Taught by
Stephen Armstrong
Taught by
Stephen ArmstrongAs we learned last week, the Lord has reinforced throughout the ages and with every dispensation that His grace would not be fully realized until Christ
The earlier manifestations of His grace served to regular man’s relationship with God for a time
But none of them were intended as a true solution to man’s sin
They couldn’t address the fundamental problem created by Adam’s fall in the Garden, which is the power sin holds over us
Sin defines our nature and therefore our behavior
Earlier dispensations served to contend with man’s sin and mitigate against its effects to a degree
But they could not remove sin
They regulated man’s fellowship with God for a time until the greater revelation of God was made available
Therefore, each new dispensation revealed more of the Lord and HIs plan
That plan was culminated in the dispensation of grace in Christ, but until that moment God designed each earlier dispensation to make clear its inadequacy
The Lord always demonstrated the weakness of prior dispensations by showing the continuation of sin’s power
After each new dispensation arrived, the protagonist inevitably succumbed to sin’s power, demonstrating that the work of God was still incomplete
But when Christ came, that pattern changed
Jesus lived a sinless life, showing it had no power over Him
Then He died and rose again, conquering the penalty of sin, that is death, thus proving He could be the solution to our sin
So in Exodus, we're studying the dispensation of Law and the covenant that brought the Law
And therefore we must expect at some point to see the pattern I described re-emerge
The arrival of the dispensation of Law must include an example of sin’s continuing power over our protagonists, the nation of Israel
God must show us that the Law was incapable of addressing the root cause of sin or breaking its power over men
The story of Israel at the base of mountain is that account
This story shows us the inability of the Law to create righteousness
Proving what Paul teaches, that the Law did not come to produce righteousness
Because it is weak and worthless in that regard, as Hebrews says
So turning back to our story in Chapter 32, Moses has been on the top of the mountain for forty days, and the people below have grown impatient
They are being deceived by their own flesh, which is craving for meat and sexual pleasure, leading them into idolatry
So they request a new leader to represent God
The new leader will preside over their sacrificial offerings, which then makes possible the feast that follows, which is what they seek after
So Aaron complies and makes an idol and an altar
The people then celebrate with a feast and debauchery
As we rejoin the narrative, let’s also considered how these circumstances mirror the time in the Garden, when Adam and Woman fell
As we noted last week, both scenes begin as relationships based upon a covenant with the Lord
In both cases, God provided them with all the food they needed
And in both cases, what God provided wasn’t good enough
Both craved after prohibited things and sinned
And as a result, both traded what they had for judgment and exile
We join Moses is still on the mountain with the Lord, but the Lord warns Moses what to expect when he returns to the camp
We must imagine that Moses was surprised and very disturbed to hear the news about the people
The Lord says that Moses’ people are corrupted
Notice the Lord isn’t calling Israel “His” people
He is calling them Moses’ people now
He says they have turned aside from the Law they agreed to follow, barely forty days after the agreed to observe it
Moses hears they have made an idol, worshipped it, and sacrificed to it
How disheartening it must have been for Moses to learn this
This moment is all the proof we need to know the powerlessness of the Law to produce righteousness
The people had been given the Law, they had agreed to it, and it was no doubt fresh on their minds
Furthermore, they had experienced remarkable manifestations of the living God
Finally, they had first-hand evidence of the Lord’s presence through the manna and the cloud covering the top of the mountain
Nevertheless, they quickly decided to follow their flesh instead of obeying the Law
We’ve never seen the manifestations these people saw
So how could we expect anyone to be sanctified by follow a Law that Israel couldn’t follow for forty days?
Clearly the Law does not have the power to put an end to sin much less bring righteousness
Let’s consider why the Lord chose to share this news with Moses in this way, while they were meeting on the mountain
The Lord could have waited for Moses to learn on his own, but the Lord wanted to invite Moses into a conversation now
Then in v.9 the Lord declares that the Jewish people are an obstinate people
The word obstinate literally translates as the back of the neck
God is saying that they are stubborn and stiff-necked
The reason God uses the neck as his description of the people is because the neck controls the attitude of the head
When the head is submitted, it bows
When it is resistant, it remains upright
The neck that’s stiff refuses to submit to God’s authority
These people are have not submitted to His authority
The Lord is leading Moses to a conclusion
The people haven’t submitted to the Lord’s authority
They are following Moses, yes, but they aren’t following the Lord in the hearts
Which is why the Lord called them Moses’ people
Secondly, Moses knows what it means to resist the Lord’s will
He saw the effect in Egypt, as the nation was crushed
And he saw it in his own life when the Lord sought to take his son’s life for Moses’ disobedience
So Moses knows that the Lord is willing to bring judgment for failure to submit
Finally, Moses realizes that something must be done or the people will perish and he is the only one to do it
The Lord has allowed Moses to become the hope of Israel in this moment
If Moses is willing to intercede, the nation can be spared
The key to understanding this scene is noticing the Lord says “let Me alone” so the Lord’s anger may destroy the people
The Lord is testing Moses
The Lord has given Moses a opportunity to intercede
The Lord prepared to act in judgment over these people, but He is also willing to forgo punishment for the sake of His servant Moses
So then Moses responds in the expected manner
Instead of leaving God alone as the Lord asked, Moses does the opposite
He petitions the Lord to save Israel
Moses intercedes for Israel as their representative
Moses makes his appeal based on three arguments
First Moses appeals to God’s love and compassion
He says these are the people you brought up out of Egypt
Moses is implying that the Lord’s prior actions demonstrate His care for the nation, and so He can’t reject those He has chosen
Secondly, Moses appeals to the Lord’s name and reputation
Should the Lord destroy Israel, then the testimony of the Exodus would be entirely different than it is today
Instead of a story of the Lord rescuing His people from slavery, it would be a story of God destroying His people
And God enemies could use this to impugn God’s character
Finally, Moses reminds God of His promises to Abraham
Moses was descendant of Abraham, so the Lord could have restarted the nation with Moses
Moses is one of Abraham’s descendants himself, no different than the rest of Israel
So why would there be any likelihood that Moses’ descendants would do any better than the rest of Israel?
The problem of sin in Israel isn’t going to come to an end just because the nation starts again with Moses
Then Moses tries to close the deal in v.12 Moses by asking God to change His mind
So in v.14, we’re told that God responds to Moses’ request by agreeing to change His plans
This statement commonly cause students some concern, since we know that other scripture tells us that God does not change His mind
1Sam. 15:29 “Also the Glory of Israel will not lie or change His mind; for He is not a man that He should change His mind.”
How do we understand what’s happening here then?
First, remember how this conversation started
The Lord told Moses to “let me alone” and if Moses complied, then the Lord would destroy Israel
This was a clear invitation for Moses to intervene and advocate for the sake of Israel
The Lord expected Moses to intervene, and he did
So clearly the Lord didn’t intend to destroy His people
God wanted Moses to assume the role of intercessor for Israel
Secondly, students of Genesis should notice a striking similarity between this moment and the moment when God visited Abraham before destroying Sodom and Gomorrah in Genesis 18
In that situation, the Lord intended to destroy wickedness and gave Abraham a chance to spare the righteous
God revealed a plan in advance
Abraham interceded for Lot and his family desiring to change God’s plan
God agreed to Abraham’s request
But Abraham’s intercession confirmed the very thing God intended to do in the first place
From Abraham’s point of view he thought he had influencing the outcome and changed God’s mind
Nevertheless, his intercession went according to God’s plan, which is why the Lord revealed His plans in advance
This moment in Exodus 32 plays out in a similar fashion
The Lord invites Moses to act as an intercessor to save Israel from the destruction they deserve
But the Lord has no intention of destroying the nation
Nevertheless, the Lord will punish the guilty for their sin against Him
And then He intends to bring the penalties required under the covenant against the nation as a whole in a future day
In the meantime, the Lord is teaching Moses and the people a lesson about both the consequences of sin and the necessity of an intercessor
So, when we hear that God changed his mind in v.14, it is written from Moses’ perspective
From the perspective of man, God appears to have changed His mind
But this change was not a true change in God’s plan
God orchestrated the circumstances by which this supposed “change” would take place
God chose the moment to reveal the news to Moses
God set the terms when he gave Mosses the chance to leave God alone so He could destroy Israel
In the end, Moses responded as intended, so God did exactly as He intended
From man’s point of view, God changed His mind
But from God’s perspective, everything went as planned
Through this encounter, the Lord accomplished three things
First, the Lord sets the expectation that as the individual Jew goes, so goes the nation under the covenant
The Lord was prepared to wipe out all Israel because of the sins of a few who participated in this debauchery
And this is the natural result of a national covenant
If any in the nation sin under the agreement, then the entire nation has broken the covenant
This principle becomes the basis for the Lord setting the entire nation outside the land in a future day because of the sins of the leaders
This is why the entire nation lost opportunity to receive the Messiah when the Pharisee’s rejected Jesus, though some Jews accepted Him
But this is also why the Bible says the Lord will save all Israel on earth in the last day
God will always treat the nation of people who are Israel as a nation because of this covenant
Secondly, the Lord prepares Moses to act as His representative
As God’s representative, Moses must know God’s wrath and intolerance for sin
And Moses must be prepared to act as judge when necessary
Yet Moses must also maintain a heart of compassion and understanding interceding on behalf of the people when the inevitable sin comes along
Like the Lord Himself, Moses must judge the people, but he is not called to destroy the people
Finally, the Lord used Moses to yield a powerful picture of Christ in this exchange
Moses is the representative of God’s people before the Lord
He must intercede on behalf of the people to save them from God’s wrath for sin
And because of Moses work, the Lord will not bring His wrath agains the people
The people deserve destruction, but because of the work of another on their behalf, they can be spared from the wrath of God
And the picture works in another way as well
Jesus acts as both to intercede and to judge
Today, Jesus is serving as our representative to the Father, interceding on our behalf in the face of our sins
But in a future day, the Father will assign all judgment to the Son and He will bring judgment against all sin
So Moses will fulfill both sides of the picture
He will not only intercede to spare Israel, but he also exacts God’s justice
For though the Lord won’t bring all Israel to destruction, He will judge sin
So now that Moses has been prepared for what to find at the base of the mountain and has interceded for the people, he returns
Moses returns carrying the two tablets
As we discussed earlier in the study, the tablets were written on front and back in duplicate
Each tablet contained a complete set of God’s commands
And they were written by the finger of God
We also know that angels were involved in the delivery, so it’s likely that the angels attended to the preparing of the stones in some way
But the handwriting was God’s
The only other time we hear of God’s finger writing was when Jesus wrote in the dirt in John 8
This has led some to think that Jesus was writing the Law again to make a point
I have my own theory, which you can learn in the teaching on the Adulterous Woman in John 8
As Moses descends, he meets back up with Joshua, who has been enjoying an extended period of alone time on the mountain
Joshua was left here for the same 40 days Moses was above
When they meet up, Joshua remarks that the sound in the camp below sounds like war taking place
What he probably meant was that sounds of men and women shrieking or crying out sounded like that of men and women dying or in distress
But Moses knew better
He says it’s not triumph or defeat in battle
It’s singing
Once Moses gets within sight of the camp, he finds quite a scene
First, he saw the calf
This idol was intended to replace Moses and lead the people
Ironically, the calf was to stand for God but it actually represented Satan
In fact, Baal is a pagan god associated with Satan worship in the form of a bull
Next he witnessed dancing
Dancing isn’t itself a problem,
There is a holy form which is praise to God
The problem is when dancing becomes an alcohol-fueled prelude to sexual activity...that’s sin
A close second would be any type of dancing that I attempt
In response to what he saw, Moses reacts in anger
He throws the tablets down on the ground and they break
In that instant, Moses created a perfect symbol of the moment
The people of Israel had broken the ten commandments
And they had broken the covenant they had made with the Lord
Moses then takes several steps to correct the situation
Then Moses proceeds to destroy the calf
First he burns it
Then he ground it into powder
Then he scattered the powder on water so that the Israelites drank it
This descriptions raises a number of questions
Like how can gold be burned?
Why did Moses want the people to drink it?
First, the construction of the calf was not pure gold
Back in v.4 the description of Aaron’s actions suggest carving took place
In Egypt, statues and idols were commonly made of wood and covered in layers of gold, which is probably what Aaron did
So the idol could be burned to remove the wood leaving only the gold behind
Secondly, the gold slag was ground into powder, presumably through additional laborers Moses enlisted
Moses scattered the gold dust on the Israelites’ water supply
The water supply at the base of the mountain was a lake formed from the flow of the water from the rock
Moses didn’t line up the nation to drink the gold
He merely scattered the gold over water supply so that every Israelite couldn’t help but consume the idol eventually
The point in this exercise was not as a punishment for Israel nor for atonement
The point was to destroy the idol fully and then pollute it so that it could never be reconstituted
Assuming the gold dust could have even be collected and melted down again, it had gone through the digestive tract of the people and become refuse
It was unclean now
The idol was now poop!
This same approach to destroying idols is repeated at other times in Israel’s history
Josiah did a similar sort of thing with the Asherah idol he removed from the Jerusalem temple in 2 Kings 23:6
He ground it to powder and scattered the dust over the graves of the common people
Touching graves made something unclean
With the idol gone, Moses turns to Aaron for an explanation
Moses begins his inquiry by assuming that Aaron must have been forced to go along with this plan
Moses asks what did the people do to you that you would bring such a great sin upon the people?
And this is followed by one of the best (and by “best,” I mean worst) excuses in all the Bible
In trying to defend himself, Aaron only proceeds to convict himself
Aaron begins by saying don’t be anger with me
Generally speaking, anytime you hear an excuse begin with the phrase “Don’t be angry...” you can be sure that when all has been said, you will have good reason to be angry
Aaron immediately places the blame on the people
Aaron reminds Moses that he knows these people are prone to evil
Wouldn’t that be the reason Moses left Aaron in charge?
Then Aaron begins to retell what happened
It’s interesting that we have Moses’ account in the first part of this chapter given to us already
So now we can contrast it with Aaron’s own account
If Aaron had known Moses was going to be writing all this down later, he might have chosen his words better
The differences between what Moses reported and what Aaron reported are readily apparent
Aaron says men came to him asking for a god to go before them, since Moses wasn’t coming back (true)
Aaron says he replied by asking for gold (true)
Then he placed the gold in the fire (true)
And behold, out popped a calf - a miracle! (silly lie)
In his retelling, Aaron does everything he can to remove himself from any of decisions
Others asked, he participated against his own will and the result was out of his hands
But even Moses’ question suggests that Moses saw the situation differently
He says how did the people make you give in to such a bad idea?
As if to say, “I can’t imagine any good reason why you would have voluntarily allowed this to take place.”
So did they point a knife to your head?
Moses expected Aaron to lead Israel away from this situation
It reminds us that when the leaders are corrupt or incompetent, the people will always suffer
It doesn’t require that a leader propose all the bad ideas
Bad leadership simply gives opportunity for group sin to emerge
The sheep are given shepherds because it’s better than allowing sheep to oversee themselves, as this scene demonstrates
Hebrews teaches us that God expects leaders to give account for the results of those under their charge
The scripture commands us to obey and respect our leaders, because they tasked with watching over our souls
Watching over souls means shepherding our spiritual development
That is the role of a spiritual leader in the church
We are to make that job as easy as it can be, because the easier it is for a leader to shepherd us, the more we have opportunity to learn and mature
This truth is predicated on the assumption that our leaders are teaching and leading us in Biblically appropriate ways
But in any case, we should make their job easier, not harder
But if not, they will give an account (or report) of our souls
It seems that our spiritual leaders will have something to say about our compliance with their leadership
They will not judge us, but they still get to spend a few minutes on the witness stand
What will they say about us?
Aaron’s coup de gras was claiming that he played no part in forming the golden calf itself
He threw the gold in the fire and magically out came a calf, as if God Himself was responsible for the outcome
His explanation is so absurd, Moses doesn’t even dignify it with an answer
Clearly Aaron was party to the sin, and Moses left it at that
Moses gets the last word on Aaron’s culpability when he wrote the account of Exodus years later, as we see in the next verse
Moses then moves to make an example of the leaders of this rebellion
In v.25 we’re told Moses saw the people out of control because Aaron allowed them to get this way
The phrase “out of control” is literally the word “unfastened” in Hebrew, referring to the way their clothes had come off
But this is not a present tense description
The text isn’t speaking in the present tense
The rebellion ended earlier when Moses stopped it
We could translate this “Because Moses saw the people had been out of control...”
So we’ve moved past the immediate moment of the dancing and whatever else
We’re now seeing the aftermath, the judgment Moses applied because of the earlier scene he witnessed
We remember from the earlier part of this chapter that the rebellion was instigated by a group of men within the camp
And these men led the rest of the nation into sin
Aaron’s fault was in not standing up to these men
Perhaps he was intimidated by the number of them
So here we see Moses begin with judging the men who committed this sin against the Lord
Moses begins by asking for men who would stand with him
We might not understand the full sense of Moses’ request, but the men in the camp certainly would have understood
Moses was asking for volunteers to perform the necessary justice against the men who committed the crime
Moses is asking for an impromptu executioners force, and everyone knew this is what Moses wanted
In the face of this request, only the tribe of Levi volunteered for the duty, perhaps because they wanted to stand with another member of their tribe
So the Levites are called upon to kill the 3,000 men who instigated the rebellion in the camp
This required the men kill people they knew
The text indicates they found themselves required to kill brothers, friends and neighbors
This was a merciless punishment
Why does God ask for death in this case?
Simply because His word required this penalty
Furthermore, the penalty for sin under the Law is death
And the nation had yet to see God’s justice in their own camp
They needed to understand the penalty that sin requires
They needed to appreciate the seriousness of the covenant
The result of the Levi’s obedience opens the door for a restored relationship with the Lord
The covenant has been broken, and this cannot be undone
But still the covenant endures and the nation will continue to walk with the Lord
And to allowed for restored fellowship, there must be a price paid and an atonement made for the sin
In this case, the Lord doesn’t choose to make a substitute available
Instead, He requires the life of ever man who led the rebellion
They will pay the price for their own sin
But there was still the matter of the nation’s relationship with the Lord under the terms of the covenant
How will the nation’s sin under the covenant itself be addressed?
So Moses needs to seek the Lord’s forgiveness for the nation
He says he hopes that the Lord may be pleased with the removal of the sinners from the camp of Israel and bring a blessing to the people
The blessing would be the blessing of continued fellowship in the covenant
The next day, Moses tells the people he is going back up the mountain to make his appeal to God
When Moses reaches the Lord again, he tells the Lord that You were right
Then Moses asks the Lord to forgive the people for their sin under the covenant
And if the Lord will not forgive them, Moses asks to be condemned in their place
He says blot me out of the book of life, which is the book recording the names of the saints
Moses would be willing to receive the punishment that God was preparing to give the entire nation
What makes Moses volunteer to do such a thing?
It seems he has embraced his role of representing the people
Evidently, Moses believes his role as intercessor includes taking upon himself the sin of the people
But Moses makes a mistake here
He assumes that his leadership role and his earnestness is enough to atone for sin
He asks God for to forgive the people under the terms of the covenant yet without making a payment for sin
Yes, the 3,000 men died, but they merely paid the price for their own sin
What about the sin of the nation regarding the terms of the Law?
Obviously, Moses is continuing the picture of Jesus we saw earlier
Not only is Moses the intercessor for the nation
Now he’s offering to be a sacrifice in their place, which is the atoning work Jesus did on the cross
But Moses failed to understand that God is perfect in mercy and justice
God can’t overlook sin without a suitable payment, or else that would be injustice
While Moses offered himself as payment, Moses isn’t sinless
He can’t serve as a substitute for a sinful nation
So the Lord rejects Moses’ offer
The says that whoever has sinned against the Lord will not be found in the book of life
This is a poetic way of saying they will not have eternal life
This is a general truth of scripture
Whoever has sinned against God will suffer the penalty of eternal death
There is no getting around that penalty
The only way out is to have someone else pay that penalty
But Moses isn’t going to be that person
He merely pictures that Person
FInally, the Lord says the nation of Israel not be vindicated from the consequences of this sin
The Lord will punish the nation in the day to come
Ultimately, that punishment will span generations
And it will culminate in the judgments of Tribulation
Remember, the nation as a whole is under condemnation because of breaking the covenant
And the Lord says that day of reckoning must happen
Moses can’t stop it with his appeals
And even the death of the 3,000 doesn’t change the terms of the covenant for the nation
The Lord will continue to lead Israel in the desert for a time, but a day of reckoning will come for the nation
That future day of reckoning will be based on the sin of Israel against God under this covenant
That sin began here in this moment
But it continued throughout the history of Israel, because the Law couldn’t contend with the root problem of sin
Moses speaks prophetically of this pattern of sin in Israel in his last words to the nation in Deuteronomy
His speech is most of Deut 32,
Reading sections of it gives us the overview of how the Lord intends to fulfill His promise to judge Israel
In this day the Lord had taking revenge against the 3,000 guilty, but the offense of breaking His covenant will not be cleared easily
In fact Israel will continue to sin against God and the covenant
As a result, Moses says they will be set outside the land, defeated by their enemies and heap misfortunes upon them
This is the long term relationship they will experience as punishment for sin
Just as Adam suffered a long term penalty for breaking the covenant in the garden, so will Israel suffer for this covenant
But this too is part of God’s plan to bless Gentiles
Because of the Jews’ sin, God can be just in setting them aside during the coming of the Messiah
Their rejection of the Christ makes available an opportunity for Gentiles to receive the Gospel
Yet God remains just in this plan, since He set the terms and they disobeyed
Scripture quotations taken from the (NASB®) New American Standard Bible®, Copyright © 1995, 2020 by The Lockman Foundation. Used by permission. All rights reserved. www.lockman.org