ever desire to betray their Master
So if the plan of the Father is for Christ to be killed by Romans on a cross, then He must position at least one unbeliever inside Christ’s inner circle
So that by this one, Christ may be handed over to His enemies at the right time
And in that way, Christ’s death in our place would be assured
So when Peter declares that they chose Jesus, the Lord rebukes Peter saying, “No, I chose you.”
And so it it for each of us who believe in Jesus
While you might be tempted to think you chose Christ
The word of God declares that He chose you
Scripture quotations taken from the (NASB®) New American Standard Bible®, Copyright © 1995, 2020 by The Lockman Foundation. Used by permission. All rights reserved. www.lockman.org