Taught by
Stephen Armstrong
Taught by
Stephen ArmstrongHaving seen the miracle of God opening the hearts of Gentiles to receive the Gospel, we turn to chapter 11 to see the expected result:
The Jewish people rejoicing in the fact that Gentiles are also turning to the Lord
Rather, they admonish Peter for daring to cross the line separating Jews and Gentiles
After Cornelius’ household received the Gospel, the news spread in Judea among the church
The spread of this news was as swift as it was stunning
But notice what part of the news interests the Jewish believers the most
It was not the miracle of the Gentiles receiving the grace of God
It was the fact that Peter went to them and ate with them
The Jewish point of view concerning the Gentile was so fixed by teaching and custom that they overlook the miracle of God in bringing them to faith
And instead they focus on Peter’s audacity in daring to cross the uncrossable line
There was a reasonable case to be made against Peter, in this case, in that his actions were likely to provoke the anger of the unbelieving Jews
Perhaps Peter’s church brethren were concerned that Peter’s actions would bring even more persecution upon the church
Regardless, their criticism ignored the obvious conclusion that God ordained this outcome, so Peter’s actions were not only warranted but necessary
In fact, Peter’s actions were according to the direction of the Spirit
So his success in persuading Cornelius concerning the Gospel should have been proof in itself to the brethren that this was a work ordained by God
Nevertheless, the apostles and brethren were critical of Peter
We should take note that even the Apostles were critical
But the principle criticism came from the Party of the Circumcision
Paul also refers to the existence and negative influence of this faction within the early church in Gal 2
Sadly it seems the early church was burdened by divisions and false teaching as it is today
The false teaching among the early Jewish believers centered around practice of the Law by a believer
The party of the circumcision was given that name because they advocated for the necessity for the church to remain Jewish and to adhere to all Jewish custom and law
The challenge to Peter here begins a years-long dispute in the church
It’s also worth noting that the church doesn’t seem hesitant to challenge Peter’s decision here
This would argue against the view that Peter was a “pope” with the kind of absolute authority assigned to the popes of today
The Church has never had a “pope” or any other single spiritual leader apart from Christ
Such offices are man-made and ultimately destructive
Watching this seen, we can certainly see better why it required such a monumental effort on God’s part to move Peter toward Cornelius
And this must have been an interesting moment for Peter
He was just as reluctant to travel to Cornelius or any Gentile
Only after God took extraordinary measures to ensure it happened did Peter cross the line
Now he finds himself called to account for doing the very thing he was opposed to doing in the first place
Peter’s only recourse is to describe the events exactly as they happened
Peter wanted to walk his critics through his experience
His hope is they will conclude, as Peter did, that taking the Gospel to Cornelius was the proper thing to do
The story follows exactly as we saw it unfold in chapter 10, with the added detail that six brothers accompanied Peter to see Cornelius
Peter’s story climaxes with his retelling of the moment the Holy Spirit descends upon the Gentiles
Peter reminds his audience that this experience mirrors their own
His point, of course, is that the arrival of the Holy Spirit is proof of the work of God in salvation
Paul echoes this same thinking in Romans, when he says
The fundamental definition of a Christian is anyone indwelled by God’s Spirit
For this is the way one becomes a Christian
And it is not an experience shared with unbelievers
Secondly, Peter draws his listeners’ attention to Jesus’ own words concerning the meaning of the Spirit’s arrival
Jesus said the arrival (or baptism) of the Holy Spirit would be an expected experience for all who follow Him
Therefore, the arrival of the Spirit upon Gentiles confirms that they have become followers of Jesus just the same
Finally, Peter makes his conclusion in verse 17
If they received the same gift (the Spirit) from the same Giver (God) for the same reason (after believing in Jesus), then how could Peter stand in the way?
Notice also that Peter recognizes the unique significance of the Holy Spirit’s arrival upon these believers
Peter says that Cornelius’ experience was similar to the one the Apostles had “at the beginning”
He is referring to Pentecost
His point is that the Pentecost experience has not been continuous
It happened only on rare occasions
And each occasion was notable because the Spirit gave such clear signs in His work
Today, Peter declares that this sign was extended to Gentiles
And there can be no other conclusion drawn from the events
The crowd listening to Peter and they acknowledge the obvious, though remarkable, news
That God was granting repentance to the Gentiles also
The repentance that leads to life
Their choice of words here is important
They recognize first this is a work of God
This opening for the Gentiles was made possible because God permitted it
Secondly, they imply that without God’s willingness to grant repentance, the Gentiles would never have come to faith
Nor would the Jewish Christians, for that matter
Paul again echoes this high view of God’s sovereignty in salvation
Paul distinguishes between two types of sorrow
Worldly sorrow and godly sorrow
The worldly kind is the kind we are all familiar with
It is the regret of making a mistake
But the regret is self-centered
We regret the consequences of our actions
We may be truly sorry, but the locus of our concern is within ourselves
The Bible talks at times of this kind of worldly sorrow
Probably the best example is Esau, as the writer of Hebrews explains
Esau felt great sorrow over his mistake of selling his birthright
He even cried over the mistake and sought his father’s forgiveness
But his sorrow was entirely self-centered
He regretted losing the inheritance and regretted disappointing his earthly father
Interestingly, the writer of Hebrews says despite his crying fit, Esau found no place for repentance
Notice that while Esau was displaying one kind of sorrow, he was denied a different kind of sorrow
Obviously, the two type of sorrow are independent of one another
It’s possible to feel sorry without experiencing repentance, as Esau proves
The language in Hebrews makes clear that the source of repentance is outside the person
Esau was “rejected”
By whom we might ask?
And he “found no place for repentance”
This implies that Esau never arrived at godly sorrow
Though he “sought it”
The only conclusion we can make is that repentance is a spiritual sorrow that only arrives when it is granted or permitted by God
Back to Paul’s letter to the Corinthians, Paul says that in v.7:9 that the Corinthians were made sorrowful by Paul’s previous letter
But Paul was more interested in the way his letter led them to a different kind of sorrow
Paul’s admonishment made them feel badly, but it also produced a sorrow that led to repentance (i.e., godly sorrow)
And then Paul adds in v.10 that this godly sorrow came as a result of the “will of God”
This confirms what we read in the letter to the Hebrews
Godly sorrow or repentance is a spiritual regret that comes only when the will God permits it
And to sum up this principle, Paul says in v.11 that the worldly sorrow leads only to temporary regret that is powerless to effect spiritual change
But godly sorrow produces repentance, which is the precursor to salvation itself
I often characterize the difference between these two types of repentance or sorrow with the terms big “R” and little “r.”
Repentance with a little “r” is the feeling of sorrow or regret we experience when we are convicted over our sins
This kind of sorrow is common to both Christians and non-christians alike
It’s the normal reaction when we bear the consequences of our sin
Repentance with a big “R” is the unique spiritual awakening that the Holy Spirit accomplishes in the heart of a person as a preparation step to receiving faith
This kind of godly sorrow isn’t the same feeling as world sorrow
It isn’t fixed on a certain behavior or mistake
It creates a more profound sense of shame or regret
It is long-lasting
It can only come if and when God grants it, because it finds it’s origins in a work of God in the heart
So in Acts 11:18, the audience responds to Peter’s testimony with the correct conclusion
The response of Cornelius was prima facia evidence that the Spirit of God had “granted” the Gentiles the repentance that leads to eternal life
They confirmed that the kingdom of God had been extended to the Gentiles
And the proof of this change was the arrival of the Holy Spirit and the speaking in tongues
Once again demonstrating that this unique display of the Spirit was reserved for moments when grace became available to a new group of humanity
Before moving forward with the story of Peter, Luke adds another important detail in the outward movement of the church
Some believe this narrative runs parallel to the events of Acts 8-10
But I believe Luke is describing events that occur both before and after and as a result of the events of chapter 11
Specifically, Luke backs up chronologically briefly in mentioning the persecution of Stephen and the evangelism that followed
That persecution caused the outward movement of the Gospel, and we discussed earlier
But it was not a uniform movement
Most of the disciples were only interested in preaching the Gospel to Jews in the Diaspora
But later, after Peter’s experience with Cornelius, other disciples went out specifically seeking Gentile converts
Their ministry was to the Gentiles
This willingness to engage Gentiles was the result of Peter’s testimony
And their success in finding converts was only possible because Peter had opened the kingdom for the Gentiles in chapter 10
Notably, they are preaching “Lord Jesus”
Among the Jews they preached “the Christ”
But among Gentiles they taught about the “Lord”
The distinction reflects the cultural and religious differences between pagan Gentiles and the god-fearing Jews
The Jews knew of the promises of a Messiah, the Christ of God
So they received the message that this Christ had arrived in the Person of Jesus
The Gentiles knew nothing of the promised Messiah, so preaching a “christ” would have meant nothing to them
But they certainly new of worship a lord, as they were required to do in worshipping the Caesar who was their lord
Now, they were taught of a greater Lord Who required their worship and offered eternal life
As a result of this movement, the church in Jerusalem is still skeptical of this response and wants to verify it for themselves
So they send our Barnabas, a devout and learned Jew
Remember Barnabas was the friend of Saul who introduced him to the church in Jerusalem following Saul’s conversion
Since that early encounter, Saul has since returned to his home in Tarsus
While Barnabas has remained in Jerusalem in the church
Now Barnabas moves outward himself to investigate the reports from Antioch
Antioch was an important city in its day
It was the third largest city in the Roman empire, after Rome and Alexandria
It was located about 15 miles inland from the Med sea in modern-day Syria
About 30o miles north of Jerusalem
It contained upward of 800,000 citizens
About 115,000 were Jews
With many Gentile proselytes
Like many Roman cities, it was also notorious as a city of pleasure-seekers
Roman satirists claimed that the city was so corrupt, that its sewage contaminated Rome, which was 1,300 miles away
It’s in this city that the Gentile church first gains a foothold
Importantly, Antioch was also near Barnabas’ home on the island of Cyprus
Which might explain why he was chosen to go to Antioch
Secondly, Antioch was only 90 miles from Tarsus, where Saul was living at the time
When Barnabas arrives, he find a growing, vibrant, genuine Gentile church
And begin a man under the influence of the Spirit, Barnabas receives them as brothers and encourages them
But he also must have wondered how the church would begin to disciple and encourage this budding group of believers
They lacked the knowledge of the Scriptures and they were heavily influenced by pagan practices
Who would care for this congregation so far geographically and culturally from the influence Jerusalem?
Barnabas knew where to find the answer
As God would have it, the first Gentile church is founded near the Apostle appointed to the Gentiles: Saul
And Barnabas must have recognized, by the Spirit, that Saul was the right man for this job
Perhaps Saul had confessed to Barnabas that he felt called in that way
More likely, Barnabas simply recognized an obvious opportunity based on Saul’s close proximity to the new church in Antioch
Nevertheless, we know that God has orchestrated these events so that when the keys to the kingdom have been extended to Gentiles, Saul would be in the proper position to begin his ministry
Remember, it’s been about nine years since Saul’s conversion, yet he hasn’t yet begun his ministry to the Gentiles in earnest
His ministry opportunity awaited Peter’s opening of the kingdom for that group
Now that barrier has been removed, and so circumstances will lead Saul into ministry in Antioch first
And in this place, the term “Christian” is established
The name is significant in that it reflects the establishment of a new, distinct religious party or affiliation
It was distinct from pagan Gentile and religious Jew
By adopting a new name, the Church recognized the fact that the family of God had changed and separated itself spiritually from either of the previous two distinctions
Though there were Gentiles in the Church and Jews in the Church, the Church was neither
It was an entirely new concept, created by God, and called into existence for a time and purpose
We are “Christians” by faith, regardless of our heritage beforehand
Finally, Luke relates an interesting encounter
Prophets come “down” from Jerusalem to Antioch
They come to deliver a message from God
The church has prophets during this period because the canon of Scripture was not yet complete
Until John’s letter of Revelation, the Spirit’s work of revealing God’s word is not finished, so prophets are still available to bring God’s word in this way
The prophets tell of a coming famine in the world, and the famine would bring destitution to the brethren in Judea and Jerusalem particularly
In a time of famine, and in an age without welfare, people had to depend on family and tribes to get through the tough times
But the church in Jerusalem, which was largely Jewish, would have been disowned by their Jewish families
So a famine would have been particularly devastating to believing Jews in that city
Luke says the Spirit sent these prophets to the church in Antioch to inform them of the need to send support to the church in Jerusalem during this time of famine
Since we know the Lord is at work in producing these events, we must ask the question why does He do this?
God is bringing about circumstances to teach the Gentile church of their responsibility to honor and support their Jewish brethren in keeping with Israel’s pre-eminent role in God’s plan of salvation
Secondly, this act of goodwill helps cement the Jews acceptance of the new Gentile church in the family of God
Scripture quotations taken from the (NASB®) New American Standard Bible®, Copyright © 1995, 2020 by The Lockman Foundation. Used by permission. All rights reserved. www.lockman.org